Re: Sunni Terrorist Fragments of Unstable Pakistan-13 June,2016
Posted: 21 Oct 2016 08:12
Any cunning yindoo baniya on BRF willing to partner with me to start a Washington DC based lobbying firm? Our sole client will be Bakistan.
Consortium of Indian Defence Websites
https://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/
The takedown by Tony Irish, FICA Chief executive :"The second edition of the PSL, with five teams in the competition, will be more successful and the final will be held in Lahore," Sethi, who is also the head of the PCB executive committee, said. "International players know what we can do; most of them are ready to come to Pakistan and play. We have signed players with a condition that if their team reaches the final, they will have to go to Lahore and they have all agreed.
"It will be a fly-in, fly-out plan and the government has promised to give full security to the players. We are convinced that the final will happen in Lahore."
The Islamic Republic of Pakistan’s downhill skiing after their “strategically brilliant” plan of including playing in Lahore in player contracts was torpedoed by FICA’s position on security in the Islamic Republic:"The consistent advice we have received from independent security consultants over the last few years is that playing cricket in Pakistan for foreign teams and players constitutes an unacceptably high security risk," Tony Irish, the FICA chief executive, told ESPNcricinfo. "Although we are sure that PSL and PCB would do their very best to implement security plans, the advice of our consultants is also that this risk is unmanageable in the current environment.
"FICA has a duty to relay that advice to players and, given that players are participating as individuals in PSL and they are not participating as part of a touring foreign team, it will be up to each individual player to decide whether or not to take that advice."
]The PSL chairman Najam Sethi had said there was a clause in the PSL player contracts that stated they would need to travel to Lahore if their team made the final. Summarising the nature of the clause, a PSL team official said players would be offered extremely high security and cash incentives if they were willing to go. However, there would also be no repercussions if they did not.
In retaliation to bsf trooper injured by sniper firing.sudhan wrote:Things seem to be heating up again. Looks like BSF took out the uniformed pigs covering the downhill skiing of the ununiformed pigs .. Good going boys!
Also, does this mean that one Jeehardi is equal to 7 Pork Rangers, hain?
Inappropriate heading, kufr!
http://mahapunjab.com/pakistan-sc-judge ... ophrenics/What will you call judges of a court that hangs little boys for inadvertently tearing a piece of (supposedly holy) paper in 'Blasphemy' case, but allows dreaded terrorists roam free in the country. How would you respect a court that has ceded its authority to the Military without a murmur but proudly hangs severely mentally ill.
A three-judge bench of Pakistan’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Anwer Zaheed Jamali who should be in a mental institution himself, today ruled ..
BSF officer has a Gmail account?kish wrote:^^^
Looks like India is in control of the escalation ladder.
cowardly pakis snipe BSF trooper Gurnam Singh & gets 7 pigs slaughtered.
Next few days will be very crucial, Pigs will be eager to retaliate.
Forces has to be extra vigilant during this diwali week (Both internal security & Border forces).
Image courtesy: @shivAroor
SSM as NSA had gmail account. Go figure. Must be CBM to US.sampat wrote:everyone uses GMAIL in India. our embassy's official email is gmail!
And the guy has his cell phone number on the notice. Who sets these security protocols?sampat wrote:everyone uses GMAIL in India. our embassy's official email is gmail!
The writer is a PhD scholar at Nutt.Pakistan is currently beset with a clear and present danger – the desertification of its agricultural heartland along with a concomitant drought that would parch the burgeoning population of one of the fastest growing populations on the planet. The looming crisis is partially of our own making and partially a result of climate change.Pakistan has 21.29 million hectares of arable land which would shrink to 14 million hectares if the water flow from the eastern rivers and their irrigation canals gets reduced even by a margin of 30 percent. Through unbridled pumping out of sub-surface waters the aquifers stand in mortal danger of depletion while the water logging threatens the fertility of soil due to unregulated and wasteful irrigation practices.Pakistan’s decrepit irrigation infrastructure results in an annual loss of 4 maf of water through evaporation and 37 maf through water seepage alone. Though Pakistan has 80 percent share of the Indus Water Basin Rivers due to the generous flow in its three allotted rivers as per the Indus Waters Treaty, the country has only utilised 25 percent of its total hydel power generation and water storage potential so far. The comparable hydel utilisation ratio in India, the US and China is 50 percent, 60 percent and 40 percent respectively.
Pakistan’s agricultural sector, which contributes 21.8 percent of its GDP and 40 percent of labour force, needs an additional arable land of 0.5 million hectares every year to produce the requisite quantity of food to feed a population that is growing at a rate of 2.1 percent per year. Based on population growth and concomitant need for more arable land by 2021, there would be a requirement of an additional national storage capacity of 17 maf. That means construction of all three mega dams – Kalabagh, Bhasha and Dassu – in the coming five years a food security compulsion.When viewed in the context of the commissioning time of big dams – 5 to 10 years – the future does not appear too promising. India has constructed 4,000 dams since independence and is now amongst the top five dam constructing countries of the world including the US, China, Japan and Spain.
The Indus Waters Treaty that was signed after a decade-long deliberation in 1960 is a guarantor of the water rights of our three allotted eastern rivers. The right of the upper riparian ie India to water use for domestic, non-consumptive, agricultural, and run of the river projects stands clearly defined in the treaty, which was essentially an agreement between engineers from both the countries – duly overseen by the World Bank.
Pakistan as a lower riparian, therefore, is disadvantaged due to the ill-intentioned Indian water storage and power generation project spree. India has displayed operational celerity in the execution of the Kishanganga Hydel Project while Pakistan’s Neelam-Jehlum project is still hanging fire! Our tardiness in the execution of the project has already cost the country dearly.If we ignore the warnings of our water Cassandras shouting hoarse about the coming drought we would be guilty of an egregious omission imperilling the security of our future generations. It is time we securitised the water issue because, more than anything else – even more than terrorism and extremism – it is the water threat that imperils our national security.
sudhan wrote:Things seem to be heating up again. Looks like BSF took out the uniformed pigs covering the downhill skiing of the ununiformed pigs .. Good going boys!
Also, does this mean that one Jeehardi is equal to 7 Pork Rangers, hain?
http://www.dawn.com/news/1291476/ispr-d ... g-by-indiaThe Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) on Friday denied the Indian claim that Pakistani forces suffered casualties in firing across the Line of Control (LoC) in the Shakargarh sector.
“Indian claim of hitting or killing any Pakistani soldier or Ranger with firing at anytime today at LoC is absolutely false,” said the statement released from the armed forces media wing.
I have several issues with this videoPratikDas wrote:
Taliban drone footage of VBIED attack on an Afghan Army base in Nawa distric, Helmand
Gautamhttp://news.rediff.com/commentary/2016/ ... pdates.htm
07:50 Pakistani spy caught in Samba sector; 2 SIM cards, map seized :
Indian forces on Saturday caught a Pakistani spy in Samba sector of Jammu and Kashmir, reports said. The arrested spy has been identified as Bodh Raj.
At least two Pakistani SIM cards and a map showing deployment of forces was also seized from his possession.
Meanwhile, Pak troops once again violated ceasefire in Rajouri sector of Kashmir Valley late on Friday night. Heavy shelling was heard along the line of control in Manjakote sector. Indian Army gave fitting reply, sources said.
Here is some more "doubts" on authenticityshiv wrote:...
I have several issues with this video
1. It is a very high resolution video and good colour - so it can't be a cheap drone. If it is Taliban at all it was supplied by Paki army
2. There is a good highway and much greenery about and flat terrain along with what appear to be multiple plots of private farms - is that really Afghanistan?
3. The video is obviously "dramatized". Assuming the drone was just 1 km away from the explosion - the sound of the explosion must take at least 3 seconds to reach the drone's microphone, if any. No ambient sounds heard like wind/drone engine. So the sound has been added for drama.
The Helmand river keeps this area quite fertile, and there are lots of canals here too. I'm guessing what got blown up is around this area:shiv wrote:2. There is a good highway and much greenery about and flat terrain along with what appear to be multiple plots of private farms - is that really Afghanistan?
Yes, there is movement there and one can't be sure if it is human or not. Tried scaling with the vehicle but still not sure.Manish_P wrote:Deejay Sir, there is movement at the bottom left corner of the compound around the 12 sec mark. Difficult to make out whether it is human or not but looks like it. However there is no other movement, not even in the adjoining areas despite it being day time. Very strange
our military and civilian rulers have never really understood the importance of soft power
Our image is tarnished, our soft power nonexistent
we have already succeeded in making brand Pakistan toxic in foreign eyes - when was it ever non-toxic?
Pakistan has been seen as the epicentre of the global jihad, with foreign Muslim radicals coming to our shores for training and brainwashing
The foreign secretary explained that whenever our diplomats raised the Kashmir issue abroad, they had to listen to lectures about harbouring and supporting terrorists
Hafiz Saeed openly address public rallies despite the widely held perception that they are responsible for many acts of terrorism
we also have an unsavoury image for intolerance towards those with different beliefs and lifestyles
Pakistan is now widely seen as a major problem, and not part of the solution
“an international migraine”
...they neglect the fact that our overseas missions are no match for India’s soft power
Hussain still doesn't get it. Pakis need to understand that "Pakiness or pakinsanityiat" is a negative brand value cast over decades. To build marketable brand value for a nation, it takes generations. It is not an "on-off" switch. Just like one doesn't become a democratic nation overnight just because one semi-successfully held a round of semi-flawed general elections. Matching (or trying to match) India for its music,movies, food and fashion is just not it. It goes deeper than that superfluous check list. It goes down to the cultural DNA and the very basis of your society. A wandering minstrel is a wanderer first and minstrel second ("na ghar ka, na ghat ka" reputation).Indian music, movies, food and fashions are now an integral part of many Western cities. Restaurants owned by Pakistanis are often labelled ‘Indian’
In a wide ranging speech of close to an hour, Senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Dr. Subramanian Swamy spoke on India and Pakistan – Nature and Prospects and started from the time of getting independence to the current situation and into the future.
Nature/ Background The Parliament in United Kingdom enacted the Indian Independence Act, 1947. This was enacted on 18th July 1947, with both India and Pakistan to be formed on August 15, 1947. But before this, on April 11, 1947, the British objective was to create a Muslim governed state, viz. Pakistan and a Hindu governed state, the continuing state of India. The two countries were to come to existence by June 1948. B R Ambedkar, the chief architect of India’s Constitution proposed a population exchange in an orderly fashion.
But Mountbatten, fresh from South East War theater, advanced it to August 15, 1947. Thus there was no time to even consider a transfer of population. Why?
On Dec 26, 1946, Nehru informed Clement Attlee that Soviet Union had Subhas Chandra Bose in their custody. At around the same time, The Congress Party was to elect their President who would have become the presumptive Prime Minister. Gandhi conducted a poll of the PCC Presidents and found that they favored Patel as the Prime Minister by a majority of 15-1. But Gandhi prevailed over Patel because Nehru told him that he could not work under anyone. The British were conducting trials of Bose’s Indian National Army (INA) soldiers. Armed forces were in rebellion in various places in India and the British decided to leave India by June 1948.
Mountbatten feared that if Bose were to return to India, the British would lose all influence over India. Hence he advanced the date to August 15, 1947
Relations between India and Pakistan is convoluted and hence the cause of much strife is because our national identities have become fudged.A Hindu India has lived in peace with Parsis, Jews, Jains and Buddhists for thousands of years.
While Nehru declared India a secular country, the Constitution in force since 1950, did not say so. Mrs. Indira Gandhi added the word secular in the Constitution during the Emergency period, in 1976.Therefore, is the conflict between India and Pakistan a religion vs religion or secularism vs religion?
The terrorists attacking India are all Muslims and they invoke the Koran. Their supporters in India are too and say that they will fight a Hindu India, not a Secular India.Dr. Swamy added that from his personal experience, a large number of India’s Muslims want to be in India and not Pakistan.
The ISIS, Al Qaeda and Taliban refer to India as an unfinished chapter of Islam.
Wherever the Muslims are in majority in India, the Hindus are in trouble. Is this Darul Islam?
Hence, a growing Hindu consolidated polity is good because it destroys caste affinity. Seculars want Hindus divided and Muslims united.
Prospects of Relations India’s confusion in dealing with Pakistan is: Does Pakistan want even now slices of Indian territory by war, or Does Pakistan want to set India on fire to radicalize Muslims to accept the Caliphate concept? India will never concede any territory. India is ready for war. India split Pakistan into two after four wars. India will split Pakistan into four the next time. If war, then India needs to devote its attention to social engineering so as to create inter-faith unity over the national integrity. For the above to be achieved, all of India must consider itself as one, belonging to Hindustan.The final question – Is War inevitable with Pakistan or can the problems be settled by dialogue?
Answer
War is inevitable if Pakistan does not contain its home trained terrorists. India is ready for them.
Dialogue to settle terror questions is not possible since Pakistan’s Civil society at present is impotent.
ISLAMABAD: A three-member delegation from the Taliban’s Qatar office is currently in Pakistan to meet authorities — the first such contact following the breakdown of Islamabad-brokered talks between Kabul and the Taliban in May.The visit comes days after Taliban leaders reportedly held informal meetings with Afghan and US officials in Qatar.“The delegates — Maulvi Shahabuddin Dilawar, Maulvi Salam Hanafi and Jan Muhammad — have been in Pakistan for the past two days,” a government official confirmed.
Two of the men served as ministers in Afghanistan’s Taliban-led government, while the third one is a former Taliban ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.Pakistan has hosted several rounds of international talks over the last year to jumpstart peace negotiations between the two sides, but dialogue ground to a halt earlier this year when former Taliban leader Mullah Akhtar Mansour was killed in a drone strike in Balochistan.Reuters quoted Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid as saying: “The delegation was sent to discuss some major issues with Pakistani leadership including the arrests of Afghan refugees and their repatriation to Afghanistan.”
A Taliban functionary said the delegates also raised the issue of some Taliban leaders who were recently arrested in Pakistan.A few days ago, security forces raided a seminary in Quetta and arrested a Taliban commander, Mullah Abdul Samad Sani, Reuters quoted a Taliban member as saying.“We don’t know what’s going on but this is the second time during the past two months that Pakistani authorities raided a madressah in Quetta to arrest a senior Taliban member,” the Quetta-based Taliban told the news agency.Afghanistan’s Ambassador to Pakistan Hazrat Omar Zakhilwal said he was aware of the developments, but refused to divulge any details.Foreign Office Spokesperson Nafees Zakria was not available for comment, despite repeated attempts.
Has this anything to do with the "peace treaty" signed by the Butcher Of Kabul ( Pak Proxy Hekmatyar ) and his return to Afghanistan ?Sartaj Aziz, who advises the prime minister on foreign affairs, told Dawn that while he was not aware of the details, Pakistan welcomed all efforts for peace in Afghanistan.
A day earlier, Mr Aziz had said there had been no positive response from the Afghan Taliban on peace talks, despite Islamabad’s best efforts.
Author seems to share the majority view of citizens of the Mohammadden Terrorist fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan that India is limited to a slice that covers Punjab and the Ganga-Jumna belt which is assumed to be culturally Mohammaddenised and thus believes that Indian’s are cognizant about Punjabi and Urdu speaking Poets, Writers ,Musician’s and Mohammadden Clerics.Can Pakistan give up Lata or India Nusrat Ali because of a line on the atlas, asks Pakistani singer
Politicians and forces have always found reasons to fight, but the common man does not want bloodshed and hatred; he is far too busy making a living.
Written by Shafqat Amanat Ali | Updated: October 23, 2016 11:22 am ………………
And can anyone in India say that he will give up on Baba Farid, Bulleh Shah, Shah Hussain, Waris Shah, Sultan Bahu or Faiz Ahmed Faiz, Ahmed Faraz and Intizar Hussain? Will the music created by the likes of Barkat Ali Khan, Amanat Ali Khan, Abida Parveen, Iqbal Bano, Farida Khanum, Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan and numerous other artistes be any less intoxicating just because they live across that line? …………………
PeregrineJi, it begs the question as to why US has not done so to date, after all, TSP has taken out many of its (US) soldiers in AfPak. Also, one doesn't expect US to fight India's war, but I do see an opening US has left for TSP by its omission of India-specific pigLeTs. So just as TSP maneuvered and went after the "mighty" Al Quaida (picking up a bunch of yahoos from tribal areas) and saved its arse from US wrath, I could very well foresee that TSP giving up Haqqanis when the price is just right: Lots of F-solas, some form of strategic depth restored in Afghanistan, tacit support for India-specific pigLeTs, bogus "neutrality" on Kashmir etc. Add Chincom steadfast support, and Ruskies flirting with them, not a bad position.Peregrine wrote:US warns Pakistan, says 'we will act alone on terror'
All the above are invoked only to score brownie points in an argument with Indians. If anyone of them were alive in today's p**kistan, they would be wajib-ul... for denigrating islam.arun wrote:Singer from the Mohammadden Terrorist fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan by name of Shafqat Amanat Ali and son of one Ustad Amanat Ali Khan, writes Amaan Ki Asha type article in the Indian Express.
Author seems to share the majority view of citizens of the Mohammadden Terrorist fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan that India is limited to a slice that covers Punjab and the Ganga-Jumna belt which is assumed to be culturally Mohammaddenised and thus believes that Indian’s are cognizant about Punjabi and Urdu speaking Poets, Writers ,Musician’s and Mohammadden Clerics.Can Pakistan give up Lata or India Nusrat Ali because of a line on the atlas, asks Pakistani singer
Politicians and forces have always found reasons to fight, but the common man does not want bloodshed and hatred; he is far too busy making a living.
Written by Shafqat Amanat Ali | Updated: October 23, 2016 11:22 am ………………
And can anyone in India say that he will give up on Baba Farid, Bulleh Shah, Shah Hussain, Waris Shah, Sultan Bahu or Faiz Ahmed Faiz, Ahmed Faraz and Intizar Hussain? Will the music created by the likes of Barkat Ali Khan, Amanat Ali Khan, Abida Parveen, Iqbal Bano, Farida Khanum, Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan and numerous other artistes be any less intoxicating just because they live across that line? …………………
I am neither a Punjabi or Urdu speaker and indeed come from a State in India that has a local language not spoken in the Islamic Republic and further my home State is surrounded by other States of India who likewise have local languages not spoken in the Islamic Republic. Not being knowledgeable in the first place of the works of the names listed due to language barrier and very much more inclined to devote scarce time to learning the multiple languages of the States surrounding my home State to more fully appreciate India’s diversity, I have no problem in saying that I will give up on Baba Farid et al.
Another point that struck me is that there is not one single Non-Mohammadden in the list of names posted above. In the Islamic Republic, Non Mohammaddens seem to have been purged from the national consciousness as historical icons and are also so marginalised in the current dispensation that they are simply not enough of them around to become icons.
CRamS Ji :CRamS wrote:PeregrineJi, it begs the question as to why US has not done so to date, after all, TSP has taken out many of its (US) soldiers in AfPak. Also, one doesn't expect US to fight India's war, but I do see an opening US has left for TSP by its omission of India-specific pigLeTs. So just as TSP maneuvered and went after the "mighty" Al Quaida (picking up a bunch of yahoos from tribal areas) and saved its arse from US wrath, I could very well foresee that TSP giving up Haqqanis when the price is just right: Lots of F-solas, some form of strategic depth restored in Afghanistan, tacit support for India-specific pigLeTs, bogus "neutrality" on Kashmir etc. Add Chincom steadfast support, and Ruskies flirting with them, not a bad position.Peregrine wrote:US warns Pakistan, says 'we will act alone on terror'