Coming from the supposedly IAF source - it is music to my earsIndeed, according to an air force officer, the performance of the LCA as a fighter exceeds that of the Mirage 2000, even when the latter is upgraded.
Search found 355 matches
- 15 Dec 2011 12:50
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1014749
Re: LCA News and Discussions
- 15 Dec 2011 12:42
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3918
- Views: 921991
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
On this very thread, there was a report couple of months back that the current assembly line for Arjun has scope for further utilization (read adding another shift). If the IA orders in numbers, would there be any hesitation on part of the PSU to add another assembly line? Saying that because the Ar...
- 13 Dec 2011 12:18
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1014749
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Spot on Singha ji. The LMs, Boeings etc of the world have gathered data and experience over decades . This is the unglamorous part whose importance will never be told and never be shared. When the first jets came out, all of them were underpowered by today’s standards but were cutting edge for that ...
- 12 Dec 2011 18:55
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3918
- Views: 921991
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Why even bother giving small crumbs to Arjun , shun the desi maal and have an all T90 force - that is, after all THE super duper tank.
- 12 Dec 2011 12:09
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: UAVs, Drones, Remote Surveillance Tech
- Replies: 2937
- Views: 1047775
Re: UAVs, Drones, Remote Surveillance Tech
Gliding down safely is the last thing anyone would want. One wouldn’t want to gift away such piece of technology to the enemy; right? Looking at the size of this thing, it would easily weigh close to a ton. How can such a heavy machine remain intact after a fall even from a thoussand feet? There wou...
- 09 Dec 2011 20:05
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1032157
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
The OEMs are not ready to part with the cutting edge any way, no matter how many $$ are thrown at them. Only way out is we develop on our own. Reverse engineering entire systems will not provide us with the data points for building future generations. So, it may work at first but may not help in the...
- 09 Dec 2011 19:51
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1189665
Re: Indian Military Aviation
F-16? looks like the second Jag to me.
- 09 Dec 2011 19:36
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: UAVs, Drones, Remote Surveillance Tech
- Replies: 2937
- Views: 1047775
Re: UAVs, Drones, Remote Surveillance Tech
Panda can always give the lollipop – you give us access of the drone and we will give you our super duper JF17 along with a couple of missiles we gave to the pukes.
- 08 Dec 2011 16:01
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1032157
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
I haven’t really read anywhere that we will have the veto power of the PAK-FA. FGFA is a different matter - more of a customized stuff for our requirements like the MKI. I am still very skeptical unless something concrete is announced or comes up. To me, it is no different than partners in JSF. Uncl...
- 08 Dec 2011 14:55
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1189665
Re: Indian Military Aviation
Or, formulate the requirements in a manner where airbus and others come but airbus wins
Include the lifecycle cost, uptimes etc in the calculations....
Include the lifecycle cost, uptimes etc in the calculations....
- 07 Dec 2011 17:28
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1032157
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
As per the latest updates we will take greater number of PAK FA than the FGFA. We wont have any say on who the PAK-FA is exported to and the meaty stuff (stealth) has already been taken care of for most part. Engine will also be a no go area for us. In light of these facts, I simply cannot understan...
- 07 Dec 2011 12:30
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3918
- Views: 921991
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Well, one can argue that. Even when the private players may be upselling foreign designs, it is in the direction of building inhouse capability. A case in point can be Hyundai from the automotive sector. They started with designs from auto majors of that time and today they are completely independen...
- 07 Dec 2011 12:05
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Airborne Early Warning & Control: News & Discussion
- Replies: 3965
- Views: 1215732
Re: AEW&C News & Discussion
Was DRDO involved in suggesting the mods to the airframe or was it done by Embraer themselves on the requirements given to them?
- 07 Dec 2011 11:27
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3918
- Views: 921991
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Talking abut this, what is the staus of FICV? There was supposed to be a competetion on the lines of the khan model. Any news on that?
On another note, ppl say involve the pvt sector; when they are involved, others say they dont have required exp. What to do sir
On another note, ppl say involve the pvt sector; when they are involved, others say they dont have required exp. What to do sir
- 06 Dec 2011 18:50
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
- Replies: 6593
- Views: 1260017
Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
China’s Maturing Fighter Force Even the chinese don’t claim to have put their indigenous engines to use and this article is saying that they are using their own engines, avionics, radars etc etc etc. Looks motivated/sponsored. They may have developed a lot (not being sold in intl mkt though :wink: ...
- 06 Dec 2011 17:16
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3918
- Views: 921991
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
From the comment of GOC 21 corps looks like the army is willing (hopefully more than willing :?: ) to take mk2 even with the increased weight. If that may be the case, is anyone willing to speculate the numbers they will go for? I vaguely recall someone (maybe chacko) mentioning a production run of ...
- 02 Dec 2011 12:33
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Pakistan arms sales, ops, doctrine, etc
- Replies: 3959
- Views: 1281601
Re: Pakistan arms sales, ops, doctrine, etc
As per the latest reports Kayani stated “It would have been better if the PAF could have also participated in the response.” (to NATO strike taking 28 mujahids to their hoories) It will be very interesting to see what aircraft they will bring against NATO when the next jhapad lands on their face – t...
- 30 Nov 2011 15:23
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Pakistan arms sales, ops, doctrine, etc
- Replies: 3959
- Views: 1281601
Re: Pakistan arms sales, ops, doctrine, etc
The reaction from the US sounds conciliatory but stops short of being conciliatory enough. It is almost like yes, they deserved it :evil: After the last years blockade, the US would definitely have established alternate lines for logistics. Routing through central Asia may be more expensive but I gu...
- 30 Nov 2011 14:17
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
- Replies: 3918
- Views: 921991
Re: Armoured Vehicles Discussion Thread
Oh! please, please explain us how so? Because, he has not been too kind to the T90 in his assessment? Some members have gone to the extent of questioning his officer like qualities!
- 29 Nov 2011 15:15
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1014749
Re: LCA News and Discussions
Was going through the wiki on LCA and Bandar – made me wonder, what makes the Bandar have almost 50% greater combat radius. Can anyone explain it or provide links?
- 23 Nov 2011 17:38
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion
- Replies: 6378
- Views: 2075575
Re: Kaveri & aero-engine discussion
Haven’t the talks been going on forever?
- 11 Nov 2011 13:08
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
- Replies: 6593
- Views: 1260017
Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
The bandar may not be as good as it is touted to be but, isn’t it a huge improvement over the earlier chicom junk that the PAF has? The chinese are in PoK which is ours - thay have no hesitation in being there. chinese developed Gwadar port for the bakis - the list simply goes on. That bakis have be...
- 01 Nov 2011 18:27
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Transport Aircraft for IAF
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 794476
Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF
That brings us to the next question. What capabilities will the 476 offer that will be new or significantly better from it's predecessor? Tried googling but could not find much.
- 01 Nov 2011 17:43
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Transport Aircraft for IAF
- Replies: 4067
- Views: 794476
Re: Transport Aircraft for IAF
Any officially announced day/month/year the 476 facility in Russia is going to come online? How much will be the lead time between the time the new assembly line becomes operational and the first 476 rolls out
- 31 Oct 2011 16:56
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
- Replies: 6593
- Views: 1260017
Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
We should increase the khujli in south china sea by engaging Vietnam militarily. What are the other probable khujli spots?
- 20 Oct 2011 14:27
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Newbie Corner & Military Miscellaneous
- Replies: 4126
- Views: 859032
Re: Newbie Corner & Military Miscellaneous
What is the difference between the holographic HUD (one seen on typhoon, raptor etc) and the one that we have on the LCA? Are there any plans/intent to manufacture holographic HUD anytime soon?
- 19 Oct 2011 18:18
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1189665
- 19 Oct 2011 15:00
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
- Replies: 6593
- Views: 1260017
Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
Last when I checked with serving personnel of the army in the NE, they were very emphatic - this is not 1962 and there never ever will be any 1962 again.
We may indulge in dhoti shiver but the people on ground sounded quiet confident of handling the panda.
We may indulge in dhoti shiver but the people on ground sounded quiet confident of handling the panda.
- 11 Oct 2011 13:12
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1189665
Re: Indian Military Aviation
Was going over the gallery at BR, Marut was a very TFTA looking aircraft of it's time - maybe beacuse of the German connection.
Can anyone provide a link to it's service record with the IAF?
Can anyone provide a link to it's service record with the IAF?
- 04 Oct 2011 14:53
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
- Replies: 4001
- Views: 1032157
Re: PAK-FA and FGFA Thread
If the AF is looking for a smaller 5th Gen from Russia - as suggested by some members, what direction will the AMCA take, where will it fit in?
- 15 Sep 2011 18:26
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
- Replies: 6593
- Views: 1260017
- 19 Aug 2011 18:10
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: Kaveri & Aero-Engine: News & Discussion
- Replies: 6378
- Views: 2075575
Re: Kaveri & aero-engine discussion
Couldn’t find any information on the targeted thrust for Kaveri - post improvements by searching through google chacha. Any links or guesses?
- 18 Aug 2011 12:00
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Pakistan arms sales, ops, doctrine, etc
- Replies: 3959
- Views: 1281601
Re: Pakistan arms sales, ops, doctrine, etc
They are probably providing 50 kits free of cost - the kits will come free but assembling and painting (the most important part ) them will be the responsibility of the pakis.
- 09 Aug 2011 12:02
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
- Replies: 6593
- Views: 1260017
Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
Other than TSP, what do people think are the chances of panda stationing their naval ships in Sri Lanka or B'desh in the next ten years?
- 03 Aug 2011 12:26
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Naval Discussion
- Replies: 3950
- Views: 1300382
Re: Indian Naval Discussion
Interesting part in RMs statement is that the govt envisions two carrier task forces deployed at two separate locations at the same time. To make this possible, we definitely need more than two carriers making IAC2 a certainty now. Hope it comes with 65K tonnage. Any higher would be a bonus
- 03 Aug 2011 11:45
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
- Replies: 6593
- Views: 1260017
Re: China Military Watch - Jan 11, 2011
Quiet right. If they arm their all weather friends, why shouldn’t we do the same with Vietnam. Whether it is openly or quietly doesn’t matter.
- 27 Jul 2011 12:13
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Military Aviation
- Replies: 4004
- Views: 1189665
Re: Indian Military Aviation
Has anyone thought ACMs statements may have been made with the political leadership on board? Our record has been such statements always come from the services, not the political leadership - for all we know there may be a tactic understanding between the two on this subject.
- 26 Jul 2011 12:22
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: LCA News and Discussions
- Replies: 3947
- Views: 1014749
Re: LCA News and Discussions
There was news today on MMRCA numbers. They may be increased if the LCA or FGFA is delayed. The MoD may be just hedging a risk but still one is left wondering what was the need of pronouncing it publicly or officially. Don’t know about the FGFA but are any delays foreseen with LCA as well? Hope the ...
- 18 Jul 2011 16:58
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 3952
- Views: 1214146
Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
In that case, would anyone have an idea/can speculate how many Pinakas are planned to be inducted eventually? For that matter, how many MLRS of this category are planned till the period 2020. Links or any other sources would help, if possible. We should have there in hundreds to boost the firepower ...
- 18 Jul 2011 16:01
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 3952
- Views: 1214146
Re: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
Wanted to check - what is the planned number of Pinakas for the Army? I believe, current order stands at 80. We need 80 x n number of Pinakas - 80 is simply a very puny number. Number of Grads itself is 150+.