Sunni Terrorist Fragments of Unstable Pakistan-July 10, 2015

SBajwa · Post by **SBajwa** » 12 Aug 2015 00:22

by Shiv
What is Brinks?

The Brink

In the very first episode two US pilots from an aircraft carrier flying over Pakistan accidentally (when taking drugs) shots down Indian drone. India is threatening to escalate against Pakistan. US politicians (and air force) denies that they did the shooting while Foreign secretary is going to India to stop the escalation. Meanwhile there is coup in Pakistan with military general taking over. Very funny show!

The first 12 episode will be about India-Pakistan and how US politicians stop them from fighting. The in next season it will be some other part of the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Brink

salaam · Post by **salaam** » 12 Aug 2015 02:54

Latest Tarek Fatah - Bilatakalluf with Tahir Gora

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQqlP1an5eI

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 12 Aug 2015 06:08

Falijee wrote:Ashraf Ghani Changes His Tune On Pakistan ?

Pakistan sending 'messages of war': Afghan President Ashraf Ghani [*][/b]
[*] Beginning to sound like Karzai II

Basically the Talibs are coming to P1ss talks from Quetta all the way to Murree and then P1ssfully going back and Pakis continue to deny that there are any taliban in Pakistan

By now only an idiot will believe that. The Quid pro Quo with Ghani was that Pakis wont allow Talibs to assemble openly in Quetta. Another agreement was to not let the Talibs plan and attack population centers. Afghans/Pakis then announced the death of Mullah Omar, expecting that with a leadership crisis and with an ability to not assemble and with P1ss talks going on, taliban will splinter & fracture and Afghans will have upper hand in negotiations.

However this hasnt happened. Talibs are openly conducting meetings in Quetta to iron out differences and the new Chief is ISI protege. So is the new deputy chief (Siraj Haqqani). The new chief has sanctioned a series of attacks and carbombings. Ghani is beginning to realize Paki perfidy.

A_Gupta · Post by **A_Gupta** » 12 Aug 2015 06:51

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/islamabad/ ... ams-please

Sheikh Rasheed said that the output from solar energy is merely 20-22 percent of total capacity. He said that the Bahawalpur Solar Park with the capacity of 100MW would produce not more than 22MW.

He claimed that valuable land in Karachi has been handed over to corrupt elements for the construction of wind power project. He said that Sahiwal coal power project is appreciable but restoring the rail link for the supply of coal would take a long time. He revealed that China invests overseas whenever it has a growth less than 8 percent. He said China is investing $34 billion for electricity supply at China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Questioning the viability of the independent power projects (IPPs), he deplored that Pakistan’s oil revenue is the lowest today.

A_Gupta · Post by **A_Gupta** » 12 Aug 2015 06:58

Whatever you may think of Mahatma Gandhi, this piece by retired Justice Markandey Katju is not excusable.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/12 ... nd-caste-i

....in almost every article Gandhi wrote and in almost every speech he delivered from about 1915, when he came to India from South Africa, till his death in 1948, he publicly propagated Hindu religious ideas like ramraj, cow protection, varnashram (caste system), brahmacharya, etc.

Now, if one were a sadhu or saint sitting in an ashram (hermitage), one can say anything. But when one enters politics and says such things in public political meetings, what effect will it have on a conservative Muslim mind?

Whatever you may think of Gandhi, as I said, nobody other than dhimmis ought to have to worry about "the effect it will have on a conservative Muslim mind".

RCase · Post by **RCase** » 12 Aug 2015 07:45

Basically the Talibs are coming to P1ss talks from Quetta all the way to Murree and then P1ssfully going back and Pakis continue to deny that there are any taliban in Pakistan

Quetta is a non-state city of Pakistan!

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 12 Aug 2015 08:19

A_Gupta wrote:
Whatever you may think of Gandhi, as I said, nobody other than dhimmis ought to have to worry about "the effect it will have on a conservative Muslim mind".

The schooling that Katju has had is similar to mine. We were taught to be ever conscious of things that would hurt the conservative Muslim mind. We were also taught to face up to and accept all the bad bad things that Hindus had done. It was decades of cognitive dissonance for me to discover what the conservative Muslim had done and what the Hindu had not done. Markanday Katju obviosuly has not had to think about such things

Avinash R · Post by **Avinash R** » 12 Aug 2015 08:31

INDIA ASKS CPA TO CHANGE MEET VENUE FROM PAKISTAN
http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/indi ... istan.html
Wednesday, 12 August 2015 | PNS | New Delhi

Toughening its stance further, India on Tuesday asked the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) to shift the venue of its annual conference from Islamabad, saying Pakistan has “forfeited” its right to host the meet by not inviting the Jammu & Kashmir Assembly Speaker in violation of the Association’s Constitution.

In a letter to CPA chairperson, Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan also called for immediate settlement of the matter by ensuring invitation to the J&K Speaker. She reiterated that if the J&K Speaker was not invited, India would boycott the annual conference in Islamabad.

Referring to a meeting of the Speakers of all States on Friday, she said it was resolved to call upon the chairperson and CPA Executive Committee “to use her good offices to immediately resolve the matter” arising out of “unilateral” decision of Pakistan, failing which CPA India region, including the Union and State branches, will boycott the event.

Conveying the outcome of the meeting which was held last week, the Lok Sabha Speaker said the members felt Pakistan “forfeited” its right to host the 61st Conference by not inviting the Jammu & Kashmir CPA branch in violation of Article 8 of the CPA Constitution and that the venue of the conference be shifted to another country.

“I trust that as Chairperson of the Executive Committee, you would pursue the matter and ensure that the century-old traditions of the Commonwealth are upheld,” Mahajan said in the letter written on Saturday.

“The host Pakistan CPA branch has taken the unilateral decision not to extend invitation to Jammu & Kashmir CPA branch. This is not only in violation of the provisions of CPA Constitution, it is also against the principle that CPA is a membership organisation which has constitutionally been bound for over a century to invite all its member branches to the CPA annual conference so long as a branch is in good financial standing with the Association,” she said in the letter.

Last week, India had decided to boycott the conference in Islamabad from September 30 to October 8 in protest against Pakistan not inviting the Speaker of Jammu & Kashmir Assembly. Invitations for the conference have been sent to all the other Assembly Speakers in India.

stupid uneducated mawalis being schooled

SSridhar · Post by **SSridhar** » 12 Aug 2015 08:34

RCase wrote:Quetta is a non-state city of Pakistan!

I am sure someone in Pakistan is going to use this very soon ! Pakistan thrives on cliches. Non-state actor, jugular vein, unfinished agenda, taller than Himalayas (and a whole host of such descriptions), strategic depth, crown jewels, SDRE, TFTA . . . Now, this one.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 12 Aug 2015 08:47

Are Religion and Nationalism False Subconsciousness? Password Ep68 on IK Ball

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 12 Aug 2015 08:55

This is from Afghanistan government press release. Pakis as usual displayed their tactical brilliance

http://president.gov.af/en/news/50924

President Ashraf Ghani met this afternoon with Kabul-based ambassadors of European, North American and regional countries.

The President began by thanking the ambassadors for the messages of condolences their respective leaders had expressed to Afghanistan on the recent terrorist attacks.

In the meeting that took place in ARG, President Ghani elaborated on Afghanistan’s position in regard to Pakistan following the recent terrorist attacks. Referring to the recent attacks in Kabul and other big cities in Afghanistan, President Ghani said the attack in Kabul’s Shah Shahid area was designed and planned by terrorist groups in Pakistan.

President Ghani stressed that the Kabul’s attack marked a turning point for Afghanistan. The President added that after Mullah Omar’s death was confirmed, terrorist groups held public gatherings in Pakistan and declared war against Afghanistan.

The President emphasized that the Pakistani government should realize the sensitivity of the issue and it is expected to take strong action against terrorist groups inside its territory. President Ghani added that an Afghan delegation will be leaving for Pakistan on this Thursday to further discuss the issue.

President Ghani said that the government of Pakistan should have the same definition of terrorism in regard to Afghanistan, just as it has for its own.

The President concluded that Afghan government has made its position clear to the Pakistani officials and now Pakistan’s decisions in the coming weeks will determine the status of the relations between the two countries.

Anujan · Post by **Anujan** » 12 Aug 2015 09:09

http://www.dawn.com/news/1199935/csf-ma ... nd-2015-us

The United States has indicated to Pakistan that further extension in the Coalition Support Fund (CSF) beyond 2015 may not be possible.....Speaking at the forum, Defence Secretary retired Lt Gen Alam Khattak emphasised on the importance of Pakistan in the regional security and said: “Pakistan is at the frontline fighting for the stability of the region. … Pakistan’s armed forces are committed to flushing terrorists out of the area by continuing operation Zarb-i-Azb.”....Rehabilitation of IDPs technically does not come under the activities mandated under the CSF, but Pakistani officials use this argument to strengthen their case for continuation of the programme....Pakistan had in 2014 lobbied for conversion of the CSF into a ‘Stability Support Fund’

gakakkad · Post by **gakakkad** » 12 Aug 2015 09:16

SBajwa wrote:
by Shiv
What is Brinks?
The Brink

In the very first episode two US pilots from an aircraft carrier flying over Pakistan accidentally (when taking drugs) shots down Indian drone. India is threatening to escalate against Pakistan. US politicians (and air force) denies that they did the shooting while Foreign secretary is going to India to stop the escalation. Meanwhile there is coup in Pakistan with military general taking over. Very funny show!

The first 12 episode will be about India-Pakistan and how US politicians stop them from fighting. The in next season it will be some other part of the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Brink

actually it is not as much Yindia pakistan as it is yehudi v/s pakistan...

some points..

SPOILER WARNING

1) It portrays US SD as being utterly clueless and often getting fooled by the Pakis..
2) There is a minor sub-plot about a British couple . They are portrayed as sexually pervert smugglers...Do we know such people in real life ?
3) Walter Larson seems to be based on John Kerry. An interesting aspect is that he and Haroon Raja , the ISI chief went to the same college ... Now we at brf know , that school connections in places like columbia and georgetown can have geo-political impact..
4)Bible thumpers : we know that they have an important role in Amreeki politics..

In fact the Israeli PM mentions that the Jewish American politicians hate them..It is the texas and okhlama folks that keep there cash register ticking...

5)interestingly after the first 2 or 3 episodes , India is not even mentioned ... Most of what is being mentioned about India , is in a positive light .. Like the Delhi hospital that walter larson was shown to get a surgery...

other interesting thing about the Drone part : Indian drone is accidentally shot down by American F-18s as the pilots are on drugs ... Walter Larson admits to the Indian MEA that it was his mistake .. He says "Your drone was flying at 60,000 feet .Do you think the Paakis have the tech to blow it ? " What does that remind of ? Remember , before we had extensive satellite imagery , we used Mig 25 to spy over the Paakis ? Sometimes our pilots would create a sonic boom over Paaki cities ,just to annoy them...And to the paakis dismay , they had nothing that could reach the altitude and speed of Mig 25 ...

there are many more reasons to believe that the script writers frequently visit this page...

gakakkad · Post by **gakakkad** » 12 Aug 2015 09:18

harbans wrote:What a cute Paki kid..

[youtube]77HHYWSvm8Q&feature=youtu.be[/youtube]

And to watch on You tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77HHYWS ... e=youtu.be

it would be good to have this in brink...

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 12 Aug 2015 09:29

Low flood likely as India releases more water

LAHORE: India is releasing water from its dams over Sutlej and Beas which is likely to generate low flood at Ganda Singhwala on August 13.The Flood Forecasting Division (FFD) said on Tuesday that the flow in River Sutlej at Ganda Singhwala was likely to increase from 45,000 to 55,000 cusecs on August 13. As a result, river Sutlej is likely to attain low flood at this point.It said India was likely to release 20,000 cusecs of water in the river.The FFD said River Indus at Guddu, Sukkur and Kotri was in high flood. It was in medium flood at Chashma and Taunsa and in low flood at Tarbela and Kalabagh. River Kabul was also in low flood at Nowshera.Tarbela Dam is filled to its capacity of 1,550 ft and its outflows are almost matching its inflows these days. The inflow on Tuesday was 336,000 cusecs and the outflows 314,000 cusecs.

Prem · Post by **Prem** » 12 Aug 2015 09:31

CSF may not be possible beyond 2015: US

Abb Cash China Sey Ayega?

ISLAMABAD: The United States has indicated to Pakistan that further extension in the Coalition Support Fund (CSF) beyond 2015 may not be possible.The issue about the future of CSF, according to a defence source, was discussed at the 23rd Defence Consultative Group Meeting (DCG)-Interim Progress Review (IPR) held at the defence ministry on Tuesday. Principal Deputy Secretary of Defence Ms Kelly Magsamen led the US delegation comprising officials of the defence and state departments.Under the CSF arrangement, the US reimbursed Pakistan for operations and maintenance costs incurred in direct support of its operations in Afghanistan. Since 2001, the US has reimbursed $13 billion to Pakistan, which is the largest recipient of the fund.

schinnas · Post by **schinnas** » 12 Aug 2015 10:30

Regarding US not extending Coalition support fund beyond 2015: Pukis are indeed used rubber. Now that their need in Af-Pak is over for Uncle, Pukis are thrown away. Why would anyone bother to keep a used rubber?

g.sarkar · Post by **g.sarkar** » 12 Aug 2015 10:39

Regarding Brink: I am actually encouraged by Brink. Before the image of Paki Jernails and Kernails in Amreeka was ram rod stiff Sandhurst returned clipped accented Pakjabi afsars. I think years of killing US soldiers by the double dealing Pakis have finally sunk into the US sub-conscious. In Brink the Pakis are coming across as greedy, fundamentalist, proud and stupid. The Paki streets are shown as chaotic, lawless and violent. I hope it stays that way.
Gautam

Avinash R · Post by **Avinash R** » 12 Aug 2015 10:50

Anujan wrote:http://www.dawn.com/news/1199935/csf-ma ... nd-2015-us

The United States has indicated to Pakistan that further extension in the Coalition Support Fund (CSF) beyond 2015 may not be possible.....Speaking at the forum, Defence Secretary retired Lt Gen Alam Khattak emphasised on the importance of Pakistan in the regional security and said: “Pakistan is at the frontline fighting for the stability of the region. … Pakistan’s armed forces are committed to flushing terrorists out of the area by continuing operation Zarb-i-Azb.”....Rehabilitation of IDPs technically does not come under the activities mandated under the CSF, but Pakistani officials use this argument to strengthen their case for continuation of the programme....Pakistan had in 2014 lobbied for conversion of the CSF into a ‘Stability Support Fund’

so now the bakistani army terrorists are gonna flush themselves to get some bheek from america

amit · Post by **amit** » 12 Aug 2015 11:18

g.sarkar wrote:Regarding Brink: I am actually encouraged by Brink. Before the image of Paki Jernails and Kernails in Amreeka was ram rod stiff Sandhurst returned clipped accented Pakjabi afsars. I think years of killing US soldiers by the double dealing Pakis have finally sunk into the US sub-conscious. In Brink the Pakis are coming across as greedy, fundamentalist, proud and stupid. The Paki streets are shown as chaotic, lawless and violent. I hope it stays that way.
Gautam

I find it interesting that two recent TV serials as well as some movies, which deal with terror in this region, seems to be spot on as far as Pakistan is concerned.

Apart from Brink, the other recent TV serial which really got the Paki langots in a twist was Home Land Season 5. It really took the Pakis and their SD sympathisers to the cleaners. The Pak foreign office actually made an official complaint. Just imagine complaining about one serial shown on a few networks among the hundreds that are available in the US. Just waiting for them to launch a complaint about Brink. Or may be they can ask for more coalition funds to tide over the negative impact of Brink on the good Taliban.

There may be other TV/movies that I may have missed, don't really watch too many.

If I remember correctly the last G I Joe movie also had some bad Paki press about it selling or giving a nuclear bomb. The point is all these serials is that in the places where India is mentioned it is positive light as Gakakkad mentioned.

Since TV serials and movies reflect the popular meme, I would tend to think there's a general understanding on just how unreliable Pakistan is. And this change seems to be over the last five years or so. If only the SD babus were a bit more cued to this thinking. Or maybe they are and they think they can still use the already used made in China condom yet again.

arun · Post by **arun** » 12 Aug 2015 12:21

Economic Times prints Op-Ed by Seema Sirohi under the title “US doesn’t have the stomach to deal with Pakistan in a realistic fashion”, on the detrimental to India pandering of the terrorist fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan by the United States:

US doesn’t have the stomach to deal with Pakistan in a realistic fashion

The article by Daniel Runde titled “Pakistan: The Next Colombia Success Story?” referenced by Seema Sirohi was posted by Sudhan on BRF’s STFUP thread on Aug 5th : Clicky.

The article by (US Citizen?) Sameer Lalwani titled “Pakistan's Shocking Strategic Shift” in The National Interest which appeared on Aug. 3, I do not recollect seeing on BRF so here is the link:

Pakistan's Shocking Strategic Shift

Then there was yesterday in the NYT the below piece by Bina Shah on the Islamic Republic of Pakistan’s prowess in IT, no not IT of Islamic Terrorism variety but rather Information Technology.

Seems that there is a deliberate coordinated effort going on in the US to spin the idea that it is not a case of IslamaBad but rather a case of IslamaGood:

arun wrote:New York Times provides the platform to peddle the theory that the Islamic Republic of Pakistan will become a global IT export hub, that is IT of the Information Technology and not IT of the Islamic Terrorism variety where the Islamic Republic is a leading exporter.

Article in NYT, as is not uncommon of articles authored by citizens of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, one Bina Shah in this case, has its usual share of Madrassah Maths. Claim of the volume of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan’s IT exports at USD 1,600 Million is highly exaggerated going by Pakistan Software Export Board statistics (Clicky) which had projected IT exports of USD 500 Million in 2015 and reported USD 370 Million of IT exports in 2014:

Pakistan, the Next Software Hub?

arun · Post by **arun** » 12 Aug 2015 12:43

Avinash R wrote:INDIA ASKS CPA TO CHANGE MEET VENUE FROM PAKISTAN
http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/indi ... istan.html
Wednesday, 12 August 2015 | PNS | New Delhi

Toughening its stance further, India on Tuesday asked the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) to shift the venue of its annual conference from Islamabad, saying Pakistan has “forfeited” its right to host the meet by not inviting the Jammu & Kashmir Assembly Speaker in violation of the Association’s Constitution.

In a letter to CPA chairperson, Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan also called for immediate settlement of the matter by ensuring invitation to the J&K Speaker. She reiterated that if the J&K Speaker was not invited, India would boycott the annual conference in Islamabad.

Referring to a meeting of the Speakers of all States on Friday, she said it was resolved to call upon the chairperson and CPA Executive Committee “to use her good offices to immediately resolve the matter” arising out of “unilateral” decision of Pakistan, failing which CPA India region, including the Union and State branches, will boycott the event.

Conveying the outcome of the meeting which was held last week, the Lok Sabha Speaker said the members felt Pakistan “forfeited” its right to host the 61st Conference by not inviting the Jammu & Kashmir CPA branch in violation of Article 8 of the CPA Constitution and that the venue of the conference be shifted to another country.

“I trust that as Chairperson of the Executive Committee, you would pursue the matter and ensure that the century-old traditions of the Commonwealth are upheld,” Mahajan said in the letter written on Saturday.

“The host Pakistan CPA branch has taken the unilateral decision not to extend invitation to Jammu & Kashmir CPA branch. This is not only in violation of the provisions of CPA Constitution, it is also against the principle that CPA is a membership organisation which has constitutionally been bound for over a century to invite all its member branches to the CPA annual conference so long as a branch is in good financial standing with the Association,” she said in the letter.

Last week, India had decided to boycott the conference in Islamabad from September 30 to October 8 in protest against Pakistan not inviting the Speaker of Jammu & Kashmir Assembly. Invitations for the conference have been sent to all the other Assembly Speakers in India.

Meanwhile the Islamic Republic of Pakistan is hanging tough. Speaker of the Islamic Republics National Assembly Sardar Ayaz Sadiq who also holds the position of Commonwealth Parliamentary Conference (CPC) President:

“We will not invite the Indian Occupied Kashmir Assembly speaker to the CPA meeting schedule to be held in Islamabad despite India’s decline to attend it,” he said while talking to newsmen after the launch of the National Assembly’s Strategic Plan at the Institute for Parliamentary Services.

“The Bangladesh Assembly Speaker asked me to invite the Indian Occupied Kashmir Assembly. But I without consulting the government and the Foreign Office and keeping Pakistan’s principled stance on Kashmir told him clearly that I will not invite the assembly of Indian Occupied Kashmir,” he said.

“For us Kashmir issue is more important so we have decided not to invite the Indian Occupied Kashmir Assembly,” he added. ………………………..

From here:

Kashmir more important than CPA meeting: Ayaz

sudhan · Post by **sudhan** » 12 Aug 2015 13:24

Barf worthy editorial on Yawn

Ghani's remarks

For sure ghost written by ISI. The lines just make you cringe..

Much as it is possible to understand Mr Ghani and other Afghan officials’ concerns about the grave instability inside Afghanistan, the anger directed towards Pakistan is hardly going to help matters. Perhaps Mr Ghani and his supporters ought to recall recent history.

Ahead of the first round of the Murree talks, there had been much talk of a growing understanding between the Pakistani and Afghan states. The mood in the short run-up to the second round of talks was almost celebratory. Then, on the eve of the second round, it was the Afghan government itself that threw the talks into disarray by asserting that Mullah Omar had died two years ago in Karachi.

Yes, till then everything was fine, Mullah Omar was giving statements to the press, telling the bunnies what the ISI wanted told.. Now you effed everythin up, Ghani. You blew a perfect cover story.

On that count at least, the Pakistani position has been relatively clear: discourage factionalism and help keep as much of the Afghan Taliban as possible under one central leadership. Surely, whatever Mr Ghani may claim and Afghan officials may believe, the security establishment here could not have wanted a bitter leadership struggle to have erupted inside the Taliban.

Oh my! Can't you see? What a noble thought! We Pawkis did not stop there, we also made sure that the Taliban leadership was well-protected.. well supplied..

President Ghani’s diatribe was probably meant in part to appease hawks inside his government and the Afghan security apparatus.

Yep! Quite sure about that, why would Ghani be bothered by his people dying in heaps? We at ISI are never bothered by it

And the Pakistani state’s relative reticence may be to not cause the Taliban to fracture more and deeper than it needs to. A bit of patience in Kabul, however difficult, may help.

Yes, Please! More patience is always better.. heh heh!

asgkhan · Post by **asgkhan** » 12 Aug 2015 15:06

Rahul M wrote:seriously looks like the brink's script-writer browses BRF.

"the general's speech will instigate riots"
"they will surely burn down the domino's pizza again"

Seriously, I was greatly amused with that second line. Word for word it was like watching BRF.

The street riots, the locals are also cringeworthy to watch if viewed by a Puke. India is always talked about positively though.

All in all, just to embarass the pukis, this series gets a 8 out of 10. 9 when watching all the noodity.

Seriously folks, download it from the usual sites and watch it. The story sometimes drifts off, but everytime a puke is on-screen it is awesome to watch.

A_Gupta · Post by **A_Gupta** » 12 Aug 2015 16:16

arun wrote:
Avinash R wrote:INDIA ASKS CPA TO CHANGE MEET VENUE FROM PAKISTAN
http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/indi ... istan.html
Wednesday, 12 August 2015 | PNS | New Delhi

The CPA's constitution is available here: (PDF file)
http://www.cpahq.org/cpahq/cpadocs/CPA% ... tution.pdf

The rules are very simple, quoting from the document:
1. Any legislative body of a Commonwealth nation can qualify to be a member of CPA.

A Legislature shall qualify if:
(a)it is recognized by domestic law as an Assembly competent to enact national, state, provincial or territorial legislation, or to enact legislation in a dependency, and
(b) its Members sit by due process of domestic law, and
(c) it functions as a parliamentary body.

Notice, it just has to be recognized by domestic law. Whether other members of the Commonwealth recognize it or not is irrelevant.

Each such qualified legislature is a "Branch". Then

Each Branch shall be:
(a) included in a Region of the Association, and
(b) entitled to send a prescribed number of delegates and officials to each plenary conference.

So, IMO, it is not a matter even of being "invited". If someone is holding a plenary conference, the Branch is entitled to send its delegates.

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 12 Aug 2015 16:18

A_Gupta wrote:http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/islamabad/ ... ams-please

Sheikh Rasheed said that the output from solar energy is merely 20-22 percent of total capacity. He said that the Bahawalpur Solar Park with the capacity of 100MW would produce not more than 22MW.

Cheena Maal

A_Gupta · Post by **A_Gupta** » 12 Aug 2015 16:44

Remember this cr*ppy article?
http://paktribune.com/articles/Indian-m ... 42813.html

Perfect fit into the theme of how Pakistanis see victory if they live to fight another day.

Avinash R · Post by **Avinash R** » 12 Aug 2015 17:12

Hosting PSL abroad will kill cricket in Pakistan: Azhar Mahmood

http://www.dawn.com/news/1200031/hostin ... ar-mahmood

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 12 Aug 2015 18:38

AOA Bakistan ij now a member of BRICS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFKGsvxk_MQ

Paul · Post by **Paul** » 12 Aug 2015 18:40

Mush in 70s

Shreeman · Post by **Shreeman** » 12 Aug 2015 18:59

biraders, I mean महिलाओं और सज्जनों, this hiyar ij what I call a mouth breaking aansar:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/indi ... 454825.cms

you keel us, we whill not a give any sweets onlee. Nou you think about it. Was the keeling worth it?

Meanhwile, aggarwal-a sueets has sent a delegashun to eggsplain to the governmand the harm from loss of chai biscuit opporchunities.

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 12 Aug 2015 19:35

Must watch. Discusssion on Firkawaariyat and Terrorism within Pakistan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ABObtuN5DI

Gagan · Post by **Gagan** » 12 Aug 2015 19:42

For pak lurkers viewing pleasure:
BMW make in India campaign.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9-Kt3xbABM

There are many many videos also linked in the associated links outlining the Make In India strategy.
There are videos by Volkswagon, Mercedes Benz, Siemens, Volvo, Tata Defence, Merck, DHL etc.
This explains why India is the Fastest growing economy of the world today.

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 12 Aug 2015 19:46

Well here is more evidence that the BJP government under Modi is unable to break out from the same ol' same ol' mould of treating Pakistan like just any other normal country like Thailand or France. They want to send a "Letter rogatory" to Pakistan to give name address etc of that captutred moron terrorist wotzisname
http://idrw.org/nia-to-write-letters-ro ... more-71195

A letter rogatory as per Wiki is

A letter rogatory or letter of request is a formal request from a court to a foreign court for some type of judicial assistance. The most common remedies sought by letters rogatory are service of process and taking of evidence.

This is so stupid it makes me shake my head in anguish.

No. the Modi government is showing no signs of new thinking. Might as well start getting over the cognitive dissonance.
1. The courts in Pakistan do not give a flying fuk about India
2. Paki courts have no power
3. Pakistan will piss on the letter rogatory.

They will send it back saying they have no record of any such person. What will India do then? Stuff the reply up our backside - or go crying to some European court.

Why is my government so blind. Someone call me out if I am wrong..

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 12 Aug 2015 20:08

What saddens me is that these government babus of NIA probably have a rule book that they consult

Chapter 7 Page 326:

What to do after capturing and interrogating a foreign national who is accused of having committed a criminal act in India?

A letter rogatory (vide appendix XVII a(iii)) must be sent to the court in the foreign nation from which the alleged criminal is thought to hail from

Pakis will laugh their guts out.

Indians are "trying to collect evidence"

What are we going to do with all the evidence? Pakistan does not accept any evidence collected by India. Does no Indian realize that?

sudhan · Post by **sudhan** » 12 Aug 2015 20:15

Saar, patience please.. Here is my 2 paisa..

As you know, not everything is directly controlled by the PMO.

Here for example, NIA is playing by its usual rules, which is to request assistance from another country in case of a foreign national's involvement, misphortunately the country in question in this case is a 'c*nt-ry'. NIA does not have a separate rule book for Porkis and normal countries (they should have one).

What will actually show the what the govt is really up to is the actions post 15th Aug and post the proposed NSA talks.. The porkis are trying everything from their books to provoke India to call these talks off. To me this looks like a measured silence from the govt's part to hand the pigs a long rope, things will become clearer, let's say after Aug.

Mean-e-while, lots of incidents happening in the 'Ishtrategic depth-e-ispashe' of pak land.. 'Mr. Brandys' of our consulates there must be rather busy

.. From public news sources, one can already pick up bits of the rumbling that may come to pass.. Like the steady yet huge build up of forces along the yellow sea. I would give our govt some more time before passing a judgement on their 'pig sty' handling skills..

CRamS · Post by **CRamS** » 12 Aug 2015 20:17

DoCi, what do you have saar for dinner? You are sounding more like me today

.

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 12 Aug 2015 20:26

CRamS wrote:DoCi, what do you have saar for dinner? You are sounding more like me today .

Even you can be right sometimes. Sending a letter rogatory to Pakistan sounds like "Procedure being followed"

Procedure being followed means that Pakistan is considered a normal state. it also means that there is no new thinking and new way of handling Pakistan. We have been saying for years that Pakistan needs to be treated for what it is rather than what we would like it to be. If a US national was caught in India, sending a letter rogatory to the US would invite a response as per the same books that the US follows.

Pakistan does not follow those books. Time will be wasted sending this letter rogatory and after weeks or months we will get a non reply from Pakistan.

Then what?

shiv · Post by **shiv** » 12 Aug 2015 20:31

sudhan wrote:Saar, patience please.. Here is my 2 paisa..

As you know, not everything is directly controlled by the PMO.

I understand. But this "Letter rogatory"sounds like Becturbation. Didn't we all come down hard on Harpal Bector when he said that this is the sort of stuff that will be done?

CRamS · Post by **CRamS** » 12 Aug 2015 20:41

Like A_GuptaJi cautioned yesterday, I'd give ModiJi some more time to see what his thinking is. Right now for sure, he being flanked by his nemesis on all sides, Rahul/Sonia duo and their slaves beating his arse everyday, and TSP on the other and he (ModiJi) is following the same old same old "stay engaged" BS that has been tried many times before, while Unlce is watching with a danda; Uncle is curiously quiet even on the AfPak front as his 2 other munnas get into a squabble.