Correct ramana sir!
Lets prepare for another round of Paki claims in Chicago
1. We want a stable A'stan. (while our strategic assets - Talibs, run afoul)
2. We support an Afghan led peace process. (but want the Talibs to be in the driving seat)
3. Pak is a victim of terrorism, we've lost 3000000000000000000 people, 350000000 security personnel and $7800000000000000 billion in your WoT.
NATO needs to identify this perfidy and not get all optimistic after hearing groper tell all sorts of lies.
By the way, Clinton's assertion that Pakis are harboring al zawahiri caused a lot of kolaveri among pakjabis. Yawn wrote an editorial critcizing Hilary for calling Pakis what they are - two faced liars, harboring virtually every terrorist in the world. The most heartburn was caused by the fact that she chose to say this in Yindia.
Hillary Clinton’s claim
...Must the secretary of state have chosen the soil of a country, with which Pakistan has had a long history of rivalry, to say the things she did? Equally unfortunate was the timing of her disparaging remarks, for they came at a time when negotiations between the US and Pakistan to reset ties are at a crucial stage. In fact, on Monday a State Department spokesman said that matters were not at a “standstill” between the two countries and the negotiators were trying to lay down “the groundwork for new cooperation”. Ms Clinton’s ill-advised words go against this spirit. As Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar said, if the US has any information that the Al Qaeda chief is hiding in Pakistan, it should share it with Islamabad instead of making speculative statements. Indeed, Ms Clinton should put her faith in quiet diplomacy rather than make sensitive statements through the media.