Very good Morning everyone !
I'm not here to console each&every viewpoints on 75I & related decision taken by GoI including Nval bureau..
In gwneral, the decisions so far is for the good!
You have to see for yourself!
Bye, Have a very goid weekdays!
Search found 2982 matches
- 14 Jun 2021 10:19
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Project 75I - It Begins
- Replies: 1851
- Views: 600468
- 10 May 2021 13:26
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: BR Forum Feedback
- Replies: 1178
- Views: 353775
Re: BR Forum Feedback
May be we couldn't hear from chaiwalas, the constant feed of existing information. Its all hard day. Nobody knows what happens next, whether life, job or basic food.. hope good things happens soon.
- 10 May 2021 13:18
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments
- Replies: 3251
- Views: 957662
Re: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments
Engine development for AMCA. Per a Defence AV: -Rolls Royce has submitted a "financial cost report" to the Indian government and it is a $3 Billion "Co-development program" for developing the 110 KN engine with "Full transfer of technology and Intellectual Property Rights&q...
- 31 Mar 2021 07:47
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Any links? Little OT but relevant as Barak-8 ABM capabilities aren’t advertised. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/azerbaijan-armenia-israel-russia-missile-fired-shot-down There is a claim that on capability-wise it sits between existing David Sling/Iron Dome systems and Arrow ABM. Israel may put ...
- 31 Mar 2021 07:26
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft: News & Discussion - 30 August 2019
- Replies: 861
- Views: 468680
Re: Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft: News & Discussion - 30 August 2019
Maan gaye apki paarkhi nazron ko!!! As much as I would like to take credit for "paarkhi nazron"....I was not the one who caught this :) https://twitter.com/ButaliaEshan/status/1375774559844986886?s=20 ---> It's AMCA, I guess. [img]https:%20//pbs.twimg.com/media/Exe7qboUYAULoOJ?format=jpg&...
- 06 Mar 2021 14:24
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Why the booster of SFDR is described as nozzle-less? Missile like Brahmos do have internal booster as that of SFDR. But we place much emphasis on referring the booster of SFDR and Meteor as nozzle-less. Does nozzle-less is so unique? Does it increase the effectiveness? Or anything of significance? W...
- 01 Mar 2021 14:35
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
IAF do possess something of that long range in this section.
- 25 Feb 2021 19:10
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Main area of operation for vl-srsam is in handling targets at short ranges. Though flavour of the day is dual pulse, Long ranges could be reached depending upon alt & trajectory. After all in aam role its actual range of 20+ km is boosted to 80+km by speed & alt. Word around is it range coul...
- 16 Feb 2021 23:12
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: India's Border Security with China and Pakistan-2020 - Part 2
- Replies: 5268
- Views: 1821639
Re: India's Border Security with China and Pakistan-2020 - Part 2
Reasoning is: this agression started as India started its new role in WHO last year and China wanted to use this agression to press upon India on WHO findings. The agression ended or melowed once the WHO Corona report came out is not adversarial to china. In my view, it has nothng to do with other i...
- 16 Feb 2021 22:53
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
I see not anything new in IAF Chief's statement. He perhaps expressing the current stage of IAF's procurement plan (based on various developmental activities). --> between LCA MK1A & AMCA... Expression is just the logical reasoning Not necessarily the exact production plan. So it may start even ...
- 27 Jan 2021 22:34
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
I have trying to understand the Akash NG program. It is heavier than Barak8, but the length is almost similar. It is also as tall/little more taller than Astra. Given the length, I would assume it is Astra 2. But the weight doesn't support this theory. Aim120 looks similar, but is thinner. I feel A...
- 25 Jan 2021 21:27
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter (TEDBF): News & Discussion
- Replies: 769
- Views: 368998
Re: Twin Engine Deck Based Fighter (TEDBF): News & Discussion
1st design is very nuch an extension of LCA Mk2 upto nose section. Nose section is inspired by Hornet , shaped & blended with stealth consideration with added touch of Rafale cheeks. 2nd design adds more stability & less risky. It will be of consideration for unforseen or super critical carr...
- 22 Jan 2021 22:51
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
MWF is going to have 5 pre-production test models. TEDBF design-analysis for DSI intakes will finish by 2023 by all means. And TEDBF first rollout is expected in 2025-26. Then won't it be prudent to at-least use 1 out 5 test-models of MWF to try DSI intakes for MWF? Will redesign of intakes from 20...
- 22 Jan 2021 22:38
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
Simple... as i see it, there won't be separate IOC & FOC later. Jets will be delivered in single Final production variant. This is to reduce dev time and to maintain strict timeline. At present Mk2 is strategically of higher importance. More than even AMCA. ADA has to deliver as per previously ...
- 21 Jan 2021 23:29
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
- Replies: 2731
- Views: 1136607
Re: Tejas Mk2 Medium Weight Fighter: News & Discussion - 23 February 2019
A doubt... I'm not sure this was discussed here before... Will IAF order all 8-9 squadrons on Tejas Mk2 in one go after it is fully ready with FOC...??? Or will they order around 2 squadrons of IOC initially and remaining 6-7 squadrons later after FOC...??? - This is important becoz. if Tejas gets ...
- 08 Dec 2020 19:46
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Indian Naval Aviation
- Replies: 2818
- Views: 897787
Re: Indian Naval Aviation
Dhruv news is heartening!
Beyond SH blk iii & Rafale, there is a wild card entry in the form of F-35.
Navy is also getting stealth at same time.
While picking Rafale is practical, makes more economic sense, F-35 appears futuristic.
Beyond SH blk iii & Rafale, there is a wild card entry in the form of F-35.
Navy is also getting stealth at same time.
While picking Rafale is practical, makes more economic sense, F-35 appears futuristic.
- 27 Nov 2020 22:59
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Why not? Indian scientists are continuously improving the Bhmos missile. Proposal for 800km version came atleast a decade back frm russian side. It is not hard to guess that the tech behind this proposal is that much old. So it is natural to see the Bhmos extended further by current standards. Which...
- 28 Oct 2020 16:05
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
QRSAM is larger and is expected to have larger range (around 25-30 km). It is not vertically launched but is slewed in the direction of the target by a ground based launcher. The latter is not a viable solution on ships for 360 degree coverage. Indranil: if QRSAM is a grounds-up design, what's the ...
- 28 Oct 2020 15:47
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Though QRSAM was designed specifically for IA, its specs exceeds the requirement set by IA. (IA was Ok with the increased spec). This exceeding capability of QRSAM was done in case to meet the requirement of IN if the need arises, if the IN opts for QRSAM for their SRSAM. Even then it has to be cust...
- 23 Oct 2020 18:48
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Latest round of NAG test was fired from a BMPII/Namica and it hit a target (Vijayanta) tank in top attack mode. There seems to be perceived growth path for Nag. There were representation in the the form of ppt slides. Panel discussion on the same, altogether. In a positive note, May be, nag is gett...
- 23 Oct 2020 18:37
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Once ballistic misdile is fired, it cannot be stopped. So to abort the mission, the option available is to press the "self-destruct" button. In case of cruise missile, all you have to do is stop the engine. To abort the mission, you can simply send the signal to shutdown the turbofan/turbo...
- 23 Oct 2020 18:17
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
BrahMos tested from INS Chennai today in the Arabian Sea and from Rajnath Singh downwards everyone congratulates. Obviously, there is more to it than meets the eye. i suppose one can only guess ER land attack version ? ..maybe a 1000 km :mrgreen: The number of improvents that we are adding to Bhmos...
- 14 Oct 2020 04:17
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: India's Border Security with China and Pakistan-2020 - Part 2
- Replies: 5268
- Views: 1821639
Re: India's Border Security with China and Pakistan-2020 - Part 2
Let there may be Vijayyibhawa!
Let our flag fly high amongst nations
Let there be pride & light to our country!
Let our flag fly high amongst nations
Let there be pride & light to our country!
- 10 Oct 2020 14:20
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
This is using a Trapeze Launcher https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/equip/lau-141.htm Looks like there was a small time gap between the disengagement of the front and the back connection point. It may have even be intentional to orient the head of the missile downwards. But the missile did self-sta...
- 10 Oct 2020 13:59
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Once we test out the A2A version of Rudram-1, there is no escape for the Pak propeller AWACS. It is all nice and TFTA to show around number of propeller AWACS in peace time. In a war, when your adversary is going to have a 200 - 250KM long ARM, streaming at you at Mach 4, datalinked, you really hop...
- 10 Oct 2020 13:51
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
vKJTrckBHSQ In this video, there is a very visible wobble when it free falls & before the booster ignites. Is this normal? I think the air-launched Brahmos separation was quite clean, if memory serves me right If i have to offer my opinion, the separation is good and it is normal. Actually, thi...
- 09 Oct 2020 22:26
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Question. Why can't the NGARM be drop launched like the Brahmos or the R-27/77's from the MKI's fuselage HP's? Why does it need this special trapeze launcher? I had assumed they would develop a drop-launcher for the Astra as well to be used on the MKI's fuselage HP's. Now I am thinking the Astra mi...
- 09 Oct 2020 21:44
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
[ This is a great post. CONOPS, networks, and de-confliction is very important. In the gulf-war, an ATACMS launch (a sub 200 km quasi ballistic missile) could need up to 1.5 hours to properly de-conflict and be cleared (in a war where inadequate de-confliction was ID'd as the reason for 1/3 of all ...
- 09 Oct 2020 21:31
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Also, I did a rough L/D of the SMART missile in image 3 and it came to be about 13. Compare that to the L/D ratio of Shaurya missiles going by its wiki dimensions where the length = 10 m and the diameter = 0.74m. The L/D of Shaurya is = 10/0.74 ~ 13.5 quite close to the SMART's "approx" L...
- 09 Oct 2020 21:24
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: 2020 Strategic and Political Analysis-1
- Replies: 10196
- Views: 2208353
Re: 2020 Strategic and Political Analysis-1
hanumadu wrote:Look what people on Twitter found out.
Audrey Truschke's page on Rate My Professors.
She has a rating of 1.5/5. Read the reviews. Will make your day.
https://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRa ... atingsList
- 07 Oct 2020 01:42
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Effectiveness of asbm doubtfull...why not design a bigger brahmos like missile!! Probably hstdv based missile will have that type of range.. You should know that success of any weapon system above 60 % is considered effective. Here effectiveness is defined in denying the space for carrier borne ope...
- 07 Oct 2020 01:18
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/shaurya-missile-to-be-inducted-in-strategic-arsenal-agni-5-s-sea-version-by-2022/story-bS1100SkwoGLEXW5ANFQuO.html The strategic missile flies at a supersonic speed of Mach 7, or 2.4 km per second, at a height of 50 km (within atmosphere) and hits the design...
- 07 Oct 2020 01:07
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Thanks for the update. I believe you are mistaken. I was interested in understanding MoD report. Coming To TAL/Shyena LWT: DRDO presents no information on the range. And maintains the operational depth as 450 m only. Whereas Lt. General P.C. Katoch (Retd) here mentions the range as 19 km. Your beli...
- 06 Oct 2020 17:00
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
For those questioning the 650 Km range, its clearly mentioned in the MoD 2018-2019 annual report. Thanks to "The Week"'s article that Swarajya republished, that had this reference https://www.mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/MoDAR2018.pdf Check page 105 Supersonic Missile Assisted Release o...
- 06 Oct 2020 08:35
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
The only logical way I can make sense of the 650 km number is having underwater SOSUS arrays far away and using land based SMART to destroy targets detected by SOSUS. However SOSUS is expensive to develop, deploy and super maintenance intensive. Also I havent read about any Indian Development of SO...
- 06 Oct 2020 07:47
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
For those questioning the 650 Km range, its clearly mentioned in the MoD 2018-2019 annual report. Thanks to "The Week"'s article that Swarajya republished, that had this reference https://www.mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/MoDAR2018.pdf Check page 105 Supersonic Missile Assisted Release o...
- 05 Oct 2020 11:21
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Onyx max range is 580 km or around 600 km as per russian news magazine. So this should be by default the range of Brahmos, if not for the MTCR restrictions. Once we are party to MTCR, this is the default range of Brahmos. It could be that, initial test will be to increase the speed before increasin...
- 05 Oct 2020 11:12
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
Looks like IA suddenly realized the value of having a 1000KM CM. Tells us how the threat from China was underestimated. They planned to go "better" CM with longer range and indian engine, instead of inducting the current version. Now that the threat is open, there is a scramble. It is nei...
- 05 Oct 2020 11:01
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
A longer-ranged variant (without increase in speed) might have limitations against ships or other mobile targets (because the target has moved further away). But for static land targets, it can still be quite useful. Even against static land targets, higher speed offers that much less reaction time...
- 05 Oct 2020 10:56
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
- Replies: 5960
- Views: 2349255
Re: Indian Missiles News & Discussions - 17 Dec 2018
This black and white pattern is used for experimental launches, not production batches. A news report in 2019 mentioned that Russia would develop a 800 km ranged Oniks. So this Brahmos can't be 800 km atleast. Started from 290, then 400, now claims of 500-600. I have no idea what to make of it. BTW...