Theo_Fidel wrote:Yup! Everyone is a Paki now. Kudankulam agitators are now the Taliban based on some
thanx for the calc.
For a single state.
Kudankulam total acquired land of various types over the years ~ 4,800 acres or so. Some of it is separate from main exclusion zone.
Sorry Theo but my post was mainly against your position.
The calc was just to help out some other member who was working under the assumption that land is scarce for SPV projects and doesnt say anything more then that.
As I see it you have only been able to prove that SPV in basement is better then Yellocake in basement. A position well understood by all, hence people who dont have access to grid are taking to.
Also the larger the area occupiable implies more of Khamba And Tar Infrastructure (KATI)
. Reactor is a one to many queue and SPV is a many to many queue. You have only shifted the cost from the generation to distribution. Just take a look at the post above by Ankitash. Why else do you think the Kudankulam plant is aiming for Rs. 2.5 per unit while SPVs are asking for 8+.
Also why are you so hell bent on having only the SPV in Kudankulam. In fact within the Sterlized and Exclusion Zone itself you can have your SPV in addition to the Reactor. Its just that Neta-gan want Haryali instead of more electricity generation so they get green spaces there.
Also why do you have to have a comparison based on Land occupancy. Russians have been offering floating Reactors. Also I dont see such a big challenge in taking the SPV also off shore. They already have Windpower offshore. I am sure the smart Engineers can figure out a way to have a floating KATI also.
See Theo while I love your love for things solar and feel indebted to you for forcing me to keep track of things solar but your logic is not working out bhaijaan. There is on the net even a comparison which shows Cost per kwh to produce at Nuke 0.26USD and Solar Tower=0.05USD and SPV+Solar Tower=0.04USD. But they won't explain why the comparative user charges are the way actually are.
Rigth now SPV is searching for Grid Parity not searching to be the cheapest. Nobody would say no to SPV if it just gives grid parity.