Give me a break.
Feeling is mutual.
Chaos didn't "just start" in Syria and poor US was drug in. You know that's not at all how it really happened. The US and its Sunni Gulf allies, plus the Turks and the Jews all worked to destabilize Syria in the months leading up to the "civil war".
Agreed. Assad isnt the biggest democrat on the planet either. And Sunni hostility didnt just erupt one day. Its not Americans fighting against Assad. Is it? Its Syrians.
Remember all those terrorist bombings in Damascus and other cities that kept happening in the years before the Arab Spring? America's Wahhabist allies (pawns?) were actively stirring up Syria through their Sunni terror proxies both before and after the Arab Spring demonstrations. And of course the rebellion wasn't organic or spontaneous; it was externally organized, armed and funded from the beginning. As for your claim that the US was "supporting Iraqis in their war against ISIS" that's also pretty disingenuous when ISIS was effectively spawned and then later shielded from serious attack by the same US. USAF planes were dropping bombs in empty fields, abandoned buildings, not seeing huge oil convoys to Syria and somehow unable to damage ISIS when it had no problem decimating the Taliban with less accurate weapons back in 2001. Only after Russian intervention forced them did the US start getting serious (though never fully committed) to taking on ISIS.
US is supporting ISIS. Israael is also supporting ISIS. Turkey was supporting ISIS but then was joining SCO and supporting ISIS again.Blah blah.
The rest of your post is similar rubbish.
Thanks for pointing that out and writing a genius reply.
It's like you've been watching CNN for months or something. It's been well established by a huge body of evidence, including a number of internal leaks, that the US was deliberately supporting the worst kinds of Sunni terror groups, that they always knew there were really no "moderate" rebels, that ISIS was being deliberately spared from attack, and so many other revelations that paint a really ugly and damning picture of US motives.
I live in India. My posts are mostly pro Russia. Except that I cant take all the shit peddled by Sputnik reading Roos lovers. US did support extremist groups. Like Russia supporting taliban now.
Russia was about to get Turkey into SCO. The same Turkey which was arming and funding jihadis and what not. Whatever happened to that.
As for your inferring us "Roos-lovers" want to see Russia arming the Taliban, we're obviously horrified. Things must be very bad on the home front for Putin to even consider such a move. The Russians are obviously hurting and desperate to get the US off their backs, even if it's bad for us strategically. The Russians need to get the US to stop undermining their security. Maybe threatening to arm the Taliban will get the US to back the f*ck off, for once. That's the Russian thinking and I'm sure they'd only resort to arming Taliban as a last resort, because they actually hate those people and don't want to hurt us, an ally. Now that Trump is the US president, assuming he isn't deposed (ie: impeached or assassinated), I expect the US will let the Russians "win" in Syria, and in exchange the Russians will withdraw their feelers to the Taliban. This is good for us.
Actually, you are not horrified. Russian `feelers` to the Taliban and `threats to arm the Taliban` are tactical steps by Moscow to force US to let Russia `win` in Syria, according to your own post. Its rich to blame US for arming radical groups in Syria when Russia is not so different, threatening to arm the pious Taliban.
No chance of change in Russian policy. Putin is a despot and will rule till 2027 at least. And may be longer by changing the constitution again. Cheers to that.
Sorry,a correction. Russian policy could change depending on which side of the bed Chessmaster gets off. Reminds me of Turkey joining SCO again. Great move by grand chessmaster. And there were also some genius analysis of his brilliant move then, not unlike now.
I know the Russians aren't angels, but have a little perspective! You take what Washington says at face value but have no empathy for the Russian POV. As an Indian you should know better, considering how much our country has suffered as a result of US machinations since the 1960's. US-Russian friendship is win-win for India, in any case. We should want that to happen but also recognize it's the US holding up such an alliance, not the Russians. We ourselves should avoid entanglements with the US until they prove themselves to be more trustworthy. The US is still giving Pakistan $$$ billions per year to build nukes for blowing us up, and you want us dumping Russia for this same US?
I take what washington says at face value.
.
I have all empathy for Russian POV in Ukraine. But like I said, I wont have blind hatred for US like Roos lovers. US killing the Taliban suits me and Russia `threatening to arm the Taliban` doesnt.
India has suffered at the hands of US machinations so we should support Russia in arming the Taliban. Sorry, i disagree.
Wouldnt it be better if we lived in the present world where Russians are arming the Chinese and where Russian jet engines end up in Paki planes not unlike F-16s and where India needs US for economic uplift and where America is willing to provide air defence and other firepower against Cheenis.
Also, last I checked, it was Roos ally China which was giving 50 billion dollars to Pakis.
Forgive me Roos-lover bhai, but Russian interests seem to be above Indian ones in your priorities.