Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Vips
BRFite
Posts: 1716
Joined: 14 Apr 2017 18:23

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby Vips » 31 Dec 2018 22:01

Pak BAT action foiled: Army used Quadcopters to locate attackers terrorists corpse.

Quadcopters were used to locate the dead bodies of suspected Pakistani soldiers, who were gunned down by the Indian Army while foiling an attempt by Pakistani Border Action Team (BAT) to carry out an attack across the LoC (Pic source: Army)

Image

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 19 Feb 2019 23:26

X Posted from the Pakistani Role In Global Terrorism thread.

Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour of Irans Revolutionary Guards says the suicide bomber who carried out a car bomb attack targeting the Revolutionary Guard on February 13th was a citizen of the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan by name of Hafiz Mohammad Ali:

Suicide bomber was a Pakistani, Iran's Revolutionary Guard claims

Three Iranians were also part of the cell behind the deadly February 13 attack, says a senior military official. ……..

The suicide bomber who killed 27 members of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guard last week was a Pakistani, a senior commander for the force has alleged.

Two other members of the cell behind the attack in the country's southeastern Sistan-Baluchestan province, which borders Pakistan, were also Pakistani nationals, local media reported Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour as saying on Tuesday.

Pakpour identified the attacker as Hafiz Mohammad Ali, who Iranian officials claim also wounded 13 other members of the Revolutionary Guards in the suicide car bomb attack on February 13. ……..


From Al Jazeera:

Suicide bomber was a Pakistani, Iran's Revolutionary Guard claims

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 22 Feb 2019 21:50

Peregrine wrote:China's opposition to mentioning of terrorism delayed UNSC statement on Pulwama – PTI

NEW DELHI: China's lone opposition in the 15-member UN Security Council to any mention of terrorism resulted in a delay of nearly one week in issuance of a statement by the powerful body on the dastardly Pulwama terror attack, official sources said here on Friday.

However, the US assiduously worked as "pen holder" making various adjustments to get the approval by all other members of the Council, the sources told PTI.

While China was trying to water down the UNSC statement on Pulwama Pakistan , worked against issuance of any statement. Pakistan's Permanent representative at the UN Maleeha Lodhi even met the president of Security Council but her efforts did not bear any fruit, they said.

The UN Security Council comprising 15 permanent and non-permanent members on Thursday condemned in the "strongest terms" the "heinous and cowardly" terror attack perpetrated by Pakistan-based terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) on February 14.

Sharing details of diplomatic wranglings on the matter, the sources said the UNSC statement on Pulwama was to be issued on the evening of February 15 but China repeatedly sought extension of timing.

China requested extension till Feb 18 when 14 member countries were ready to issue it on February 15 itself," they said, adding China broke "silence" procedure two times suggesting multiple amendments aiming to "derail" the effort.

Even after UNSC condemned the Pulwama strike as "terrorism" China continued to oppose any mention of terrorism in the statement, said a person familiar with the diplomatic parleys on the issue at the UN headquarters.

However, notwithstanding hectic Chinese and Pakistani efforts, the UNSC agreed to issue the first statement in its history regarding an attack on Indian troops in Jammu and Kashmir, the sources said.

India has mounted a diplomatic offensive to isolate Pakistan in the international community for its support to terror groups and cross border terrorism.

Official sources said the UNSC statement contained specific language proposed by India through its partner countries including naming of JeM, and calling for bringing the perpetrators of the crime to justice.

In the statement, the UNSC also reaffirmed that terrorism in all its forms and manifestations constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security and underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of these reprehensible acts of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice.

The UNSC also urged all States, in accordance with their obligations under international law and relevant Security Council resolutions, to cooperate actively with India and all other relevant authorities to bring perpetrators of the Pulwama attack to justice.

It also reiterated that any acts of terrorism are criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of their motivation, wherever, whenever and by whomsoever committed.

In Video: China's lone opposition to mentioning of terrorism delayed UNSC statement on Pulwama

Cheers Image



The UN Security Council Press Statement the PRC was trying to bowdlerize on behalf of its client, the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan:



SC/13712
21 FEBRUARY 2019
SECURITY COUNCIL

Security Council Press Statement on Suicide Bombing in Jammu and Kashmir

The following Security Council press statement was issued today by Council President Anatolio Ndong Mba (Equatorial Guinea):

The members of the Security Council condemned in the strongest terms the heinous and cowardly suicide bombing in Jammu and Kashmir, which resulted in over 40 Indian paramilitary forces dead and dozens wounded on 14 February 2019, for which Jaish-e-Mohammed has claimed responsibility.

The members of the Security Council expressed their deepest sympathy and condolences to the families of the victims, as well as to the Indian people and the Government of India, and wished a speedy and full recovery to those who were injured.

The members of the Security Council reaffirmed that terrorism in all its forms and manifestations constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security.

The members of the Security Council underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organizers, financiers and sponsors of these reprehensible acts of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice, and urged all States, in accordance with their obligations under international law and relevant Security Council resolutions, to cooperate actively with the Government of India and all other relevant authorities in this regard.

The members of the Security Council reiterated that any acts of terrorism are criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of their motivation, wherever, whenever and by whomsoever committed. They reaffirmed the need for all States to combat by all means, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and other obligations under international law, including international human rights law, international refugee law and international humanitarian law, threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts.

For information media. Not an official record :-? .


From UN Website here:

https://www.un.org/press/en/2019/sc13712.doc.htm

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 23 Feb 2019 09:20

X Posted from the Pulwama Attack thread.

PRC does its Great Wall of China Act to protect client State, the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan, that there is no significance to the UN Security Council naming Pakistan based Islamic Terrorist organisation, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) as responsible for the Pulwama Islamic Terrorist attack:

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang's Regular Press Conference on February 22, 2019

Q: The United Nations Security Council yesterday issued a press statement on the attack in India-controlled Kashmir, identifying Jaish-e-Mohammed as responsible for the attack. Does this mean that the Security Council now has evidence in hand to prove that JeM is the perpetrator of the attack? What are your comments?

A: China has been closely following the development of this recent attack. In yesterday's Security Council press statement, a specific organization was mentioned, but it was a general statement rather than a judgment. The Chinese side has noted that the Pakistani government expressed its will to coordinate with India in the investigation and seek to resolve differences through dialogue. Parties concerned should conduct objective and unbiased investigation to find out the truth. China hopes that India and Pakistan can exercise restraint, engage in dialogues and make joint efforts to preserve peace and stability of the region.


From here:

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang's Regular Press Conference on February 22, 2019

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 27 Feb 2019 11:56

X Posted from the Terroristan thread.

Balakot Islamic Terrorist training camp strike by India is described by the US Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo in his statement as “Indian counter-terrorism actions”.

Demands the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan take steps for “de-escalating current tensions by avoiding military action” and also takes “meaningful action against terrorist groups operating on its soil”.

Pompeo’s statement is not the usual equal=equal US statements of old.


Concern Regarding India-Pakistan Tensions

Press Statement
Michael R. Pompeo
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
February 26, 2019

Following Indian counter-terrorism actions on February 26, I spoke with Indian Minister of External Affairs Swaraj to emphasize our close security partnership and shared goal of maintaining peace and security in the region. I also spoke to Pakistani Foreign Minister Qureshi to underscore the priority of de-escalating current tensions by avoiding military action, and the urgency of Pakistan taking meaningful action against terrorist groups operating on its soil. I expressed to both Ministers that we encourage India and Pakistan to exercise restraint, and avoid escalation at any cost. I also encouraged both Ministers to prioritize direct communication and avoid further military activity.


From US State Department here:

Concern Regarding India-Pakistan Tensions

UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11383
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby UlanBatori » 07 Mar 2019 07:41

Usual stopwatch time: Hours/seconds until Paki ties revealed:

Pakis send flowers to Bilayat to inflate trains (and stations)

three "small improvised explosives," one of which partially exploded, were discovered after being sent to major transport hubs in London on Tuesday, police said. No one was injured and no arrests have been made, though the Metropolitan Police are working with the U.K.'s counter-terror forces in the ongoing inquiry. "The packages -- all A4-sized white postal bags containing yellow Jiffy bags -- have been assessed by specialist officers to be small improvised explosive devices," London's Metropolitan Police said in a statement. "These devices, at this early stage of the investigation, appear capable of igniting an initially small fire when opened."


Good IED-makers are evidently hard to find these days after Syria ISIS and J-e-M pest-e-sha'eed.

UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11383
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby UlanBatori » 07 Mar 2019 08:58

Hain" SDREs in Bilayat?

UK counter-terror chief Neil Basu
:eek: :((

Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13271
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby Lalmohan » 07 Mar 2019 14:46

the devices in London are being alleged to be related to irish terror organisation(s)

Lilo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4060
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 09:08

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby Lilo » 07 Mar 2019 16:17

x-post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPZLL3e-sYE

"Pakistan Intelligence Used Jaish For Bomb blasts In India: Pervez Musharraf"

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 09 Mar 2019 11:10

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has reportedly placed 18 conditions that the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan needs to comply with prior to the next scheduled FATF soiree at Colombo in May / June 2019:

FATF adds three more conditions for Pakistan to comply with

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 09 Mar 2019 22:55

X Posted from the Terroristan thread.

Finance Minister of the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Asad Umar, in his Twitter account writes that he has written to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) President to remove India from the position of co-chair for the Pakistan FATF review.

Al La Ham Sandwich, Asad Umar and the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan will be thwarted:

I have written to the FATF president to remove India from the position of co chair for the Pakistan FATF review. India has blatantly abused its position by lobbying to get Pakistan blacklisted in the last review in Paris. We successfully defended our position Alhamdulillah


From Twitter here:

Clicky

UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11383
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby UlanBatori » 10 Mar 2019 05:19

co chair for the Pakistan FATF review.
Really? :rotfl:

UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11383
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby UlanBatori » 10 Mar 2019 05:21

Lalmohan wrote:the devices in London are being alleged to be related to irish terror organisation(s)

What Irish terrorism? Why would they even get into this bijnej, with BREXIT imminent? It is code no doubt. Didn't know that L-e-T had a Belfast branch.

chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19312
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby chetak » 11 Mar 2019 00:04

twitter


Image

UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11383
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby UlanBatori » 11 Mar 2019 06:49

Is it my computer/browser or do twitter links and Image links not show up?

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 11 Mar 2019 10:07

X Posted from the Terroristan thread.

Joh Lahore Mein Gaan*u Woh London mein bhi Gaan*u Hai. Indulging in the national pastime of the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan catches up with two sisters who have their UK Citizenship Revoked:

Britain Removes Citizenship Of 2 Pakistan-Origin ISIS Brides: Report

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 29 Mar 2019 14:12

Policy of the Sunni Punjabi Military Dominated Deep State of the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan of supporting “Strategic Asset” Islamic Terrorist to harm neighbouring countries comes in for stick from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) affiliated Asia Pacific Group (APG). Presence of 2 of 4 Fathers, namely PRC and Turkey, on the APG delegation does not seem to have provided wiggle room for the Islamic Republic.

Various articles from what passes for the Main Stream English language media of the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan follow.

1.Editorial in Daily Times:

Sustained effort required

2.Business Recorder:

Country needs to make ”considerable” progress prior to next FATF meeting

3.Geo News:

FATF expresses dissatisfaction over action against outlawed groups in Pakistan: sources

4.Daily Times:

FATF affiliate disappointed with Pakistan’s effort to block banned groups funding

5.Dawn:

APG dissatisfied over Pakistan’s compliance with commitments

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 29 Mar 2019 14:14

Meanwhile the UN Security Council passes a binding resolution under Chapter VII making Terror Financing a sanctionable offence to ensure countries like the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan crack down on the practise.

UN Security Council binding resolution makes terror financing a serious crime

India takes the opportunity to take a dig at “serial offenders”. Unfortunately the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan was not named by India:

As UN pushes nations to crack down on terror funding, India targets ‘serial offender’ Pak

The Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan has not missed out the thrust of the message in the UNSC Chapter VII resolution as evidenced by the reaction of its thesis plagiarising Ambassador to the UN:

Pakistan warns against politicisation of UN’s counter-terrorism regime

"It is important that current structures like FATF (Financial Action Task Force) and the 1267 Sanctions regimes are not used as political tools by some to advance their geopolitical goals,"


"Yet killings continue in occupied Jammu and Kashmir and Palestine,"


:wink: The below demand of the Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan should be granted with specific reference to the Sunni Punjabi Military’s genocidal actions in suppressing Baloch, Pathan Mohajir and Sindhi aspirations for freedom. Thereafter one could look into the facilitating of freedom aspirations of Uighurs and Tibetian’s from the Hans of the PRC and that of the Kurds and Azheri’s from the Turks of Turkey. Off course Pakistan will also have to stop supporting momin brother Azerbaijan’s claim over the Armenian dominated enclave of Nagorno Karabakh at the OIC and elsewhere:

"Brutalization and oppression of people struggling for their legitimate right to self-determination constitutes state terrorism. This too should be the focus of international attention."

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 29 Mar 2019 14:28

X Posted from the Pakistan Economic Stress Watch thread.

The dreamed for low cost option of the Sunni Punjabi Military Dominated Deep State of the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic of promoting “Strategic Assets” to indulge in Islamic Terrorism targeting neighbouring countries, continues to exact a high cost for the economy:

Stocks shed gains as MSCI, FATF concerns send investors packing

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 29 Mar 2019 17:19

X Posted from the Neutering and Defanging Chinese Threat thread.

PRC going to bat gang busters for Islamic Terrorism with roots in the Deeper than Indian Ocean, Higher than Himalaya’s, Sweeter than Honey, As Close as Lips to Teeth, Stronger than Steel, Iron Brother, the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang's Regular Press Conference on March 28, 2019 …..

Q: So the US has circulated a draft resolution to UN Security Council to blacklist Masood Azhar. Given that China has vetoed past actions to add Masood Azhar to the sanctions blacklist, what is China's response to this recent draft resolution?

A: I will need to correct you. China has not vetoed anything relating to this matter. We put a hold on the application and voiced a different view in the sanctions committee. It's something completely different from a veto in the Security Council.

Follow-up: You are saying that China has never blocked actions to add Azhar to the sanctions blacklist?

A: You are referring to the 1267 Committee. That and the Security Council, to which your original question is related, are two different levels.

Follow-up: Can you then just comment on this draft resolution to the UN Security Council?

A: The request to designate Masood a global terrorist was put forward to the Security Council 1267 Committee not long ago. China has put a technical hold on the application as more time is needed for a comprehensive and thorough assessment. This is in line with the rules of procedure of the 1267 Committee and there are many such precedents.

The Masood designation issue involves a series of complicated factors. China has noted that relevant parties have expressed willingness to conduct dialogue and consultation. China has also been promoting proper settlement of the issue through dialogue. Under current circumstances, the Security Council should act prudently and play a constructive role by allowing time and space for dialogue and consultation between parties concerned.

The US is bypassing the 1267 Committee by putting forward its draft resolution directly to the Security Council. Such an act will do nothing to facilitate a solution through consultation and will only lead to further complication of the issue. It has undermined the authority of the 1267 Committee as a main counter-terrorism agency at the Security Council and is not conducive to upholding the unity of the Security Council.

China urges the US to respect the will and efforts of parties to the issue and observe traditions of the Security Council to safeguard the 1267 Committee's authority and the Security Council's unity. We hope the US will by all means exercise prudence and refrain from forceful actions.


From the same press conference championing Islamic Terrorism, PRC shows a lack of love for her own Uighur Mohammaddens and refuses to own up to the abuses the PRC has dished out to the Uighurs:

Q: After meeting with people who accounted "abuses" while being held in one of China's "reeducation centers" for Uyghurs, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo denounced China's treatment of Muslims. I wonder if you could comment on this.

A: The Xinjiang affairs are purely China's internal affairs. Xinjiang currently enjoys social stability, good momentum for economic growth and harmony among all ethnic groups. Residents there now have a much stronger sense of security and fulfillment. Xinjiang has taken preventive measures by setting up the vocational and educational training centers for counter-terrorism and de-radicalization purposes. Such lawful measures have been endorsed by people of all ethnic groups and delivered social benefits.

Facts speak volumes that the vocational and educational training centers are by no means the so-called "reeducation camps" painted by the US and other Western countries. China deplores and firmly opposes the absurd remarks made by some US individuals on Xinjiang, which constitute gross interference in China's internal affairs. We have made stern representations to the US side.

China never accepts the false accusations and slanders made by the US against the Chinese government and its Xinjiang policies. Once again we urge the US to respect the facts, abandon bias, exercise prudence in its words and deeds, stop tarnishing and making unfounded accusations against China and using Xinjiang-related affairs as tools to interfere in China's internal affairs, and make efforts to enhance China-US cooperation and mutual trust instead of the contrary.


From PRC Foreign Ministry website here:

[url=https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/2511_665403/t1649338.shtml][b]Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang's Regular Press Conference on March 28, 2019

Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66605
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby Singha » 31 Mar 2019 14:11

https://www.aninews.in/news/world/asia/ ... 331075957/

reign of terror and disappeared people in balochistan.

in other news, afghan vp Dostum narrowly escaped an attack on his convoy in balkh province yesterday. some of his bodyguards was killed.

yensoy
BRFite
Posts: 1340
Joined: 29 May 2002 11:31
Location: USA

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby yensoy » 31 Mar 2019 22:04

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-middle-east-47764792/is-defeat-british-fighters-emerge-after-fall-of-baghuz

Former Londonistan police cadet turned true paki Hamza Parvez, enuf said.

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 01 Apr 2019 08:58

X Posted from the Neutering and Defanging Chinese Threat thread.

Wash, rinse, repeat.

Second day in a row for PRC going to bat gang busters for Islamic Terrorism with roots in the Deeper than Indian Ocean, Higher than Himalaya’s, Sweeter than Honey, As Close as Lips to Teeth, Stronger than Steel, Iron Brother, the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan:

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang's Regular Press Conference on March 29, 2019
2019/03/29 ……………………

Q: I've got a short one. This has been repeatedly brought up in recent days. China is accused of shielding terrorists for putting on hold the request to blacklist Masood in the UN Security Council 1267 Committee. I wonder what is your response?

A: Putting a technical hold is consistent with the 1267 Committee rules. It is not China that has put more technical holds than any other country in recent years in the committee. If China is accused of shielding terrorists, all countries having put technical holds must receive the same sentence. Following that logic, won't the country that has put more technical holds than any other country be called the top protector of terrorism?

China has put a technical hold on the relevant request in the 1267 Committee not long ago to get more time for a comprehensive and thorough review and to allow time and space for dialogue and consultation between relevant parties.

China has been in close contact with the parties concerned for a proper solution through dialogue. We hope all Security Council members can work together to this end.

Q: A follow-up on the 1267 Committee. When China put a technical hold in February, it had actually sought time to explain the rationale behind this move. Have you prepared your response regarding the rationale for your putting a technical hold on the proposal?

A: China has been in close contact with the relevant parties. Like we said, we will continue to play a responsible and constructive role in the 1267 Committee discussions. We also hope all relevant parties can work together for a proper solution.

Q: One very important aspect in all the four technical holds China put up on this particular issue is about providing evidence and the discussions between the two parties. Now whatever evidence India has provided like in the previous cases, Pakistan always came back to say that it is not enough. Don't you think it is also incumbent on the particular country which is facing the allegations to also probe and and provide evidence and those countries which are supporting the particular country to also take interest in that?

A: The 1267 Committee has clear criteria for the listing procedures. What China did conforms with Security Council resolutions and the 1267 Committee's rules of procedure.

As we have continuously emphasized, we will continue to play a responsible, constructive role and maintain communication with the relevant parties for a proper solution.


Second day in row and from the same press conference championing Islamic Terrorism, PRC shows a lack of love for her own Uighur Mohammaddens and refuses to own up to the abuses the PRC has dished out to the Uighurs:

Q: At yesterday's US State Department press briefing, Sam Brownback, ambassador-at-large for international religious freedom, when talking about Xinjiang, said that "it's not just the camps anymore and people are limited on their movement in and out of the villages in that region". Do you have any comment?

A: China strongly rejects the remarks by the US ambassador-at-large for international religious freedom. Xinjiang currently enjoys social stability, good momentum for economic and social growth and harmony among all ethnic groups. Residents there now have a much stronger sense of security and fulfillment. China is firmly opposed to US interference in China's domestic affairs using Xinjiang as a pretext.

Q: My media organizations have interviewed Uygurs in Turkey claiming they have been tortured in " re-education camps" in Xinjiang. What is your response to these allegations? Second, when will international journalists and observers be allowed to visit these camps in Xinjiang that you say are training facilities?

A: You haven't been around lately, have you? I have answered many similar questions.

I do wonder why some journalists choose to believe the made-up stories of a handful of individuals overseas. Are you so sure they are telling the truth? Why on earth would you believe certain individuals' fake stories over the official statements of a responsible government? Truly, your judgment is beyond me.

As to visits to vocational education and training centers in Xinjiang, any follower of latest news or our press conferences will have noted that China has organized many such trips for foreign diplomats in China, foreign media and other foreign delegations. After seeing for themselves Xinjiang's social stability and people's sense of fulfillment, many of them commended China's Xinjiang policies. You may look for the wide news coverage of that online.


Both excerpts from PRC Foreign Ministry website here:

Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Geng Shuang's Regular Press Conference on March 29, 2019

Previous days PRC comment posted here BRF:

BRF Clicky

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby arun » 03 Apr 2019 15:25

Tooba Gondal, described earlier by Vice in a separate Dec 20, 2016 article (Clicky) as “a 22-year-old French-born, British - Pakistani woman who grew up in east London” and who acted as recruiter of other sisterly momina’s for supplying terrestrial houris for the sexual gratification of male members of the Sunni Mohammadden Terrorism Group, Islamic State, is begging to return to Kaafir Non Mohammadden Islamic Emirate of England, held Scotland, occupied Wales and English Administered Ireland.

The Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan must do its self imposed IEDological Mohammadden duty and stop this grovelling of a sisterly momina before Kaafirs by providing shelter for this other “Daughter of Pakistan”, within the Islamic Republic itself:

Tooba Gondal: Female British Isis recruiter asks to return to UK saying ‘we just want a normal life’ : Former London student previously radicalised teenagers online, while brandishing an AK-47 and claiming she wanted to become a ‘martyr’

Vips
BRFite
Posts: 1716
Joined: 14 Apr 2017 18:23

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby Vips » 01 May 2019 19:47

Masood Azhar designated as global terrorist by UN.

In a major diplomatic victory for India, Jaish-e-Mohammad chief Masood Azhar was on May 1 listed as a "designated" global terrorist by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) 1267 Al-Qaeda Sanctions Committee.

JeM had claimed responsibility for the deadly Pulwama terror attack that had martyred 40 of India's security personnel.

The listing comes after China lifted its technical hold, placed on March 13, on the move sponsored by the United States, United Kingdom and France.

A UNSC designation will subject Azhar to an assets freeze, travel ban and an arms embargo.

The US, the UK and France had, this time around, stepped up pressure on Beijing by taking the issue directly to the UNSC. Though China can exercise its veto power as a permanent member of the UNSC, Beijing had staunchly opposed the issue to be taken to the apex UN body as it had to publically explain its stand on its reservations to list Azhar, whose group JeM has already been designated as terror outfit by UN, before exercising its veto.

Vips
BRFite
Posts: 1716
Joined: 14 Apr 2017 18:23

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby Vips » 01 May 2019 20:20

The paki tradition of claiming victory in defeat continues... :rotfl: ]

Senior politician and geo-strategic analyst Jan Achakzai shared reports received through diplomatic channels that indicate that Pakistan is “on the verge of a big diplomatic breathtaking” against Indian narrative of Pakistan’s refusal to eliminate extremist groups and the listing of Masood Azhar.


Diplomat and political adviser Achakzai revealed, in a series of tweets that, the issue of Maulana Masood Azhar is “almost resolved”. He indicated that a “compromise has been reached” and this compromise is “unprecedented”.

Mr. Achakzai went onto reveal that Islamabad has agreed to place Masood Azhar on the terrorist list as per the UN Committee terrorist listing in its “bid to prevent going to the UNSC”. He added that while Pakistan has agreed to this listing, it has chosen its own “timing.” Achakzai stated, “Pakistan is only suggesting appropriate time. It (Islamabad) says he should be put on the list after Indian Elections so PM Modi does not take advantage politically”.

It appears that Islamabad has agreed to designate Masood Azhar as a global terrorist; however, the timing must be such that it does not provide PM Modi the political advantage of scoring a win in the ongoing election (So much for your sense of timing, The UN showed pakistan the middle finger and designated Masood as a Global Terrorist immediately). Jan Achakzai added that the US and European Union is consulting Pakistan on the time it needs to see this listing through, and the proposed dates have been until mid-May or end of May when the Indian elections have ended. He explained, “Islamabad is looking at the issue post-Indian elections. (US and EU consulting pakistan? Guy is desperately trying to save his non existant and tattered H&D, US and EU gave an ultimatum to China and made the declaration immediately)

Achakzai observed that once a consensus has been reached (What concensus? Pakistan had no leverage on this china had to agree in face of overwheling eveidence of pakistan's involovement in global terrorism), the issue of Masood Azhar’s listing will not be transferred to the UN Security Council. Achakzai deduced that Islamabad’s decision would also “save China the embarrassment” of having to put a hold on Azhar’s listing through its influential position in the UNSC. (What pakistan decision is this 'anal' yst alluding to? He is desperately trying to give the impression that it was Pakistan that had control on declaring its citizen a terrorist and did so, fact is China ditched pakistan to save on embarrassing itselff) He further added Islamabad’s decision will also help “prevent setting precedent at the UNSC for future (use or misuse) by the US”. (On the contrary anytime China will now try to pakistani side in the UN on technicalities , it will be publically called out by US, UK and France to give reasons of it supporting pakistan before the UN security council)

Jan Achakzai stressed that Pakistan is not “obliging to Indian demands” and Islamabad does not want to be seen to agreeing to list Masood Azhar as a terrorist due to any kind of international pressure, least of all New Delhi’s (It does not matter if pakistan agrees to list or not, UN will simply declare the pakistani as a global terrrorist).


Desperate terrorist pakistanis :rotfl:

saip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3562
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby saip » 01 May 2019 20:30

So Shri Massood Azharji is no longer eligible for Nishan - e - Pakistan? How sad! :rotfl:

UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11383
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby UlanBatori » 02 May 2019 08:03

Now he can hijack a PITA plane and get them to fly him to ..... ???? Yemen? Antarctica? Amethi? Wynad? Somalia?
I wonder why Eleven buckled. The writing was on the Great Wall, after the Sri Lanka attacks?
Or was it Balochistan?

QUETTA: Since 2009, 911 police officials across Balochistan have been killed while combating terrorists which include two DIGs, two SSPs, one ASP, 19 DSPs, 23 inspectors, 75 sub-inspectors, 54 ASIs, 164 head constables, 552 constables and 79 class four employees of the police department.
Read: How death stalks policemen in Quetta


Or was it the reality of Uighuristan I wonder. Think about it: with all the construction activity in Cheen, how easy it must be to get explosives to turn into BakPaks and VBIEDs. It's just that news is not allowed to leak out.

Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6803
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby Anujan » 02 May 2019 09:22

UB

As I mentioned somewhere else, Massa and Desh have an understanding vis-a-vis Iran. Desh will stop importing oil, Massa will support FATF, someone blurted this out.

Which means Pakistan needs a Echandee way of acting against Masood Azhar. Pakistan getting on FATF means Cheen does not get paid. On top of it, China probably wants to squeeze Pakistan's balls for Immy making too many demands about CPEC? Immy apparently had the temerity to divert CPEC related funds for social scheme. The gall! That too against Emperor Xi!!

All these fortuitously came together to get Masood Azhar listed.

UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11383
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Pakistani Role in Global Terrorism

Postby UlanBatori » 02 May 2019 18:16

A! So desh is importing oil from "Afghanistan" instead. Via Chabahar, incidentally. Makes sense.


Return to “Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests