India-US Strategic News and Discussion

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 54780
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby ramana » 20 Sep 2011 02:25




Wanst this guy warning India while arguing for giving the Taliban all of Sotuhern Afghanistan!


vishvak
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5836
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 21:19

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby vishvak » 20 Sep 2011 12:44

Sanku wrote:
shivajisisodia wrote: The world doesnt know that Hindus never will. It is out of the West's frame of reference that a people can just keep on taking it and taking it and taking it.


You seriously misunderstand the world; and you seriously misunderstand Indians too.

The top most echelons of the "world" do understand "Hindu's" very well, and know they will never use terror, since the fundamental ideological underpinnings that form the basis of terror are different..

However, that to your understanding can not go beyond the second half of the statement.

However despite knowing that pretty well, they will still accuse "Hindu's" of terror if it serves their purpose. They are inherently excellent opportunists.

The word terrorism is used by the world power for disfranchisement of others from their own lands.

For Hindus, it is used for disfranchisement of Hindus on lands where Hinduism originated, by the same people.

VinodTK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2388
Joined: 18 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby VinodTK » 21 Sep 2011 05:23

Indo-US panel agrees on N-exigency plans on Pak
WASHINGTON: A blue ribbon panel tasked to identify "shared national interests" between the US and India has suggested among other steps, secretly planning together for exigencies in Pakistan such as its collapse and loss of control over its nuclear weapons.

The joint study group led by experts from both countries has also called for regular mutual briefings and intensifying consultations between US and India on China "given worrisome and heavy-handed Chinese actions since 2007."
:

ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 54780
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby ramana » 21 Sep 2011 07:12

Those joint exercises are about that maybe?

No wonder Gen Singh and ACM Naik said they could do Abortabad!

Rony
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3269
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 23:29

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Rony » 21 Sep 2011 16:14

How and why Americans are getting fat ! Food politics in America


A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11639
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby A_Gupta » 21 Sep 2011 18:55

http://ricks.foreignpolicy.com/posts/20 ... f_pakistan

In full

The seven steps of American officials dealing with the puzzles of Pakistan
Posted By Thomas E. Ricks Tuesday, September 20, 2011 - 11:18 AM Share

By Tom Lynch
Best Defense department of dysfunctional diplomacy

Recent comments by Senator Kirk from Illinois exemplify a familiar pattern by senior U.S. political, military and diplomatic officials struggling to understand the devilish intricacies and deep challenges of South Asian politics through the constrained access portal of experience in or focus on Afghanistan. This struggle all too frequently takes the pattern of a seven-step process of "discovery learning" regarding the complexities of South Asia security by Americans first introduced to Afghanistan without background in the wider region. That process goes something like this ....

STEP 1 - MEET Afghans, find them engaging, look for the quick way to help them with a "hand up," ignore the vexing, decades-long regional security dilemmas underpinning their plight.

STEP 2 - DISCOVER Afghans suffer from multiple internal and external challenges -- take the (northern) Afghan viewpoint that theirs is all a problem of Pakistan's making.

STEP 3 - BLAME Pakistan for all Afghanistan's ills and despair of American engagement with Pakistan or Afghanistan, throw out the "I" word suggesting that more India in Afghanistan would "teach" Pakistan a lesson (and presumably save some cash).

STEP 4 - DISCOVER Pakistan already believes there is an Indian under every rock in Afghanistan - and that threatening a quicker Coalition departure and greater Indian involvement won't faze Pakistan.... Rawalpindi will move more quickly to bolster its Afghan Taliban allies for a proxy war.

STEP 5 - DETERMINE that India isn't really interested in bailing out the Coalition (or American politicians and diplomats) on western terms, has its own regional objectives and timetables, and isn't much responsive to boisterous American rhetoric accelerating the timelines on a Pakistan-India proxy war in Afghanistan. That proxy war may come, but India will work to prolong its onset as long as possible.

STEP 6 - RECOGNIZE that a rapidly-accelerating proxy war between two nuclear-armed nations encouraged by a precipitous withdrawal of US/Coalition forces before some political mechanism in place to limit the possibilities for that war is irresponsible, an approach that is all too similar to America's walk away from Afghanistan and Pakistan back the early 1990s that led to a proxy war in Afghanistan between India and Pakistan before both were fully tested nuclear-armed states.

STEP 7 - RESOLVE either to remain engaged with Afghanistan, Pakistan and India for a lengthy and challenging diplomatic-military process (including some level of non-trivial economic and military aid to both Afghanistan and Pakistan for some time); or, SUCCUMB to the personal frustrations of it all and quit the field, making room for the next nouveau American to start the process at STEP 1.

shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6885
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby shyamd » 21 Sep 2011 22:03

US setting up secret drone bases in Indian Ocean (from seychelles)

Link added since Singha wishes to be childish:
http://zeenews.india.com/news/world/us- ... 32760.html
Last edited by shyamd on 21 Sep 2011 22:29, edited 1 time in total.

Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Singha » 21 Sep 2011 22:13

if you know it and post on BR, how can it be considered a secret?

shyamd
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6885
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 18:43

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby shyamd » 21 Sep 2011 22:18

I copied a title for the article. Didn't add the link. Its not new info. THey operate out of Djibouti and Oman currently and are building one in KSA. Seychelles was mentioned in the article

Btw the US/Brits have a lot of bases that they dont explictly advertise but people know about them.

Cosmo_R
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3407
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 01:24

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Cosmo_R » 21 Sep 2011 22:18

Singha wrote:if you know it and post on BR, how can it be considered a secret?


Hiding in plain sight? :)

Sanku
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12526
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 15:57
Location: Naaahhhh

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Sanku » 21 Sep 2011 22:18

Singha wrote:if you know it and post on BR, how can it be considered a secret?


:lol:

Zynda
BRFite
Posts: 1913
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 00:37
Location: J4

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Zynda » 21 Sep 2011 22:19


joshvajohn
BRFite
Posts: 1516
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 03:27

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby joshvajohn » 21 Sep 2011 23:48

While Obama is a black president why he allows a black American man who is mistakenly identifed for execution. This is ridiculous if the identity is found to be wrong after his execution. This will add to furthering negative spots in US history.

JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7051
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby JE Menon » 22 Sep 2011 00:22

Pls stick to the thread topic... Not sure who the black man who is being executed is and so on, seems like a local thing, certainly with no major implications out side the US, where such executions are carried out routinely it appears...

JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7051
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby JE Menon » 22 Sep 2011 00:53

Meanwhile, on a truly strategic note, this is a must watch. Watch it all. :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w69nILEk ... re=related

joshvajohn
BRFite
Posts: 1516
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 03:27

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby joshvajohn » 22 Sep 2011 16:32

India and US as civilised democratic societies have to ask a common question about punishments, particularly that of Capital punishments. What does it serve? Does it serve as a purpose of creating a fear for legal systems to be followed or as a lesson for others to follow? or Does it serve the purpose of eliminating those murders as a revenge and so a satisfaction for the victims?

One of the important issue in India US relatioship people have to raise this as an issue at times. Very Recently Indians or Asians involved in some money laundering or arms transactions had their legal support in supplying some knowhows to India. As the political scenerio changed some of these activities were interpreted as illegal and judges used strong terminologies against some people. So one has to have these subjective interpretation of legal system as and when political systems fallout then some of these people can become political victiims. In such cases India needs to engage creatidvely with US in order seek legal protection of those indian citizens who are doing business in various ways. For those Indians who hold US citizens this may not be applicable.

Now coming back to punishment - capital punishment- one has to look at philosophy of this practice and ask whether this practice achieves its purpose. Secondly whether some have been rather victims of different strata of the society - for those with money and political back up can always escape capital punishment and so on. Also ask questions such as such capital punishment has negative implications in society? This may help both countries to study this carefully and exchange some strategical thinking in this area, possibly jointly.

RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 15995
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby RajeshA » 22 Sep 2011 16:35

There isn't much strategic about capital punishments. That is an ethics issue!

JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7051
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby JE Menon » 22 Sep 2011 16:42

>>India and US as civilised democratic societies have to ask a common question about punishments, particularly that of Capital punishments. What does it serve? Does it serve as a purpose of creating a fear for legal systems to be followed or as a lesson for others to follow? or Does it serve the purpose of eliminating those murders as a revenge and so a satisfaction for the victims?

Boss, capital punishment is a matter for the US penal system. All your questions above are best addressed in a forum dedicated to social issues in the US. Capital punishment in India is a rare enough event, and there is virtually no point to discussing or comparing or whatever you intend to do ... in this thread. Please desist.

Rony
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3269
Joined: 14 Jul 2006 23:29

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Rony » 22 Sep 2011 17:12

White House bickering and Taiwan’s F-16s : Staffers beholden to Beijing risk island’s security, American jobs

The “highly personal, often bitter animosity existing between senior White House officials and senior Asia players at State” is how one of Washington’s nonpareil foreign-policy insider newsletters, Chris Nelson’s eponymous NelsonReport, describes the forces at the bottom of the Obama administration’s latest national security crisis: whether to sell 66 new F-16 fighters to Taiwan to replace unsafe Vietnam War-era F-5 jets.

Taiwan has hundreds of supporters on Capitol Hill, and two dozen House members made a point of greeting a visiting Taiwanese presidential candidate, Tsai Ing-wen, at a reception in the Rayburn House Office Building on Sept. 14. Several senators also made the trek across Capitol Hill to show their support, including the venerable Daniel K. Inouye, Hawaii Democrat, chairman of the Senate Defense appropriations subcommittee, an unmistakable signal of broad bipartisan support for U.S. defense sales to Taiwan, especially the new F-16s.

Also on Sept. 14, an unnamed “senior American official” phoned a Washington correspondent of the FinancialTimes, a respected British newspaper, to ungraciously badmouth Ms. Tsai. He then declared he was speaking for the Obama administration. The State Department, which had been very supportive of Ms. Tsai, quickly denounced the “senior official” and flatly asserted that whoever he was, he “certainly did not speak for the administration.”

The “senior official,” who quickly was traced to the National Security Council staff, apparently was motivated by anxieties that Congress might force the Obama White House to approve new F-16s for Taiwan. Because Beijing is quite unhappy with any Taiwanese politician who isn’t wholeheartedly committed to Taiwan’s unification with China (and Ms. Tsai is not), the “senior official” no doubt hoped that discrediting Ms. Tsai would ingratiate Mr. Obama to the Chinese leadership. The Obama White House is on the verge of announcing “upgrades” of Taiwan’s existing fleet of 20-year-old F-16s and worries that China will be displeased. Trashing Ms. Tsai may have been a way to soften the announcement with Beijing.


The whole episode was bizarre.

Congress sees Taiwan as an authentic Asian democracy worthy of America’s support and, not incidentally, a customer for advanced aerospace weapons systems that would bring 20,000 new jobs to depressed defense production lines in Texas, Florida, Ohio and California and keep additional tens of thousands of engineers and skilled technicians employed in high-tech industrial sectors that are essential to America’s economic recovery.

Under the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act, the Pentagon also has a statutory mandate “to maintain the capacity of the United States to resist any resort to force” and another to “make available to Taiwan such defense articles and defense services in such quantity as may be necessary to enable Taiwan to maintain a sufficient self-defense capability.” The Defense Department, therefore, hopes to keep Taiwan’s armed forces strong enough to defend the island because otherwise U.S. forces will have to do the job.

The Pentagon has completed a congressionally mandated report on Taiwan’s air-power requirements, which, though still classified, warns that the military balance in the Taiwan Strait has tilted decisively toward China. Without replacement fighter aircraft, Taiwan will be unable to defend its airspace and the full responsibility of defending that island nation will fall completely on the United States. Pentagon analysts also point out that war-gamers running the latest iteration of “Terminal Fury” - a scenario for a crisis in the Taiwan Strait - cannot see how even the newest versions of the F-16 could survive a Chinese air assault for more than a few hours. Taiwan’s air force, they say, needs a new fleet of STOVL “short take-off and vertical landing” jets that can use the island’s modern highways as runways. In short, Taiwan needs the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter, a STOVL jet that is designed for export to America’s friends and allies.

This is where bureaucratic “animosities” come in. President Obama’s top Asia advisers in the National Security Council (NSC), Daniel R. Russel and Evan S. Medeiros, are firmly pro-China, or at least do not believe anything - anything at all - is worth a confrontation with the Chinese. At the State Department, Kurt Campbell, assistant secretary for East Asia and the Pacific, and his team are firmly pro-everybody-else in Asia, or at least they do not see how the United States can sustain its core interests globally - human rights, democracy, freedom, fair trade, freedom of the seas and airspace, access to resources and a world safe from the rampant proliferation of nuclear weapons and their delivery systems - by abjuring its global leadership.


Taiwan is not a small part of America’s security architecture. For 60 years, since 1951, the United States has maintained a robust defense and trade relationship with Taiwan that has been a key link in America’s network of security cooperation and alliances in the Western Pacific. The broad question debated in the Obama administration is whether the United States will withdraw from Asia in the face of China’s inexorable military rise. Mr. Obama’s NSC apparently thinks the United States should simply bow to Chinese expansion, while State and Defense see Taiwan as emblematic of America’s commitments to the rest of Asia, from Japan and Australia through Southeast Asia to India. When asked about the Obama administration’s reluctance to sell the new F-16C/Ds to Taiwan, State people caution that the administration has not ruled out consideration of new jets for Taiwan at some point.

Congress has weighed in on the State-Defense side. Several new bills seek to require the administration to sell the latest F-16s to Taiwan, and there is an appreciation on the Hill that simply “upgrading” Taiwan’s deployed fleet of 145 older F-16A/Bs, while clearly necessary, equally clearly is not sufficient. Congress also sees that sustaining and creating new jobs in America’s advanced aerospace sectors is essential to economic recovery. New jet fighter sales to Taiwan should be a no-brainer; they help Taiwan defend itself and they employ U.S. aerospace engineers.

NSC staffers in the Obama White House, on the other hand, are letting “highly personal, often bitter animosity” get in the way of national security - and jobs. They also are abetting America’s demotion to a second-class power unwilling - but not quite unable - to challenge the hegemony of China’s ruthless, new brand of state mercantilism in Asia.

darshhan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2590
Joined: 12 Dec 2008 11:52

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby darshhan » 22 Sep 2011 19:22

JE Menon wrote:>>India and US as civilised democratic societies have to ask a common question about punishments, particularly that of Capital punishments. What does it serve? Does it serve as a purpose of creating a fear for legal systems to be followed or as a lesson for others to follow? or Does it serve the purpose of eliminating those murders as a revenge and so a satisfaction for the victims?

Boss, capital punishment is a matter for the US penal system. All your questions above are best addressed in a forum dedicated to social issues in the US. Capital punishment in India is a rare enough event, and there is virtually no point to discussing or comparing or whatever you intend to do ... in this thread. Please desist.


JE Menon ji, Joshvajohn is a big dramebaaj.On some other thread(I do not remember which one) few days back he actually implied that massacre of hindus in Moplah riots was justified since they were oppressing.He even produced some shady links to support his thesis.And now he is questioning capital punishment.Typical of faux philosophers.

devesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5129
Joined: 17 Feb 2011 03:27

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby devesh » 22 Sep 2011 19:41

^^^
JJ has a very long history of promoting intellectually enlightened solutions. one of them includes secession of South. Ramana ji warned him that he was crossing the line.

Sushupti
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5198
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 21:24

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Sushupti » 22 Sep 2011 23:18



vishvak
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5836
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 21:19

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby vishvak » 24 Sep 2011 14:47


So someone learning Sitar in India for 4 decades also "published a series of interviews that include Propaganda and the Public Mind: Conversations with Noam Chomsky, The Pen and the Sword: Conversations with Edward Said". As also delivers lectures at "Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP)". How strange that he also gave lectures on tourist Visa though.


Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 20960
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Philip » 24 Sep 2011 19:24

Josh the US as a "civiised democratic society" ? What about the illegal invasion of Iraq,the deaths of lakhs of innocent civilians,Abu Ghraib and the despicable acts committed by US troops,Camp Gitmo,"Rendition flights"-to concentration camps outside the US in lands ruled by dspots and dictators,Afghanistan and "collateral damage" due to drone strikes,the hundreds of Tomahawk missiles fired into Libya by just one US SSGN,and the civilian deaths that followed.Please do not rope India and the US in the same bracket! We might share similar vaules that both our founding fathers left us,but today,the US is anything but the state that adheres to the values left by Washington and co.It is a modern Mongol empire where American MNCs act as economic mercenaries that are looting the wealth of poorer ,weaker states through eco. rules that favour the "North"/MNCs and wherever possible abusing the UN to invade nations with dodgy dictators,etc.,carry out regime change and then share out the loot with other western MNCs or oil companies as is the case with Libya.

krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5829
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby krisna » 25 Sep 2011 02:08

India asks US to resolve H1B visa issue
India has sought an early resolution to the problems being faced by the IT industry over H1B visas in the US.

He drew attention to the estimates by Indian industry that the uptake of H1B visa this year has been less than half of the annual prescribed limit, and the rejection rates had gone up.

He said India has signed totalization agreements with several European countries, whose social security systems are different from the Indian system and from the US system.

India has been pursuing a totalisation agreement with the US for several years now. According to government sources, there are 300,000 Indians working in the US and they lose their social security contributions if they do not complete 10 years of employment. If a totalisation agreement is signed it would exempt payment of social security contribution for those on short term work contracts if contribution is already being paid in the country of origin. It would also help in portability of benefits on relocation.
( the figures run in $millions likely)
The US side has assured that they would seriously consider the proposal but there has been no substantial progress on the issue, sources say.

menon s
BRFite
Posts: 721
Joined: 01 May 2010 09:51
Location: Bangalore

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby menon s » 27 Sep 2011 12:17

I recently came across this article written by Dr. Kissinger on the 1971 Genocide in Bangladesh. The excerpts from this article points to why? even in this day, this age. When Petreaus, Mullen, Hillary and Panetta are all taking a single stand, and going to the extent of saying that, Pakistan is a state sponsor of terrorism, there is a certain inertia in turning towards India.
http://www.globalwebpost.com/genocide19 ... iss_71.htm
Unlike China, which imposed its own matrix of law and culture on invaders so successfully that they grew indistinguishable from the Chinese people, India transcended foreigners not by co-opting but by segregating them. Invaders might raise incredible monuments to their own importance as if to reassure themselves of their greatness in the face of so much indifference, but the Indian peoples endured by creating relationships all but impervious to alien influence. Like the Middle East, India is the home of great religions. Yet unlike those of the East, these are religions not of exaltation but of endurance; they have inspired man not by prophetic visions of messianic fulfillment but by bearing witness to the fragility of human existence; they offer not personal salvation but the solace of an inevitable destiny. Where each man is classified from birth, his failure is never personal; his quality is tested by his ability to endure his fate, not to shape it. The caste system does not attract civilizations determined to seek fulfillment in a single lifetime. It provides extraordinary resilience and comfort in larger perspectives. The Hindu religion is proud and self-contained; it accepts no converts. One is either born into it or forever denied its comforts and the assured position it confers.Foreign conquest is an ultimate irrelevancy in the face of such impermeability; it gives the non-Indian no status in Indian society, enabling Indian civilization to survive, occasionally even to thrive, through centuries of foreign rule. Of course, so many invasions have had to leave a human, not only an architectural, residue. The Moslem conquerors, representing a proselytizing religion, offered mass conversion as a route for lower-caste Hindus to alleviate their condition. They succeeded only partially, for once converted the new Moslems lost the respect to which even their low-caste status had entitled them. Here were sown the seeds of the communal hatred that has rent the subcontinent for the past generations.


wonder which Pakistani diplomat taught him history? Using partial truths and giving it a spin that one desires is an old Pakistani art.

As the prospect of nationhood appeared, the polyglot nationalities that he flood of invasions had swept into India now were left alone with their swelling numbers, their grinding poverty, and above all with one another. Nearly a third of the total population was Moslem, concentrated in the West Punjab and East Bengal but with important pockets all over India. Many of these peoples, by now outcasts of Indian society, found it unacceptable to live in a secular state dominated by those who through the centuries had disdained them. The British solution in 1947 was partition along religious lines.


"unacceptable to live in a secular state dominated by those who disdained them for centuries" .......????

Few old neighbors have less in common, despite their centuries of living side by side, than the intricate, complex Hindus and the simpler, more direct Moslems. It is reflected in the contrasts of their architecture. The finely carved Hindu temples have nooks and corners whose seemingly endless detail conveys no single view or meaning. The mosques and forts with which the Moguls have covered the northern third of the subcontinent are vast, elegant, romantic, their resplendent opulence contrasting with the flatness of the simmering countryside, their innumerable fountains expressing a yearning for surcease from a harsh environment and a nostalgia for the less complicated regions that had extruded the invader.


The Hindu is complicated....the Muslim is direct. the intricacy of our architecture, is the simile, our dear Harvard Professor could find! Our region is also complicated?

We took at face value Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru's claim to be neutral moral arbiter of world affairs. We hardly noticed that this was precisely the policy by which a weak nation seeks influence out of proportion to its strength, or that India rarely matched its international pretensions with a willingness to assume risks, except on the sub-Continent where it saw itself destined for preeminence.


I think ill have to agree with him on that fact. May be the fallacy , that our thinking has, is that we are calling "self interest", by other "Moralistic" names. May be that too is a part of Brahminic Heritage.

But Nixon and Mrs. Indira Gandhi, Indian Prime Minister and daughter of Nehru, were not intended by fate to be personally congenial. Her assumption of almost hereditary moral superiority and her moody silences brought out all of Nixon's latent insecurities. Her bearing toward Nixon combined a disdain for a symbol of capitalism quite fashionable in developing countries with a hint that the obnoxious things she had heard about the President from her intellectual friends could not all be untrue. Nixon's comments after meetings with her were not printable. On the other hand, Nixon had an understanding for leaders who operated on an unsentimental assessment of the national interest. Once one cut through the strident, self-righteous rhetoric, Mrs. Gandhi had few peers in the cold-blooded calculation of the elements of power. The political relationship in substance was thus far better than the personal one.


self righteous rhetoric! "latent inesurities of Nixon" Did he have a problem with a Powerful woman?

KLNMurthy
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4271
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 13:06

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby KLNMurthy » 27 Sep 2011 12:40

^^^ kissinger's bilge is very useful in calibrating what is considered intellectual depth and eminence by US diplomatic community.

devesh
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5129
Joined: 17 Feb 2011 03:27

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby devesh » 27 Sep 2011 19:35

Kissingers defecation is a pointer towards the "intellectual understanding" of India that the West has. the propaganda imposed by Judeo-Christian thinking is applied to India.

vishvak
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5836
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 21:19

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby vishvak » 27 Sep 2011 19:59

devesh wrote:Kissingers defecation is a pointer towards the "intellectual understanding" of India that the West has. the propaganda imposed by Judeo-Christian thinking is applied to India.

Are there many places outside India who actually genuinely believe in Sarve-Dharma-Sama-Bhava and such high ideals? If there are too few of the kind (limit tending to 0), then why bother extending same courtesy to others who just feign it and do their routines anyways?

Can there be a list of such countries?

Amber G.
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7183
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Amber G. » 28 Sep 2011 02:22

Three Indian-origin among White House honors list of 12
... two inventors and a researcher - figure in a celebrated White House honors list this year, broadly underscoring India's continued contribution to American science and technology streams. Two of them are IIT-ians....
New York University's Srinivasa SR Vardhan, Purdue University's Rakesh Agarwal, and North Carolina State Univeristy's B Jayant Baliga are among the select dozen named by President Obama to receive the National Medal of Science, and for Technology and Innovation, the highest honor bestowed by the U.S government on scientists, engineers and inventors.
<snip>..

Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21172
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Prem » 28 Sep 2011 23:10

http://www.rediff.com/news/report/india ... 110928.htm
'India, US militaries have a lot to overcome'
Willard pointed out that "we renewed engagement with India in about 2002 and on the military side we renewed military to military relations in 2004 when I was the 7th Fleet Commander. So, I was having opportunities to engage with India's navy at that time."
"Ever since then, so only for six or seven years, we've been working very hard to improve relations," he said, but added, "there's a lot to overcome in terms of our lack of acquaintance with one another. Just understanding how we work organisation to organisation has been an important part of the relationship-building."But Willard said, "Right now, all of our services engage at a pretty robust pace with the Indian armed forces. We are exchanging on issues ranging from extremism, counterterrorism, and counterinsurgency to maritime security in the Indian Ocean region."Thus, he reiterated, "So there is a very robust engagement with India. I think President Obama's [ Images ] visit and the visit of our cabinet members and many leaders within the United States to India, and vice versa, have been a good illustration of that."
Meanwhile, asked about how the Pacific Command views the burgeoning military ties between China and Pakistan and how it would impact on the Asian region, Willard said, "Certainly the relationship between China-Pakistan is very pronounced. They have a very strong government-to-government as well as military-to-military relationship, have had for a long time.""And certainly," he added, "It counts in the overall security dynamic within South Asia, which as we all know, is very complex, given India's neighbourhood and long history with Pakistan, the Kashmir [ Images ] issue, the contested border between India-China along the northern reaches -- frontiers of India, Afghanistan, Central Asian states, and the overall dynamics of the region."Willard said, consequently, "We certainly pay attention to and understand the relationship between China-Pakistan. One thing I think that we should account for is the inherent convergence and interest by all nations and that is a stable Pakistan and a favourable outcome and ultimately stability in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and security in and around India."He argued that he believed, "China recognises, just as the US does, the importance of an outcome in all of this where Pakistan is -- winds up a very stable and peaceful state, and Afghanistan, Pakistan, India relations continue to be stable and managed."Wiilard said, in such a situation, "China's interests and US interests in the region, while we don't spend a lot of time dwelling on this, are inherently convergent and desire a stable South Asia."

paramu
BRFite
Posts: 669
Joined: 20 May 2008 11:38

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby paramu » 28 Sep 2011 23:38

Prem wrote: "Certainly the relationship between China-Pakistan is very pronounced. They have a very strong government-to-government as well as military-to-military relationship, have had for a long time.""And certainly," he added, "It counts in the overall security dynamic within South Asia, which as we all know, is very complex, given India's neighbourhood and long history with Pakistan, the Kashmir [ Images ] issue, the contested border between India-China along the northern reaches -- frontiers of India, Afghanistan, Central Asian states, and the overall dynamics of the region."Willard said, consequently, "We certainly pay attention to and understand the relationship between China-Pakistan. One thing I think that we should account for is the inherent convergence and interest by all nations and that is a stable Pakistan and a favourable outcome and ultimately stability in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and security in and around India.

"He argued that he believed, "China recognises, just as the US does, the importance of an outcome in all of this where Pakistan is -- winds up a very stable and peaceful state, and Afghanistan, Pakistan, India relations continue to be stable and managed."Wiilard said, in such a situation, "China's interests and US interests in the region, while we don't spend a lot of time dwelling on this, are inherently convergent and desire a stable South Asia
."

The fundamental drivers are the huge military aid and grants to Pakistan over 30 years.
Proliferation of Chinese nukes and WMD arms to Pakistan over the last 30 years. And non compliance of international rules on China for these violations and US has stood the other way.

This is the primary reason why the region is in this way and now US wants to create stability in the region with "China's interests and US interests in the region desire a stable South Asia

krithivas
BRFite
Posts: 438
Joined: 20 Oct 2002 11:31
Location: Offline

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby krithivas » 29 Sep 2011 21:32

LONDON: In one of the largest shipwreck hauls, nearly £150 million worth of silver has been found on a British ship that was travelling from India but was sunk by a German U-boat in the Atlantic in 1941. The wreck of SS Gairsoppa has been found to contain 200 tonnes of silver by the American exploration company, Odyssey Marine, which will keep 80% of the cargo's value according to a contract with the department of transport

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/200-tonnes-of-silver-seized-from-sunken-ship-from-India/articleshow/10134924.cms

Indian wealth stolen by the British thieves and now claimed by the US. Interesting to read the comments, and at-least Indians are waking up now.

Haresh
BRFite
Posts: 895
Joined: 30 Jun 2009 17:27

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby Haresh » 30 Sep 2011 19:53


paramu
BRFite
Posts: 669
Joined: 20 May 2008 11:38

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby paramu » 01 Oct 2011 00:19

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/us/ba ... icans.html

THE BAY CITIZEN
Element of Indian Culture Feeds a Rising Crime Wave
By SCOTT JAMES
Published: September 29, 2011

A husband, wife and their 6-year-old son had just returned from the airport to their suburban home in Fremont. It was a sunny Sunday afternoon, Sept. 11, as they unloaded luggage from their car. Seemingly out of nowhere, two men appeared, one pointing a handgun.

“He said, ‘You’ll get hurt if you do anything,’ ” the husband later said, asking that his family and their street not be identified for fear of being further victimized. “They took us into the bedroom and made us kneel down. I was very scared that we might be shot.”

But the invaders were not there to kill — they wanted gold. The men ripped chains off the wife’s neck, tore at the husband’s bracelet and then ransacked the home until they found the rest of the jewelry, worth as much as $25,000. The thieves have not been caught.

That the family had so much gold is not unusual. As immigrants from India, it is their tradition to own and wear gold. The precious metal indicates prosperity, is a means of savings, and some gold jewelry can signify a woman’s marital status. It is a common wedding gift in many Indian cultures.

Thieves, it appears, have learned of these traditions, leading to a rash of robberies throughout Silicon Valley’s Indian-American communities in recent months. Indian-Americans are one of the fastest-growing Bay Area populations, and in Santa Clara County alone their number nearly doubled, to 111,000, in the past decade, according to the United States census.

The exact number of gold thefts is difficult to determine because the crimes have happened in several jurisdictions and victims’ ethnicity is not always made public. But interviews with the police, government and civic leaders, and representatives of the region’s Indian-American community confirmed the trend and growing alarm.

“It increased significantly nine months ago,” said Anu Natarajian, a Fremont city councilwoman. “It’s not a random thing that’s happening. People are afraid. People are nervous about it.”

abhischekcc
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4277
Joined: 12 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: If I can’t move the gods, I’ll stir up hell
Contact:

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby abhischekcc » 01 Oct 2011 09:25

If they note down the ethnicity of the thieves, they WILL be found to be pakis.

ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 54780
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US Strategic News and Discussion

Postby ramana » 01 Oct 2011 09:28

Will talk to the corporator and find out what the police is doing. I used to know the former mayor of that city.


Return to “Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests