Bharat Rakshak Forum Announcement

Hello Everyone,

A warm welcome back to the Bharat Rakshak Forum.

Important Notice: Due to a corruption in the BR forum database we regret to announce that data records relating to some of our registered users have been lost. We estimate approx. 500 user details are deleted.

To ease the process of recreating the user IDs we request members that have previously posted on the BR forums to recognise and identify their posts, once the posts are identified please contact the BRF moderator team by emailing BRF Mod Team with your post details.

The mod team will be able to update your username, email etc. so that the user history can be maintained.

Unfortunately for members that have never posted or have had all their posts deleted i.e. users that have 0 posts, we will be unable to recreate your account hence we request that you re-register again.

We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
Seetal

Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6802
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby JE Menon » 07 Sep 2017 16:50

^^^>>>Just like how when it comes to engineering, i will overrule 99% people here officially

Did I just actually see this...as my former GHQ with poor English used to say: "Somebody bite me" (referring to a mosquito bite, instead of something bit me).

That's communist-level confidence there macha!!!

Plus, aren't you an amateur historian like everybody else (I think) here?

A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9677
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby A_Gupta » 07 Sep 2017 17:41

Shiv, how history is literally erased:
http://dispatchesfromturtleisland.blogs ... ry-in.html

sudarshan
BRFite
Posts: 1601
Joined: 09 Aug 2008 08:56

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby sudarshan » 07 Sep 2017 18:36

^^^>>>Just like how when it comes to engineering, i will overrule 99% people here officially

:rotfl: From what I have learned over the years about members on this forum, there is no way you're going to overrule 99% of them officially in engineering. 9.9% - maybe. In any case, you know nothing about anybody or their backgrounds on this anonymous forum, so I suggest you lay off the bragging and attempts to intimidate. Learn to make your points some other way.

I do agree that you can overrule 99.9% of the members here in bragging about yourself. You don't see anybody else here bragging about their credentials, do you? I suspect that if they did, you'd be hard put to keep up.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33316
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby shiv » 07 Sep 2017 19:32

A_Gupta wrote:Shiv, how history is literally erased:
http://dispatchesfromturtleisland.blogs ... ry-in.html


There are many other examples including the rejection of Ctesias' work.

But that aside - the amount of literature that was put out in the last 150-200 years is so large that it is not al all difficult to locate stuff that historians have ignored and simply propagated what one person or wrote. The example closest to my interest is the misuse of the Vedas by translations of Max Muller as compared to translations by Aurobindo, Kashyap and Vidyarthi.(which range from the 1800s to 2010) I am using these currently to point out what has been done.

The other thing is that because the average volume produced from say 1850 to 1900 was typically verbose and ran into multiple hundreds of pages - even the "historians" have not read all of them or have not read them thoroughly and have left out or ignored details which can be dug out now. Many of those volumes have been digitized but the character recognition is poor and so they need to be read physically.

The third point is about assumptions and fudging that were based on racist ideas and ideas of Christian/western supremacy that have become mainstream because they have not been important enough for western and western trained desi historians to look at or revise. The field that is opening up is exciting.

Like I said earlier my thrust has been to depend as far as possible on texts from western authors which have been used to write history and critically examine the arguments that have been used to reach some conclusion or other and compare them with other similar authors. Some are hilarious in their shoddiness especially something written by David Anthony (Horse, Wheel and Language). In fact I am tempted to make a video of that - an AIT bashing video using some of that information.

SriJoy
BRFite
Posts: 859
Joined: 20 Apr 2017 23:21

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby SriJoy » 07 Sep 2017 21:58

shiv wrote:There are many other examples including the rejection of Ctesias' work.


Don't forget to include the reason why Ctesias is often rejected : Diodorus Siculus and Arrian (the latter is by far, the most dispassionate telling of history we have from that era) both openly state, in their own work 2000+ years ago, that Ctesias is unreliable and a liar. Same reason why Polybius is often overruled.
When the ancients themselves wrote 'this guy is a hack', we become skeptical.

SriJoy
BRFite
Posts: 859
Joined: 20 Apr 2017 23:21

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby SriJoy » 07 Sep 2017 22:05

sudarshan wrote:^^^>>>Just like how when it comes to engineering, i will overrule 99% people here officially

:rotfl: From what I have learned over the years about members on this forum, there is no way you're going to overrule 99% of them officially in engineering. 9.9% - maybe. In any case, you know nothing about anybody or their backgrounds on this anonymous forum, so I suggest you lay off the bragging and attempts to intimidate. Learn to make your points some other way.

I do agree that you can overrule 99.9% of the members here in bragging about yourself. You don't see anybody else here bragging about their credentials, do you? I suspect that if they did, you'd be hard put to keep up.


Way to miss the point. I work under the assumption that in a given coitierie of people, the majority are not engineers/doctors. Did you forget the part where i also said Shiv can overrule 99.9% here on medical matters, or was that too a brag ?

SriJoy
BRFite
Posts: 859
Joined: 20 Apr 2017 23:21

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby SriJoy » 07 Sep 2017 22:06

^^^>>>Just like how when it comes to engineering, i will overrule 99% people here officially

Did I just actually see this...as my former GHQ with poor English used to say: "Somebody bite me" (referring to a mosquito bite, instead of something bit me).

That's communist-level confidence there macha!!!

Plus, aren't you an amateur historian like everybody else (I think) here?


Perhaps its the wrong assumption to think most here aren't engineers/doctors (since most people in a random group of people are not),but the point was to draw attention to hierarchy of credibility in today's world.
And yes, i am what you'd call a true amatuer historian - a guy who has a minor degree in history and lifelong interest in it. One isn't a 'historian', never mind amatuer or professional, if they have no training/education in it at all. the difference is critical, as demonstrated in this thread: people who've read history formally, are aware of what the primary sources in their focus of history are. People who are simple, 'self-taught in history', as you can see, have no inkling on what constitute the primary/secondary sources in their focus of history.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33316
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby shiv » 07 Sep 2017 22:10

SriJoy wrote:When the ancients themselves wrote 'this guy is a hack', we become skeptical.

Please produce evidence that the ancients were not lying. Most of Ctesias' work was destroyed by those same people and only fragmentary evidence and third party references to Ctesias exist. They did not leave behind proof that could be verified by later people. Some historians they were. And you admire these jerks? LOL How about puttin your money where your mouth is o great degree holding engineer historian and show us the evidence.

And guess what - like all the other stuff you said you would show - you will once again produce nothing. That is what the nakshatras tell me and I betcha they will be right yet again :D Except maybe some long verbose posts with your CV in them. Oh by the way - your CV did not say what this "history degree" you have is called. This is the exact level of accuracy and detail I have come to reliably and unfailingly expect from historians and their tall claims. I can now believe that you are a true historian.

SriJoy
BRFite
Posts: 859
Joined: 20 Apr 2017 23:21

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby SriJoy » 07 Sep 2017 22:22

shiv wrote:Please produce evidence that the ancients were not lying. Most of Ctesias' work was destroyed by those same people and only fragmentary evidence and third party references to Ctesias exist. They did not leave behind proof that could be verified by later people. Some historians they were. And you admire these jerks? LOL How about puttin your money where your mouth is o great degree holding engineer historian and show us the evidence.

And guess what - like all the other stuff you said you would show - you will once again produce nothing. That is what the nakshatras tell me and I betcha they will be right yet again :D Except maybe some long verbose posts with your CV in them. Oh by the way - your CV did not say what this "history degree" you have is called. This is the exact level of accuracy and detail I have come to reliably and unfailingly expect from historians and their tall claims. I can now believe that you are a true historian.


Did you just ask evidence of a negative ? So much for your 'scientific education' there, chap. I will use the same evidence methodology you provide, to prove that the authors of Mahabharata and Ramayana are not lying and the whole thing isn't '4th century BC fiction to teach lessons to young princelings', to answer your 'prove a negative' own-goal question.

of course no such evidence exists. And of course, anyone with a sane mind will treat person X's work from 2000 years ago as 'iffy', if multiple people Y and Z from also 2000+ years ago say 'don't believe him, he is a hack'.

But i just wanted to put it on record, that the reason people like Ctesias, Polybius and Herodotus are not trusted, is not because of some 'random snipping and whim of evil western historians' but because other historians form the same period (read: before fall of Roman Empire), such as Arrian, Diodorus Siculus, etc. have called into question Polybius, Ctesias and Herodotus.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33316
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby shiv » 07 Sep 2017 22:43

SriJoy wrote:of course no such evidence exists.

Precisely. That is all that is needed from you. There is no evidence at all that Ctesias was a liar other than the claims of people who destroyed his work. The rest of your post is fluff - the sort of fluff used as justification by historians when they are clearly bluffing and trying to dodge it when caught.

Some of what remains could be accurate and certainly some of it is more accurate than Herodotus ants that mine gold in India :rotfl:
I tell ya historians are a laugh - in the way they take themselves so seriously

SriJoy
BRFite
Posts: 859
Joined: 20 Apr 2017 23:21

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby SriJoy » 07 Sep 2017 22:49

shiv wrote:
SriJoy wrote:of course no such evidence exists.

Precisely. That is all that is needed from you. There is no evidence at all that Ctesias was a liar other than the claims of people who destroyed his work. The rest of your post is fluff - the sort of fluff used as justification by historians when they are clearly bluffing and trying to dodge it when caught.

Some of what remains could be accurate and certainly some of it is more accurate than Herodotus ants that mine gold in India :rotfl:
I tell ya historians are a laugh - in the way they take themselves so seriously


What your psuedo-scientific mind missed, is that no evidence of such exist, because no evidence of a negative exists. time to brush up on your basic science methodology, doc. One too many kook-aid has been drunk by you at the altar of Indian irridentism.

Prove that it was Arrian and Diodorus Siculus were the ones who destroyed Ctesias's work.

Rest of my post provides reason for why Ctesias/Polybius/Herodotus are not seen favourably by historians. An unqualified and ignorant person like you calling it 'fluff' is in the same ballpark as a creationist calling Big Bang 'fluff'- meaningless.

Historians take themselves seriously because they have spent decades of their life pursuing their craft. they are no more/no less of a laugh than any art studies field. But a self-professed propaganda expert who sees history only as a tool for propaganda and has zero education in history, will not understand this, i suppose.

Oh and 'could bes' mean jack $hit. As i said, Mahabharata could be a composition of an Iranian travelling through India, imposed on NW India under Persian rule. Could be, ya know.
Maybe the nakshatra system was so popular amongst religious idiots 2000+ years ago, because Krishna actually pointed out a paneer planet revolving around an eggplant sun and the starving masses of India were hoodwinked by the prospect of no hunger. Hence they invented stories of 'Vimanas' so they could go to paneer planet. Could be.
:rotfl: :lol:

JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6802
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby JE Menon » 07 Sep 2017 23:03

>>Diodorus Siculus and Arrian (the latter is by far, the most dispassionate telling of history we have from that era)

Regarding Arrian, is it your personal assessment?

SriJoy
BRFite
Posts: 859
Joined: 20 Apr 2017 23:21

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby SriJoy » 07 Sep 2017 23:14

JE Menon wrote:>>Diodorus Siculus and Arrian (the latter is by far, the most dispassionate telling of history we have from that era)

Regarding Arrian, is it your personal assessment?


Its the assessment of most historians. this is because, Arrian, like Al Biruni, begins his works with 'i wasn't there, this is info i've gathered, some of which are questionable' and then proceeded (Arrian much better than Al Biruni) to say when/what findings he found unreliable.
Arrian also makes sure, in his writing, to cite exactly who told him what.

sudarshan
BRFite
Posts: 1601
Joined: 09 Aug 2008 08:56

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby sudarshan » 07 Sep 2017 23:24

SriJoy wrote:Way to miss the point. I work under the assumption that in a given coitierie of people, the majority are not engineers/doctors. Did you forget the part where i also said Shiv can overrule 99.9% here on medical matters, or was that too a brag ?


And I'm telling you the assumption is invalid. Since the assumption is invalid to begin with, I don't have to address the rest of your argument (this is your statement, not mine).

JE Menon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 6802
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby JE Menon » 07 Sep 2017 23:41

Hmmm...because Arrian's history of Alexander came 300-400 years after the fact, and was based on as far as I know a currently unavailable recounting by Ptolemy and Aristobolus. And his speculation on Alexander's reasons for doing things are not exactly based on who told him what. Plus, he wrote in ancient Greek (in both Attic and Ionic dialects), which were later translated by the Brits (as far as I know), and that is the version I presume you are referring to as being "the most dispassionate" - unless you are fluent in the Attic and Ionic dialects of ancient Greek.

Secondly, anyone today reading the English translation of his Indika (based on the work of the same name by Megasthenes and Eratosthenes), will immediately have to take a step back because the translation and name associations in it (for instance) are nothing short of startling unless one just wants to believe because some old white guy with a reputation said it.

RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 15996
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby RajeshA » 08 Sep 2017 01:53

SriJoy wrote:
RajeshA wrote:
The issue is not when the Yuan dynasty ended, but when it started. Vedveer Arya gives the dates from 619 CE - 1368 CE.


And Vedveer Arya is wrong. because Yuan dynasty did not end in 1368 CE. We have writings from tamerlane, where he is planning invasion of Ming China to put the Yuan as titular head (just like how Chagatai khan was titular head of timurid empire). its all there. Yuan dynasty cannot be from 619 CE because we have tang records, we have detailed account of Marco Polo, who had interactions with Kublai, Genghis Khan's grandson. Vedveer Arya is cooking up falsehood after falsehood that is easy to dismiss.


Marco Polo does not belong to 13th century at all, but to the 7th century, and this is me talking and not Vedveer Arya. Why do you think historians have always doubted the veracity of Il Milone?!

There is a lot more to this, but I'll leave it for a paper, for another time.

SriJoy wrote:
RajeshA wrote:Are you now promoting the notion that the Chinese had no astronomy or that they did not know how to observe and record solar eclipses, alignment of planets, etc.?


Nope. Except such references are not made in Chinese recording of dates.


Ha ha. Go read up then! There are loads of solar eclipses recorded in Chinese history! If you can't find on your own, you can always read Vedveer Arya's article.

SriJoy wrote:Yes, i have. I have emphatically proven that Ashoka is from 200s BC. Pick what source you would like and i will supply the said authorative study.


In fact, the Yavana kings mentioned in Asoka's rock edicts, have an extremely dubious mapping to Macedonian-Greek kings which followed Seleucus. For one thing, one wonders why would Ashoka be talking about some non-entity small time little king of Libya. Also there is quite some controversy about the dates of these kings, when are they to be considered contemporary to Ashoka, and that too, all at the same time. One only need to scrape the surface and one knows just how hollow and fragile these mappings really are.

Perhaps another interesting observation is that Greek sources are completely silent on Ashoka. There is nothing on him! Why is that? Wasn't he a neighbor, friend, adversary to all those "Greek" kingdoms?

If you want to do some serious repudiation of Vedveer Arya's claims, then you can take the two papers, read them and show why his alternative explanations are wrong!


If I wanted to know what current thinking is on these matters, then some of it I already know, and the rest is easily accessible on the net or libraries. I don't really need you to tell me about the current thinking.

When you come out of your Macaulayite brainwashing and wish to do some serious discussion, rather than regurgitate old school arguments, which Vedveer Arya has already shown as conflicting, then do write!

Interesting would be if you can show his list of conflicting claims by today's historians as not-conflicting. Instead right now you are simply reading me the Qu'ran!

Prem
BRF Oldie
Posts: 20214
Joined: 01 Jul 1999 11:31
Location: Weighing and Waiting 8T Yconomy

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby Prem » 08 Sep 2017 05:36

Rakhi Garhi DNA results to be out next Week ?

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33316
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby shiv » 08 Sep 2017 06:49


shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33316
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby shiv » 08 Sep 2017 09:24

"(In)Credible historian" Herodotus writing about India - and this guy is given the status of the Grand Poobah (PBUH) of historiography
http://www.thenagain.info/Classes/Sourc ... India.html
Here, in this desert, there live amid the sand great ants, in size somewhat less than dogs, but bigger than foxes. The Persian king has a number of them, which have been caught by the hunters in the land whereof we are speaking. Those ants make their dwellings under ground, and like the Hellene ants, which they very much resemble in shape, throw up sand-heaps as they burrow. Now the sand which they throw up is full of gold.
<snipsnip>
When the Indians reach the place where the gold is, they fill their bags with the sand, and ride away at their best speed: the ants, however, scenting them, as the Persians say, rush forth in pursuit. Now these animals are, they declare, so swift, that there is nothing in the world like them, if it were not, therefore, that the Indians get a start while the ants are mustering, not a single gold-gatherer could escape. :D


Herodotus Book III- Indians eat their parents but will not burn them
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/prit ... ok_03.html
When Darius was king, he summoned the Greeks who were with him and asked them for what price they would eat their fathers' dead bodies. They answered that there was no price for which they would do it. [4] Then Darius summoned those Indians who are called Callatiae, who eat their parents, and asked them
:eek: AllahoHerodotus!

"Credible historian" Herodotus
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/prit ... tml#89_107
These Indians whom I have described have intercourse openly like cattle; they are all black-skinned, like the Ethiopians. [2] Their semen too, which they ejaculate into the women, is not white like other men's, but black like their skin, and resembles in this respect that of the Ethiopians. These Indians dwell far away from the Persians southwards, and were not subjects of King Darius.



Here is one chap Andrew Nichols- who has done a dissertation of Ctesias who has the gumption to compare Ctesias the pariah with Herodotus the prophet (PBUH)

But download the paper and read it. This is what I call proper research. It is very good and shows the kind of dogma that is being peddled as history without re examination of several centuries of bluffing by LOL "historians"

http://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/0 ... hols_a.pdf
F45) [Ctesias] says about the Indus River that it is forty stades wide at its narrowest
point and two hundred at its widest: Cf. F45a; the width of the Indus River, by Ctesias’
calculations, would have ranged from 7-35 km. The narrowest point of the lower Indus in
modern times is at Sukkur in Pakistan where in 1932 the British completed a barrage across
the river which had a length of nearly 1.6 km. The actual width of the river would be no
more than 20 stades, however Ctesias’ exgerrated claims may stem from an observation of
the river when flooded beyond its banks (cf. Arora 1996 p. 20-21). During flood season
(July-September) the river can be several miles wide, although in modern times embankents
often prevent flooding.
the Indians: It should be noted that the ‘Indians’ discussed by the early Greek authors were
for the most part not within the realm of Sanskrit culture (cf. Kartunnen 1991 p. 83 n. 50).
What the Greeks called ‘India’ actually refers to the northwestern territory of the country
around the Indus (from which the country gets its name) in mostly what is now Pakistan (cf.
Kartunnen 1989 p. 7).
the population of the Indians is nearly greater than the rest of the world combined:
Herodotus (5.3) simply says that the Indians are the most populous nation on earth. While
both authors are in agreement about the magnitude of the Indian population, Ctesias makes
his assessment of the Indian population in a more emphatic and exaggerated manner than his
predecesor. This passage offers a glimpse into the dramatic style of Ctesias’ writing showing
how he sought to entertain and amaze his audience (See Introducton).
the only animal to live in it: Hdt. (4.44) states more accurately that the Indus is the world’s
second largest producer of crocodiles. It is possible that Ctesias’ worm is actually a fantastic
interpretation of the crocodile, however he is more likely describing a serpent influenced by
Indian beliefs (see note on §46). It is evident by is use of the term ‘animal’ (θηρίων) that
Ctesias is not including fish in this statement but rather he is only referring to the lack of
other types of ferocious beasts (cf. Lenfant 2004 p. 171 n. 780).
no men live beyond India: The Greeks viewed India as the end of the inhabited world (cf.
Kartunnen 1989 p. 157). Herodotus (3.98) also claims that India is the furthest east of any
known nation and that to the east of them is nothing but dessert. The testimony of these
authors seemes to be geographically based on the Thar in modern Pakistan which lies to the
west of the Indus (cf. Lenfant 2004 p. CXXXVIII-CXXXIX and p. 291 n. 781).


Ctesias:
It does not rain but India is irrigated by the river:

Actually the Oxus river is fed from snow-melt from the Pamirs in a rain poor area

Introduction for a full discussion on Ctesias’ sources).
the wall-destroying elephants: Cf. F45bα; F1b §16.4 and note; F48a and b with note;
Although 18th century scholars often cited this comment as evidence for the unreliability of
Ctesias, his decription of the elephant was remarkably accurate (cf. Kartunnen 1980 p. 106).
There is ample evidence in Indian sources to indicate that elephants were in fact used to tear
down fortification walls, which were often made of wood (cf. Megasth. FGrH 715 F17;
whose testimony is confirmed by archaeological finds in Page 1930 p. 135-140) . In the
Samgāmāvacarajātaka, for example, there is a description of an elephant breaking apart the
gates of Benares and in the Arthašāstra elephants are used to attack fortresses. Despite his
criticisms of Ctesias (see F48a and F48b), it is clear that even Aristotle used him extensively
in his treatment of the elephant (659a2; cf. Scullard 1974 p. 37), much of which is accurate
(see the excellent discussion of Bigwood 1993a). While it is clear that Ctesias gave a
detailed description of the elephant (see the greater detail in F45bα), little of his account
survives, probably because after the campaigns of Alexander and into the Roman period
elephants ceased to be a source of amazement.


It can converse like a human: The species of parakeet being described here may be the
plum-headed parakeet (psittacula cyanocephala). The male of the species has mostly green
(of varying shades) plummage but has a red patch (‘like cinnebar’) on its upper wing, a
narrow black collar that leads to a black stripe under the beak (‘a black beard’). Its head is a
deep red (‘crimson face’) tinged with purple on the lower cheek and back of the neck (‘dark
blue as far as the neck’). For a full discussion see Bigwood 1993b p. 324-327. The accuracy
with which Ctesias describes this bird indicates that he likely saw one in person. The fact the
the bird ‘can speak Greek’ was probably the result of the bird mimicing Ctesias himself.
That it speaks ‘Indian’ may indicate that the bird was brought to the court by an Indian
traveller, rather than a Persian or Bactrian merchant who had interacted with the Indians. As
such, this pasage provides valuable insight into the sources of Ctesias for the Indika. We
know elswhere that he had seen several Indians at the court, so he likely obtained some of his
testimony directly from Indians (See Introduction for full discussion on Ctesias sources).


239-240).
The dogs in India: These dogs were famous in antiquity and were kept in various parts of
the Near East (cf. Hdt. 1.192; see also 7.187 where we are told Xerxes took them with his
army). Their size and courage are well attested in both Greek and Indian sources. There is a
description in the Ramayana (2.64.21) of huge dogs with fangs like spears and the strength
and courage of tigers. Comparisons such as this, although common, may have resulted in
confusion for the Greeks leading Aristotle (H.A. 8.28 607a4; cf. G.A. 746a34) to claim that
the Indian dog is a hybrid of a dog and a tiger (it is unclear if he is using a source other than
Ctesias). However, there is evidence to support the assertion that these dogs fought with
lions. Sopeithes, an Indian king, gave Alexander a gift of Indian dogs and demonstrated their
prowress by having them fight a lion (Diod. 17.92). In Indian literature, the Mācala dogs of
the Vidarbha country were said to have the ability to kill tigers (JB 2.442) and in the
Mahābhārata (2.37.8) a pack of hunting dogs is seen attacking a sleeping lion.

There lives in India a beast called the martichora: CF. F45dα-δ; Believed to be derived
from OP martiya- (‘man’) and khordeh (‘eating’) (cf. McCrindle 1881 p. 298 n. 25; see also
Avest. khwar- ‘eat’) – cf. Modern Persian mard-kwār as a designation for the tiger. The
Near Eastern root indicates that Ctesias likely received his information from a Persian source
(cf. Arora 1991 p. 90) or at least through a Persian interpreter (F45dβ seems to indicate an
Indian source; perhaps the interpreter simply translated the phrase man-eater into Persian
rather than give the exact Indian phrase). Since antiquity this creature has been identified
with the tiger (cf. F45dγ). Although some have rejected this identification and seen the beast
as pure fantasy (cf. Lassen 1874 vol. 2 p. 652), most accept it as plausible (see for example
Bigwood 1964 p. 74-75). In fact, many of the attributes ascribed to the martichora can be
discerned in the tiger. For instance, at the tip of the tail is a small dermal protrusion like a
nail which is seen as the basis for the stinger of the martichora (although Ctesias would have
seen one with the stinger already crushed – cf. F45d β). The tiger’s whiskers are seen by
natives of India as harmful and are removed from tiger hides when hunted (they are also
believed to endow someone with power over the opposite sex). Unlike ruminants and
equines, the carniverous molar of the tiger has three lobes thus giving rise to the belief that
the martichora had three rows of teeth (cf. Ball 1885 p. 280-281). Ctesias likely accepted his
informant’s statement that it had a human face since this is a matter of opinion and we do not
know how close he was able to get to the animal’s cage (cf. Kartunnen 1991 p. 79).

svenkat
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4722
Joined: 19 May 2009 17:23

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby svenkat » 08 Sep 2017 11:02

I hope learned mullahs dont mind this distraction.

Subhash Kak‏ @subhashkak1
Zoroastrians call their original land Airyana Vaeja and the Sanskrit texts call it Aryavarta. http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroas ... avaeja.htm …

The names Eire (Ireland) and Iran are from Arya, which remembers the original land of Greater India from where these people moved West.

Rajesh Raina‏
@rajesh_raina

King, old Cyng are derived from Singh. Simha. No lion ever found in Europe. Indians continued to call ruler Cyng when they migrated west.

Subhash Kak‏ @subhashkak1
Subhash Kak Retweeted Rajesh Raina
Most interesting theory: King (old form, cyningg; German König) = Sanskrit Singh, सिंह. "As leon is the king of bested." John Gower, 1390

Prem Kumar
BRFite
Posts: 1983
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 00:10

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby Prem Kumar » 08 Sep 2017 22:06

Shiv: I happened to read that article as well today.

Stunning similarities between the Slavic languages/cultures and Sanskrit!

One is amazed at the perversion of the Western mind. Tries to paint the most tolerant religion as the most violent. Portrays the mother of civilization (biggest source) as the youngest one (biggest recipient). Calls the most violent religion as the one of love.

krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5694
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby krisna » 09 Sep 2017 02:35

shiv wrote:<snip>
Here is one chap Andrew Nichols- who has done a dissertation of Ctesias who has the gumption to compare Ctesias the pariah with Herodotus the prophet (PBUH)


https://rajivmalhotra.com/books/indras- ... chapter-8/

With Indra's Net Rajiv Malhotra actually gave publicity to this Nicholson without knowing that actually Nicholson had plagiarised the book from an Indian during his desseration thesis.
This came to light when RM was accused of plagiarism from the usual anti RM folks. :rotfl:

In fact Andrew Nicholson gained popularity due to his being quoted by RM ironically. :lol:

But post plagiarism charges which boomranged massively on him, he has kept quiet.

krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5694
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby krisna » 09 Sep 2017 03:24

SriJoy wrote: <snip>

Again, Chinese history- atleast, their king list- has undergone only minor changes (+/- couple of years for a couple of Emperors/kings, which is normal), since the era of Qianlong Emperor- i.e., late 1700s AD. Its not like the Chinese dynasty list from 1800s is radically different from the 1950s onwards. It is not. ( china has same language for centuries with some change but not a whole lot. most if the Chinese are of same stock, no outsiders of different race stayed for considerable length of time to muck the history)

As for 'evil western historians'- has it ever struck any of you- how unlikely a 'grand conspiracy of history' is, between every single historian in the west, japan, China, etc- especially considering that the historian who exposes this fraud instantly becomes the richest and most prominent historian of his/her time in the world ???
( can pipe down a little- there are some controversies but not germane to this thread)
Sorry, i have no time for biassed conspiracies. Only for first hand records and as someone else said- Satyameva Jayate.

Only reason the hack jobs here are pi$$ed off, is because they are dealing with someone (me), who has decades of learning history and formal history education under his belt- hence they are angry that i can call them out on BS claims, such as entire history of the world being faked and none-the wiser, except a so-called non-professional like Vedveer Arya (who is a civil servant, with less history education than me- a part timer- never mind actual professionals). Which is why there are individuals here who are intimidated by knowledge and instead, make ridiculous claims of 'no one can know as much'. Ironically, what i know, may be 100x the combined historical knowledge possessed by these irridentists, but my own knowledge is like 10-20% of what a history professor should have.

these folks are conspiracy-selling hack-jobs, which the world has seen for decades.looking to make a quick buck by distorting history for popular consumption.


About the bolded part is fully BS.
Example-
I am a lowly hakim in my profession. I routinely discard suggestions of other specialities if their view does not help the patient or looks absurd. I have done it to professors, many senior doctors strictly based on clinical aspects without any ego or personal issues with them. But some biggies se a threat to their authority and ego. I have had compliants to higher authorities by these oiseaules so called profs and specilaity folks who claim knalidge in their subject being bested routinely by me. The authorities know me well. Also I have the backing of having some of the best reviews by patients which is usually handy to beat the power and pelf of these specialities.

I normally don't say these but I am forced to now. :(( :((

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33316
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby shiv » 09 Sep 2017 06:50

krisna wrote:
shiv wrote:<snip>
Here is one chap Andrew Nichols- who has done a dissertation of Ctesias who has the gumption to compare Ctesias the pariah with Herodotus the prophet (PBUH)


https://rajivmalhotra.com/books/indras- ... chapter-8/

With Indra's Net.

Interesting but this guy is Andrew D Nichols of the U of Florida, not Nicholson

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33316
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby shiv » 09 Sep 2017 07:28

krisna wrote:
SriJoy wrote:Only reason the hack jobs here are pi$$ed off, is because they are dealing with someone (me), who has decades of learning history and formal history education under his belt- hence they are angry that i can call them out on BS claims, such as entire history of the world being faked and none-the wiser, except a so-called non-professional like Vedveer Arya (who is a civil servant, with less history education than me- a part timer- never mind actual professionals). Which is why there are individuals here who are intimidated by knowledge and instead, make ridiculous claims of 'no one can know as much'. Ironically, what i know, may be 100x the combined historical knowledge possessed by these irridentists, but my own knowledge is like 10-20% of what a history professor should have.



About the bolded part is fully BS.
Example-
I am a lowly hakim in my profession. I routinely discard suggestions of other specialities if their view does not help the patient or looks absurd. I have done it to professors, many senior doctors strictly based on clinical aspects without any ego or personal issues with them. But some biggies se a threat to their authority and ego. I have had compliants to higher authorities by these oiseaules so called profs and specilaity folks who claim knalidge in their subject being bested routinely by me. The authorities know me well. Also I have the backing of having some of the best reviews by patients which is usually handy to beat the power and pelf of these specialities.

I normally don't say these but I am forced to now. :(( :((


:lol: Thanks for saying it but it was a mistake saying it to this guy. He will come up with a long rant in response.

I was reminded by the man's boasting of a sports director in college who happened to have a degree in law. Every time we cornered him in an argument he would say. "You can't argue with me, I hold a law degree"

The most hypocritical statement of comes from this sentence:
SriJoy wrote:Sorry, i have no time for biassed conspiracies. Only for first hand records and as someone else said- Satyameva Jayate.


Clearly he has the time and motivation to come on here, read and rant. Something upsets him a great deal and his objections are mainly about the motivations of people, their ignorance and his own qualifications. He has made at least four promises to produce facts and data and now I know that these will not come.

vnms
BRFite
Posts: 155
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 01:56

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby vnms » 09 Sep 2017 07:35

This dude, SriJoy, claims that he has "has decades of learning history and formal history education under his belt".

So, after spending decades in the field of studying history, did he go back to college and get his engineering degree and move into the software field?

I'm confused onlee.

PS: It might be unpopular here, but I really pity this dude. He is the perfect metaphor for the saying:
"Dhobi ka kutta, na ghar ka, na ghat ka".

A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9677
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby A_Gupta » 09 Sep 2017 17:40

What is going on with Rakhigarhi aDNA?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city ... 431875.cms
LUCKNOW: The mystery surrounding the origin of the Indus valley population and reconstructing the history of Harappa will be possible with the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences (BSIP) all set to conduct research on prehistoric DNA. In a first, the institute is setting up an ancient DNA laboratory.

Earlier, the institute had found through research that ostrich lived in India 25,000 years ago. Now, palaeo-scientists would be researching on the DNA of 20 skeletons procured from Rakhigarhi and Farmana in Harappa. The institute will officially declare setting up of the ancient DNA laboratory on its foundation day on September 10. The lab would also be the first in South Asia to study DNA of the prehistoric age.

"The institute has a rare collection of some of the oldest grains from the Gangetic plains and rare archaeological sites. Ancient DNA analysis may lead to major discovery in the field of palaeosciences," said BSIP director Sunil Bajpai.
The institute will first conduct DNA study of the 20 skeletons from the Harappan site followed by that of horses, rice grains from Gangetic plains and grains from Harappan sites. "DNA study of the earbone and teeth of the 20 skeletons will be conducted. These skeletons were collected by the BSIP after excavation from two of the oldest Harappan sites," said scientist Niraj Rai.

A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9677
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby A_Gupta » 09 Sep 2017 18:50

Hahaha, for a bunch of guys who study history, you should try learning from it. I turned on "ignore" on SriJoy weeks ago, and need only suffer him in other folks' quotes of him.

krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5694
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby krisna » 09 Sep 2017 20:10

shiv wrote:

Interesting but this guy is Andrew D Nichols of the U of Florida, not Nicholson


Thanks, my mistake.

krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5694
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby krisna » 09 Sep 2017 20:11

A_Gupta wrote:Hahaha, for a bunch of guys who study history, you should try learning from it. I turned on "ignore" on SriJoy weeks ago, and need only suffer him in other folks' quotes of him.


sorry but do pity you :(( :mrgreen:

krisna
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5694
Joined: 22 Dec 2008 06:36

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby krisna » 09 Sep 2017 20:26

Might be OT to some extent

About China history, it is good major parts are non controversial at least some form of evidence- reasons are simple-- same language for centuries with not much little change . No large scale invasions and destruction except for brief periods from ulanbatorji yaks who grazed beyond their confines of their land. Hence no large scale distortion of history.
Recall similarly the period of Indian history. lot of destruction, rewriting of history by invaders.
Indians have devised ways of preserving its history through temples and its intricate carvings, symbols of beyone eras, poetries, baallads , different forms of dramas like yakshaganas, dance forms like kuchipudi, bhartanatyam and myriad other features. They have been refined and honed over time spanning centuries.
In fcat people say even if current form of Hinduism as is known is destroyed it has seeds of revival due to the redundancies built inot the system aas in above. History iss intermixed into all these.

Despite large scale destruction of Indian libarries and educational institutions by both Christian and Islamic invaders and rewriting their history superimposed on Indian ones, still there is some spark about olden times.
Due to this and the overwhelming presence of anti Indian forces ruling for long time , things have not been alright overall. I have to appreciate the ingenuity of our forefathers that despite such large scale destruction, they had the brilliance to have some form of history stored in various forms.


Recall European history-- large scale destruction of europe by Christianity made sure the history of pre chirstian times is completely erased from memory and in all forms. only we have vetsiges like Christmas tree, and few others disgested into christianity

Recall Arab history- not much is known about pre Islamic origins due to large scale destruction by islamists.

Recall American history-- large scale destruction by Christians resulted in less history known about pre 1400s life of orginal americans in both Americas.

Hence china is lucky in many ways .

Pulikeshi
BRFite
Posts: 1293
Joined: 31 Oct 2002 12:31
Location: Badami

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby Pulikeshi » 09 Sep 2017 20:44

A_Gupta wrote:What is going on with Rakhigarhi aDNA?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city ... 431875.cms
LUCKNOW: The mystery surrounding the origin of the Indus valley population and reconstructing the history of Harappa will be possible with the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences (BSIP) all set to conduct research on prehistoric DNA. In a first, the institute is setting up an ancient DNA laboratory.

Earlier, the institute had found through research that ostrich lived in India 25,000 years ago. Now, palaeo-scientists would be researching on the DNA of 20 skeletons procured from Rakhigarhi and Farmana in Harappa. The institute will officially declare setting up of the ancient DNA laboratory on its foundation day on September 10. The lab would also be the first in South Asia to study DNA of the prehistoric age.


What's the background story of this institute? Seems like it was started as a PaleoBotany institute -
What's the interest in ancient animal/human DNA? Is this something supported/funded by DST in India?

Pulikeshi
BRFite
Posts: 1293
Joined: 31 Oct 2002 12:31
Location: Badami

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby Pulikeshi » 09 Sep 2017 21:30

SriJoy wrote:Your type of distortions will remain 'fringe historical fiction' until - if- your type of people manage to utterly destroy the academic system we have in place and revert to ignorant religious rantings of cavemen and taking those on face-value. the world we live in, you, Nilesh, this Vedveer guy etc. will only ever matter on this topic, over the internet. In official setting, i will overrule all of you- because i have an actual degree in this topic and you guys don't.And Kazanas will overrule me when it comes to history. Because he is a professor and i am a lowly minor degree. Just like how when it comes to engineering, i will overrule 99% people here officially and when it comes to medicine, you will overrule me and 99% here on official basis.


Having been on this forum since its very beginning, and having fought a few pitched battles meself...
must say this diatribe above takes the cake! :rotfl:
In the real world none of all of us matter, self-inflated egos aside...
anonymity protects the pedestrian/mediocre as much as the scholar/successful
The system of History itself has undergone massive changes in how it approaches the subject and there are enough documented works to accommodate this evolution in what is essentially a 'social science' ~ What is the need to ironically put it on a "religious" pedestal of infallibility?

I'd take the caveman's ranting any day to avoid the neophyte religious zealotry you claim for the academic system called "History!"
Listening to the former is to see him making a fool of himself, listening to you is making a fool of all of us! :evil:

You are welcome to your opinion and voice, but you are drowning out even the open-minded and skeptical in your blind dogmatic belief in History!

peter
BRFite
Posts: 1161
Joined: 23 Jan 2008 11:19

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby peter » 09 Sep 2017 23:05

SriJoy wrote:
peter wrote:
Assume there were 50 authors who revised Mahabharata repeatedly in various centuries or millenniums. They wrote N observations of stellar phenomenon.

What date distribution do you expect for these N observations?


Can you clarify your question ?

Sure. There are many astronomical observations in Mahabharata. Winter solstice, eclipses, sequence of repeating eclipses, movement of pole star etc.

If you were to identify the dates for each of the observation and some of these observations may be satisfied on multiple dates what distribution of dates do you expect?

vnms
BRFite
Posts: 155
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 01:56

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby vnms » 10 Sep 2017 03:01

Talking about history from western perspective, the British do not teach, in their schools, about the atrocities committed by them in India. So, per our eminent historian cum engineer, it never happened because it is not taught in the bastion of the western world view.

Western exceptionalism... my @ss

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33316
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby shiv » 10 Sep 2017 06:55

Folks here is a Tweet I found from a well known (online) personality with the same disease of self aggrandisement as the crutch for being The Fountain of Knowledge. Almost like they both have the same degree in history
https://twitter.com/helpunmask/status/9 ... 9935877120
Image

Dipanker
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2875
Joined: 14 May 2002 11:31

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby Dipanker » 10 Sep 2017 07:17

Just checked her bio, she has a PHD from Columbia University and teaches Indian History at Rutgers. Columbia is one of the top university. So she does have the impressive credential to back her claims.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33316
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby shiv » 10 Sep 2017 07:36

Dipanker wrote:Just checked her bio, she has a PHD from Columbia University and teaches Indian History at Rutgers. Columbia is one of the top university. So she does have the impressive credential to back her claims.

It is not degrees that make the person. Thousands of great people come out of unknown universities. The reputation of the University is made by greats and sullied by bums. That said I don't know what the hell Columbia university is. It has certainly produced biased trash like Trushcke just like Harvard has Witzel. If you admire the university - that is your prerogative - but I will choose what to see as "impressive", as is my prerogative.

sudarshan
BRFite
Posts: 1601
Joined: 09 Aug 2008 08:56

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby sudarshan » 10 Sep 2017 08:12

I too have a PhD from a well-known university (not in history though). Since we're throwing credentials around, I might as well toot my own horn a little. And the reason I'm tooting my horn, is so that what I say below doesn't get dismissed as "sour grapes."

I agree with shiv, a degree is great, but is not a reliable marker of merit. If the person harbors a systemic bias in his/her mindset, then the degree is not just useless, but actually something to be wary of - it is a credential which the person has earned, just so he/she can use that credential to push biased views.

It was rumored that the Soviets had a certain method in setting up spies. They would groom the spy for years and years, training him/her in English, in the native culture of the USA or UK, getting them to talk dollars and cents, even building mock-ups of areas in the USA or UK where the spy was later expected to live, etc. But it didn't stop there. The Soviets would also actively scout for "lost identities" of American or British citizens. These could be dead and forgotten people, whose deaths were mysterious, or who were lost for good. The Soviets would then prepare papers like passports and other ID, phone numbers, etc., all duplicating this dead and/or lost person. The spy who is groomed then simply takes on the identity of this lost soul, and takes up residence in the USA or UK. This could be a classic spy (information source), or a sleeper agent who is waiting to be activated on some do-or-die mission.

Kind of like Islamic sleeper cells.

Why do I mention this? Just to show that it is possible to do the grunge-work of acquiring a PhD, all the while harboring systemic biases (which are shelved during the academic process), and once the credential is set up, to use that credential to push the bias. I'm not saying that people consciously do this - but sub-consciously, it is very much possible for a biased or otherwise bad researcher to shelve those biases for the period of the degree, and then to revive them during the research or teaching career.

So, tread with caution when evaluating these degreed and pedigreed individuals. Look more at the pattern of their research and their methods, and particularly at any in-built biases, than at the bland degree statement itself.

I also say this - a PhD from a reputed university is not such a rarity anymore. Thousands or even tens of thousands of these PhDs are churned out every year. What distinguishes one such PhD-holding researcher from the next? Research quality. Which includes biases, obligation to funding sources, commitments to mortgages and other payments, commitment to the research itself, and many, many other such factors.

Pulikeshi
BRFite
Posts: 1293
Joined: 31 Oct 2002 12:31
Location: Badami

Re: Out-of-India - From Theory to Truth: Part 2

Postby Pulikeshi » 10 Sep 2017 08:30

Dipanker wrote:Just checked her bio, she has a PHD from Columbia University and teaches Indian History at Rutgers. Columbia is one of the top university. So she does have the impressive credential to back her claims.


Now I am going to come off harsh, but it is not personal - just making a point for anyone who's interest is Bharat!

Please to research 'Bless India' (disappeared off the radar... but used to be a shady EJ operation in NE) - why is this important...
Well it was run by Nate Rehn (whose son Thane is apparently married to the motormama) Audrey Truschke and them all are EJ Southern Baptists...
But being married to a EJ husband or being part of 'soul harvesting' church should not make her less of a scholar...
after all many were historically worse: Max Muller et. al. :P :mrgreen:

Now as far as Columbia, Yale, Harvard, whatever... In logic minimally this fails in 'appeal to authority' (Motormama better read Aristotle first!)

Irrespective... anyone who shows up on twitter and claims "I have deep knowledge, language skills, & make well-supported arguments."
Caveat emptor! :P
Last edited by Pulikeshi on 10 Sep 2017 08:35, edited 1 time in total.


Return to “Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bharotshontan, rudradeep and 23 guests