So basically he does not define it. Not defining then according to you is 'comfortably contextualizing' the concept, Secularism in this case. So whats your problem if i didn't give any definitions of those values.Secularism is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution……and it was Justice Ahmadi who said the following while justifying the 42nd amendment - “The term 'Secular' has advisedly not been defined presumably because it is a very elastic term not capable of a precise definition and perhaps best left undefined”. [Note how he is comfortable contextualizing the concept.
Others:
From what i gather you consider values are in context and thus no universality to them. That is Moral Relativism. Your Truth is different from the Truth of others. The concept of such moral relativism translates to all other Truths are = to your Truth. By indulging in moral relativism you have implicity recognized other Truths as having the same validity as your truth.
In short and in one shot, you have narrowed Dharma and all the values espoused by Lord Krishna and many others to narrow self imposed constraints.Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false only relative to some particular standpoint (for instance, that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others. It has often been associated with other claims about morality: notably, the thesis that different cultures often exhibit radically different moral values; the denial that there are universal moral values shared by every human society
The fight is not Hindutva vs constitution. The question is what kind of constitution do the Hndutvaadi's want? It's for them to define. This thread title and purpose is after all establishing such a state, right? From my side i have defined XYZ ideology whatever you want to pursue must reflect ABC values.If you have to set it up as Constitution vs. Hindutva fight, then at the very least you have to come prepared on Constitution
So if you set up some Hindutva state that is despotic, uncompassionate, untruthful, biased to it's citizens, seeking it's destruction is nothing wrong. That is the real Dharm Yudh. Ravana as i mentioned before was according to most here a HIndu, intelligent, learned in the Vedas. shastras etc etc. So why was he destoyed? Well i have been giving you the answer all along..
Ultimately cry, whine, yell, scream, froth as much. Whatever concept you come out with, it will have to be certified and tested with respect to values one expects the State to reflect.