Bharat Rakshak

http://themostfeared.blogspot.com/2009/10/j-xx-4th-generation-fighter-aircraft.html

Any comment gurus.

@Vishnu

what about others...I mean any details for Mig35 or Rafale.

vavinash wrote:They just need to stop supply of spare parts to ensure that entire fleet becomes hangar queens.

I have got tired and bored of listening this.... truly i mean it. Ok..the question is...what we have been doing all this year..can we not reverse engineer on of the jet for our noble cause .

the real stuff is here.. !!!

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attach ... 1256144403

Craig Alpert wrote:
Being in the military we are always reminded NEVER TO UNDERESTIMATE YOUR ENEMY. Moral of the Story - DON'T LOOK DOWN ONTO OTHERS as YOU(or for that matter I) HAVE NOT SEEN THE FINAL PRODUCT YET.

what do you mean by "WE ARE"...JUST ASKING NOTHING PERSONAL.

The MIG-35 is by far the most cost-effective option for the IAF and will be the easiest to assimilate into the IAF's structure and operations. two sqds of SU-34s for strategic strike,a sqd. of MIG-31s for anti-AWACS duty, ok...Sir..It is good with Mig-35s..but do we have Su-34 or Mig 31..??? or we ...

2017 once again! Its a good thing that they are trying to get it early, but 2017 reminds me of the report that said that 2017 might be date of war between India and China. Don't worry my friend...I think by that time we will have MMRCA and upgraded Mig-29 and LCA and Su - 30MKI...!!! I think with a...

sanjaychoudhry wrote:
What do we call these Indian officers? A cadre of compulsive shoppers of imported goods? This shows they have absolutely no vision of dominating Asia and expanding their military influence beyond India.

Cool down my friend...!!!

I read somewhere...that we are testing missiles for user trial this month.

Anyone with some ground news...???

shameekg wrote:Besides the MRCA is not for 2040. Lets keep it to the next 5-10 years.

I do not understand....I think It would take around 10 years to introduce all 126 birds....!!!

and then...they will not be of any use..???

Please explain..!!!

I think India should allow private players in the field of defense and aerospace...I would give a great boost..as the people there will not have CHALTA HAI attitude.

I think that will draft us...ahead of china and also increase self-reliance...!!

It has the capability to change colors: http://www.duler.ru/CONTENT/pic/industrial/SU_PAKFA_pic_4.jpg What ???? How ? http://freesmileyface.net/smiley/Confused/where-am-i.gif Btw, its a forward-swept wing design ? here are the remaining (concept) pictures http://www.duler.ru/CONTENT/pic/industrial/...

Foreign ship strays near Tamil Nadu nuclear plant

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/india/Foreign-ship-strays-near-Tamil-Nadu-nuclear-plant/articleshow/5081612.cms

no missile ever gets old with upgrades whether its AIM9/7 or R27 and this makes some logic. My friend...Just read the two below...I think they will covey you my massage that every thing do have a life...!!! http://www.deagel.com/news/Royal-Navys-Seawolf-Missiles-Life-Cycle-Extended-Through-at-Least...

what is the technical proof that its loosing foot :?: There is no need to have a technical proof..just logical....new technologies comes from the graveyards of old ones...it is like...you eat when you are hungry...!!! and I am just a b.tech student....not yet mature enough to prove or disprove anyt...

. I would welcome more technical explanation from anyone though. two pages explains something about radar lock and how to brake it..!!! http://books.google.co.in/books?id=ZJQ31WqojjoC&pg=PA138&lpg=PA138&dq=break+the+radar+lock&source=bl&ots=uaCfZXY0TT&sig=l1R4t8bjoTolSSPG8Xg...

missiles never gets old as long as its got good seeker and guidance don't forget AIM7 with upgrade still in production I thought every think has a shelf life....and also when we talk of upgrade ...I think it simply means that very thing is loosing foot with time..i.e. to get old...isn't that.....my...

Rahul M wrote:info/link on r-74 please.

Something that I found...but perhaps it is about R-73....I really didn't get anything about R-74...!!!

http://trishulgroup.blogspot.com/2008/10/vympels-r-27-r-73-aams.html

NRao wrote:

So, Rahul(G) --> Rahul(H) --> Rahul(M)

is the M model the latest? AESA, super cruise, etc? Meets RFP?

Nope...I think Its export version..!!!

NRao wrote:How many T/R modules on MiG-35 AESA?

Sir...with all due respect i doubt motive of the question..!!!

but as far i know The radar uses 680 4 channel transceiver modules with a power output of 5 watts per channel in its export version.

Yogi_G wrote:Latest news in, the Dravidian parties are against the Moskva Maiden MIG 35 due to its "Aryan" roots.

something beyond my understanding..!!!

can someone explain..!!!

US Government is not even in favour of allowing Lockheed to help Tejas development. Remember its the same Country which stopped assistance on LCA Development for several years and will continue for the coming years. IN my opinion ---- MMRCA must be converted into 2 Separate strategic bids: Rafale -...

I am not sure if its a good idea of comparing a paper plane with Gripen. Just because both falls in Light Combat Aircraft category , we should not equate LCA with Gripen. Well...Gripen may be ahead...I can't doubt it. But, I think it is potentially good to discuss the concerns of LCA... 1st of all ...

I am sorry ... if I am reposting it..!!!

U.S. eyes military equipment in Iraq for Pakistan

http://majalahmiliter.blogspot.com/2009_09_06_archive.html

IN is also interested in the v-22. apache will win the attack helo deal as well. I am not so sure...but I had read somewhere that deal for helis were called off due to poor global response...?? also....interested in V-22..?? Gurus ..need some help...in what ever form..to for self-enlightenment..!!

not necessarily just because Russia will have 50 more su30mki + 30 mig29k and there may be more mki ordered in future say in 2012. and in future mki may carry these http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/852/40120120ac23646060m750x.jpg What is that...in Picture. I think it is some kinda bomb...but what k...

Baldev wrote:only gripen and mig meets these two last points

Well....and Grippen is more or less similar to LCA ...so there is No point in selecting this...also it do not add any strategic value to our country...!!!

So the winner is Mig-35.

hahahaha..!!!

sumshyam, Do u think that amazing piece of machine is on sale??? Well my friend....it is not like "IT IS ON SELL OR NOT"......as far as I remember F-22 was also out for sell...but at aquite high price...!!! Israeli Air Force (IAF) chief procurement officer Brigadier-General Ze'ev Snir sai...

Its better to go for DRDO-private industry defense complex, where NRI's are directly hired from around the world. Rather than inviting American defense MNC's to create a weapons lobby in Delhi which will be stronger than Russian lobby and we will end up in permanent foreign dependence in defense se...

oh my god !!! where are we going ??? any idea about the cost of maintaining one Tu 160... My idea not be of your std...but I think 1 B$ around...but with that...we can Rename 1. Arab Sagar as West Coast Sea 2. Bay of Bengal as East Coast Sea. Don't you agree...?? We need to have a strategic bomber ...

BurhanGabaji wrote:I strongly recommend to split the deal between SH & Mig.

My friend ... If it is about changing basic format of the deal... I will say..we should go out with 90+ Mig-35s and around 30 Tu-160 BlackJacks. That will be the ultimate answer to all of our problem ....!!!

Hi Guys...It is my first post..!!! Well...I think it is good to experiment and go out for something new...but it is not that good in our situation .... where we are 1. lacking in number of aircraft. 2. facing fleet aging problem. I think we should stick some tested friend....and then we have only tw...