Search found 41 matches
- 07 Nov 2005 03:28
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
SouthAfrica and Brazil are the biggest critic of India's accomodation at NSG They are also quite competent in nuke tech. SA has the new pebble bed reactors and Brazil is building a naval reactor for its nuke submarine programme. It is zealously guarding its U enrichment tech. Venezuela is another s...
- 06 Nov 2005 13:25
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
But from what little I can gather from your responses, you are saying NSG access is for reasons other than nuke fuel. Since you are unable or unwilling to elaborate, I will stop asking. Also, Thanks to Gerard for pointing to the info. sources. Clearly, I understand a lot less than I thought I did, ...
- 06 Nov 2005 13:04
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Nuclear freedom The fourth alternative is to forge a global alternative to the US-led Nuclear Suppliers Group. Uranium is found in many countries which are not part of the NSG. But these countries are afraid of the US ire hence have not developed their resources and are reluctant to export the same...
- 06 Nov 2005 11:48
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Under the 1963 agreement, India must get U.S. approval to reprocess. India disputes this and insists it is free to reprocess the used fuel at any time. The State Department, historically reluctant to tangle with India, rationalized Tarapur as an unnecessary irritant in U.S.-India relations and put ...
- 05 Nov 2005 13:00
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
India's reserve, if fully exploted, going to last at 20GW for 20 years., You do the maths. Okay, that seems to imply that India is self-sufficient nukewise, is that true ? Yes, India is self-sufficient Noookewise,,,, do you need proofs, when you wake up? Have you been sleeping or on Cannabinol? If ...
- 05 Nov 2005 12:30
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
JaiKissan wrote: Uzbekistan, recently being odds with Unkil for closing(kicking) US bases. @6% worlds proved Uranium resorces. How much does that translate to, in terms of what India needs energywise? Their Ores are very high-graded, 3x times India's. And quantity-wise(proven reserves) @ 8 times In...
- 05 Nov 2005 12:16
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Re: Tarapore. Back in 1998, after the tests, I had advocated that India should consider reprocessing the Tarapore stock after sanctions had been imposed, especially when Clinton announced his papal-bull with the PRC. Just the hint of reprocessing the Tarapore Pu, would have altered the contours of ...
- 05 Nov 2005 12:04
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
JaiKissan wrote: If nothing materialises, we will use Tarapore's huge stock-pile for Pu reprocessing. I am no physicist even on TV, but isn't this sorta the nuclear equivalent of the perpetual motion machine? Or are you saying that we will be getting uranium cakes from Niger to produce Pu? Give us ...
- 05 Nov 2005 11:26
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Lets test their sincerity with Tarapur. I don't get it ... let's say that Tarapur is designated as civilian ... what would it do for India's power needs? as I recall those units are puny ... Where were you all this days, when important in-puts were required from you? Ex: Japan in NSG opposed to Ind...
- 05 Nov 2005 09:37
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 04 Nov 2005 20:16
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 03 Nov 2005 12:38
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 03 Nov 2005 11:29
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 01 Nov 2005 20:03
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 01 Nov 2005 11:07
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Folks slow @ uranium and its naturally occuring oxide deposits i mines( Yellow Cake). Those yellow cakes are not covered by NPT. That is the reason, Unkil floated the story, Saddam bought those Yellow Cake from Niger, and went on to invade Iraq. Officially, yellow cake can be traded, wherever they c...
- 01 Nov 2005 10:56
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 01 Nov 2005 10:52
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 01 Nov 2005 10:36
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 29 Oct 2005 05:25
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 28 Oct 2005 09:45
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
It is time, I feel, that we wired up all that is required for another explosion and kept our finger on the trigger. Just as soon as the congress rubbishes the agreement, press the trigger and say FYS. Second, we are not signatories to the NPT, so be ready to prolifirate and make some money out of i...
- 28 Oct 2005 09:38
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 27 Oct 2005 09:10
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Lawmakers Seek Info on India Nuclear Deal By FOSTER KLUG The Associated Press Wednesday, October 26, 2005; 9:02 PM WASHINGTON -- Congressional support of a landmark proposal to share civilian nuclear technology with India is not guaranteed , lawmakers are telling the Bush administration. Members of...
- 27 Oct 2005 08:58
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
POLITICS: India Abandons Global Nuclear Disarmament Analysis by Praful Bidwai NEW DELHI , Oct 26 (IPS) - Seven years after blasting its way into the world’s 'nuclear club', India has executed a major shift in its policy stance by jettisoning its long-standing advocacy of global nuclear disarmament ...
- 25 Oct 2005 11:19
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Dubya-Rice move to deep-six the current NPT agreement and reign in Axis of Evil nations like N. Korea, Iran (maybe TSP), Libya (done deal) is causing a lot of upset apple carts. Non-profutullahs who made a career out of NPT are left with nothing. China’s cozy arrangement of duplicitous proliferatio...
- 25 Oct 2005 06:45
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Dubya-Rice move to deep-six the current NPT agreement and reign in Axis of Evil nations like N. Korea, Iran (maybe TSP), Libya (done deal) is causing a lot of upset apple carts. Non-profutullahs who made a career out of NPT are left with nothing. China’s cozy arrangement of duplicitous proliferatio...
- 23 Oct 2005 05:24
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 23 Oct 2005 03:47
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Seems, India's MEA mandarins did not consult Japan or Brazil before NSG. Though the chincoms supported India's UNSC membership, they wanted India to break-away from G-4(meaning exclude Japan). We showed our loyalty to the other 3, meaning Japan, Brazil and Germany, by sticking with them. Despite all...
- 22 Oct 2005 07:56
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Expediency to sign the nuclear deal in Feb-Mar '06, means it will be attached to some (Katrina or other)budgetary supplements, as Ackerman(pl. read his interview with Rediff) and Hyde( during 1st testimony) suspected. Though Dubya's admin. will be answering the questions through hearings of all kind...
- 21 Oct 2005 22:22
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 19 Oct 2005 09:57
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 19 Oct 2005 09:13
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 19 Oct 2005 09:03
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Indian Express This supports my earlier observation: Too much discussion regarding India's(MMS's decision) vote in IAEA, as oil-LNG versus Nuclear energy. Iran versus Unkil. As far the IAEA vote, a 'favour' to Iran was done by Indian diplomatic tango with E-3 to 'delay' referral to UNSC...a Shyam S...
- 16 Oct 2005 23:12
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 16 Oct 2005 05:21
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
I believe the Niger mines are controlled by French companies and therefore fuel from them would be difficult to obtain. Uzbekistan is a non-NSG uranium exporter ? Ideal source for yellowcake. Eventhough, Niger has excess of yellowcake(little expensive, compared to international prices) Namibia: 213...
- 16 Oct 2005 04:58
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 16 Oct 2005 04:41
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Too much discussion regarding India's(MMS's decision) vote in IAEA, as oil-LNG versus Nuclear energy. Iran versus Unkil. MMS wants 8% sustained growth to claim G-8 or G-10 status. He was not overly-enthusiastic about N-5 UNSC seat hype. He possibly believes, that seat will eventually come down the r...
- 08 Oct 2005 08:36
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
- 08 Oct 2005 08:27
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
IMO, there is a larger strategy of energy security at play here ... If Indo-US collaboration in nuke is established, that is the best ... so, watch out for the entire playlist ... depending on how things play out with US Congress and with IRAN in UNSC etc etc, there may be a return to the play of I...
- 08 Oct 2005 07:43
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
India just needs one NSG member states to do business(break the voluntary, self-imposed, guideline...remember not breaking any treaty or legal obligation, just a guideline...or fudging technicality) boldly with us. I feel we squandered that when we did not utilise our IA-Air-Bus/Scorpene deal with F...
- 07 Oct 2005 23:58
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Opposition to the Indo-US nuclear cooperation agreement
- Replies: 321
- Views: 109791
Note: The US nuclear power industry has serious manufacturing weaknesses . (Reactor tech - not the gigawatt generator tech that GE etc churn out). NSA Narayanan has hinted that their is a very good possibility of Indian NPCIL setting up plants in the US in the near future. Kakrapar attaining top pe...