Search found 2778 matches
- 17 Sep 2009 11:54
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
3) The way Indian establishement works he would have also been told a lot of details by BARC people themselves (not the top ones) -- check -- refer to the fact that he says that BARC radiologists say that the measurement they gave to Raja Ramana and the one publicly announced to the world by RC wer...
- 17 Sep 2009 11:36
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Barrak Hussain Obama presiding in UNSC and crafted this draft Draft of U.N. Security Council Resolution on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Nuclear Disarmament. the target of this UNSC draft is only India. In particular the following two articles 15, 17 are highly damaging to Indian interests and plugs/...
- 17 Sep 2009 10:58
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
I just hope the govt withstands the pressure of the "Need to test" lobby. Oh yeah. CTBT or not, India's weapon capability , just like everyone else's is frozen at current levels. But dayumm.. One chance Vajpayee gave to the BARC dudes, and they blew it. That is the line I have been parrot...
- 17 Sep 2009 10:55
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Since I am not affiliated to government in anyway and have no access to secrets, I can only say highly probable.ramdas wrote:Arunji,
According to you, are any FBF weapons based on the S-1 primary weaponized and deployed ?
- 17 Sep 2009 10:53
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
How many MIRV can the Agni-5 carry with 25kT yeald/weight , onleee 3 ? Correct, 3 MIRV with Indian payload designed for Agni-II. It was confirmed to me by a senior DRDO scientist (on record, no OSA WOSHA secret) who was also at Pok-II few years ago, and that is the reason it is depicted as such on ...
- 17 Sep 2009 10:46
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Santhanam's article clears some things up, but creates some more confusions.. BARC claimed the fission weapons yield was 15KT, Santhanam says it was 25KT, why the discrepancy here? :-? Perhaps the FBF primary of the S1 experiment has been deployed as the weapon and not the 15KT weapon in TajMahal s...
- 17 Sep 2009 10:03
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
The 25 kT he is talking is the S1 weapon as it is was tested.
- 17 Sep 2009 05:02
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Oh Ramaaa ..... As my sources said, KSanthnam has key data (as life insurance) and will disclose if necessary. Dr. K. Santanama has now ripped the lies of BA RC /Chidambaram/Brijesh Mishra to shreds. Emperor is now totally naked. http://www.hindu.com/2009/09/17/stories/2009091751550900.htm Pokhran-I...
- 17 Sep 2009 04:23
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Being rosey and being positive are two different things. The author is negative. OK it was initially a tangetial cacoon argument. Now somethign else. Bottom line is: Is the author factual? Some delinquents respond to loving suggestion, others to criticism, and yet other to chastisement. An author m...
- 17 Sep 2009 04:12
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
How many projects did the ex-DRDO scientist deliver on his own time commitment for those killed weapons import? I do not recall even ONE. IOW failed in his own terms of measurement matrices. Yes, IGMDP missile project under Kalam had delays. Same is true with Russian missile programmes. They faced ...
- 17 Sep 2009 02:48
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
You are suggesting to continue to live in make believe feel good cocoon of we live in country of honey and milk. Just like No Korea, TSP and USA. Some people call that living in fool's paradise. In early 1990's, the act of turning down American WLR offer wasn't honey and cocoon. It was bitter only ...
- 17 Sep 2009 02:37
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Just look objectively at teh facts he presents and see if the facts are worg, in which case teh conclusion he make could be wrong. Ok, lets get him one by one. 1. He quoted the facts but gave those facts a negative twist, to push his psy-op propaganda against an ex-DRDO scientist who killed weapons...
- 17 Sep 2009 02:22
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
This Manoj Joshi fits in the pattern which is part of keeping Indian media full of negative news and feeding Indian youth depressing picture of National security. That helps fasten the process of brain-drain through making youth depressive and hopeless of their country's future. You are suggesting ...
- 17 Sep 2009 01:58
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
The issue is not "belief" but validation - by Manoj Joshi IMO, the writer must been high when he wrote the article. Article is depressing in tone and full of twisted facts. The case he is supporting is good, that is of validation of nuclear tests yield but he is using this to demean whole...
- 17 Sep 2009 01:52
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
The issue is not "belief" but validation - by Manoj Joshi IMO, the writer must been high when he wrote the article. Article is depressing in tone and full of twisted facts. The case he is supporting is good, that is of validation of nuclear tests yield but he is using this to demean whole...
- 17 Sep 2009 01:45
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Arun, using LEU helps in allowing more reaction time for the operator? hence better safety margin for the plant? for us, plutonium isn't abundant either unless there is clarity on the reprocessing rights of imported uranium LEU has nothing to do with reaction time for operator or plant safety. Pls ...
- 17 Sep 2009 00:54
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News And Discussion
- Replies: 4936
- Views: 797346
Re: India Nuclear News And Discussion
I will highlight the parts that is deterimental to Indian interests: United States Draft UNSC Resolution on Nuclear Nonproliferation and Nuclear Disarmament The Security Council, PP1. Resolving to seek a safer world for all and to create the conditions for a world without nuclear weapons, in accorda...
- 17 Sep 2009 00:15
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: India Nuclear News And Discussion
- Replies: 4936
- Views: 797346
Re: India Nuclear News And Discussion
Something in line with what I was proposing an year ago as the intermediate solution where PHWR can be run in mixed mode, and while AHWR funding approval awaits on MMS desk for the last 4 years. However the most cost effective, compact and Thorium efficient reactor however will be the type that uses...
- 17 Sep 2009 00:08
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Here's something from the other side of the 'nuclear testing coin', the 3 stage nuclear power program reaching a milestone http://www.indianexpress.com/news/india-designs-new-atomic-reactor-for-thorium-utilisation/517864/ which is on top of deals to obtain Uranium Something in line with what I was ...
- 16 Sep 2009 23:52
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
Cross positing my post from POK-II fizzle thread: ----------------------------------------------- If you recall the old days when Prithvi I was said to be able to carry a 1 ton payload 150 Km. Later we heard about Prithvi II with 500 Kg payload and 250 Km. Doesn't it seem absurd to have these stupid...
- 16 Sep 2009 23:02
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: INS Arihant (ATV) News and Discussion -2
- Replies: 4158
- Views: 1199201
Re: INS Arihant (ATV) News and Discussion -2
Cross positing my post from POK-II fizzle thread: ----------------------------------------------- If you recall the old days when Prithvi I was said to be able to carry a 1 ton payload 150 Km. Later we heard about Prithvi II with 500 Kg payload and 250 Km. Doesn't it seem absurd to have these stupid...
- 16 Sep 2009 22:13
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
This document is signed by K.Muralidhar on 15 Sept 09, it has obviously gone through a time-warp: "Later , at meetings of the AEC held on March 26, 1999 and Nov 18, 1999, results of radio-chemical analaysis of bore-hole samples confirming the estimated yield were presented to the Commission&quo...
- 16 Sep 2009 21:59
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
India has an explicit agreement with IAEA and NSG and US which says that certain facilities are under safeguards. Period. IOW, this is what NWS do. Lesson: India is NWS. There is absolutely no grounds for US/P5 to ask P6 to place ALL under safeguards - it is up to the P6th to say :P to that. Comple...
- 16 Sep 2009 21:48
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
N^3, Although I agree with pretty much everything you state, what is your 'game plan'. What is it you would want the next move Obama makes? Clearly Omaba has the lead (and the mike, etc). He is trying to force the issue because he has the attention. However, everything there was very predictable - ...
- 16 Sep 2009 09:37
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Obama has made no move to abrogate the nuclear deal and reimpose the NSG full scope rules. He tried and seems to have failed - at the G8. I can see him splitting the entire topic and getting what he can. Then he will repeat the process and go as far as he can. He will never threaten India (or Pak/I...
- 15 Sep 2009 21:55
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
The flux compressor generator stuff, as reported, doesn't yield anything practical. It has a long history, starting with experiments on magnetic flux compression (liner implosion) using Hi explosives, which dates back to the late 1960's and early 1970's at Frascati in Italy. The work was abruptly st...
- 15 Sep 2009 00:58
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: Indian Naval Discussion
- Replies: 3938
- Views: 1470586
Re: Indian Naval Discussion
Cross posting from MRCA thread ------------------------------------- Amongst the candidates in MRCA competition F-18 is unique in that it also carries a deadly trojen horse with direct link to massa with capabelity to snoop and disrupt Indian of Network Centric infrastructure, and remote control. In...
- 15 Sep 2009 00:56
- Forum: Trash Can Archive
- Topic: MRCA News and Discussion
- Replies: 3260
- Views: 885604
Re: MRCA News and Discussion
Amongst the candidates in MRCA competition F-18 is unique in that it also carries a deadly trojen horse with direct link to massa with capabelity to snoop and disrupt Indian of Network Centric infrastructure, and remote control. India should keep it a pole's distance. Indian Navy is the first one to...
- 14 Sep 2009 23:52
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
OK. Harpoon is turbojet powered missile with a solid fuel booster for surface and underwater launch. Lengthening the turbo jet portion to add extra fuel would also add weight which the solid booster has to accomodate and all this requies launch validation. And not to mention needs new computer soft...
- 14 Sep 2009 21:37
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
It is time for the government to set up an independent evaluation group, comprising scientists, experts and the armed forces, to assure themselves and the nation that the weapons systems constituting our nuclear deterrent are battleworthy. Then the armed forces must take ownership and be held to ac...
- 14 Sep 2009 21:28
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Reality is more dynamic, probabilistic and involved. Still - if anyone can get fusion to start at the center of a hollow pit within a Pu primary before the periphery then fusion would be easy to achieve and this thread would not exist. Possible but only if you want to burn few micrograms of fusion ...
- 14 Sep 2009 08:39
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
The proliferation of nukes is a bit like swine flu. First the WHO tried localization - but that failed and it became a pandemic. Nukes to are heading that way. Nations with nukes are desperately trying to keep nukes localized and available only to a few. But that is not working because, in the ulti...
- 14 Sep 2009 08:30
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
BTW IIRC most weapons are designed with safeing method that relies on Boosting gas as a critical safeing element. In those FBF weapons the first few generations of fission be near core center. If fission starts at the core, the expansion will be outwards and tend to interfere with compression and c...
- 14 Sep 2009 06:49
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
The highlighted part is incorrect. In boosted fission there is no staging/sequence the way you put it. The fission never stops from beginning to end, while fusion is a brief flash in the beginning of fission Sorry sir. Your statement is correct but that does not make what I have written wrong. I go...
- 14 Sep 2009 05:48
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Playing poker with Pokhran, September 13th, 2009 , Deccan Chronicle. Indeed, according to strategic affairs researcher Bharat Karnad, Chidambaram, who argued even before the 1998 tests that explosive testing is unnecessary and that India could build a nuclear arsenal using computer simulations alon...
- 14 Sep 2009 04:58
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
Re Shiv Actually the nuclear physics package or the TN device itself is very small, something like 50kg for modern 100kt device. As a thumb rule (based on a link above) 50% of the payload should be nuclear payload while 50% of the nuclear device should be the "physics package". In case of...
- 14 Sep 2009 04:21
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
If you recall the old days when Prithvi I was said to be able to carry a 1 ton payload 150 Km. Later we heard about Prithvi II with 500 Kg payload and 250 Km. Doesn't it seem absurd to have these stupidly small ranges? Even a MiG 21 can carry a bigger load of conventional weapons for a longer dista...
- 13 Sep 2009 23:01
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
I would guess that Indian weapons are heavier and may (I am guessing) give yields of 60-80 kiloton at weights of 500 kg. Probably mostly fission and boosted fission (which is fission-fusion-fission ). The highlighted part is incorrect. In boosted fission there is no staging/sequence the way you put...
- 13 Sep 2009 01:14
- Forum: Mil-Tech Archive
- Topic: Indian Missiles and Munitions Discussion
- Replies: 2936
- Views: 1027042
Re: Indian Missile Technology Discussion
U.S. Says Pakistan has modified the Harpoon antiship missiles to Attack Land Targets http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/world/asia/30missile.html?hp At issue is the detection by American intelligence agencies of a suspicious missile test on April 23 — a test never announced by the Pakistanis — that ...
- 13 Sep 2009 00:56
- Forum: Nuclear Issues Archive
- Topic: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
- Replies: 2359
- Views: 413798
Re: Pokhran II not fully successful: Scientist - Part-2
It cant be masked as 30 kT period !! Yes but Seismologists may be tempted to admit that there are error margins is all seismological estimates. If they say 50 to 150 kt we will have to test 1 megaton so that they can say 200 kt to 1 megaton. Shiv ji, clever to switch context. So let me set you back...