Bharat Rakshak Forum Announcement

Hello Everyone,

A warm welcome back to the Bharat Rakshak Forum.

Important Notice: Due to a corruption in the BR forum database we regret to announce that data records relating to some of our registered users have been lost. We estimate approx. 500 user details are deleted.

To ease the process of recreating the user IDs we request members that have previously posted on the BR forums to recognise and identify their posts, once the posts are identified please contact the BRF moderator team by emailing BRF Mod Team with your post details.

The mod team will be able to update your username, email etc. so that the user history can be maintained.

Unfortunately for members that have never posted or have had all their posts deleted i.e. users that have 0 posts, we will be unable to recreate your account hence we request that you re-register again.

We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
Seetal

India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4372
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby Peregrine » 10 Jan 2018 15:01

Trump suggests two-phase immigration deal for 'Dreamers'

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump is suggesting that an immigration deal could be tackled in two phases - first by taking care of the so-called Dreamers and border security, then by making comprehensive reforms to the immigration system.

Trump on Tuesday held a lengthy meeting with a bipartisan group of lawmakers on immigration.

The president says he would need construction of a border security wall as part of an agreement involving young immigrants, but he says Congress could then pursue a comprehensive immigration overhaul in the second phase.

During a wide-ranging conversation with lawmakers, Trump stressed he needs funding for a border wall and changes to the immigration system.

He has said those are necessary for a deal to protect hundreds of thousands of young people who had been shielded from deportation.

Cheers Image

Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4372
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby Peregrine » 11 Jan 2018 15:25

Working with countries like India a good thing: Trump

WASHINGTON: Working with countries like India, Russia and China is a good not bad thing, US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday.

He was responding to criticism of his desire to improve relationship with Moscow.

"Working with countries, whether it's Russia or China or India, or any of the countries that surround this world and encompass this world, is a very good thing. That's not a bad thing," he told reporters at a joint White House news conference with Prime Minister, Norway, Erna Solberg.

Trump said he was for strongest military, massive oil and gas and a lot of energy. "Putin (Russian President Vladimir Putin) can't love that," he added.

Trump said it was "very much better" having to do with North Korea where the US currently has a problem.

"That should have never been my problem. It should have been a problem solved many years ago when it was much less dangerous. But it was given to him, along with a big mess of other things," he noted.

He blamed former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, his presidential rival in 2016 elections, saying she "was not was not for a strong military".

"Hillary, my opponent, was for windmills, and she was for other types of energy that don't have the same capacities at this moment certainly," he said.

Trump said it was a "lot better" to work with other countries.

"We're working with China on North Korea. We're working with various other countries, and I think we're doing very well. We had a great talk, as you know and as you reported.

"We had a great talk this morning with President Moon (of South Korea), and I think that a lot of good things are happening. We're going to see what happens," the US president said.
Solberg said Norway has a "very good" relationship with Russia.

"As a neighbouring country we do day-to-day work on things that we have to solve for the people and the economic activity that is in that area, which is a fragile area for the whole world," she said.

Norway share border with Russia.

Responding to a question on allegations of Russian interference in elections in European countries, Solberg said her government has found no such evidence in Norway.

"I think that it's up to every political system and countries to scrutinise and discuss their own political agenda in their countries. And I respect that very much and that this is an issue for American politics," she said.

Cheers Image

ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 48482
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby ramana » 12 Jan 2018 05:14

https://twitter.com/dna/status/951463709670436866

US ambassador on Trump and Terrorism

UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8808
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby UlanBatori » 12 Jan 2018 07:05

More on Bleat Phalala's coujin

An Outrageous Injustice Against An AsAm Bank
(If you own a business, view the documentary & worry!)

Abacus Bank, a small bank operated by the Sung family in NYC, was the only U.S. bank to be charged after the Great Recession of 2008.
The bank ultimately prevailed, but it took all they had to fight against the unfair accusations.



The story was recorded in a documentary by Steve James, Abacus:
Small Enough to Jail. It was Broadcast on PBS Frontline in 2017. The
prosecutor spent 5 years and reportedly $10 million on prosecuting the bank for larceny. In the end, the bank and all its employees were found not
guilty on all 80 charges. Deservedly, the documentary is now shortlisted
for an Oscar.

Click here to watch it. I was enraged by the injustice but inspired by how one of the daughters, who was a lawyer, quit her job to help her father in his hour of need. It was such a touching illustration of our AsAm family values. I was also elated to learn that, at the end, the good guys won.

This documentary deserves an Oscar to show that justice still
prevails in the U.S., at least in this case. The Oscar will greatly publicize worldwide the immense injustice caused by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.

The Misdeeds of Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.

(1) No sense of justice: He accommodates the strong and takes campaign money from their attorneys:

Excerpts from Cyrus Vance Jr. - Wikipedia "Vance also drew controversy for deciding not to press criminal charges against public figures accused of crimes,
including Harvey Weinstein, Ivanka Trump, and Donald Trump Jr., after which he received campaign contributions from their attorneys."

(2) Adding insult to injury to a weak minority:

Another excerpt from Cyrus Vance Jr. - Wikipedia: "In an effort at
grandstanding, Vance's office orchestrated a show by parading ex-employees of the bank in a chain, handcuffed to each other, in front of reporters. Nevertheless, Cyrus Vance stated in an interview that the decision to exhibit the non-violent ex-employees was due to "security issues." Click
here to watch the documentary. How humiliating! Vance was humiliating powerless citizens to advance his political career. How cruel!


Please forward to your friends in NYC so that his constituents will
know about his misdeeds. He was a good D.A. back in 2010, when first elected. However, power corrupts, he seemingly has become callous and careless. Will the people of Manhattan County still want him, if and when "Small Enough to Jail" wins an Oscar? This could exemplify the immense power for good of arts.

DONATE

S. B. Woo

President and a volunteer for the past 18 years
80-20 Educational Foundation, Inc, a 501 C-3 organization,
http://www.80-20educationalfoundation.org/index.php

To know more about 80-20, view these videos :
https://youtu.be/dB3eGVqG-wAÂ (Ignore the last 35 secs. The election is over.)
http://youtu.be/h781_ECSJYM
80-20 EF Mission Statement

ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 48482
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby ramana » 12 Jan 2018 11:09

+108

UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8808
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby UlanBatori » 12 Jan 2018 21:52

Wasn't Cyrus Vance Sr one of Jimmy Carter's dumbass cousins in the State Dept or something?
Junior is a classic case of DonaldTrumpHaitiName.

These are dark times for Manhattan district attorney Cyrus Vance, Jr., as two high-profile investigative reports—about Harvey Weinstein and Ivanka and Donald Trump Jr.—have revealed that Vance has a suspicious habit of declining to prosecute some of New York’s most powerful people, while, uh, also accepting campaign donations from their lawyers.

Last week, a joint bombshell by The New Yorker, WNYC, and ProPublica revealed Ivanka and Donald Jr. narrowly avoided criminal fraud charges in 2012 for allegedly misleading potential buyers at the flailing Trump Soho Hotel—because Vance dropped the mounting case after a meeting with Donald Trump Sr.’s personal lawyer, Marc Kasowitz. Kasowitz had donated $25,000 to Vance’s reelection campaign before the meeting (money Vance later returned) and went on to donate and raise a total of more than $50,000 in the months after the case against the Trump kids disappeared. Vance now says that, roughly five years later, he’ll return that money, too—but even a lawyer who was on the Trump defense team said Vance’s intermingling with Kasowitz “didn’t have an air you’d like.”

Now, that fishy air is surrounding Vance for the second time in as many weeks after The New Yorker’s disturbing report on Weinstein revealed that the NYPD had been gathering evidence to charge Weinstein with a misdemeanor sex crime in 2015 for groping model Ambra Battilana Gutierrez, but Vance had declined to charge him. Vance cited a lack of evidence—even as Gutierrez, in a police sting operation, had caught Weinstein on tape apologizing for groping her the day before. In a bit of déjà vu, the International Business Times reports that Weinstein Company lawyer David Boies, a former Vance donor, contributed $10,000 to Vance’s campaign in the months after the district attorney decided not to prosecute Weinstein, and that, during Vance’s political career, Boies, his son, and his law partners have donated more than $182,000 to him.


(sigh!) What a contrast to that paragon of courage, Bleat "Cavity" Bhalala!

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9414
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby arun » 13 Jan 2018 10:00

X Posted from the Terroristan thread :wink: on the "lessons" India needs to learn from the US for arm twisting the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan :lol: .

shiv wrote:
arun wrote:Xinhua reports that civilian underling in chief to the Uniformed Jihadi’s of the Punjabi Military Dominated Deep State of the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan fronting fictional façade of civilian control over the Uniformed Jihadi’s , namely Defense Minister Khurram Dastgir Khan, has disclosed that the Islamic Republic has suspended defense and intelligence cooperation with the United States amid growing tensions over U.S. suspension of military aid to Pakistan:

Defense, intelligence cooperation with U.S. suspended: Pakistani defense minister

The Voice of America (VOA) on the other hand reports that the US insists its Major Non-NATO Ally has done no such thing :roll: .

:wink: Appears the US may be pretending that her Major Non-NATO Ally, the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan has not stuck a finger up the US backside and wiggled it vigorously by claiming that that no such thing happened so as to not have to act on the tough guy threats they (the US) have made to the Islamic Republic :lol: :

US Denies Pakistani Claims of Suspension of Military or Intel Cooperation


Where are all the rahrah USA smokegetsinyoureyes people who used to come on this thread to say that the US twirls Pakistan around its little finger and that India should learn from the US. Cat got their tongue? Maun vrat?


Indeed where are all the “rahrah USA smokegetsinyoureyes people who used to come on this thread to say that the US twirls Pakistan around its little finger and that India should learn from the US”.

Meanwhile the US adds more lubrication to ensure they do not have to act on the tough guy threats they (the US) have made to the Islamic Republic :lol: . This time via Steven (Steve) Goldstein, their Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs, who continues to insist that they, the US, have not been informed by the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan of a cessation in intelligence sharing.

Looks the US continues to lay the groundwork to roll back the scale of their military aid stoppage to the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic of Pakistan as even a week after a formal announcement of a supposed and highly qualified cutback in military aid ie: subject to legal obligations and critical for national security considerations (Clicky BRF). Further Steven (Steve) Goldstein could not name a figure for the actual amount of the alleged military aid cutback:

Special Briefing
I. Steven (Steve) Goldstein
Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs
2. Brian Hook
Director of Policy Planning
Press Briefing Room
Washington, DC
January 11, 2018 ………………………….

QUESTION: Yeah. Another question regarding Pakistan policy. What will be the next step of decision of United State toward Pakistan if Pakistan still keep its old policy toward Afghanistan and United State? Any update?

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: As it relates to the decision that we made?

QUESTION: Yeah.

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: We would hope that Pakistan would come to the table and that they would turn over those terrorists that we have asked be turned over. We’ve indicated very clearly that we are – that we believe that can happen. We’ve only suspended the aid; we have not reallocated the money. So now it is the job of Pakistan to take seriously their commitment to us, and most importantly to the people of Pakistan who would most be hurt by this, by another terrorist – any terrorist activity, and come forward. So our position hasn’t changed. They have not yet come forward, to answer your follow-up question.

QUESTION: One follow-up on this?

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: Yes, sir.

QUESTION: Can you tell us now precisely what is the amount of Foreign Military Financing that the U.S. State Department will suspend pursuant to the President’s decision? You had previously said, I think, or an NSC spokesman said it was about a billion dollars including --

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: Yes.

QUESTION: But it’s a week later, and I wonder if you now have the actual number.

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: I’ll get back to you with the number. You’re correct, though. That is the number that we use – something close to a billion dollars. It’s a series of dollars in different areas that would have to be put together.

QUESTION: Yeah.

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: But again, our hope – and we haven’t reallocated the money. Our hope is that Pakistan will do the right thing for the people of Pakistan because they should want to root out terrorists in their country as much as we want to root out terrorists in their country.

QUESTION: On Pakistan?

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: Yes, sir.

QUESTION: And I brought this up earlier. I don’t know if there’s an answer to it or not. But do you have anything on any kind of recent interaction with the Government of Pakistan on the situation – the case of Dr. Afridi?

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: I don’t, but I will check on that and I will get back to you later today.

QUESTION: Thank you.

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: Yes, ma’am.

QUESTION: Thanks so much. On Pakistan, we understand that officials have said they will stop sharing intelligence and already have stopped sharing intelligence from sources on the ground on the Afghan border with the U.S. What’s your reaction to that? Have they informed you of that? Are you making efforts to see if that’s correct and take action?

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: No, they have not informed us of that. And I checked on that at a quarter to two Eastern Time, and as of that point, that had not occurred.

QUESTION: Do you anticipate that to happen? Do you anticipate the unilaterally cut off the supply?

UNDER SECRETARY GOLDSTEIN: Because, as Matt noted, I have feeling, I am hopeful that Pakistan will do the right thing and turn over the terrorists and honor their commitment.


From the US State Department website:

On-the-Record-Briefing : January 11, 2018

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9414
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby arun » 16 Jan 2018 16:29

X Posted from the Terroristan thread.

Peregrine wrote:US trying to convince us that India is not a threat, says Pakistan defence minister

ISLAMABAD: The US has been trying to convince Pakistan that India was not a threat to it and Islamabad should change its strategic stance towards New Delhi, defence minister Khurram Dastagir Khan has said.

…………………..{Snipped}………………

Reading out a policy statement on the government's foreign policy contours and the security situation in Pakistan in the National Assembly yesterday, he regretted that the US played down India's aggressive posturing along the Line of Control (LoC) and Working Boundary, the Dawn reported on Tuesday.

The minister said the perception of India was one of the foundational divergences between Pakistan and the US.

…………………..{Snipped}……………

Khan said that Washington had been trying to convince Pakistan that India was not a threat and, therefore, Islamabad should change its strategic stance.

"But the truism remains true. Both India's capacity and intents are today hostile towards Pakistan," he alleged.

…………………..{Snipped}……………

Khan alleged that "India has amassed men, material and garrisons along the border with Pakistan" and said that 2017 was the deadliest year in terms of LoC violations by India and the killings of civilians.

"India today is a highly militarised and an increasingly belligerent neighbour," he claimed, adding that the unrelentingly hostile and anti-Pakistan stance taken by the current Indian government has reduced drastically the space for any advocacy of peace.

………….{Rest Snipped}………..


As the above article shows, the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic is very clear that India is the enemy.

Given the above and US Acting Assistant Secretary of State Alice Wells reportedly having said to journalist Hamid Mir per the below article that the United States considers the Mohammadden Terrorism Fomenting Islamic Republic Pakistan’s enemy as its own enemy; is the US now saying that India is their (i.e. the US’) Enemy :?:

Pakistan’s enemy is our enemy, says US State Dept official

Y. Kanan
BRFite
Posts: 631
Joined: 27 Mar 2003 12:31
Location: USA

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby Y. Kanan » 17 Jan 2018 13:01

ashish raval wrote:Just one line Good luck to those who suck up to communist regime without any regard for democracy. It will implode it will be when not if..I will say less than 25 years.


Ha! They were saying the same thing 25 years ago. There’s no law of the universe that says you have to have democracy. Indeed, democracy is an historical aberration if you look at the big picture of humanity since the beginning.

Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 60714
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: Lupine but moderately dharmic

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby Singha » 17 Jan 2018 17:09

the longest lived regimes in world history have been thoroughly mercantile and autocratic, usually a monarchy or oligarchy of some sort.

rome and the ottoman empire come to mind.

the ottomans lasted some 600 years. the western roman empire 500, the eastern roman(byzantine @ constantinople) nearly 1000 years!!

compare that to pax americana of some 70 years, most of which was contested by peer powers and the proposed pax sinica ... ashes and stardust brothers.

the longest lived india empire is the Later Chola around 400 years. the early cholas were said to be 600 years but not as well documented. they were among the more dharmic and hands on monarchs , trade with even faraway rome has been found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Cholas

the next longest lived indian empires have been the gupta and mughal around 300 years each. maurya was around 150.

Prasad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6637
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 00:53
Location: Chennai

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby Prasad » 17 Jan 2018 21:10

Wishy washy blah blah as usual about piss progress and mutual help -
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues ... rtnership/

Interesting to see the people involved though.

ShauryaT
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5029
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 06:06

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby ShauryaT » 18 Jan 2018 23:26

Prasad wrote:Wishy washy blah blah as usual about piss progress and mutual help -
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues ... rtnership/

Interesting to see the people involved though.
More on the above. https://www.facebook.com/CentreforPolic ... ign=buffer

Such is the state of what is called "strategic affairs" these days. What a fall! Disappointed with CPR.

srinebula
BRFite
Posts: 120
Joined: 12 Oct 2016 13:36

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby srinebula » 18 Jan 2018 23:34

arun wrote:X Posted from the Indian Foreign Policy thread.

Op Ed by Barkha Dutt in the Washington Post


Sir, sorry if it is OT, and if I am naive, but does BDutt really bring any new insights?
Why to link to her post and drive traffic to the snake pit WaPo.

ashish raval
BRFite
Posts: 1234
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 00:49
Location: London
Contact:

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby ashish raval » 19 Jan 2018 03:03

Y. Kanan wrote:
ashish raval wrote:Just one line Good luck to those who suck up to communist regime without any regard for democracy. It will implode it will be when not if..I will say less than 25 years.


Ha! They were saying the same thing 25 years ago. There’s no law of the universe that says you have to have democracy. Indeed, democracy is an historical aberration if you look at the big picture of humanity since the beginning.


Show me one communist regime apart from Chin that has flourished or is flourishing!! History does not matter it is dynamic and humans evolve so does beliefs and system of governance.

Bart S
BRFite
Posts: 855
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 00:03

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby Bart S » 19 Jan 2018 03:33

ashish raval wrote:
Y. Kanan wrote:
Ha! They were saying the same thing 25 years ago. There’s no law of the universe that says you have to have democracy. Indeed, democracy is an historical aberration if you look at the big picture of humanity since the beginning.


Show me one communist regime apart from Chin that has flourished or is flourishing!! History does not matter it is dynamic and humans evolve so does beliefs and system of governance.


China post Deng can hardly be called communist. It might be communist in name, however the only resemblance to other communist states is the authoritarian, single-party rule. Economy-wise it is an odd hybrid of capitalism mercantilism with extremely parochial state backing for local companies to undermine foreign trade partners.

Kashi
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2586
Joined: 06 May 2011 13:53

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby Kashi » 19 Jan 2018 12:36

ashish raval wrote:Show me one communist regime apart from Chin that has flourished or is flourishing!! History does not matter it is dynamic and humans evolve so does beliefs and system of governance.


Communist != Antonym of democracy. That would be dictatorship. Historically, communist regimes have been a subset of Dictatorial regimes.

As far as flourished or flourishing goes. Republic of Korea (SoKo) and Republic of China (Taiwan) were neo-dictatorial for a long time and they flourished.

Taiwan became a representative democracy only in 1990 and RoK became a true democracy only in 1987 with the establishment of the sixth republic, just a year before 1988 Seoul Olympics.

Both these countries were strong and vibrant economies by then.

Singapore is another example.

Even the democracies of the West were not always truly representative for a long long time. At its height, the British empire was hardly democratic in the true sense. Universal suffrage in the UK first happened only in 1918 and that too only for men!! Women had to wait another 10 years for the right to vote. In the US, women were allowed to vote only in 1920 and African-Americans continued to be denied voting rights till 1960s.

ashish raval
BRFite
Posts: 1234
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 00:49
Location: London
Contact:

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby ashish raval » 19 Jan 2018 18:19

Kashi wrote:
ashish raval wrote:Show me one communist regime apart from Chin that has flourished or is flourishing!! History does not matter it is dynamic and humans evolve so does beliefs and system of governance.


Communist != Antonym of democracy. That would be dictatorship. Historically, communist regimes have been a subset of Dictatorial regimes.

As far as flourished or flourishing goes. Republic of Korea (SoKo) and Republic of China (Taiwan) were neo-dictatorial for a long time and they flourished.

Taiwan became a representative democracy only in 1990 and RoK became a true democracy only in 1987 with the establishment of the sixth republic, just a year before 1988 Seoul Olympics.

Both these countries were strong and vibrant economies by then.

Singapore is another example.

Even the democracies of the West were not always truly representative for a long long time. At its height, the British empire was hardly democratic in the true sense. Universal suffrage in the UK first happened only in 1918 and that too only for men!! Women had to wait another 10 years for the right to vote. In the US, women were allowed to vote only in 1920 and African-Americans continued to be denied voting rights till 1960s.

Dont talk about history here!! Historically Napoleon was sleeping on a golden bed means nothing in modern days. South Korea, Taiwan, Japan had massive help from United States and its allies like UK in the past. UK has actually built both Hongkong and Singapore and there is hardly any chini contribution apart from Manpower there.
West has democratic regimes since Greek times however weaker form it has been or intermittent. Americans have democracy since 18th century with nation having hardly 500 years history. World War changed everything in western world so let's keep argument to 20th century once communism arrived on the scene. Anything before that to be compared is beating around the Bush and distraction.
The countries you said were mildly dictatorship because Americans wanted it that way to be strong US ally and build those countries to have spine to stand in region against Chin. Not otherwise..

KrishnaK
BRFite
Posts: 884
Joined: 29 Mar 2005 23:00

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby KrishnaK » 20 Jan 2018 00:37

Singha wrote:the longest lived regimes in world history have been thoroughly mercantile and autocratic, usually a monarchy or oligarchy of some sort.

rome and the ottoman empire come to mind.

the ottomans lasted some 600 years. the western roman empire 500, the eastern roman(byzantine @ constantinople) nearly 1000 years!!

compare that to pax americana of some 70 years, most of which was contested by peer powers and the proposed pax sinica ... ashes and stardust brothers.

the longest lived india empire is the Later Chola around 400 years. the early cholas were said to be 600 years but not as well documented. they were among the more dharmic and hands on monarchs , trade with even faraway rome has been found https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Cholas

the next longest lived indian empires have been the gupta and mughal around 300 years each. maurya was around 150.

Time is a bad comparator of democracies and autocracies - India has been a democracy for 70 odd years and has had 16 elections. The US in its 200 years of democracy has had 56 presedential elections ? How many times has power changed in the Ottman, Roman, Chola, Mughal empires ?

ShauryaT
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5029
Joined: 31 Oct 2005 06:06

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby ShauryaT » 20 Jan 2018 08:42

Indo-US relations, India and Indian interests as Indira Gandhi saw it in 1972.

India and the World By Indira Gandhi

To our grave concern, U.S. policy as it developed impinged seriously on our vital interests. The admission of Pakistan into the U.S.-controlled system of alliances and the massive supply of arms to Pakistan were ostensibly part of the U.S. grand design against communism, but we cannot believe that the U.S. administration was unaware that these weapons could be and would be used only against India. We took considerable pains to point this out but our protests went unheeded.

Should not the people of the United States ask their government what they have gained from America's activities in Europe and in Asia? Has the United States succeeded in containing communism? On the contrary, has not the U.S. government been compelled to build bridges with the nonaligned and to woo the opposite bloc-the hated Communists? I have no doubt that if we had followed the advice of the Western bloc, conditions in India would have deteriorated and the extremists would have been strengthened.

In regard to Bangladesh and during the December war, the United States openly backed Pakistan at the cost of basic human values. This further strained our relations. I do not wish to analyze the U.S. role at that time or go into the misrepresentations which were circulated. But it is necessary to take note of the dispatch of the warship Enterprise to support a ruthless military dictatorship and to intimidate a democracy, and the extraordinary similarity of the attitudes adopted by the United States and China. Imagine our feelings. The original misunderstanding with the United States had arisen because of our contacts with China, the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. We find it difficult to understand why, when the U.S. policy toward these countries changed, the resentment against us increased.

But, we have some here, who claim history does not matter, well..

Dipanker
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2972
Joined: 14 May 2002 11:31

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby Dipanker » 20 Jan 2018 09:44

^Apropos the last paragraph, the answer has to be "racism", even much more so back then. For the white supremacists Republicans and the non-liberal types the hybrid Indians figure much lower on the proverbial racial totem pole, lower than the orientals, may be marginally higher than the "shithole" continent dwellers.

Pulikeshi
BRFite
Posts: 1324
Joined: 31 Oct 2002 12:31
Location: Badami

Re: India-US relations: News and Discussions IV

Postby Pulikeshi » 20 Jan 2018 12:16

^^^ Your argument falls into the gap of Paki (Aryan TFTA) and Bangladeshi (SDRE) - India was just a spectator :mrgreen:
There is no difference between Republican and Democrats on all these things...
Them both have adorned the hood and the wood of lesser than Übermensch when they so desired... :oops:

Progressive US attitude has evolved along these lines -
India is a basket case and will not feed itself, Them Nehru/IG folks piss us off as they seem to speak British Inglish, but preach Indian morals! Prevent India from becoming a sub-continental power, Prevent India from becoming a regional power in Asia, Prevent India from having any influence in West Asia but maybe economic activity in East Asia is ok, rinse repeate... wait till end of presidency or second term to solve the Cashmere issue! Rinse! Some Repeate!
Prevent India from.... wait, what China is dominating all of Asia. Hey India, can we Quad? But only in the Act East please! :P
I conclude that the US does not know what to do with India ~ just like India does not know what to do with US - democrazy confunds each other!

"Hanlon's razor - "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."


Return to “Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: anupmisra, Ashok Sarraff, kumarn and 54 guests