Search found 8736 matches
- 23 Mar 2007 08:09
- Forum: Religion Discussion Archive
- Topic: Religion Thread 3
- Replies: 338
- Views: 130061
ts a vicious rumor that was probably started by the vatican itself. in all my readings about the vatican, never have i come across a credible assertion of any pope saving any , even a single, jew. IMO, vatican news dissemination should be given the same credibility as TASS and PRAVDA in the FSU. Ca...
- 23 Feb 2007 21:36
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
I keep trying to tell Sanjay M not to take that site seriously ... the Leaping Frogs thread is full of excerpts from that site Alokji the last paragraph of that blog may have been addressed to people like you: To make the story even more impressive, the CNN-IBN story in India is rated by the reader...
- 23 Feb 2007 21:04
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
The Kak's paper appears in the IJTP .. It is same as the preprint except for small formatting changes ..(Paper print version, I believe is still not out, but it is in the latest online version) (BTW, the editor of IJTP, IMO, himself does not have a good reputation) There is a blog by a Harvard strin...
- 21 Feb 2007 09:25
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
- 21 Feb 2007 08:26
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
Not to beat a dead paradox, but the press release is simply unbelievable - I mean how gullible or stupid LSU Media-relation people could be: LSU professor resolves Einstein's twin paradox Note: What every novice who took even an introductory course in relativity would know about Inertial frame of re...
- 21 Feb 2007 01:46
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
- 20 Feb 2007 20:39
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
- 19 Feb 2007 08:00
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
just cause its not doctored doesn't mean its not silly ... :roll: From the link above: In the recent issue of Physical Review Letters, Putterman and Kenneth Suslick ( University of Illinois) report reproducing Taleyarkhan's original sonofusion setup. It didn't work. The experiment is designed to us...
- 19 Feb 2007 07:47
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
- 27 Sep 2005 01:36
- Forum: Military Issues & History Forum
- Topic: 1965 India Pakistan War: Forty Years Since
- Replies: 99
- Views: 85715
Final concluding part http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/27war.htm The Rediff Special/Marshal Arjan Singh 'We didn't want to capture Pakistan' BTW , and in this http://im.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/21gnat.jpg looks familier, because: Photograph: A Gnat being readied for take off. Photograph courtesy:...
- 13 Sep 2005 08:00
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 March 2005
- Replies: 329
- Views: 120506
- 09 Jun 2005 20:10
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 March 2005
- Replies: 329
- Views: 120506
Johann – I do not know much about history, (that’s why I enjoy your posts) but you and others may find it interesting to read the Tsien affair in detail I had some professors who knew him. To call him a brilliant physicist/Engineer would be an understatement He had a prestigious scholarship from MIT...
- 09 Jun 2005 10:46
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 March 2005
- Replies: 329
- Views: 120506
The Chinese test device in 1964 was was an implosion design using uranium, which came as a surprise to the rest of the world. For many it was not a surprise, After all, thanks to McCarthyism, Tsien was deported from USA - and China got a lot delivered on a silver platter (Not only in missles/rocket...
- 08 Jun 2005 23:30
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 March 2005
- Replies: 329
- Views: 120506
the claim here is that centrifuges face technical hurdles that are worse than diffusion pipes Alok - As you say, looking at it as a physicist ( deducing from first principle) it is hard to support that claim. FWIW here are my thoughts Unlike involvement of laser (or similar techniques); where you s...
- 08 Jun 2005 22:08
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 March 2005
- Replies: 329
- Views: 120506
Alok – I think you already know Oak-Ridge Plant employed Diffusion process – Read somewhere that , that and the other (in Washington state) used mega-mega-watts of electricity.. BTW – Russia still has a huge centrifuge industry (Inherited from Soviet Union – their primary way to get HEU was/is centr...
- 08 Jun 2005 21:37
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 31 March 2005
- Replies: 329
- Views: 120506
- 07 May 2005 01:09
- Forum: Military History Archive
- Topic: Lieutenant General Jagjit Singh Aurora - RIP
- Replies: 104
- Views: 80298
Salute to a
Hero
Hero
- 11 Mar 2005 00:20
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 02 October 2004
- Replies: 321
- Views: 110729
Fox news story too: Pakistan: Khan Gave Nuke Material to Iran Pakistan: Khan Gave Nuke Material to Iran Thursday, March 10, 2005 Kashmir Snow Death Toll Nears 300 ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — Pakistan's information minister acknowledged on Thursday that a rogue scientist at the heart of an international nu...
- 12 Jul 2004 02:58
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
Re: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
Sridhar - Thanks for putting the poem here. Really enjoyed it.
BTW - Did I miss Ramanujan in the list?
BTW - Did I miss Ramanujan in the list?
- 12 Jul 2004 02:14
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
Re: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
Originally posted by vishnua: [QB]aryabhata (500 AD) ...Bhaskara (12th century) Mâdhava (c 1340-1425) and Nîlakantha (c 1444-1545), /QB] BTW I some times coach High/middle school math teams amd make a special point to make sure that correct terminlogy is used .. And these terms are being increasing...
- 12 Jul 2004 01:45
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
Re: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
Ok a story about S Chandrasekhar (From an old NY times article): One story in particular illustrates Chandrasekhar's devotion to his science and his students. In the 1940s, while he was based at the University's Yerkes Observatory in Williams Bay, Wis., he drove more than 100 miles round-trip each w...
- 12 Jul 2004 01:31
- Forum: Science, Economics & Technology Forum
- Topic: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
- Replies: 855
- Views: 344829
Re: India's Contribution to Science & Technology
Ashok About your comments about SN Bose, I find a few things hard to believe. (Do you have any references for those comments) About Bohr/Bathroom/housekeeper saga : Nice urban legend but most likely not true. AFAIK Bose has visited Paris (Worked with Mme Curie) and Germany (worked with Einstein) and...
- 17 Mar 2004 03:35
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 02 Mar 2004
- Replies: 326
- Views: 95289
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 02 Mar 2004
is he an SOS or Mush ka Chamcha. Nah.. its just .. May be you are right ... And this from khilafah.com The only reason why these meetings take place is so that the Western powers can order and instruct their subcontractors (the rulers of the Muslims) in order to further their plans to subdue and hu...
- 17 Mar 2004 01:32
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 02 Mar 2004
- Replies: 326
- Views: 95289
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 02 Mar 2004
Oh.. my god! Is he our SOS or Mush chamcha?Mr Powell said Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf was "as determined as we are" to put an end to nuclear proliferation.
- 16 Mar 2004 06:33
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 02 Mar 2004
- Replies: 326
- Views: 95289
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 02 Mar 2004
Price for Pu ( for research purpose etx) is about $15 per gram in open market... If some one is ready to sell it to you.$7000 per gram?
- 11 Mar 2004 01:18
- Forum: BR Nostalgia Archive
- Topic: Top 100,000 Websites: Bharat Rakshak!!!
- Replies: 75
- Views: 101105
Re: Top 100,000 Websites: Bharat Rakshak!!!
Congrats. BTW Shiv, : Well - this only proves to me that I have been right in my personal jihad in not allowing BRF to enter into a stupid and needless competition with unmentionable Paki sites. FWIW I was a little skeptic and thought a few times that you are a little more strict than necessary but ...
- 01 Mar 2004 18:41
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
- Replies: 334
- Views: 105663
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
For what it's worth (again, these are really rough estimates), I think it takes about 200 tons of yellowcake to build 50 bombs worth of HEU. I'll see if I can't track down that source. FWIW - 200 Tons of Yellowcake would give about 120 tons of tuballoy or about 1000 Kg of oralloy.. so 50 bombs seem...
- 01 Mar 2004 01:42
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
- Replies: 334
- Views: 105663
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
GD: What do you think?assuming you posted it seriously
Seriously ( ), ask any Pak expert here, Just because a book is available in Barns and Noble .. do you really think that a pak govt scientis would know that? Fat chance.
- 01 Mar 2004 01:30
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
- Replies: 334
- Views: 105663
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
JEM - Too bad there was no google in 1982.. I just did a google on 'barn' and found this web page among many;.. (Honestly I did not know the origin of the word 'barn' During wartime research on the atomic bomb, American physicists who were bouncing neutrons off uranium nuclei described the uranium n...
- 01 Mar 2004 00:18
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
- Replies: 334
- Views: 105663
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
My understanding was that you had to have a reactor going to generate Pu (that Pu was a fission by-product or processed by-product?) - but that may be wrong, based on what I see everyone saying?? No plutonium expert, (just basic knowledge of Nuclear Physics).. but don't see how one can get Pu (in q...
- 29 Feb 2004 23:56
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
- Replies: 334
- Views: 105663
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 20 Feb 2004
OK, I will bite. Of course, unlike Tim, I would only give facts (and not opinions) :) based upon solid evidence. Since, unlike N^3 some of the evidence may not be as reliable as being told by an alien, :) I would present the evidence, and the rational for reaching the conclusion I am reaching. So yo...
- 11 Feb 2004 07:49
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 07 Feb 2004
- Replies: 354
- Views: 105311
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 07 Feb 2004
along with 300 of Pakistan's best nuclear physicists ... Now as a physics grad student (My degree happens to be in Nuclea physics too) around the same time (in 1972 ) I doubt if there were more than 20 (most likely 10) 'nuclear physicst' (say a PhD) in whole of Pakistan. Any one has any stat on how...
- 07 Feb 2004 06:02
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
- Replies: 339
- Views: 106608
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Don't know if posted earler or not but .. not bad an article in TOI: Reactions to fork-tongued Gen WASHINGTON: Does the Bush administration trust Pakistan's military ruler Pervez Musharraf? Yes. No. Maybe. Perhaps. Sometimes. Occassionally. Er. ... The Pakistani general evokes so much mixed emotions...
- 07 Feb 2004 02:13
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
- Replies: 339
- Views: 106608
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
OK! Everyone rest easy!
Powell says nuclear ring broken
Yes this is straight from Our SOS (C. Powell's) mouth!The biggest (proliferator) is now gone and so we don't have to worry about proliferation from Mr AQ Khan or his network. And this is a success for the international community,
Powell says nuclear ring broken
- 07 Feb 2004 00:09
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
- Replies: 339
- Views: 106608
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
i think the link is posted on page 3 but it does not work for me - tried several times.
http://www.pakistanvision.com/site/
http://www.pakistanvision.com/site/
- 06 Feb 2004 21:52
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
- Replies: 339
- Views: 106608
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Can you? ..Please!!! (I have tried to listen but no luck - the link - for me - does not work -- is there any place where the transcripts are?.. Thanks.Sridhar,
Can we translate the Mushy press conf for the benefit of all? Thanks, ramana
- 06 Feb 2004 08:29
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
- Replies: 339
- Views: 106608
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
You got it all wrong.. according to Qazi-uvach "tip of the iceberg" means it is not only Pakistan but many many other nations are involved.. :whine:Mr Khan is the tip of the iceberg
- 06 Feb 2004 07:35
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
- Replies: 339
- Views: 106608
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Come on folks - Pakistan has come clean, Yes. How bold and straight-forward Pak is. Now it is Inida's turn and they should start investigating their scientists starting with Kalam. Everyone knows that India is known to be a "terrific" prolifilator and they are the one who are close to Ira...
- 05 Feb 2004 19:59
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
- Replies: 339
- Views: 106608
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 04 Feb 2004
Sorry to show my ignorance, but is he the same Tikka Khan as the 71 mass murderer?Since 1947 Pakistan had 13 Commanders-in-Chief/Chiefs of Army Staff.
7. Gen. Tikka Khan (1972-1976) ? A Punjabi
- 29 Jan 2004 20:23
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 22 Jan 2004
- Replies: 325
- Views: 97256
Re: Pakistan Nuclear Proliferation - 22 Jan 2004
Don't know if this is news to many (I have heard that before) From Rediff: Ex-colleague spills beans on A Q Khan A former friend and colleague has made sensational disclosures about how Dr Abdul Qader Khan -- 'father' of Pakistan's nuclear programme -- stole blueprints and classified components from...