Search found 78 matches
- 10 Sep 2007 08:53
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 100120
Sraj, Boss, the FMCT tamasha is one mighty fine piss process in the making. I don't think the sort of FMCT that we have said we will sign is going to come around any time soon. The GoI's position has been that India will only join a multilateral FMCT that among other things is internationally verifi...
- 10 Sep 2007 04:27
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 100120
Shankar, More vacuous rhetoric and nonsense from you. It is you who has not made any points or justified your claims. Keep doing this and it is you who will have lost the argument irrespective of whatever language I choose use about your idiotic claims. You have claimed on more than one occasion tha...
- 09 Sep 2007 23:38
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 9 Sept 2007
- Replies: 239
- Views: 100120
Shankar, From your reply to my post a couple of threads ago: Before you make such sweeping comments may be you should go into some more depth about our nuclear weapons program me and from where the fissile material for the bombs and missile warheads come Most of our weapons are based on plutonium or...
- 02 Sep 2007 22:18
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 31 Aug 2007
- Replies: 298
- Views: 136438
Shankar, -it is irrelevant the objection was made and a turn around was made too without any change in the basic understanding that is putting 2/3 of our nuclear fissile material making capability under safeguard for perpetuity This is the second time that you have made this statement. You can not g...
- 27 Aug 2007 06:10
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 24 August 2007
- Replies: 261
- Views: 114106
- 27 Aug 2007 04:11
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 24 August 2007
- Replies: 261
- Views: 114106
- 27 Aug 2007 02:46
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 24 August 2007
- Replies: 261
- Views: 114106
- 18 Aug 2007 09:41
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News and Discussion 17 August 2007
- Replies: 351
- Views: 128119
- 18 Aug 2007 09:35
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News and Discussion 17 August 2007
- Replies: 351
- Views: 128119
Here is a mental exercise for people to do: (1) What sort of Indian nuclear force posture do you advocate? (2) Try to answer that question in two parts. The first part should be qualitative and then on the basis of that the second part should be quantitative. (3) When you answer the quantitative par...
- 12 Aug 2007 23:40
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 10 Aug 2007
- Replies: 283
- Views: 103420
- 12 Aug 2007 03:37
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News & Discussion - 10 Aug 2007
- Replies: 283
- Views: 103420
Calvin, In addition to what you said there is one more thing: Building bigger bombs beyond a certain point is not only useless but actually counterproductive. You are better off taking the extra fission and fusion fuel you need for the bigger bomb and using it to make more of the smaller ones. A lar...
- 06 Aug 2007 00:58
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: India's R&D in Defence DRDO, PSUs and Private Sector
- Replies: 320
- Views: 183043
- 04 Aug 2007 08:14
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 04 Aug 2007
- Replies: 325
- Views: 112790
- 04 Aug 2007 08:08
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 04 Aug 2007
- Replies: 325
- Views: 112790
- 04 Aug 2007 08:01
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 04 Aug 2007
- Replies: 325
- Views: 112790
Samuel, I don't get your question. A fuel reserve is a fuel reserve. An empty box is just that, an empty box. And we aren't going to dump fuel on open ground are we? The size of the fuel reserve will increase every time we buy a foreign reactor or put a domestic one in the safeguarded list. As for t...
- 04 Aug 2007 02:28
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 04 Aug 2007
- Replies: 325
- Views: 112790
Vsudhir, As an aside, perhaps now you can understand why I got irritated at the FBR question. I post crystal clear language from the DAE's website on how something is civilian or not is decided and yet a page or two of posts debating how something is civilian or not (including the FBRs) is decided. ...
- 04 Aug 2007 02:16
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 04 Aug 2007
- Replies: 325
- Views: 112790
Samuel, Milind, I think the language is not ambiguous. Look at the exact words: It says India's reactors, i.e. reactors belonging to India which is what foreign reactors become once we pay for them. The language would be ambiguous if it said Indian reactors instead of India's reactors. And as far as...
- 04 Aug 2007 01:11
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 01 Aug 2007
- Replies: 266
- Views: 116801
- 04 Aug 2007 01:04
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 01 Aug 2007
- Replies: 266
- Views: 116801
- 01 Aug 2007 23:58
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 01 Aug 2007
- Replies: 266
- Views: 116801
- 01 Aug 2007 23:48
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 01 Aug 2007
- Replies: 266
- Views: 116801
NRao, There you go again with your inexplicable fixation on the Hyde act. The GoI only has to fulfill those commitments that it agrees to a bilateral agreement like 123 and in return expect the Americans to only fulfill those commitments that they have likewise agreed to. If the Americans try to wea...
- 01 Aug 2007 13:00
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 01 Aug 2007
- Replies: 266
- Views: 116801
ShauryaT, As Arun has pointed out and extensively tabulated, we do not need a FBR to generate weapons grade plutonium in how much ever quantity we could possibly need. The existing PHWRs are sufficient for that. It is useful in augmenting existing capacity but not critical. It is however uniquely us...
- 01 Aug 2007 12:08
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 28 Jul 2007
- Replies: 272
- Views: 105986
Vsudhir, The GoI's policy on future nuclear facilities is spelled out in writing and is as crystal clear and unambiguous as it can be. It was made explicitly so from day one and has been reiterated since then whenever it has been asked about it. And as far as the differing statements go, could you p...
- 01 Aug 2007 05:59
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 28 Jul 2007
- Replies: 272
- Views: 105986
Vsudhir, MKN gets asked this epcifically in the media breif. Note that MKN says FBR 'at the moment' is not under int'l obligations. Read his reply again and think about it for just a moment. The FBR program is entirely on the non-civilian side at the moment. In the future some parts of it, i.e. some...
- 01 Aug 2007 03:45
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 28 Jul 2007
- Replies: 272
- Views: 105986
- 31 Jul 2007 08:40
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 28 Jul 2007
- Replies: 272
- Views: 105986
Ananth, No country, not even the Russians, will consent to us using their material in an unsafeguarded facility, i.e. a non-civilian facility. What is the whole point of having a separation then? How do they know we are not using their stuff to make bums? So if you want to use foreign fuel in an AHW...
- 31 Jul 2007 08:15
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 28 Jul 2007
- Replies: 272
- Views: 105986
Ramana, There is nothing mysterious in what the DAE can do to reactor grade plutonium with the FBR that has far reaching implication for our weapons program. The fast neutrons from the fissioning of the reactor grade plutonium in the core of the FBR are captured by U-238 in the breeding blankets to ...
- 31 Jul 2007 07:32
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 28 Jul 2007
- Replies: 272
- Views: 105986
Ananth, Ldev, ShauryaT, You people are unnecessarily tying yourself into knots about what is safeguarded and what is not. Instead of thinking in terms of material, think in terms of facilities. We have declared a list of civilian and non-civilian facilities. And when new facilities are build, the Go...
- 30 Jul 2007 01:15
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 28 Jul 2007
- Replies: 272
- Views: 105986
JCage, I highly doubt that the GoI is going to let private companies, Indian or foreign, operate any civilian power reactors any time soon. There are issues like insurance and accident liability that need to be worked out and this is easier said than done. Kgoan had talked about this a while ago. An...
- 28 Jul 2007 03:53
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 25 Jul 2007
- Replies: 268
- Views: 106992
There we go again dredging up old issues that had been dealt with. The GoI and no one else will decide whether any future DAE facility will be on the civilian or military side. This includes reactors, reprocessing plants, fuel fabrication plants, etc. This is our determination to make and ours alone...
- 26 Jul 2007 23:27
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Badges, Patches, Insignia, Medals & Uniforms
- Replies: 197
- Views: 84326
Rakesh,
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORC ... Corps.html
Are you sure the 14 Corps badge shown is correct?
I am asking this because I recently saw a jeep in Jaipur with that badge on it.
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORC ... Corps.html
Are you sure the 14 Corps badge shown is correct?
I am asking this because I recently saw a jeep in Jaipur with that badge on it.
- 26 Jul 2007 23:04
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 25 Jul 2007
- Replies: 268
- Views: 106992
Vsudhir, The FMCT (no such thing as the FMCO) is going to turn out into another mighty fine piss process. Mark my words. There is no way that a FMCT acceptable to everyone can be arrived at. Because if that were to happen then the P-5 club and its attendant perks are effectively dissolved. That is w...
- 26 Jul 2007 22:40
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 25 Jul 2007
- Replies: 268
- Views: 106992
- 26 Jul 2007 22:26
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 25 Jul 2007
- Replies: 268
- Views: 106992
NRao, The civil-military separation was always going to be a static one. The only point of contention was ensuring the perpetuity of the fuel supply for the civilian side. This much has been clear since the J18/M2 days. And I still do not understand this fixation on the Hyde act. The 123 agreement i...
- 26 Jul 2007 10:20
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 25 Jul 2007
- Replies: 268
- Views: 106992
NRao, What we are giving up with this deal is the option to play the spoiler and throw a spanner into the GNEP framework that the Americans are going about creating. That is fine with me. As long as we are left alone and unhindered in pursuing our own independent energy plans which is what we get in...
- 26 Jul 2007 09:48
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 25 Jul 2007
- Replies: 268
- Views: 106992
- 23 Jul 2007 10:27
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 22 Jul 2007
- Replies: 255
- Views: 110491
- 23 Jul 2007 08:47
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 22 Jul 2007
- Replies: 255
- Views: 110491
- 23 Jul 2007 08:25
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 22 Jul 2007
- Replies: 255
- Views: 110491
- 23 Jul 2007 07:45
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Indian Nuclear News & Discussion - 22 Jul 2007
- Replies: 255
- Views: 110491
Arun, If the Americans renege on their commitments in the 123 agreement at a later date then for whatever reason then we do so likewise in a reciprocal manner. It is up to us to ensure that there are punitive measures available to us to dissuade such reneging. I can think of several at the moment: T...