1 MMCM = 35 MMSCF
40 MMCMD = 1300 MMSCFD
1 MMSCF = $8,000
1200 MMSCFD = $10MM/day = $3.6B /year
Search found 619 matches
- 13 Jan 2008 02:18
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Oil & Natural Gas: News & Discussion
- Replies: 1620
- Views: 457351
- 30 Dec 2007 21:42
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Oil & Natural Gas: News & Discussion
- Replies: 1620
- Views: 457351
- 01 Oct 2007 05:03
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 30 Sep 2007 10:48
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 30 Sep 2007 03:47
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
The Indian public does not speak with one voice, on most issues, because, the republic, its current and past leaders, have done a poor job of uniting Indians as Indian, first. This is a ludicrous comment. The polity that are opposing this are not opposing it because they are not Indians, nor are th...
- 29 Sep 2007 23:40
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 29 Sep 2007 18:26
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 28 Sep 2007 16:32
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 27 Sep 2007 05:56
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
It is fascinating to see the number of and type of bold statements being made by people who are not taking the trouble to read their own posts, and think about the implications of what they write. There used to be a time when you had to go to the University Library to actually gain access to journal...
- 27 Sep 2007 03:28
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
Until, we have some confirmation, that a part of the RGP reserve, is being actively enriched to WGPu and/or reactors are being used in low burn mode, the assumption that, India does not have enough fissile material, for all its scenarios, shall remain. Actually it is the opposite assumption that op...
- 26 Sep 2007 18:11
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 26 Sep 2007 17:15
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
Re: Backdoor FMCT - look at the RGP and do an estimate on how many weapons this means. Use 15 kg Pu per weapon to be conservative. Arun_S will say that 5 kg is more than conservative, but lets use the larger number. How much separated and unseparated RGP does India have? So, now what numbers of weap...
- 26 Sep 2007 16:24
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 26 Sep 2007 15:28
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
so a deterrence if any should also be ready with that context in mind? Such that any of the parties does not think lobbing one at India is a shirt cut to take us out of the equation and then proceed with its usual games with others. It is. The DND was quite clear in this regard. This is why the lon...
- 26 Sep 2007 07:13
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
the lack of political will is mainly due to a total lack of a strategic thinking Of course, this is why we decided to pursue the 3 stage nuclear power program, the IGMDP, the ADS, LCA, Kaveri, PSLV, GSLV and other critical technology areas, despite fundamental technology denial regimes. This is als...
- 26 Sep 2007 06:32
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Large Infrastructure Projects: Inertia and Opposition
- Replies: 325
- Views: 79325
- 26 Sep 2007 04:44
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 26 Sep 2007 04:41
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
Pakistan and Israel cannot be our role model both have a limited kind of deterance against India/Middle east asia and that is it Both Pakistan and Israel demonstrate the asymmetry of deterrence against the parties they need to deter. It seems strange that after much discussion (nearly a decade wort...
- 25 Sep 2007 17:41
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 25 Sep 2007 16:08
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- why did then US has 10000plus nuclear weapons and so does Russia. By your logic they should have been happy with couple of hundreds or for that mattero tens of advanced weapons and thats it . You are going to have think this through on your own. In my mind we today are no where near that kind of ...
- 25 Sep 2007 07:39
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
- 25 Sep 2007 06:43
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
With US if it comes to a nuclear showdown -knowing how they behaved in a past a huge inventory of all three types of triad and the political will may become essential to make the deterance effective and meaningful,like China is doing today or Soviet Union did and doing . Shankar: This is absolutely...
- 24 Sep 2007 15:21
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
-No it may not be ok for us .The weapon design we have is surely much better than Russian /us in sixties may be but far behind what is on top of the line they have today and that may include some of china designs too Shankar - In the unique calculus of nuclear deterrence, weapons that kill >100,000...
- 24 Sep 2007 07:13
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Nuclear Discussion - Nukkad Thread
- Replies: 323
- Views: 138083
US and SU deterrent was then credible because both of them didn't possess TN weapons. Not at all. A TN weapon does not change the deterrence equation. We've some workable bomb designs (but at the 200kt level?) Yes So even in the worst case if we somehow get caught in the CTBT, FMCT kinda web, we'd ...
- 24 Sep 2007 07:09
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Large Infrastructure Projects: Inertia and Opposition
- Replies: 325
- Views: 79325
- 24 Sep 2007 00:06
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Large Infrastructure Projects: Inertia and Opposition
- Replies: 325
- Views: 79325
- 23 Sep 2007 19:53
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Large Infrastructure Projects: Inertia and Opposition
- Replies: 325
- Views: 79325
- 23 Sep 2007 19:51
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Large Infrastructure Projects: Inertia and Opposition
- Replies: 325
- Views: 79325
Shippers would only increase revenues if they increase the frieght charges to its costumers. Not at all. Shippers would increase revenues by increasing the utilization of their ships. One extra day out of 4 means that they could be shipping 25% more cargo than they would otherwise. Instead of makin...
- 23 Sep 2007 18:51
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Large Infrastructure Projects: Inertia and Opposition
- Replies: 325
- Views: 79325
The saving in sailing time of just about a day will not justify the incurring of over 8 times the cost of fuel saved. This is not exactly how a shipper looks at it. If they save a day, then that is an extra day for transportation. Assuming that a ship travels at 12mph. We can deduce the following: ...
- 23 Sep 2007 08:02
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: Large Infrastructure Projects: Inertia and Opposition
- Replies: 325
- Views: 79325
- 10 Sep 2007 16:10
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 103320
I thought that we were into discussing the message and not the messenger...the onus is on the person claiming that they are wrong by presenting proofs. Sanku - let us not play games. The message only has credibility in this case, because of the messenger. These guys are defined by the credibility o...
- 10 Sep 2007 16:06
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 103320
Do the tea leaves not tell that the team IAEA will come back with with Hyde+123 template at best And what then? We would be no worse off than before. We would still not be bound to anyone. We would not be bound to the Americans under 123 because we would not have bought anything from them. We would...
- 10 Sep 2007 16:04
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 103320
I would say, if the deal doesnot restrict our freedom to develop our own nuclear defense systems, does not prevent us from further research, gives us un-interrupted supply of nuke fuel for our power requirements, gives us freedom to negotiate and have bilateral deals with all NSG countries, the IAE...
- 10 Sep 2007 15:59
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 103320
BC not good enough for you as well Actually, since BC has been given to over-exaggerations, his credibility is not particularly high. It may be useful to have more than a couple of datapoints in this regard. Additionally, it may be useful to review claims from people that are not in the maximalist ...
- 10 Sep 2007 15:53
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 103320
the Hyde Act does not waive the need for India to seek and obtain US permission every time we wish to reprocess the irradiated imported fuel from our reactors The Hyde act governs what the US may do, under 123. Can someone point me in the direction of the language that has stimulated this claim abo...
- 10 Sep 2007 15:47
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 103320
- 10 Sep 2007 15:42
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 103320
Never mind what was the yield. Just make more of them and don't get on any FMCO bandwagon unless you have enough numbers. Ramana and Snow - excellent point, particularly since damage scales with 1/3 power of yield, it makes more sense to deploy more, smaller yield weapons. Practically, this means m...
- 03 Sep 2007 21:38
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 139761
- 03 Sep 2007 18:37
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 139761
- 03 Sep 2007 18:27
- Forum: Strategic & Security Issues Archive
- Topic: Distorted History - Causes, Consequences and Remedies
- Replies: 320
- Views: 132685