Having been defeated in Syria-unable to oust Assad despite the backing of the Sunni coalition,ISIS and co., thanks to Russia in the main and Iran,who also engineered the defection of the Sultan of Turkey(!), The US and its Saudi wants to wreak vengeance against the weakest of its enemies,read Iran,which at the moment unlike NoKo does not possess N-weapons,but is on the cusp of that capability.Destabilising Iran is the next big thing on the Yanqui agenda as Shiite Iraq,a resurgent Syria and a weakened Saudi Arabia licking its wounds,both physical and economical over its misadventure in the Yemen,is allowing the balance of power in the ME to shift decisively the Shiite way. The Sultan's about turn and the latest shocker of the Saudi King making a pilgrimage to Moscow and seeking S-400 ABM missiles, has sent Washington into a frenzy. The alleged reports that Bibi N almost or did cry when he met with Czar Putin ,pleading with him to stop the Iranian-Syrian-Hiz juggernaut against Israel from marching on, indicates the dramatic change which has come about in the ME.With Egypt and Libya too getting closer to Russia,abandoning their old ties with the West, a "whitewash",pun intended could be on the anvil of predominant Western influence in the ME,Gulf and N.Africa. The stakes are high in the Meditt. too with Russia seeking extra naval facilities in Egypt and Libya apart from its expanding base at Tartus in Syria.
By destabilising,and limiting Iran's influence in the region,the Yanquis hope to salvage their ties with the Sunni potentates .Iran pushed to the brink have but to options.One,to reject the West's agreement if the US tears it up,and press on regardless with its N-ambitions,or to seek a guarantee from a powerful friend to provide it with a nuclear umbrella,which would require a deeper defence agreement of some sort with Russia. It has already allowed Russian bombers to refuel on their way back from air strikes in Suria.Russia in return could obtain from Iran naval facilities in the Persian Gulf,which would really send the torpedo up the West's nether end! Hitherto,only the West had naval bases in the Gulf like the Brit. one at Bahrein and US facilities there too,with the largest base at Qatar.In fact,Iran is actually encircled by US bases as this map shows:http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/intera ... 67298.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/05/middl ... index.html
Map: US bases encircle Iran
Dozens of US and allied forces' military installations dot the region, from Oman, UAE and Kuwait to Turkey and Israel.
Qatar hosts largest US military base in Mideast
The base, which boasts one of the longest runways in the Persian Gulf at 12,500 feet, is a strategically important facility that can accommodate up to 120 aircraft.
In 2016, the base was used as staging ground to fly B-52 airstrikes against ISIS targets in Iraq and Syria. Early in the Afghanistan campaign, F-16 fighters and E-8C Joint Stars reconnaissance planes that monitor ground units were based there, along with refueling tankers.
According to a 2014 congressional research paper by Middle Eastern specialist, Christopher M. Blanchard, Qatar invested over $1 billion to construct the air base during the 1990s, despite having only a small air force of its own at the time. This in turn, "facilitated gradually deeper cooperation with US military forces."
The base houses the forward headquarters of the US Air Force Central Command, Combined Air and Space Operations Center and the 379th Air Expedition Wing.
The Combined Air and Space Operations Center (CAOC) oversees US military air power in Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq and 18 other nations, according to the Air Force.
Manned by personnel from the US Air Force, Army, Navy and Marines as well as coalition partner countries, the CAOC is "the nerve center" of air campaigns across the region, according to the Air Force.
Just ck the link and see the pic of the huge CAOC (Combined Air Operations Centre) facility.Iran needs future support to resist the US just as Assad required. I predict a further deepening of both political and military ties between Iran and Russia,esp. as the "Triumvirate" of Iran,Syria and Russia defeated the US and its Sunni/ISIS allies in Syria.http://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/05/middl ... index.html
Trump threatens to rip up Iran nuclear deal unless US and allies fix 'serious flaws'
Trump says he will not recertify deal but stops short of pulling out entirely
President says US participation ‘can be cancelled by me at any time’4
Julian Borger in Washington, Saeed Kamali Dehghan in London and Peter Beaumont in Jerusalem
Friday 13 October 2017 21.44 BST First published on Friday 13 October 2017 16.45 BST
Donald Trump has threatened to terminate the 2015 Iran nuclear deal if Congress and US allies fail to amend the agreement in significant ways.
In a vituperative speech on Friday that began by listing Iran’s alleged crimes over the decades, Trump announced he would not continue to certify the agreement to Congress, but stopped short of immediately cancelling US participation in the deal.
“Based on the factual record I have put forward, I am announcing today that we cannot and will not make this certification. We will not continue down a path whose predictable conclusion is more violence, more terror and the very real threat of Iran’s nuclear breakout,” Trump said at the White House.
Trump put the onus on Congress and US allies to agree to means to toughen the conditions on Iran – and to make restriction on the country’s nuclear programme permanent. He made clear that if those negotiations fail to reach a solution – which is almost certain – he would unilaterally pull the US out of the international agreement, a move likely to lead to a return to nuclear confrontation in the Middle East.
“In the event we are not able to reach a solution working with Congress and our allies, then the agreement will be terminated,” Trump said. “It is under continuous review and our participation can be cancelled by me, as president, at any time.”
'It's become a monster': is Iran's revolutionary guard a terror group?
The president also announced he had ordered the US Treasury to impose new sanctions on Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a backer of terrorist groups in the region, although the state department did not designate the IRGC as a terrorist group itself.
The international backlash to Trump’s speech was immediate. The leaders of the UK, France and Germany – also signatories of the nuclear deal – issued a statement vowing their commitment to the agreement.
The EU foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, insisted that the agreement, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was working, and that no single country or leader could terminate it.
“The president of the United States has many powers, but not this one,” Mogherini told reporters in Brussels.
Yukiya Amano, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN’s nuclear watchdog, issued a statement restating the agency’s finding that Iran was abiding by its obligations.
Within minutes of Trump’s speech, Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani, went live on state television.
He said: “What we heard tonight was a repeat of the same baseless accusations and insults that we’ve heard over the past 40 years. It had nothing new; we weren’t surprised because for 40 years we’ve got used to these words. With your baseless speech you made our people more united.”
Rouhani went on: “Today, the US is more isolated than ever against the nuclear deal, [more] isolated than any other time in its plots against people of Iran.”
The Iranian president shrugged off Trump’s call for constraints on Iran’s ballistic missile programme.
“Our missile and defence activities have always been important to us for our defence, and today it’s more important,” Rouhani said. “We have always made efforts to produce weapons that we need, and from now on we will double our efforts. These weapons are for our defence and we will continue strengthening our defence capabilities.”
Trump received rapid support, meanwhile, from Israel and Saudi Arabia, who have emerged as his own major allies on the world stage.
Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said he wanted to “congratulate President Trump for his courageous decision today” and for “boldly confront[ing] Iran’s terrorist regime”.
For European diplomats seeking to salvage the JCPOA, the days leading up to Trump’s long-awaited speech were a roller-coaster. Initially fearful that Trump could immediately trigger a possible collapse of the deal, the Europeans were buoyed when they were briefed that Trump would not call for the reimposition of sanctions by Congress.
However, in the wake of the president’s speech on Friday, the JCPOA’s survival looked tenuous.
In the speech, Trump declared: “I am directing my administration to work closely with Congress and our allies to address the deal’s many serious flaws so the Iranian regime can never threaten the world with nuclear weapons.”
He noted that congressional leaders were already drafting amendments to legislation that would include restrictions on ballistic missiles and make the curbs on Iran’s nuclear programme under the 2015 deal permanent, and to reimpose sanctions instantly if those restrictions were breached.
However, any such changes would need 60 votes in the US Senate to pass, and Democrats are high unlikely to give them their backing. Even if they did pass into law, the restrictions would represent a unilateral effort to change the accord that would not be acceptable to the other national signatories.
Hours earlier, the US secretary of state, Rex Tillerson had acknowledged that it was very unlikely that the JCPOA agreement could be change, but suggested that the issue of Iran’s ballistic missile programme and the time limits on some of the nuclear constraints in the deal, could be dealt with in a separate agreement that could exist alongside the JCPOA.
Trump's tough talk on Iran could end in a big, blame-evading dodge
Trump, however, made no reference to such a way out of the looming impasse.
He appeared to go out of his way to goad Iran, even linking Tehran with al-Qaida and the attacks on US embassies in 1998. He referred to Tehran as a “fanatical regime” and a “dictatorship”. He even referred to the body of water almost universally known as the Persian Gulf as the Arabian Gulf.
“How come a president has not yet learned the name of a famous gulf in the world, the same Persian Gulf that US vessels always pass through aimlessly?” a riled Rouhani said in his response.
“He needs to study geography, but also international law. How come an international agreement that is endorsed by a UN resolution, which is a UN document … how a US president can annul such an international document?”
The exchange of insults mirrored Trump’s continuing spat with the North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, adding personal animus to already tense situations on opposite sides of the world