The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
ShyamSP
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2395
Joined: 06 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby ShyamSP » 09 Nov 2019 11:04

Court doesn't go theology. Land belongs to Government

OmkarC
BRFite
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 11:25

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby OmkarC » 09 Nov 2019 11:05

"ASI findings "may" suggest an underlying temple from 12th century"

Sicanta
BRFite
Posts: 1122
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 11:16

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Sicanta » 09 Nov 2019 11:05

SC- temple not destroyed to built mosque as per asi

Rupesh
BRFite
Posts: 869
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 19:14
Location: Somewhere in South Central India

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Rupesh » 09 Nov 2019 11:06

Belief of Hindus undisputed.

williams
BRFite
Posts: 379
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 20:55

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby williams » 09 Nov 2019 11:06

All this legal language is confusing.

Sanju
BRFite
Posts: 996
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 01:00
Location: North of 49

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Sanju » 09 Nov 2019 11:07

Ram born in Ayodhya undisputed. CJI

Rupesh
BRFite
Posts: 869
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 19:14
Location: Somewhere in South Central India

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Rupesh » 09 Nov 2019 11:07

Where is Yagnashri?

ShyamSP
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2395
Joined: 06 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby ShyamSP » 09 Nov 2019 11:08

williams wrote:All this legal language is confusing.


We don't care faith but only deal with legal things. Means No judgment on anything other than title

Rahul M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16834
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Location: Skies over BRFATA
Contact:

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Rahul M » 09 Nov 2019 11:10

Sanju wrote:Ram born in Ayodhya undisputed. CJI

not really what he said. he says hindus belief in that is undisputed.

OmkarC
BRFite
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 11:25

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby OmkarC » 09 Nov 2019 11:10

Title can't be decided based on faith & belief

OmkarC
BRFite
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 11:25

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby OmkarC » 09 Nov 2019 11:11

unanimous judgement - with Messrs Chandrachud & Nazeer.. not looking good

Sanju
BRFite
Posts: 996
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 01:00
Location: North of 49

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Sanju » 09 Nov 2019 11:11

Rahul M wrote:
Sanju wrote:Ram born in Ayodhya undisputed. CJI

not really what he said. he says hindus belief in that is undisputed.


As per TV channel.

OmkarC
BRFite
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 11:25

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby OmkarC » 09 Nov 2019 11:12

Act of placing Idols, an act of Desecration !!!!!!

abhijitm
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3679
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 15:02
Contact:

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby abhijitm » 09 Nov 2019 11:13

OmkarC wrote:unanimous judgement - with Messrs Chandrachud & Nazeer.. not looking good

Does not look good for hindus for sure

OmkarC
BRFite
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 11:25

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby OmkarC » 09 Nov 2019 11:14

Waqf board suit is within limitation !

ShyamSP
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2395
Joined: 06 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby ShyamSP » 09 Nov 2019 11:14

Shia Waqf suit is dismissed. Sunni Waqf is not inheritors of Mughal lands so its suit may be dismissed too.

Schmidt
BRFite
Posts: 244
Joined: 19 Aug 2016 08:02

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Schmidt » 09 Nov 2019 11:15

Just chant Ram Ram , every thing will be fine

ShyamSP
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2395
Joined: 06 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby ShyamSP » 09 Nov 2019 11:17

Weak judging. If court says title belongs to Government, Swami formula will come into picture.

williams
BRFite
Posts: 379
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 20:55

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby williams » 09 Nov 2019 11:17

Hope the court does not wash their hands in legal mumbo jumbo

OmkarC
BRFite
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 11:25

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby OmkarC » 09 Nov 2019 11:20

"Muslims couldnt prove necessary title"

Sachin
Webmaster BR
Posts: 7648
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Undisclosed

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Sachin » 09 Nov 2019 11:21

Nirmohi Akhada's plea also dismissed.

sooraj
BRFite
Posts: 1079
Joined: 06 May 2011 15:45

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby sooraj » 09 Nov 2019 11:21

There are documents between 1856-57 that the Hindus were not obstructed from worshipping at Ayodhya temple: SC

Patni
BRFite
Posts: 872
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 10:32
Location: Researching sub-humans to our west!

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Patni » 09 Nov 2019 11:21

Sounds to me like court is going to just uphold highcourt verdict, And sermonize everyone to be secular!

Sachin
Webmaster BR
Posts: 7648
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Undisclosed

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Sachin » 09 Nov 2019 11:21

OmkarC wrote:"Muslims couldnt prove necessary title"

The land then most likely goto Govt. (and not any Hindu org).

Rupesh
BRFite
Posts: 869
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 19:14
Location: Somewhere in South Central India

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Rupesh » 09 Nov 2019 11:22

Says damage to mosque a violation.

OmkarC
BRFite
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 11:25

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby OmkarC » 09 Nov 2019 11:23

"Hindu plea that Mosque was unislamic - rejected"

sooraj
BRFite
Posts: 1079
Joined: 06 May 2011 15:45

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby sooraj » 09 Nov 2019 11:24

It is clearly established that while Muslims offered prayers inside the inner courtyard, the same was done by Hindus in the outer court yard: SC

williams
BRFite
Posts: 379
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 20:55

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby williams » 09 Nov 2019 11:25

SC says Allahabad HC was wrong in dividing the disputed site into three parts

KJo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9695
Joined: 05 Oct 2010 02:54

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby KJo » 09 Nov 2019 11:25

11:03 (IST), NOV 09
SC says Allahabad HC was wrong in dividing the disputed site into three parts

OmkarC
BRFite
Posts: 572
Joined: 15 Nov 2016 11:25

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby OmkarC » 09 Nov 2019 11:25

SC directs allotment of alternative land to Muslims !

Najunamar
BRFite
Posts: 199
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 16:40
Location: USA

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Najunamar » 09 Nov 2019 11:25

Alternate place mosque. Jai Shri Ram

Rupesh
BRFite
Posts: 869
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 19:14
Location: Somewhere in South Central India

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Rupesh » 09 Nov 2019 11:25

Allahabad HC wrong. Alternate land to be provided to Muslims to build mosque.

KJo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9695
Joined: 05 Oct 2010 02:54

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby KJo » 09 Nov 2019 11:26

Different site allotted to Muslims according to Arnab

KJo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9695
Joined: 05 Oct 2010 02:54

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby KJo » 09 Nov 2019 11:26

Jai Shri Ram!

Sachin
Webmaster BR
Posts: 7648
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Undisclosed

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Sachin » 09 Nov 2019 11:26

Najunamar wrote:Alternate place mosque. Jai Shri Ram

But who gets the land at Ayodhya?

ShyamSP
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2395
Joined: 06 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby ShyamSP » 09 Nov 2019 11:27

Alternative site will be given to Masjid.

Pushed the decision to Center government

Rupesh
BRFite
Posts: 869
Joined: 05 Jul 2008 19:14
Location: Somewhere in South Central India

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Rupesh » 09 Nov 2019 11:27

Jai Shri Ram..

williams
BRFite
Posts: 379
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 20:55

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby williams » 09 Nov 2019 11:28

SC orders allotment of alternative land to Muslims for setting up of a mosque while decreeing the disputed site to deity

Sanju
BRFite
Posts: 996
Joined: 14 Aug 2005 01:00
Location: North of 49

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby Sanju » 09 Nov 2019 11:28

Mandir making trust scheme to be set up by central govt.

ShyamSP
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2395
Joined: 06 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion

Postby ShyamSP » 09 Nov 2019 11:28

Jai Sriram Finally got land.


Return to “Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CalvinH, kumarn and 29 guests