Sunni Terrorist Fragments of Unstable Pakistan - 12 Dec 2014

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 29 Jan 2015 10:44

partha wrote:It's probable that in private Modi has told Obama he is ready to hand over Kashmir to Pakistan. Could sacking of hawks like foreign secretary Sujata Singh be the first step? ZOMG!!

Some Pakis are speculating on twitter that Sujata Singh got sacked for her hawkish views on Pakistan and stalled Indo-Pak dialogue. Morons don't realize that her replacement is S Jaishankar: where the 'S' refers to his father, who happens to be Shri K Subrahmanyam. Yes the same K Subrahmanyam. If even 10% of his father has rubbed off on him, Pakis are in for interesting times.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 29 Jan 2015 10:47

VikasRaina wrote:How will India "Become a world Power" if it resolves its issues with Bakistan ?
I mean I have seen Pakis narrating this line ad nauseum but no Paki knows how will it make India, a world power. \On top if India becomes a world power by ceeding Kashmir to Pakistan, Isn't it fraught with risk strategy for Pakis because a legitimate world power can snatch back Kashmir along with few chunks of NWFP and Balochistan as VAT.

Paki Puebocrats came up with this line in 90s and Indian economy have grown 8 fold since Bakwasistani
came up with this fantasy.

Atri · Post by **Atri** » 29 Jan 2015 10:57

Anujan wrote:
partha wrote:It's probable that in private Modi has told Obama he is ready to hand over Kashmir to Pakistan. Could sacking of hawks like foreign secretary Sujata Singh be the first step? ZOMG!!
Some Pakis are speculating on twitter that Sujata Singh got sacked for her hawkish views on Pakistan and stalled Indo-Pak dialogue. Morons don't realize that her replacement is S Jaishankar: where the 'S' refers to his father, who happens to be Shri K Subrahmanyam. Yes the same K Subrahmanyam. If even 10% of his father has rubbed off on him, Pakis are in for interesting times.

Wow.. did not realize this.. har har mahadev onlee!!

johneeG · Post by **johneeG** » 29 Jan 2015 11:03

Anujan wrote:
partha wrote:It's probable that in private Modi has told Obama he is ready to hand over Kashmir to Pakistan. Could sacking of hawks like foreign secretary Sujata Singh be the first step? ZOMG!!
Some Pakis are speculating on twitter that Sujata Singh got sacked for her hawkish views on Pakistan and stalled Indo-Pak dialogue. Morons don't realize that her replacement is S Jaishankar: where the 'S' refers to his father, who happens to be Shri K Subrahmanyam. Yes the same K Subrahmanyam. If even 10% of his father has rubbed off on him, Pakis are in for interesting times.

If hawkishness is the criteria, I think Doval and Modi are much more hawkish than Sujata Singh. I am amazed at this pakistani ability to lie so blatantly. I mean when people normally lie, then atleast mix some truth to make the lie believable. Pakistanis seem to invent a total fiction. I think they lie to convince themselves because no one else buys their lies anyway.

VikasRaina wrote:How will India "Become a world Power" if it resolves its issues with Bakistan ?
I mean I have seen Pakis narrating this line ad nauseum but no Paki knows how will it make India, a world power.
On top if India becomes a world power by ceeding Kashmir to Pakistan, Isn't it fraught with risk strategy for Pakis because a legitimate world power can snatch back Kashmir along with few chunks of NWFP and Balochistan as VAT.

The idea is that Bhaarath will become super-power anyway. It is Pakistan which is stopping Bhaarath from getting to its potential of being a super-power. But, the solution given by Pakistanis is appeasement.

This is just a variation of 'minorities need to be appeased for India's development' mantra. One has to realize that Pakistanis act as if they are part of Bhaarath. They are just glorified naxals/jihadhis with a UN recognition.

Even if Pakistan gets Kashmir, what will it do with it? Balochistan and Paskthukwa want to become separate. Kashmiris in POK are also not happy. So, what will adding somemore areas achieve? Nothing. Pakistanis talk about Kashmir to keep themselves occupied. They don't want to face the reality that their country is coming apart. So, this is a way to distract themselves.

----
Sheshadhri Chari rocked in that Arnab talk show. Paraphrasing him,"Neither strong pakistan nor weak pakistan is in India's interests. No Pakistan is in India's interests."

partha · Post by **partha** » 29 Jan 2015 11:10

@Anujanji,

Exactly. S Jaishankar will probably be more hawkish w.r.t Pakistan i.e more realistic. It's in his genes

More than that him being an expert on US, China, Japan, Singapore the message from his appointment is likely that Pakistan is not a foreign policy priority for Modi govt and in tune with with Modi's "Act East" policy.

Pakis have been imagining things that they want to happen but not happening ever since Modi govt canceled secretary level talks and put Pakistan on ignore list -

"Pakistan sneaks into India-US strategic vision"
"It's probable Modi was advised by Obama in private blah blah"
"Sujata Singh was sacked because she was anti Pakistan hawk"

Next what? Apple agrees to fund Diamer Bhasha dam from first quarter profits, hain?

Altair · Post by **Altair** » 29 Jan 2015 11:11

Anujan wrote:
partha wrote:It's probable that in private Modi has told Obama he is ready to hand over Kashmir to Pakistan. Could sacking of hawks like foreign secretary Sujata Singh be the first step? ZOMG!!
Some Pakis are speculating on twitter that Sujata Singh got sacked for her hawkish views on Pakistan and stalled Indo-Pak dialogue. Morons don't realize that her replacement is S Jaishankar: where the 'S' refers to his father, who happens to be Shri K Subrahmanyam. Yes the same K Subrahmanyam. If even 10% of his father has rubbed off on him, Pakis are in for interesting times.

Incidentally, Subrahmanyam was on board an Indian Airlines flight (IC 421) on 24 August 1984 when the plane was hijacked to Lahore, Pakistan and onward to Dubai where all passengers were released without incident. Interestingly, the arrested hijackers later claimed in court that it was Subrahmanyam who "planned the entire hijacking to examine nuclear installations in Pakistan.lol

johneeG · Post by **johneeG** » 29 Jan 2015 11:25

partha wrote:@Anujanji,

Exactly. S Jaishankar will probably be more hawkish w.r.t Pakistan i.e more realistic. It's in his genes More than that him being an expert on US, China, Japan, Singapore the message from his appointment is likely that Pakistan is not a foreign policy priority for Modi govt and in tune with with Modi's "Act East" policy.

Pakis have been imagining things that they want to happen but not happening ever since Modi govt canceled secretary level talks and put Pakistan on ignore list -

"Pakistan sneaks into India-US strategic vision"
"It's probable Modi was advised by Obama in private blah blah"
"Sujata Singh was sacked because she was anti Pakistan hawk"

Next what? Apple agrees to fund Diamer Bhasha dam from first quarter profits, hain?

It seems that the Bhaarath's Pakistan policy is being handled by Doval rightnow. I think Jaishankar is being rewarded for a successful organization of Modi's trip to US and Obama's trip to Bhaarath.

Raja Ram · Post by **Raja Ram** » 29 Jan 2015 13:39

It is also pertinent to note that S. Jaishankar was one of the key interlocutors used when the Nuclear Deal was being negotiated. He apparently is not only well versed with the geo political and strategic nuances of Nuclear issues but is also very knowledgable on the scientific and technical aspects of it.

Also it is pertinent to note that he has served in China as well as in Japan in addition to the US and is fluent in both Mandarin and Japanese. Apparently his wife is/was a Japanese national.

It is an interesting move as it indicates certain priorities of the government in terms of external affairs. One must also add here that many diplomats serving and not serving are quite impressed and amazed of the performance of Sushma Swaraj as EAM. Apparently she is fully conversant of what needs to be done and is putting a lot of work.

Will be interesting to see the role the EAM and new Foreign Secretary will be playing along with NSA Doval and Modi himself.

Singha · Post by **Singha** » 29 Jan 2015 13:40

http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2 ... lanka.html

fascinating article on the persecution of Ahmedis in TSP and their establishing a new colony in Negombo Sri Lanka.

vina · Post by **vina** » 29 Jan 2015 14:08

More than that him being an expert on US, China, Japan, Singapore

His wife is Japanese (okay now an Indian citizen most probably). I think he will be a realist not not be given to airy fairy make believe and Urdu Shairi like some of the pre partition Punjabi types with roots in Lahore etc (Gujral, MMS, Kuldeep Nayar) and will come at it from a neutral S.Indian angle and be hard nosed about it.

KLNMurthy · Post by **KLNMurthy** » 29 Jan 2015 16:54

partha wrote: ...
"Sujata Singh was sacked because she was anti Pakistan hawk"

Next what? Apple agrees to fund Diamer Bhasha dam from first quarter profits, hain?

Or Modi will sack Doval and then himself. And become Muslim.

A_Gupta · Post by **A_Gupta** » 29 Jan 2015 17:15

http://www.inquisitr.com/1796991/isis-c ... rough-u-s/

According to Pakistan’s The Express Tribune, an affiliate of the International New York Times, Pakistani authorities said on Jan. 22 that they arrested al-Salafi, a Pakistani-Syrian, with two other ISIS operatives, in Lahore.

But a Pakistani security source told the Urdu-language Daily Express, a sister publication of the English-language The Express Tribune, that al-Salafi was in fact arrested in December, but the arrest was just being publicly announced in January.

He entered Pakistan about five months ago from Syria, travelling through Turkey on a mission to recruit Pakistani fighters for the Islamic State in the Syrian war. It was previously reported that he was arrested in Turkey, but he apparently escaped and entered Pakistan.

He reportedly confessed to receiving about $600 for every recruit he sent to Syria and that he was working with the support of an unnamed Islamic cleric in charge of a mosque in Pakistan.

The source told The Express Tribune that during interrogation, al-Salafi revealed that his drive to recruit militants in Pakistan to fight in Syria was being funded by money routed through the U.S.

A_Gupta · Post by **A_Gupta** » 29 Jan 2015 17:20

http://www.brecorder.com/top-news/108-p ... ijing.html

ISLAMABAD: China-Pakistan Year of Friendly Exchanges was launched at a grand reception in Beijing, marking its official commencement at first one of a series of activities which the two friendly countries plan to celebrate jointly throughout the year.

A_Gupta · Post by **A_Gupta** » 29 Jan 2015 17:30

Honorable mention of Pakistan in a rant against Iran
http://www.jewishjournal.com/dennis_pra ... inds_enemy

The Iranian regime regularly announces that its aim — indeed, its paramount goal — is to destroy Israel. Not defeat it in war; destroy it. And hundreds of thousands of Iranians routinely gather to scream, “Death to Israel.” Is there another example of this in the world (outside of some other Muslim countries)? Do masses of Hindus in India chant, “Death to Pakistan?” For that matter, do masses of Muslims in Pakistan chant, “Death to India?” Most Pakistanis hate India, after all. Do Tibetans — who would have every reason to — gather in large numbers to chant ‘Death to China”?

Little do they know!

SSridhar · Post by **SSridhar** » 29 Jan 2015 17:49

Will Karachi descend into chaos once again after a decade of relative peace from MQM (of course, Pashtuns are another issue)? Looks like it is a Yahud-Hanud-Nasara conspiracy that the MQM worker Sohail was killed yesterday there.

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 29 Jan 2015 19:05

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/new ... 055216.cms
Strategic imbalance to rise due to Indo-US defence ties: Pakistan

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan today voiced concern over increasing defence cooperation between India and the US saying it would "only add to the conventional asymmetry and strategic instability" in South Asia.

Pakistan's Foreign Office (FO) spokesperson Tasnim Aslam faced several questions related to the recent visit of President Barack Obama to India and its impact on Pakistan in light of renewal of the US-India 10-year defence agreement.

She said most of the issues about the visit of Obama had already been addressed by the advisor on foreign affairs Sartaj Aziz who in a statement expressed concern on the Indo-US civil nuclear deal, and US backing for India joining the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the UN Security Council.

Aslam said that "on conventional side, India's massive acquisition of weapons further complicates the regional strategic stability" as India's defence spending had increased by 12 per cent in 2014-15 and stands at USD 38.35 billion.

"India has been the top buyer of arms for the last three years. In this backdrop, the US-India 10-year defence agreement can only add to the conventional asymmetry and hence strategic instability," she said.

Aslam said Pakistan has been proposing a three-pronged Strategic Restraint Regime consisting of conflict resolution, nuclear and missile restraint and conventional balance.

She said Pakistan firmly believed that confidence- building measures and arms reduction in the regional and sub-regional context were important.

She reiterated Pakistan's opposition to India joining UNSC as a permanent member.

"India is in violation of the UN Security Council resolutions on Jammu & Kashmir and the right of people of Kashmir to self-determination. How does a country with such a record qualify to become a permanent member of UNSC," she said recalling Aziz's statement.

However, the spokesperson said that Indo-US trade agreements on expanding trade were their bilateral matter.

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 29 Jan 2015 19:44

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/new ... 054159.cms
Barack Obama's India trip, Pakistan's diplomatic failure: Mohammad Sarwar

LAHORE: The governor of Pakistan's Punjab province resigned today just days after slamming the Nawaz Sharif government for its "diplomatic failure" to build ties with the US after President Barack Obama's historic second visit to India.

Punjab Governor Mohammad Sarwar had severely criticised the government of Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif for its failure to bring the US president to Pakistan.

"Obama's visit to India is a failure of the Pakistan government. The second visit of Obama to India is Pakistan's big failure on foreign affairs front as it should have arranged his visit to Pakistan," Sarwar said in his statement after Obama's trip to India.

Obama's unprecedented second visit to India recently has echoed heavily in Pakistan, a Cold War-era ally of the US.

Government sources said that the criticism by Sarwar had disturbed Sharif who demanded an explanation but instead the governor chose to resign.

Sarwar handed over his resignation to President Mamnoon Hussain last night, which has been accepted.

Punjab Assembly Speaker Rana Iqbal will serve as acting governor pending a new appointment by the federal government.

Sarwar on Tuesday had said that it was a "diplomatic failure of Pakistan that US President Obama visited India and signed the all-important civil nuclear deal".

He also criticised Obama for failing to give equal importance to India and Pakistan and not using the opportunity to reduce tensions between the two rivals.

Sarwar became governor after renouncing his citizenship of the UK where he had settled several years ago to become a successful businessman and was the first Muslim lawmaker in the British parliament.

Sharif was also upset with Sarwar for meeting with exiled MQM chief Altaf Hussain in London without his consent.

Besides, Sarwar has close relations with Sharif's rivals - PML-Q chief Chaudhry Shujaat Husain and Pakistan Awami Tehreek chief Tahirul Qadri.

member_22733 · Post by **member_22733** » 29 Jan 2015 19:50

The Bakis are afraid of abandonment by their fourfather. The four father is the only source of self respect and identity for the bakis. It hurts them as much as it would hurt a dog if his owner ignores him even a bit more than usual. My apologies to the dog for being compared to the Bakis.

SBajwa · Post by **SBajwa** » 29 Jan 2015 19:50

I think we should have a India Vs. Bakistan comparison thread comparing things like

Per capita electricity consumption
Per capita calories consumption
Per capita income
Per capita phones

and other things
so that lurking bakis eventually have their cognitive dissonance vis-a-vis hindustan realizing that bakistan is not even equal to one average state of India., let alone whole country.

I will start
India 1,111,722,000 MW was electric consumption in 2012., average power per capita (watts) per person was 90 in 2014.
Bakistan 74,350,000 MW was electric consumption in 2010., average power per capita(watts) per person was 47 in 2013.

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 29 Jan 2015 19:52

This Sarwar fellow would have quit anyway.
Also Badmash must be losing his grip if this person was appointed governor when he is close to the opposition gang.

Tuvaluan · Post by **Tuvaluan** » 29 Jan 2015 19:56

"White House says Taliban are not a terrorist group but an insurgency. Prelude to the insurgent group talking to Kabul. Aided by Pakistan."

Tweeted by Ex-RAW chief -- the US mofos are a bunch of evil scumbags -- this explains why pakistan is being given enough aid to play rent boy in Afghanisthan. India is working against the US oiseaules in Afghanisthan. make no mistake.

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 29 Jan 2015 19:58

LokeshC wrote:The Bakis are afraid of abandonment by their fourfather. The four father is the only source of self respect and identity for the bakis. It hurts them as much as it would hurt a dog if his owner ignores him even a bit more than usual. My apologies to the dog for being compared to the Bakis.

Agree but would add to it. They are afraid of abandonment by India too. Even while they hate India, it was also their other source of self respect (when we choose to engage with them as equals while protesting bestern equal-equal).

Modi has caused a big loss to their echnadeee by ignoring them both at bilateral level and in talks with other powers. Case in point, no public reference to Bakis during the recent Ombaba visit.

Didn't one report (??) talk about Bakis sneaking into the India-US frame or some similar comment. On some of the talk shows, participants were hoping that Bak was discussed between Modi and Ombaba.

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 29 Jan 2015 20:01

SBajwa wrote:I think we should have a India Vs. Bakistan comparison thread comparing things like

Per capita electricity consumption
Per capita calories consumption
Per capita income
Per capita phones

No we should not have this. Better to compare with a better country and try and get there rather than comparing with shit and feeling happy.

Pakistanis have done this to India for decades. Every time they speak of poverty they say "Oh India has so many poor. Pakistan has fewer in comparison"

I don't know if you read my e-book about Pakistan which is now already outdated - published and uploaded on BR around 2007. But here is a quote from chapter 1

http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/EBOOKS/pfs.pdf

To illustrate why a direct comparison between India and
Pakistan can be misleading we need to use an analogy:
Imagine India to be a box with 100 eggs in it, but 30 of
those eggs are broken. Imagine Pakistan to be a smaller
box with 10 eggs in it, and 5 of those eggs are broken. A
direct comparison will show that the India box has 30
broken eggs, and the Pakistan box has only 5 broken eggs,
and it would seem that the India box is in a far worse
shape, with many more broken eggs. But what is hidden
from this comparison, is that the India box has 70 intact
eggs while the Pakistan box has only 5 intact eggs.
Direct comparisons of numbers regarding Pakistan and
India are misleading because of the difference in size,
but Pakistani leaders have persistently tried to hide
problems within Pakistan such as poverty and illiteracy
by saying that India has more problems than Pakistan. All
references to Pakistani problems are referred to by
Pakistani spokespersons as South Asian problems, South
Asian poverty, South Asian hunger, and South Asian
illiteracy. All that this does is to hide the magnitude
of the problems in Pakistan, and hide the chronic
mismanagement of Pakistan.
<snip>
For every child
that Pakistan educates, India has to educate seven
children in order to "match Pakistan". But India is not
merely matching Pakistan, it has moved ahead in literacy
and is racing ahead in other parameters. A direct
comparison of numbers will not reveal this and such
direct comparisons are useful only to hide Pakistan's
increasing problems

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 29 Jan 2015 20:08

Saar, I would also add that when we *choose* to compare ourselves with Bakis we feed into their image of their self importance. It reinforces their belief that they are as important as India.

Even if we trounce them on all parameters, the very fact that we compare them to India makes them happy. That is an indirect equal-equal and that too by Indians! Do the Bakis like being compared to Afghanistan?

This is the mindset that Modi has understood and treats them like the pests they are.

member_22733 · Post by **member_22733** » 29 Jan 2015 20:11

When the world and our DIEs drunk brishit koolaid about the ugly and dirty India, identifying themselves "we are not India" and we deal with Indians just like our four fathers do became the pseudo identity of the RAPEs.

Now when the brishit propagandu has been realized as hollow by the world and non DIE Indians, the Bakis are in a quagmire. They cannot accept the reality that India is leagues ahead and they can never catch up and nor claim superiority over Indians.

Djinnah must be proud of his legacy.

vishvak · Post by **vishvak** » 29 Jan 2015 20:17

LokeshC wrote:The Bakis are afraid of abandonment by their fourfather. The four father is the only source of self respect and identity for the bakis. It hurts them as much as it would hurt a dog if his owner ignores him even a bit more than usual. My apologies to the dog for being compared to the Bakis.

When ISRO launched Mangal-yaan and later it reached Mars, everyone congratulated India - including the Chinese. It is only us who give a damn about pakis, rest just use their rabid dogs to terrorize others and then for cheap harassment India by doing arbitrary equal==equal to drag down expectations and 'international' stature/concerns.

The STFUPpies even tax Afghan products - as high as 40%-50%, this is a level of paki competitiveness. In fact, the shocking part is that Afghans will have to face the same rabid jihadi irregulars from the land of pure.

In reality, Afghans expect more investments so as to build more in the face of reduction in coalition troops strength. But pakis being pakis tax Afghan products instead.

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 29 Jan 2015 20:19

@LokeshC on you last post ... Something that occurred to me this morning while watching a bak talk show but I promptly forgot.

Bakmil Sharif has been on a worldwide tour the latest being China. He visited US but also Bartania. Why Bartania before Barbaria?

member_28803 · Post by **member_28803** » 29 Jan 2015 20:19

What's echandee?

SBajwa · Post by **SBajwa** » 29 Jan 2015 20:20

OK. How about comparison thread of Bakistan vs. the junk countries?

i.e.
Haiti vs Bakistan
Afghanistan vs. Bakistan
Ethiopia vs Bakistan
Tunisia vs Bakistan

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 29 Jan 2015 20:21

Jivana wrote:What's echandee?

https://sites.google.com/site/brfdictio ... sary/h/h-d

member_28803 · Post by **member_28803** » 29 Jan 2015 20:21

SBajwa wrote:OK. How about comparison thread of Bakistan vs. the junk countries?

i.e.
Haiti vs Bakistan
Afghanistan vs. Bakistan
Ethiopia vs Bakistan
Tunisia vs Bakistan

I take strong offense to insulting those four countries, they have done no harm to us.

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 29 Jan 2015 20:22

Saar compare them to Bangladesh and see the Bakis squirm! It also reminds them of youm-e-echendeee.

member_28803 · Post by **member_28803** » 29 Jan 2015 20:23

shiv wrote:
Jivana wrote:What's echandee?
https://sites.google.com/site/brfdictio ... sary/h/h-d

You, Sir, have forced me to spill coffee on my computer. You are evil!

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 29 Jan 2015 20:23

SBajwa wrote:OK. How about comparison thread of Bakistan vs. the junk countries?

i.e.
Haiti vs Bakistan
Afghanistan vs. Bakistan
Ethiopia vs Bakistan
Tunisia vs Bakistan

Any Islamic nation with Pakistan would be fine I guess. It would show up Pakistan's "leadership" of the ummah

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 29 Jan 2015 20:27

Here is a Sudan versus Pakistan comparsion.

Sudan does better on some counts
http://country-facts.findthedata.com/co ... s-Pakistan

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 29 Jan 2015 20:31

Syria versus Pakistan
http://country-facts.findthedata.com/co ... b-Republic

Syria is way waay ahead on many counts

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 29 Jan 2015 20:35

Colombia versus Pakistan
http://country-facts.findthedata.com/co ... s-Pakistan

Bangladesh versus Pakistan
http://country-facts.findthedata.com/co ... s-Pakistan

pankajs · Post by **pankajs** » 29 Jan 2015 20:59

pankajs wrote:@LokeshC on you last post ... Something that occurred to me this morning while watching a bak talk show but I promptly forgot.

Bakmil Sharif has been on a worldwide tour the latest being China. He visited US but also Bartania. Why Bartania before Barbaria?

IMVVHO, The two biggest source of *moral* support for Bakis outside of the usual suspects has been Bartania and India and we have done more than Bartania or the rest to elevate the Baki status in the world. We are guilty of treating them as equal by our actions if not by words even while strongly protesting the western equal-equal.

It hit me when I realized that following Modi's disengagement with Bakistan and his firm position on the matter, the uncalled for *advice* from around the world has suddenly gone down instead of going up!! given all the talk of nuclear overhang and all the rest. And this is beyond a bullet or two even three for every bullet at the border. And I will bet that even within the BJP most will not understand this beyond the bullet for bullet.

ramana · Post by **ramana** » 29 Jan 2015 21:11

SBajwa,
You can x-post those comparison posts in the Pak Economic Stress watch thread for reference.

Thanks,

ramana

Peregrine · Post by **Peregrine** » 29 Jan 2015 21:42

LokeshC wrote:Peregrine sahib,
I am completely with you there. At the risk of sounding like a hypocrite and an example of the Barber-Paradox (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barber_paradox) let me state this (legal mumbo jumbo follows):
.
.
.
Edit: Here is the short form of the above in Engleesh (that may avoid the barber paradox ): A person is not a part of humanity if the person's beliefs makes that person become inhumane when dealing with any person who is humane.

LokeshC Ji :

I accept all Appellations, Prefixes as well as Postfixes, Ranks, Titles etc. etc. & etc. including but not limited to Barber-Paradox or any choice derogatory ones as long as my views are given for India's Sanctity, Safety, Unity etc. There are possibly over a Hundred Christian Countries and over Fifty Islamic Countries. There are even Buddhist Countries. THERE IS NO HINDU COUNTRY. I only have India.

With respect.

Cheers