Search found 121 matches

by sarang
03 Jul 2014 08:58
Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA: News & Discussion - June 2014
Replies: 2766
Views: 390003

Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread - June 2014

Friends, Do understand, Killing anything (esp. humans) is american living requirement. they dont kill for business. its their elixir. America will finish if they stop killing or putting others in trouble. So its obvious they are miles ahead in killing technology. We dont need not match Americans. Ou...
by sarang
28 Mar 2014 12:50
Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
Topic: Military Flight Safety
Replies: 2655
Views: 398748

Re: Military Flight Safety

How is that possible. No this can not happen. The world best equipment from world best manufacturer can not crash. The devine plane with out of the world ding-dong and the best flying record can only crash with improper handling of poor and untrained SDREs.
by sarang
30 Oct 2012 20:04
Forum: Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum
Topic: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012
Replies: 2850
Views: 124281

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

My friend, I am not saying anything about cricket. I am talking about how we are building Pakistani Courage by encouraging them to attack and by not retaliating in any means other than angry looking speaches from 'The Delhi comedians' and promoting various events (sports and cultural). I think Pakis...
by sarang
30 Oct 2012 19:14
Forum: Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum
Topic: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012
Replies: 2850
Views: 124281

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

with experience from past 10-15 years, we should be ready for next attack within one and half years after allowing pakistani cricket team. lets see where this time. and how big it will be. :| :|
God bless the inocent INDIANs. :( :(
by sarang
10 Jun 2011 15:18
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Replies: 3918
Views: 660940

Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread

Actually its Type-10 not Type-90.
6 ton lighter than 90.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_10
by sarang
20 Jul 2010 09:29
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Farnborough International Airshow 2010 (19th - 25th July)
Replies: 175
Views: 42706

Re: Farnborough International Airshow 2010 (19th - 25th July

Well we can see the difference, while chinki technicians handle major issues, the paki technicians kapda marofy the indigenous fighter.
:rotfl: :rotfl:
by sarang
12 Jun 2010 15:47
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Pakistan arms sales, ops, doctrine, etc
Replies: 3959
Views: 1011321

Re: Pakistan arms sales, ops, doctrine, etc

thank you, Pakistan
O.K. Mister Prime Minister now we can start talks for 2nd sub.
:evil:
by sarang
20 Oct 2009 14:52
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
Replies: 2936
Views: 767890

Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion

Alas I think that's how things work.
Any ways Its really bad to lose guys like Arun_S.
by sarang
20 Oct 2009 14:29
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
Replies: 2936
Views: 767890

Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion

Dear Mr. Arun_S. why the Agni (and other) missile pages are degraded instead of upgrade. Are admins are in some kind of problem with MoD or what? :( Kindly Reply. Sarang. Dear Mr. Sarang, Arun_S has left BR and along with him his missile pages. Kindly refer to the Google cached pages if interested....
by sarang
19 Oct 2009 20:38
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
Replies: 2936
Views: 767890

Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion

Dear Mr. Arun_S.

why the Agni (and other) missile pages are degraded instead of upgrade.

Are admins are in some kind of problem with MoD or what? :(

Kindly Reply.

Sarang.
by sarang
27 Jul 2009 12:10
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Military Aviation
Replies: 321
Views: 24915

Re: Indian Military Aviation

It seems US of A ultimately come to know that India will eventually will have Su-30 MKI & Dassault Rafale. :shock:
by sarang
30 Apr 2009 18:13
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Su-30: News and Discussion
Replies: 3952
Views: 924203

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion

God damn. I can not believe. Feeling very sad.
:cry: :cry: :cry:

May the brave rest in peace.
by sarang
27 Apr 2009 15:38
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: MRCA News and Discussion
Replies: 395
Views: 233399

Re: MRCA News and Discussion

This is too much well Arthuro, i own over 2 million class -A shares at Dassault which at today's value is easily over 50 million euros , on any given day i have more info than you could ever dream to know. so no use responding to u. you work for Technofan, no probs. good for you, things i know are h...
by sarang
17 Apr 2009 19:20
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Su-30: News and Discussion
Replies: 3952
Views: 924203

Re: Su-30: News and Discussion

Like I said, the one is only an improved version of the other, so even they won't get AL 41, we could use the AL35 for both right? I don't think the statement is correct. may be the both are from same manufacturer /family of engine but one is configured for multi-role while other one is for ground ...
by sarang
08 Apr 2009 08:21
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Military Aviation
Replies: 388
Views: 33093

Re: Indian Military Aviation

I agree. that's the core issue which I don't understand the thinking behind it. :-?

That is exactly what I am trying to say in Military acquisition thread.
by sarang
04 Apr 2009 11:12
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments
Replies: 397
Views: 27407

Re: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments

:eek: :eek: 6 seems very high number why do Indian armed forces buy them in such large quantities. Look at cheen, America, Russia etc. they buy/build in 10's or 100's ONLY. We cross the digit 10 very rarely and 100's once in a century perhaps. except bullets and guns like 100 TAR-21 with 1,000 bull...
by sarang
03 Apr 2009 21:22
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments
Replies: 397
Views: 27407

Re: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments

krishnan wrote:What are you going to do with 10's of them? Trying to compare planes to bullets?


No not at all, Just asking why in half dozens when you need in two or three.
by sarang
03 Apr 2009 21:06
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments
Replies: 397
Views: 27407

Re: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments

India and Russia place order for 40 Il-476's (heavily modified Il-76) http://www.royfc.com/acft_news.html Forty Il-476 for the Military Ul'yanovsk's Aviastar-SP, included in the Unified Airplane Building Corporation, plans to enter into contracts for the delivery to the Russian Federation defense m...
by sarang
30 Mar 2009 22:20
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments
Replies: 397
Views: 27407

Re: Military Acquisitions, Partnerships & Developments

I think its a good move to have two different types of tankers. IL-78MKI is good for short and medium range requirements (Pak Centric), whereas A-330MRTT is good for long range requirements (Cheen specific) as it gives us a real benefit for heavy fighters and cargo to extend their range.

JMT.
by sarang
25 Mar 2009 20:24
Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
Topic: Newbie Corner & Military Miscellaneous
Replies: 4126
Views: 556534

Re: Indian Military Aviation

JaiS wrote:sarang,

Please articulate your response. A smiley for a reply does not convey one's ideas in many cases. Thanks.


Sorry about that (smiley only).

Actually I don't get the LM 2000's nor installation on talwars.
by sarang
25 Mar 2009 07:32
Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
Topic: Newbie Corner & Military Miscellaneous
Replies: 4126
Views: 556534

Re: Indian Military Aviation

The US gov. also cleared the LM 2000 engine for installation in Talwars.

:shock:
by sarang
25 Mar 2009 07:23
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Replies: 518
Views: 36978

Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion

I think you are talking about NDA not UPA who did not signed barak-1 deal. UPA is involved in Barak-8 or (whatever it may called) deal. and that deal costs Rs. 10,000 Cr ($ 2.5 Billion).
by sarang
15 Mar 2009 06:44
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Replies: 518
Views: 36978

Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion

or is there full coverage over Rus and US?
I think number of visible satallites for earth points means more coverage.
by sarang
08 Mar 2009 17:59
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: LCA news and discussion
Replies: 398
Views: 275807

Re: LCA news and discussion

This reminds me,do LCA pilots have some amount of fireproofing in their uniform? If fact I did some research based on this serendipitous idea. I wrapped my pet hamster in a fireporoof coating and threw it in a small petrol fire that I created for the purpose. i was happy to see the fireproof coatin...
by sarang
06 Mar 2009 17:07
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Military Aviation
Replies: 517
Views: 32800

Re: Indian Military Aviation

Saras crashed. Three killed.
Heard on Aaj Tak. :|
by sarang
03 Feb 2009 20:36
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Military Aviation
Replies: 517
Views: 32800

Re: Indian Military Aviation

ADA plans to develop medium combat aircraft with IAF Bangalore, Feb 03: Aeronautical Development Agency, a Defence Research & Development Organisation (DRDO) lab, plans to design and develop a medium combat aircraft with "stealth features" in partnership with Indian Air Force, an ADA ...
by sarang
02 Feb 2009 09:09
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Replies: 518
Views: 25318

Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion

Sanjay can you provide any more details about the book (name publication etc)
by sarang
01 Feb 2009 09:38
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Replies: 518
Views: 25318

Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion

lack of precision and higher costs are making the weapon only display item.
It is more of a use to porki showbiz force than a true fighting one. :evil:
by sarang
07 Jan 2009 11:01
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Military Aviation
Replies: 517
Views: 33486

Re: Indian Military Aviation

kuldipchager wrote:If we can somehow put this AL-31f in LCA,we can fly LCA mach 2-plus.Need some work to be done and we don't have to waiste $10bils on MRCA.I am sure russian will love to work on this project.

:shock: :shock:
by sarang
13 Dec 2008 12:34
Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
Topic: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion
Replies: 5274
Views: 1158305

Re: Kaveri & aero-engine discussion

I think Kaveri is not and will never be part of Tejas again. over viewing the previous engine development efforts there is very remote possibility that Kaveri will ever be mature enough to fit on any aircraft let alone Tejas. It seems only naval platforms get more out of a airforce project. Probably...
by sarang
30 Oct 2008 09:26
Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Replies: 398
Views: 193133

Re: Artillery and Armor thread

Unable to open the link. Is it possible to provide another or the picture may be? Here's one of the latest photos of the Canadian Army Leopard-2A6M in Afghanistan: http://www.forces.gc.ca/site/_photos/orig/IS2008-9164.jpg The cloth-like tarp covering the entire tank - does anybody know the functions...
by sarang
24 Oct 2008 12:58
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Replies: 518
Views: 33410

Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion - 27 March 2008

I don't think DRDO will make efforts to test a already proven design. They can simply say 'design validation' of certain type like they did with 73's and 77's on MiG-29's sometime back. I think it is a new untested design or at least untested after integrating Indian components.

JMT,
Sarang :)
by sarang
30 Sep 2008 07:28
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: The Indo Russian PAK-FA Project
Replies: 1200
Views: 452478

Re: The Indo Russian PAK-FA Project

Malhotra, Rahul.
I am sorry for my rude language.

But my point was not to disturb the punch of the news because of some third rated technology nations.
by sarang
29 Sep 2008 19:49
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: The Indo Russian PAK-FA Project
Replies: 1200
Views: 452478

Re: The Indo Russian PAK-FA Project

Please Mr. Malhotra, edited. We all know pakistan is way back failed to put any challange to India (Atleast Conventionally) and china doesn't have to look at us only. They have bigger problems to handle. Both of them know they will not get anything first class from anyone including Russia. Both of t...
by sarang
27 Sep 2008 20:10
Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
Topic: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion
Replies: 5274
Views: 1158305

Re: Kaveri & aero-engine discussion

namit, cut out the histrionics. they did achieve 90-95% of both dry and wet thrust and the engine was overweight by about 100 kg. and please remember that those specs match and sometimes surpass those of modern engines like m-88/ge-404. for a first-timer that is damn good ! if this was the PLAAF, t...
by sarang
27 Sep 2008 07:28
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Military Aviation
Replies: 518
Views: 32448

Re: Indian Military Aviation

Sorry vivek but it seems my browser is not displaying the image (firefox, IE).
Can you post another link.
by sarang
19 Sep 2008 08:30
Forum: Trash Can Archive
Topic: Indian Space Program Discussion
Replies: 518
Views: 28095

Re: Indian Space Program Discussion - 23 April 2008

Is there any plan for updating BR page on PSLV or will it be updated after chandrayan Project?

Go to advanced search