Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6919
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by habal »

the dossier always travels from east-west .. it is a one-way traffic.
Gus
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8220
Joined: 07 May 2005 02:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Gus »

Brad - i think they do this just so they can say some ridiculous equal==equal crap.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59808
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by ramana »

Anujan wrote:pakis have released a list of banned organizations.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/456294/list ... -pakistan/

Surprised that LeT is in there. It has never been formally banned.
Its to please US and claim to be a normal country. What is the use of banning an org when the same people who run it have a name change and operate openly?
This moves gives them plausible deniablity and warms WKKs and Pak pasand US diplomutts so they can got to town and defend this monstorsity called Pakisatan.
member_23629
BRFite
Posts: 676
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by member_23629 »

Brad Goodman wrote:Pakistan's first astronaut wants to make peace in space

Well mam space is peaceful because till now your brothers and sisters havent figured out how to reach there and do a dawah. Hopefully it stays the same
Get ready for the first suicide explosion in space, taking down a couple of Jewish satellites with it.
KJo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9926
Joined: 05 Oct 2010 02:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by KJo »

Romney is pro Pakistan just like Bush.
I bet if he becomes POTUS, he will resume paying them billions of our tax money.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59808
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by ramana »

KJoishy wrote:Romney is pro Pakistan just like Bush.
I bet if he becomes POTUS, he will resume paying them billions of our tax money.
Realism will force him as he needs to concentrate on domestic priorties so has to pay baksheesh to TSP and force India to kowtow.

Obama has some loose ends to tie up, finish what he started and they are all in TSP!
Mihaylo
BRFite
Posts: 762
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 21:10

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Mihaylo »

KJoishy wrote:Romney is pro Pakistan just like Bush.
I bet if he becomes POTUS, he will resume paying them billions of our tax money.

If Romney gets elected, I wouldn't be surprised if the Pukes try to sneak in a major terrorist attack to take advantage of the fog of transfer of power similar to 2008. Besides, a major terrorist attack is long overdue.

-M
abhijitm
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3679
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 15:02
Contact:

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by abhijitm »

Besides GoI is encouraging pakistan more. One 26/11 and MMS gives gift of Siachen to pukies. Sir Creek is in the offing for sometime, all pak has to do is to attack any metro city. And the biggest ever attack and maximum Indian lives will get them entire J&K. Cmon pakis just 2 years of MMS are left, do your best.
KJo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9926
Joined: 05 Oct 2010 02:54

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by KJo »

The Republicans like to play helpless that "but but Packeestan has nukes!" as their excuse. But when it came to "Eye-rak has nukes" they just went and bombed them.

Hoping for Ombaba to come back. Amit Ramanna (sorry ramana ji :D ) will be bad for India and the US.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7820
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Anujan »

Brad Goodman wrote:Pakistan's first astronaut wants to make peace in space

Well mam space is peaceful because till now your brothers and sisters havent figured out how to reach there and do a dawah. Hopefully it stays the same
First astronaut indeed!!
Chasing your dreams doesn’t always come cheap, Salim paid $200,000 to sign up with Virgin Galactic in 2007, funded with support from her family, who run a heavy construction equipment firm in the UAE. The weightless component of the flight will last for only a few minutes.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59808
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by ramana »

Thats not an astronaut but a well heeled space excursion traveller on a joy ride.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7820
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Anujan »

She should be bull cuttled if she has her feet over holy places during orbit.

Is she going into orbit? If so, she should pray 5 times per orbit because it is technically a day.
kenop
BRFite
Posts: 1335
Joined: 01 Jun 2009 07:28

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by kenop »

Brad Goodman wrote:Pakistan's first astronaut wants to make peace in space

Well mam space is peaceful because till now your brothers and sisters havent figured out how to reach there and do a dawah. Hopefully it stays the same
Why do I see this for the link above?
< >
Something went wrong, this page doesn't exist.

We're sorry, the page you've requested does not exist at this address. Please note:
If you typed in the address, used a bookmark or followed a link from another Web site, the page is no longer available.
Search
Kawnjpirasy
Jaspreet
BRFite
Posts: 212
Joined: 01 Aug 2004 02:22
Location: Left of centre

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Jaspreet »

Last edited by Jaspreet on 26 Oct 2012 23:15, edited 1 time in total.
member_22872
BRFite
Posts: 1873
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by member_22872 »

^^^^BENIS material, very similar in vein to water kit sapne, look here what the TSP 'astronaut' says:
As a child I always believed I would go to space. It’s not that I read about it one fine day and thought of signing up. I’ve always said this was in my DNA,she told AFP by Skype from Dubai.
What is so great about buying a trip to space? it need not be in one's DNA, you just need money. BTW, She also has jehadi DNA, she forgot to mention.
Nandu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2195
Joined: 08 Jan 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Nandu »

twitter rumour. Immy has been offloaded from a plane in Toronto to be questioned about his views on and ties to the Taliban.
RCase
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2252
Joined: 02 Sep 2011 22:50
Location: Awaiting the sabbath of Fry djinns

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by RCase »

KJoishy wrote: Hoping for Ombaba to come back. Amit Ramanna (sorry ramana ji :D ) will be bad for India and the US.
KLJoishyji, wouldn't 'Amit Ramani' be more appropriate? :)
RCase
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2252
Joined: 02 Sep 2011 22:50
Location: Awaiting the sabbath of Fry djinns

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by RCase »

Just how does one go about 'making' peace in space or will she be thinking of 'blowing to pieces' or 'making love' or 'blowing love' or ....??? :roll:
member_22906
BRFite
Posts: 305
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by member_22906 »

http://www.thehindu.com/news/internatio ... 031545.ece
Afghanistan’s contention is that the Durand Line Agreement – signed by the erstwhile governments of Afghanistan and India (under the British) to demarcate their respective territories – was valid only for 100 years and the land that had been made part of the British holdings should return to the Afghans.

Among the Pashtoons in Pakistan also, there is a section which advocates this position; primarily because of ethnic loyalties and the general demand for a Pashtoonistan. Pakistan rejects the 100-year time-frame of the agreement and maintains that binding bilateral agreements are passed on to successor states; making the Durand Line the official Pakistan-Afghanistan border. In fact, Pakistan is prickly about the border with Afghanistan being called the Durand Line.
:rotfl: :rotfl:
partha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4490
Joined: 02 Jul 2010 15:25

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by partha »

Nandu wrote:twitter rumour. Immy has been offloaded from a plane in Toronto to be questioned about his views on and ties to the Taliban.
:lol:
saip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4231
Joined: 17 Jan 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by saip »

partha wrote:
Nandu wrote:twitter rumour. Immy has been offloaded from a plane in Toronto to be questioned about his views on and ties to the Taliban.
:lol:
PTI Chief Imran Khan off-loaded from U.S. flight in Canada
Mihaylo
BRFite
Posts: 762
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 21:10

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Mihaylo »

habal wrote:the dossier always travels from east-west .. it is a one-way traffic.

..and at the risk of stating the obvious; Terrorism almost always travels west - east.


-M
Charlie
BRFite
Posts: 318
Joined: 12 Nov 2009 05:49

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Charlie »

Nandu wrote:twitter rumour. Immy has been offloaded from a plane in Toronto to be questioned about his views on and ties to the Taliban.
:rotfl:

Image

....Strengthens the hands of extremists...so allow us to raise money for Jihad against West from the faithfool platepissers of US/Canada.....
Charlie
BRFite
Posts: 318
Joined: 12 Nov 2009 05:49

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Charlie »

Tarek Fateh posted this list of Paki-Americans who are raising funds for the Talib-Khan who recently said that "Talibans war against US is a Holy War (Jihad)".

List of Paki American traitors

https://twitter.com/TarekFatah/status/2 ... 81/photo/1
Last edited by Charlie on 27 Oct 2012 01:21, edited 1 time in total.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59808
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by ramana »

Ajay Sharma wrote:http://www.thehindu.com/news/internatio ... 031545.ece
Afghanistan’s contention is that the Durand Line Agreement – signed by the erstwhile governments of Afghanistan and India (under the British) to demarcate their respective territories – was valid only for 100 years and the land that had been made part of the British holdings should return to the Afghans.

Among the Pashtoons in Pakistan also, there is a section which advocates this position; primarily because of ethnic loyalties and the general demand for a Pashtoonistan. Pakistan rejects the 100-year time-frame of the agreement and maintains that binding bilateral agreements are passed on to successor states; making the Durand Line the official Pakistan-Afghanistan border. In fact, Pakistan is prickly about the border with Afghanistan being called the Durand Line.
:rotfl: :rotfl:
Something is cooking on the Durand line
Reuters article

In Afghan War enter Sir Mortimer Durand
No where any mention that Ghilzais were left out on the east of the Durand Line and the Durranis on the West side.
Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21233
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Prem »

Demise and national salvation

Rowtte Hue ayye yeh Loge,Rowtte Hue yeh Jiyenge Loge , Rowta Hua Poqaqland Jayega.
The republic founded by Jinnah and conceded in all good grace by the British is dead. Let’s not be coy about this fundamental circumstance. Without the British there would be no Pakistan. The Raj did not greatly trouble the Muslims of India. The prospect of living under a Hindu majority did.Our forefathers fought not for liberation from foreign rule. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan at least was in no doubt about the benefits of British rule: “...for the peace of India and for the progress of everything in India the English Government should remain for many years – in fact for ever!” (This speech in Meerut, March 1988, makes for interesting if not extraordinary reading.) No, our forefathers struggled for safeguards to protect their separate status. And the British, not averse to playing the higher game of divide and rule, as any imperial conqueror would have done, gave them those safeguards.Fear about the future, which for the leaders of the Muslim community became a consuming insecurity, led over time to the demand for a state on the grounds of separatism: that we were a separate nation distinct from the Hindu majority, with our own culture and way of life. This was the two-nation theory and, try as we may to give it a modern interpretation, its foundation was religion. Not theocracy, far from it, but on nationhood defined in religious terms. There is no getting away from this.And since our foundational principles were cast in these terms is it any wonder that the divines and mullahs who had opposed Jinnah and the Muslim League abandoned their old positions once Pakistan was created and went about appropriating the ideology of the new state to use it for their own ends and impose their own brand of philosophy on it?Yes, Jinnah outlined an altogether different vision in his address to the Constituent Assembly on August 11, 1947: you are free to go to your temples, free to go to your mosques, this has nothing to do with the business of the state. There could be no clearer exposition of a secular polity. How desperately some of us clutch at the straw provided by this speech?
Lazy Chillumudins and Fakkardeens
Tailpiece: By the way, a nation which must have five to six holidays every Eid is in no mental condition for any kind of struggle. So I agree with those who say no unnecessary risks and that discretion is the better part of valour
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Rangudu »

Anujan wrote:pakis have released a list of banned organizations.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/456294/list ... -pakistan/

Surprised that LeT is in there. It has never been formally banned.
Anujan

That is incorrect. The Lashkar-e-Taiba has been banned in TSP since 2002, after the Parliament attack, when Musharraf banned 5 groups after pressured by the Bush admin.

The difference with other groups is that the LeT's reincarnation, JuD, has never been formally banned by TSP. This is in contrast to renamed versions of JeM, Sipah-e-Sahaba etc. which were banned after renaming.

Even if we know that "banned" in TSP is pretty meaningless, the fact that JuD has not even been subjected to that inconvenience, shows how much of a favorite it is.
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Rangudu »

Teetar is agog with a rumor that US customs has seized ~$70k of undeclared cash from Imran Khan's possession :)
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7820
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Anujan »

He went to US for fundraising. There was a 5000$ per plate dinner for him. He must have forgotten to declare what is rightfully his.

Didn't he want suspension of US aid?
sudhan
BRFite
Posts: 1157
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 17:53
Location: Timbuktoo..

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by sudhan »

^^
Baki websites are awash with comments like "Khan is the real leader!" "America is afraid of khan, AoA!" "Khan is a Lion!"

Im-the-dim is going to drum-up the issue of his detention to a frenzy on his return..

The Amreeki flag making (for burning of course) industry of Bakistan must be getting ready to rake in the dough..
Rangudu
BRFite
Posts: 1751
Joined: 03 Mar 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Rangudu »

Anujan wrote:He went to US for fundraising. There was a 5000$ per plate dinner for him. He must have forgotten to declare what is rightfully his.

Didn't he want suspension of US aid?
Actually, it appears that it was $$ that Im the Dim had collected in Toronto, that he did not declare while crossing over into US. You're legally supposed to declare cash at hand beyond a certain threshold.
lakshmikanth
BRFite
Posts: 723
Joined: 27 Oct 2008 10:07
Location: Bee for Baakistan

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by lakshmikanth »

Image

LOL.... Allah ke naam pe dede baba..... Drone ke naam pe dede baba.

And while we are at it, we also issue a threat to US and Canada that it will be very "expensive" to do this. Abdul who posted it needs a full (cavity level) inspection and interrogation.
Anujan
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7820
Joined: 27 May 2007 03:55

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Anujan »

Even with the security check, it is easier for him to travel to Canada and US than to FATA. That is something to think about.

When he was stopped from going to FATA why wasn't there same outrage?
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by shiv »

Anujan wrote:Even with the security check, it is easier for him to travel to Canada and US than to FATA. That is something to think about.

When he was stopped from going to FATA why wasn't there same outrage?
The people who stopped him from going to FATA believe that FATA is their land and they have drawn a border between Pakistan and FATA. These people do not recognize the Durand line, but they recognize a border between FATA and Pakjab.

But Canada, the US and the UN do not recognize the border between FATA and Pakjab. They only recognize the Durand line. Imran Khan is in line with the US and Canada and indeed the UN n which he thinks that if he becomes PM, he will have control of all the lands of FATA up to the Durand line.

There are effectively 3 "borders" that we are seeing with respect to Pakistan

Border 1 is the "internationally recognized" (US/Canada/UN) colonial border the Durand line
Border 2 is the Taliban/Pashtun border which rejects the Durand line and restricts Pakistan to Pakjab and Sindh the Taliban seek to control Kabul as well as FATA across the Durand line.
Border 3 is the ISI/Pakistani army border that seeks to control Kabul across the Durand line and have no border - that is they wish to dissolve both the "colonial" Durand line as well ass the Taliban FATA-Pakjab border for their "strategic depth"

In short the Paki army+ISI and the Taliban both have one common aim, and that is to dissolve the Durand line. But the Paki army will dissolve the Durand line only if they can control Kabul. If the Pashtun Taliban control Kabul, they will dissolve the Durand line and draw the border at FATA, But this is opposd by both the Paki army and the US/Canada/International community.

So the Paki army+ISI have a common aim with both the Taliban (to dissolve the Durand line) and the international community (to avoid a new border between FATA and Pakjab).

The USA wants to maintain colonial status quo at the Durand line and is asking the Paki army to fight the Pashtuns as far as the Durand line, but to keep off Kabul. The Pashtun Taliban want to control FATA in Pakistan and Kabul in Afghanistan.

As I see it, one solution may be to allow the formation of Pashtunistan and build a new capital at the historic city of Ghazni or Kandahar. Let a rump Afghanistan survive with Kabul as capital
Rohit_K
BRFite
Posts: 630
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 22:53
Location: atop Sukkur Barage

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Rohit_K »

shiv wrote: The people who stopped him from going to FATA believe that FATA is their land and they have drawn a border between Pakistan and FATA. These people do not recognize the Durand line, but they recognize a border between FATA and Pakjab.
...
Border 2 is the Taliban/Pashtun border which rejects the Durand line and restricts Pakistan to Pakjab and Sindh the Taliban seek to control Kabul as well as FATA across the Durand line.
Minor correction here. FATA doesn't share a border with Pakjab. The Pashtuns and Taliban want all the land right upto the Indus river which ranges from 20 to 140 kms beyond the FATA region.
Mihaylo
BRFite
Posts: 762
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 21:10

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Mihaylo »

Pretty sad if you think about it....I had great expectations.
No serious bum belast on the occasion of Eid Ul Padha


-M
shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 34982
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by shiv »

Rohit_K wrote:
shiv wrote: The people who stopped him from going to FATA believe that FATA is their land and they have drawn a border between Pakistan and FATA. These people do not recognize the Durand line, but they recognize a border between FATA and Pakjab.
...
Border 2 is the Taliban/Pashtun border which rejects the Durand line and restricts Pakistan to Pakjab and Sindh the Taliban seek to control Kabul as well as FATA across the Durand line.
Minor correction here. FATA doesn't share a border with Pakjab. The Pashtuns and Taliban want all the land right upto the Indus river which ranges from 20 to 140 kms beyond the FATA region.
Thanks. My fault for not looking at a map before I typed. I am not sure exactly what the Taliban want but I think they certainly want to dissolve the Durand line. Not really sure about their ambition to the east, although I have heard, from time to time, the assertion that they want to control all of Pakistan. But I have also heard the slightly different take that they do not consider themselves Pakistani, or Punjabi.

I am guessing that there are two Taliban elements. One is the Islamist element that seeks domination and the other is the Pashtun element. Both are under attack from the US for seeking to dissolve the Durand line. The Pashtun element is under attack from the Paki army for drawing a border within Pakistan. The Islamic element is something that the Paki army cannot oppose.

So it makes sense for the Islamist element and the Pashtun element to unite as they have a common cause. Sharia will be imposed most strictly by the Taliban. Neither Pakistan nor the US can object to that. That is why I believe that the Taliban are good Pashtun Muslims and we must not be opposed to them so long as they are involved in their just battle with the US and its clean shaven lackeys the Pakistan army
Lilo
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4080
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 09:08

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by Lilo »

Excellent !

Drone strike clustering :
North Waziristan
>Datta Khel (Hafiz Gul Bahadur allied to Haqqanis)
>Miram Shah (Base of Hafiz Gul Bahadur)
>Mir Ali ( IMU and TTP(from 2009) )

South Waziristan
>Wana - Maulvi Nazir (allied to Gul Bahadur)
>minor centers - Ladha, Makeen, Angoor adda, sargodha etc


South Waziristan is originally the base of Mehsuds (bulk of TTP) and after excluding Wana(Maulvi Nazir's area), gets very less damage compared to NW.

Gul Bahadur and Haqqanis are the main antagonists to Amreekis but are good taleban to TSPA (Haqqanis use NW as rear Base and as a staging point for attacks into Afghanistan)
IMU - is allied with TTP and has many Alqaeda elements allied and within it (drone targets in Mir Ali ?)
TTP - with whom Gul Bahadur is now estranged is currently the main antagonist to the TSPA and is based in SW,Mir Ali(of NW) and Bannu and also operates in rest of FATA . TTP leaders like Hakimullah, Qari Hussain , Wali-ur-Rehman etc have a knack of surviving drone strikes and then threatening american interests with dire consequences as well as mounting well telegraphed but ultimately ineffectual attacks on american interests (like Camp Chapman attack and Timesquare bomb plot). Their actual relationship to americans is however unclear.

When Unkil demands a TSPA offensive into NW, he wants it into Miramshah (TSPA already has a garrison twiddling their thumbs here) and Datta khel. When TSPA promises a "limited" NW offensive, it wants to limit it to Mir Ali and other TTP influenced areas.
Last edited by Lilo on 27 Oct 2012 10:27, edited 1 time in total.
ArmenT
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 4239
Joined: 10 Sep 2007 05:57
Location: Loud, Proud, Ugly American

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - Oct 4 2012

Post by ArmenT »

Rangudu wrote:
Anujan wrote:He went to US for fundraising. There was a 5000$ per plate dinner for him. He must have forgotten to declare what is rightfully his.

Didn't he want suspension of US aid?
Actually, it appears that it was $$ that Im the Dim had collected in Toronto, that he did not declare while crossing over into US. You're legally supposed to declare cash at hand beyond a certain threshold.
He can't deny that he didn't know about that rule being the seasoned traveller that he is, as similar rules are in place in nearly every country in the world. I bet that silly idiot was probably planning to pinch some of it for his personal use and declaring the amount at the airport would have let other people know how much was originally donated.
Post Reply