Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

The Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum is a venue to discuss issues pertaining to India's security environment, her strategic outlook on global affairs and as well as the effect of international relations in the Indian Subcontinent. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
ArjunPandit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2749
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 06:37

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby ArjunPandit » 10 Sep 2019 22:39

A_Gupta wrote:
China is planning to invest $280 billion in Iran’s oil, gas, and petrochemical sectors that are being affected by US sanctions, according to Petroleum Economist magazine.

how reliable is the link..havent heard much on this news..

ArjunPandit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2749
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 06:37

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby ArjunPandit » 10 Sep 2019 22:43

Rsatchi wrote:Last night was Part II of BBC two china series: about HK demostrations, Chinese billionaires and fronts trying to buy influence
Repeatedly spoke about United Front a Chini commie organisation ( a la Amensty International) trying to peddle Chinese line and buying influence.
Some spine by Pee Pee See given so much Chini influence in the UK.
Is this something like Cash-moor = Chini so to be secular in their own way. :lol:

i also watched not sure if it was the first part or second part..but i think they were quite polite of the chinese influence buying..i wonder if bbc would have been that kind if fellow muslims or earlier british subjects were involved. I had many discussions with chinese to guage their thoughts on this..they're of the viewpoint that hong kongers were not appreciative of the economic and other benefits extended to HK and they wont be treated as favored baby all the time...chinese govt can plan for other alternatives to hk..
hearing them it struck me that there may be chinese game of letting hk fritter away and let business/industries move away to mainland china over years..

Rsatchi
BRFite
Posts: 127
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby Rsatchi » 11 Sep 2019 16:16

Part I & II all about XI rise and problems in HK and Xijiang and concentration camps(which pee pee see has not guts to call a spade a spade) interviews from people who have escaped and watching their kids being brain washed.!! But no big reaction from Lizard. Why??
Ignoring pee pee see.
Seems to be sending lot of their youths for higher studies to UK.
Maybe a long term plan to peddle influence and set up call centres/back offices in Chini to compete with India.
So for the time being not to take panga with the Britshits given that HK is daily on the news

Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7635
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby Peregrine » 11 Sep 2019 22:08

India-China spat delays deal covering a third of global trade

- The main source of tension is between India and China over the amount of goods with preferential tariffs, according to a person familiar with the negotiations who asked not to be identified

- The person said India was also unhappy with the position of Southeast Asian countries on the free movement of professionals and is weighing whether to be part of the deal at all

NEW DELHI: A spat between the world’s most populous countries is holding up a pan-Asian trade agreement encompassing nearly a third of all global trade.

Trade ministers from 16 Asia-Pacific countries this week hailed a “critical milestone” after seven years of talks and vowed to wind them up before a regional summit in November. But officials involved in the process say major sticking points remain around market access and the ability of workers to find employment in other countries.

The main source of tension is between India and China over the amount of goods with preferential tariffs, according to a person familiar with the negotiations who asked not to be identified. The person said India was also unhappy with the position of Southeast Asian countries on the free movement of professionals, particularly in the IT sector, and is
weighing whether to be part of the deal at all.

Covering nearly half of the globe’s population, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership was proclaimed “the world’s biggest regional free trade deal” when talks started in 2012. Shortly after President Donald Trump took office in 2016 and pulled the US out of an Asia-Pacific trade deal, President Xi Jinping sought to accelerate talks on the Asia-wide pact to cement bolster China’s influence.

Sticking points

But negotiators have repeatedly blown through deadlines, mostly because Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government is worried about exacerbating a trade deficit with China and the rest of Asia isn’t willing to accept large amounts of Indian workers in return for greater market access. The talks include the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations,
Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, India and China.

“I’m not too optimistic because of the differences among the member countries, especially towards how they see RCEP benefiting the economy versus the challenges it creates,” said Yeah Kim Leng, an economics professor at Sunway University in Malaysia who is an external member of the Malaysian central bank’s monetary policy committee.

“The big question now is if they would like to proceed without India, which could cause some big push back from New Zealand and Australia,” he said. “Which would in turn make the process take a longer time.”

Officially, the group is sticking together. Thai commerce minister Jurin Laksanawisit on Tuesday evening said each of the 16 nations negotiating the trade pact, including India, supports the conclusion of the talks by November.

“Everything is on track,” Jurin told reporters. “We made progress in every meeting over the past week.”

Monideepa Mukherjee, a spokesperson for trade ministry, wasn’t immediately available for comment. On Monday, external affairs minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar openly blamed China for what he described as “unfair” trade policies that created “an enormous trade deficit.”

‘No return’

China hasn’t commented officially on the latest round of talks. On August 29, China's commerce ministry spokesman Gao Feng said Beijing would play a constructive role and “push for the conclusion of the negotiations as scheduled.”

“The Chinese side is still optimistic,” said Wang Huiyao, an adviser to China’s cabinet and founder of Center for China and Globalization. “China wants it because of the Sino-US trade war,” he added, saying the deal would be a “way for the region to show that it opposes unilateralism.”

Many member countries insist the advantages of a regional pact outweigh any lingering doubts, particularly as they cope with the fallout of slowing global economic growth and enduring US-China trade war. The next round of negotiations are expected to be held later this month in Danang, Vietnam.

Indonesian minister of trade Enggartiasto Lukita warned in a statement on Monday that the talks had reached a “point of no return.” He acknowledged negotiations remained far apart in some areas, and some solutions proposed by individual countries didn’t work for the “outlying majority.”

“A settlement this year is very urgent,” Lukita said. “If not, the RCEP negotiations will lose important momentum that can drive changes and progress in the world economy.”

Ray of hope

Still, not everyone is despairing at the agreement’s progress.

Striking a tone of cautious optimism, Rebecca Fatima Sta Maria, executive director of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat, noted talks around the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership took eight years from start to ratification.

“I only worry when people stop talking -- not when they are still coming to the table for discussions,” Sta Maria, former secretary-general of Malaysia’s trade ministry, said in an email. “In my experience, trade negotiations can be unpredictable and we may frustrate ourselves if we try to pin down a magic formula, other than patience and an open mind.”

Sta Maria said she looks forward to more good news in November. She’d said in May that lack of progress this year on RCEP would be “embarrassing,” especially for Southeast Asia economies that have pushed for the deal.

Cheers Image

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23692
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby SSridhar » 12 Sep 2019 09:46

Indian, Chinese soldiers get into scuffle in Ladakh - Rajat Pandit, ToI
Border tensions between India and China flared up yet again on Wednesday with a prolonged confrontation between the rival troops in eastern Ladakh, even as the Indian Army gets all set to hold a major war game to test its new integrated battle groups (IBGs) in Arunachal Pradesh next month.

Sources said the face-off between Indian and Chinese soldiers began on the northern bank of the 134-km-long Pangong Tso (Tso means lake), two-thirds of which is controlled by China as it extends from Tibet to Ladakh, soon after dawn on Wednesday.

“Indian soldiers were on a patrol when they were confronted by People’s Liberation Army soldiers, who strongly objected to their presence in the area. This led to a scuffle between the rival soldiers, with both sides sending some reinforcements to the area… the face-off was in progress at the site till the evening,” said a source.

The Army, on being contacted by TOI, only said that delegation-level talks led by brigadier-rank officers “had been sought and agreed to by the two sides” as per the established bilateral mechanism to defuse tensions. “Such incidents often take place due to differing perceptions of where the Line of Actual Control (LAC) actually lies … they are usually resolved through border personnel meetings, flag meetings and the like,” said an officer.

The disputed “Finger-5 to Finger-8” (mountainous spurs) area on the north bank of Pangong Tso, incidentally, had witnessed a violent clash between Indian and Chinese soldiers, with stones and iron rods being used to injure each other, on August 15, 2017.

The incident had coincided with the then much more serious troop face-off at the Bhutanese territory of Doklam near the Sikkim-Bhutan-Tibet tri-junction that year. Though the two armies had disengaged from the face-off site at Doklam after a 73-day confrontation, the fallout has been that the PLA has constructed military infrastructure and helipads as well as permanently stationed troops in north Doklam, as was earlier reported by TOI.
Interestingly, the Indian Army will be holding its “Him Vijay” exercise in Arunachal Pradesh at a time when Chinese President Xi Jinping is expected to visit India for the second informal summit with PM Narendra Modi. The first summit at Wuhan in April 2018, in the aftermath of the Doklam face-off, had led to “strategic guidance” to the two militaries to manage and defuse troop confrontations during patrolling in accordance with existing protocols and mechanisms.

Sources said China has not been informed of the “Him Vijay” exercise because it will not be held close to the border in Arunachal Pradesh. It will witness around 15,000 soldiers in three IBGs, carved out of the 17 Mountain Strike Corps, being tested for mountain warfare in terms of operational viability and logistics. The IAF, in turn, will deploy C-17s, C-130Js and AN-32 aircraft as well as helicopters for airlift of soldiers and equipment as well as inter-valley transfer.

The Army is raising the new IBGs, with a potent mix of infantry, tanks, artillery, air defence, signals and engineers, to ensure they can mobilise fast and strike hard across the borders with Pakistan and China. The IBGs for the western front have already been “test-bedded and exercised” in war games in April-May in the plains of Jammu, Punjab and Rajasthan as part of the Army’s overall plan to reformat its entire war-fighting machinery and sharpen the “cold start” doctrine, as was reported by TOI earlier.

The IBGs bring together all fighting arms and support units into self-contained units even during peacetime to ensure much faster mobilisation for cross-border strikes. “The existing structures, under which the different elements largely marry up only during actual combat, are outdated. The IBGs are being fine-tuned through such exercises,” said an officer.

g.sarkar
BRFite
Posts: 1916
Joined: 09 Jul 2005 12:22
Location: MERCED, California

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby g.sarkar » 12 Sep 2019 11:45

https://www.rediff.com/news/report/indi ... 190912.htm
Indian, Chinese soldiers face-off near Pangong lake in eastern Ladakh, tensions ease after talks
Soldiers of the Indian and People’s Liberation Army of China were engaged in a face-off near Pangong lake in Ladakh on Wednesday. Tensions were eased after delegation-level talks.

India Today Web Desk, New Delhi, September 12, 2019
HIGHLIGHTS
India, China troops engage in heated exchange in eastern Ladakh
Face-off after Chinese objected to patrol by Indian soldiers in the area
Issue resolved during delegation-level talks between the two sides

Tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) flared up on Wednesday following a face-off between Indian and Chinese troops in eastern Ladakh. The standoff that lasted a day, however, ended after delegation-level talks were held.
The Indian and Chinese troops were reportedly engaged in a confrontation near the northern bank of the Pangong lake in Ladakh, two-thirds of which is controlled by China.
Army sources said tensions escalated when Indian troops on patrol were confronted by the soldiers of the People’s Liberation Army of China. This resulted in a scuffle with the two sides sending more soldiers to the area, sources added.
"There was a face-off between the two armies but it got over after the delegation-level talks between two sides. The face-off is over now and it had de-escalated and disengaged fully after delegation-level talks yesterday [Wednesday]," the Indian Army said.
.....
Gautam
Lizard showing Dimran that they are on his side.

vishvak
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 5368
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 21:19

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby vishvak » 12 Sep 2019 12:22

Sta Maria said she looks forward to more good news in November. She’d said in May that lack of progress this year on RCEP would be “embarrassing,” especially for Southeast Asia economies that have pushed for the deal.

Wonder why southeast Asian economies are waiting for 'good' news etc etc against clear opposition views.

Just reminds of Chinese setting up courts within China and calling them 'international' to resolve OBOR/BRI disputes. Hope all sides remember that right from the start.

ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 53048
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby ramana » 13 Sep 2019 04:31

Gautam, It could be related to upcoming Xi JinPing visit to India.

Here is Pangong Tso or Lake

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangong_Tso

Please watch embedded video in this link:

https://www.ibtimes.com/indian-chinese- ... kh-2825958


Also Pangong Tso was the site of 1962 war.

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23692
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby SSridhar » 13 Sep 2019 07:42

ramana wrote:Gautam, It could be related to upcoming Xi JinPing visit to India.

Precisely my thoughts too.

The China border has been quiet after the Wuhan meet last year.

The Chinesee have always behaved like this ahead of an important visit.

During the Chinese President, Xi Jinping’s state visit in September 2014, there were two incidents in Depsang and Chumar. In fact, the Chumar incident rapidly spun out of control.

In April 2013, in a deep incursion, Chinese troops entered the Indian Territory in the Daulat Beg Oldi (DBO) sector setting the stage for a face-to-face situation with Indian troops which continued for 21 days. This put the visit of Li Keqiang (who had been specially accommodated by Man Mohan Singh at very short notice upon a direct request from Xi Jinping) in jeopardy. Somehow, this was resolved by the visit of our Foreign Minister, Salman Kurshid to Beijing and Li’s visit took place. This was soon followed by the Chumar incident which occurred in June 2013 just two weeks before the first ever visit by an Indian defence minister in seven years. Much earlier, during the then Indian Foreign Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee’s path-breaking trip to Beijing, in c. 1979, China launched a war against Vietnam to “teach it a lesson” and this unsettling phrase of 1962 made Vajpayee cut short his Beijing visit. During the first ever Head of State visit to China by the Indian President R.Venkatraman in c. 1992, China conducted its first megaton nuclear test.

This is imperial and dismissive behaviour by China to show that they do not take us seriously at all.

sanjaykumar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4024
Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby sanjaykumar » 13 Sep 2019 07:45

This is imperial and dismissive behaviour by China to show that they do not take us seriously at all.


Ipso facto they do.

pandyan
BRFite
Posts: 388
Joined: 31 Jul 2006 05:12

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby pandyan » 13 Sep 2019 08:58

This was the situation in 2012 (if you recall):
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-deploys-hi-tech-boats-to-counter-China-in-Ladakh-lake/articleshow/16634214.cms
Now, at least on one particular stretch along the unresolved 4,057-km Line of Actual Control (LAC), Indian soldiers can finally cock a snook at Chinese troops after years of being aggressively needled.
Indian soldiers are armed with spanking new high-tech QRT (quick-reaction team) boats to patrol the highly-picturesque but equally-contentious Pangong Tso (Tso means lake in Ladakhi) in eastern Ladakh, which has emerged as a major flashpoint between the world’s largest and second-largest armies over the last decade
...
Equipped with over 20 well-armed boats, People’s Liberation Army troops have been virtually running circles around Indian troops handicapped by slow, outdated vessels. In the past, Chinese boats have even disabled Indian boats by ramming into them.
"Now, we have received 11 of the 17 QRT boats, each of which can carry 16 to 18 soldiers, ordered from the US. With these high-speed interceptor boats, fitted with radars, infra-red and GPS systems, we can do robust reconnaissance and area domination patrols,’’ said an officer.
"If the Chinese come one km into our territory, we can go three km into theirs. Earlier, apart from some smaller vessels, we had only a couple of large speed boats, mounted with machine guns and capable of carrying 10 soldiers,’’ he added.

chola
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3700
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby chola » 13 Sep 2019 09:12

For the US to win, it must convince its allies to not take advantage of the China market while Amreeka is fighting a goddam trade and technology war with Cheen.

The pressure is on Israel now (Japan, Korea and Germany are already in the doghouse over Cheen.)

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/11/757290503/theres-a-growing-sore-spot-in-israeli-u-s-relations-china

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-12/the-u-s-is-pressuring-israel-to-rethink-investment-from-china

Israel's involvement with the J-10 and its Lavi/F-16 technology has always been a sore spot.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/chinas-j-10-vigorous-dragon-did-israel-help-build-deadly-fighter-80136

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23692
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby SSridhar » 13 Sep 2019 09:44

India, since its independence, has recognized only the Johnson-Ardagh Line in Ladakh which gives the entire Aksai Chin to India with Shaidullah (Xiadulla now) at the north end and Pongong Tso at the southern end. After constructing the G219 Tibet-Xinjiang Hwy, the Chinese want a greater depth to protect it. Also, the gap between Pangong Tso and the Spanggur Tso leads to Chushul.

Those QRT boats changed the scenario for our Army. In June 2014, the PLA, who were on board four of their interceptor boats, had crossed over into the Indian side of the lake, even as they were moving from the Northern areas of the lake to the Southern side. Within 20 minutes of the Chinese soldiers and their boats being spotted, the Indian troopers boarded four of their boats to intercept them and chased them away.

Rsatchi
BRFite
Posts: 127
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby Rsatchi » 13 Sep 2019 14:48

Quite hard hitting part 3 of the China series on pee pee see two last night.
concluding section on industrial espionage and chini military directly involved in industrial hacking.
Also how the Bristshits got shafted by chini military implants and loosing techs to chini.
As I had posted earlier large number of chini students in UK and now they are realising that a fair number of them are military implants sent to steal technology.
Britshits are still ready to call a spade a spade.
'I want more GUBO' syndrome maybe. :((

hanumadu
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4399
Joined: 11 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby hanumadu » 13 Sep 2019 16:15

Are they stealing or are they learning from the west and taking it back to their country? IMO, that's technically not stealing if they are not doing anything illegal - that is stealing blue prints or formulas or code without the knowledge of the establishments they work for. I doubt foreign citizens are allowed to work on strategic technology projects.

Anyway, the Chinese are fools to be so aggressive and high profile about 'stealing' the technology from the west. They even gave it a name - 'Thousand Talents'. Can't understand the chinese hurry to be number one.

williams
BRFite
Posts: 368
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 20:55

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby williams » 13 Sep 2019 16:46

SSridhar wrote:
ramana wrote:Gautam, It could be related to upcoming Xi JinPing visit to India.

Precisely my thoughts too.

The China border has been quiet after the Wuhan meet last year.

The Chinesee have always behaved like this ahead of an important visit.

During the Chinese President, Xi Jinping’s state visit in September 2014, there were two incidents in Depsang and Chumar. In fact, the Chumar incident rapidly spun out of control.

In April 2013, in a deep incursion, Chinese troops entered the Indian Territory in the Daulat Beg Oldi (DBO) sector setting the stage for a face-to-face situation with Indian troops which continued for 21 days. This put the visit of Li Keqiang (who had been specially accommodated by Man Mohan Singh at very short notice upon a direct request from Xi Jinping) in jeopardy. Somehow, this was resolved by the visit of our Foreign Minister, Salman Kurshid to Beijing and Li’s visit took place. This was soon followed by the Chumar incident which occurred in June 2013 just two weeks before the first ever visit by an Indian defence minister in seven years. Much earlier, during the then Indian Foreign Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee’s path-breaking trip to Beijing, in c. 1979, China launched a war against Vietnam to “teach it a lesson” and this unsettling phrase of 1962 made Vajpayee cut short his Beijing visit. During the first ever Head of State visit to China by the Indian President R.Venkatraman in c. 1992, China conducted its first megaton nuclear test.

This is imperial and dismissive behaviour by China to show that they do not take us seriously at all.


It could also be a reaction to India asking their foreign minister to reschedule his visit.

darshan
BRFite
Posts: 1092
Joined: 28 Jan 2008 04:16

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby darshan » 13 Sep 2019 16:50

If US was serious, then shipping and receiving teams of all US based companies would be as annoyed to ship to China as they are when shipping to India. So far I haven't noticed that. Shipments are still heading out of US to China without any hassle.

The same with Chinese students and faculty. ITAR and export laws are clear. US can certainly start enforcing them when it comes to Chinese. So far the enforcement and vigilance is not up to the level. By now all US universities should have been put on notice and violators taken to courts to set new bar but hasn't happened yet. So far only students and faculty have been affected but no university's leadership.

May be there's a lag in the system, there's swamp to drain, it's a charade for election, etc. Still too hard to say if US is serious or just the election ploy to swing votes. At the three year mark of current US govt, I was hoping to see suppliers annoyed to the same level when shipping to India and/or drop off of chinese in academia. Neither has been observed.

Rsatchi
BRFite
Posts: 127
Joined: 04 Aug 2019 22:03

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby Rsatchi » 13 Sep 2019 17:43

hanumadu wrote:Are they stealing or are they learning from the west and taking it back to their country? IMO, that's technically not stealing if they are not doing anything illegal - that is stealing blue prints or formulas or code without the knowledge of the establishments they work for. I doubt foreign citizens are allowed to work on strategic technology projects.

Anyway, the Chinese are fools to be so aggressive and high profile about 'stealing' the technology from the west. They even gave it a name - 'Thousand Talents'. Can't understand the chinese hurry to be number one.

Not just studying there to improve knowledge but actively conniving to steal research done in the field so as to jump start in chin.
Also hiding facts that they are active serving officers in the army while enrolling in tech fields dealing in sensitive technology. Some of the Britshit Unis are in dire straits and hence allow foreign students on paying hefty fees(like our donation system in private colleges :lol: )
Also masquerading as sales executive etc and stealing genetic techs and getting in touch with Chini officials.
Interesting story of a guy who stole genetically modified corn seeds planted in experimental fields in Iowa and then attending official dinner in honour of visiting the then VP XI gin. :shock:
Five serviing Chini military men indicted in US for cyber attacks and stealing techs. XI gin promised Om Baba that he will honour intellectual property rights and then said thenga!! :D
German/European solar company went bust after chini stole not only their tech(Chini government gave massive subsidy to undercut goras) but also all the papers relating to Chini company being sued in US :rotfl: It was game over.

Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7635
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby Peregrine » 13 Sep 2019 18:41

Piece offering

Ren Zhengfei may sell Huawei’s 5G technology to a Western buyer

The Chinese telecoms giant’s boss considers creating a competitor for his company

In an atrium designed to evoke ancient Greece—ringed by stone columns and six towering approximations of the Caryatids—it was fitting that Ren Zhengfei, chief executive of Huawei, should extend an olive branch to the West: a piece of his company. The palatial edifice on Huawei’s sprawling campus in Shenzhen houses an exhibition hall proudly displaying the Chinese telecommunications giant’s “fifth-generation” (5g) technology. The ultra-swift, and ultra-coveted, mobile-phone networks will soon connect everything from cars to industrial robots.

It is this 5g technology—central to Huawei’s future revenue growth—that Mr Ren said he was ready to share, in a two-hour interview with The Economist on September 10th. For a one-time fee, a transaction would give the buyer perpetual access to Huawei’s existing 5g patents, licences, code, technical blueprints and production know-how. The acquirer could modify the source code, meaning that neither Huawei nor the Chinese government would have even hypothetical control of any telecoms infrastructure built using equipment produced by the new company. Huawei would likewise be free to develop its technology in whatever direction it pleases.

Huawei has been on a charm offensive this year. It has wheeled Mr Ren out once a month since January for interview bonanzas with international media outlets. But the idea of transferring its 5g “stack” to a competitor is by far the boldest offering to have surfaced. “It’s hard to come up with similar precedents in the history of technology,” says Dan Wang of Gavekal Dragonomics, a research firm.

Mr Ren’s stated aim is to create a rival that could compete in 5g with Huawei (which would keep its existing contracts and continue to sell its own 5g kit). To his mind, this would help level the playing field at a time when many in the West have grown alarmed at the prospect of a Chinese company supplying the gear for most of the world’s new mobile-phone networks. “A balanced distribution of interests is conducive to Huawei’s survival,” Mr Ren says.

No kidding. A months-long assault by America has pummelled the firm, whose global networks it suspects of allowing China to spy on others. America has also attempted to press allies not to use Huawei’s equipment as they begin to build their own 5g networks. In May American companies were barred from selling components and software to Huawei on the ground that it posed a national-security risk. Last month America restricted government agencies from doing business with it (the firm is challenging this ban in court).

At first glance, Mr Ren’s gesture has much going for it. If the sale eventually gave rise to a thriving competitor, countries such as Australia (which has banned Huawei’s gear) would no longer have to choose between, on the one hand, technology in their networks that is both cutting-edge and cheap, as Huawei’s is, and, on the other, fears of Chinese eavesdropping. They could have the best technology from an ally instead. Decisions on the purchase of telecoms equipment could then return from politicians to pragmatic boardrooms.

The gesture may also convince those suspicious of Huawei’s tech that the firm’s business intentions are hard-nosed. Mr Ren says money from the deal would allow Huawei to “make greater strides forward”. The value of the firm’s entire 5g technology portfolio, if it were sold, could run to tens of billions of dollars. In the past decade the company has spent at least $2bn on research and development for the new generation of mobile connectivity.

In saying he wants to create a fairer technological race, Mr Ren is also attempting to dissociate American security fears from those of Huawei’s market dominance. His offer is “essentially calling their bluff”, says Samm Sacks of New America, a think-tank in Washington. As she points out, America’s government is working out how to create a rival to Huawei, whether by fostering American firms or helping bolster its two main global competitors, Ericsson, a Swedish firm, and Nokia, a Finnish one. Moves are also afoot to make certain components of mobile networks interchangeable with each other, to let carriers mix and match suppliers more easily. Openran, a standards body, wants infrastructure manufacturers like Huawei to agree on standards for the technology in their networks that shuttles data around to make joint operation easier. Huawei has so far declined to join.

Yet questions over the feasibility of the deal abound. Would China accept hiving off a core part of one of its few globally powerful corporations? For better or worse, 5g has become a proxy for superpowerdom. As Mr Ren told The Economist, “5g represents speed” and “countries that have speed will move forward rapidly. On the contrary, countries that give up speed and excellent connectivity technology may see economic slowdown.”

Even if the Chinese state gave its blessing, who might be the buyer? Mr Ren says he has “no idea”. Analysts suspect that giants such as Ericsson and Nokia would balk at an offer out of pride, and would question the value of Huawei’s tech. (Having posted losses last year, they are also short of cash.) The technology may not help a smaller firm compete on an equal footing with Huawei. The Chinese company is so well entrenched with big operators, say consultants, that it would not make financial sense for most of them to take on a new supplier. Samsung, a South Korean electronics giant, has deep pockets and a smallish but growing networking-gear business—and without rival bidders, it could drive a hard bargain. A consortium of buyers is possible; who would make one up is unclear, however.

Suitors may be put off by other considerations. If Huawei really is ready to transfer all its technology to another company, then, as Mr Wang points out, “it has to accept the risk of a major competitor in the future”. But Huawei’s dominance owes as much to technology as to its low prices and the speed at which it can roll products out, says Ms Sacks. Its willingness to serve places Western firms steer clear of is also a factor: who else besides Huawei would wade through malarial swamps in Africa and haul base stations up the flanks of Colombian mountains? Mr Ren knows this. Asked whether he thought that an American firm, with Huawei’s precious know-how in hand, would be able to pull it off, he said, with swagger, “I don’t think so.” But potential buyers know it, too.

Lastly, few believe that a sale would placate America’s national-security apparatus, at least in the short run. A new competitor would almost certainly still need to make equipment in China, which produces half of America’s telecoms kit. Concerns about Chinese meddling would not go away. And Huawei’s latest offensive is not all charm. Last week it accused American officials of committing infractions while posing as Huawei workers, in order to “bring unsubstantiated accusations against the company”. It also accused America’s government of targeting it with cyber-attacks. That may sour relations.

Could Mr Ren’s proposal, then, be a sign of desperation? Not a bit of it, he says. He claims that Huawei has found alternative suppliers for its network-infrastructure business that are unaffected by its blacklisting by America. He denies that the company will make a loss in the coming year.

Image

Nonetheless, the consumer business is under pressure. Half of the company’s $105bn in sales last year came from the 208m smartphones it sold around the world. So did an outsize share of profits. This business is in deep trouble. Phones that Huawei sells outside China are desirable communication devices largely thanks to proprietary software available exclusively from Google. Android, Google’s mobile operating system, which Huawei uses, is open-source and freely available. But the American tech giant’s own apps are not. Because Google is American and its apps are compiled in America, the Commerce Department’s ban on sales of American technology to Huawei applies to them.

Mr Ren says that Google has been lobbying the Trump administration to allow it to resume supplying Huawei with proprietary Android software, but so far to no avail. Unless American policy changes, Huawei will remain stuck with the open-source version of Android, without any of the apps that consumers have come to expect. The Chinese firm is in the process of developing its own operating system, Harmony os, but it will be no rival to the mature Android ecosystem for years to come.

Sandboxed

Image

This means that all new Huawei phones will ship without Gmail, Google Maps, YouTube or, crucially, Google Play Store. The Play Store is what allows Android users to download apps like WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook easily. WhatsApp in particular has become a standard mode of communication in much of the world outside America. Unless its government lets up, Huawei’s new smartphones will be little more than decent cameras that make phone calls. The firm will launch the Mate 30, the first top-end phone since its blacklisting, on September 19th in Munich. Huawei claims its hardware features will buoy sales. But a phone which lacks basic functions is unlikely to be a hit. A weakened consumer business would dent profits.

Huawei’s share of the Chinese smartphone market, where it has never relied on Google’s apps, is growing fast. But two-fifths of its annual phone sales, or roughly $20bn, come from outside the country. Though the firm’s executives repeatedly declined to share any projections, firm-wide revenue growth in the eight months to August slowed to 20%, year on year, from 23% in the first half of 2019. If the Mate 30 and its successors flop, Huawei stands to lose billions of dollars in annual revenue.

Similar supply-chain challenges affect other parts of its business. Its coders are busily writing software tools known as compilers and libraries, themselves used to create the software that powers all manner of electronic devices, not just smartphones but also networking gear. As with Android, Huawei would have to create its own version of these, and a technological ecosystem around them. Such ecosystems take years to evolve, and there is only so much one company can do to stimulate this evolution, which relies on third-party developers, with their own goals and incentives. Huawei’s expertise in high, hard technology is of little use here.

And, Mr Ren’s assurances notwithstanding, Huawei’s finances are being squeezed. Even he concedes that its relations with large Western banks such as hsbc and Standard Chartered have been disrupted. Still, the firm has plenty of cash and he says that smaller banks remain willing to lend to it. The Chinese Development Bank, which has reportedly extended credit lines to Huawei and zte, a Chinese competitor, in the past, may stump up if needed. Mr Ren and his underlings repeatedly claim that cashflow is “healthy”, pointing to the firm’s furious building work. It has just finished a 120-hectare, $1.4bn research campus.

Huawei is being forced to transform itself from a company that makes and sells hardware into one that also makes many components that it used to buy from others. This kind of shift strains a firm. Its cash cow is under threat even as it has to invest heavily to replace the suppliers and software it can no longer get from America. Mr Ren may hope that his mooted sale of Huawei’s 5g technology will give him sufficient fuel for the company to fly ever higher. But peer behind the showy frescoes in Shenzhen, and his showier gesture, and Huawei’s future looks decidedly hazy.

Cheers Image

A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11318
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby A_Gupta » 13 Sep 2019 19:28

ArjunPandit wrote:
A_Gupta wrote:
China is planning to invest $280 billion in Iran’s oil, gas, and petrochemical sectors that are being affected by US sanctions, according to Petroleum Economist magazine.

how reliable is the link..havent heard much on this news..


This link points to Iranian reporting ( translate.google.com helps).
https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1398 ... 9%86%D8%AF

Here's some more (but not original reporting)
https://www.trtworld.com/opinion/the-pr ... cold-29686

A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11318
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby A_Gupta » 13 Sep 2019 19:30

FYI, the last part of that Iranian reporting above says:

"Chinese customs data show that the country imported more than 925,000 barrels of crude from Iran in July, up 4.7 percent on a monthly basis. According to Iranian sources, China's actual oil imports are higher than China's, with additional barrels being kept in floating reserves around China and not passing through customs to be recorded in official statistics."

A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11318
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby A_Gupta » 13 Sep 2019 19:39

https://www.arabnews.com/node/1553431
US sanctions bringing China and Iran together
Trump’s policies have energized Iranian interest in China. While, following the striking of the nuclear deal, Iran was focusing on Europe to build commercial ties and boost its industrial infrastructure, today all eyes are on China. CITIC Group, a state-owned investment firm, has given a $10 billion credit line to Chinese companies to finance water, energy and transport projects in Iran. The China Development Bank has also committed to deals worth $15 billion. And China has signed several deals with Iran to invest in its oil and gas infrastructure, including a project in the giant South Pars gas field.
China can also use its relations with Iran as a way to weaken the prestige of the US around the world and as retaliation against Trump’s trade war. Beijing is reluctant to abide by the US sanctions as it is committed to many projects in Iran, which the latter is supposed to pay for with oil. There is a synergy between the two countries: Both are confronted by the US, and China is a consumer of oil while Iran is a supplier of the precious commodity. Iran can resort to the infrastructure projects presented in the BRI to boost its economy and compensate for the losses incurred as a result of the US sanctions. Development projects tend to have a multiplier effect, i.e., the money spent on them cascades through several layers of the economy and has a larger effect than the original sum spent.

Kati
BRFite
Posts: 1197
Joined: 27 Jun 1999 11:31
Location: The planet Earth

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby Kati » 14 Sep 2019 20:56

RCMP Intelligence Director Charged Under National Secrets Act

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/vb5e ... ide-report

He was allegedly selling state secret to Panda....

Kati
BRFite
Posts: 1197
Joined: 27 Jun 1999 11:31
Location: The planet Earth

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby Kati » 14 Sep 2019 21:00

Chinese-born Australian lawmaker under fire over past links

https://news.yahoo.com/chinese-born-aus ... 11428.html

She was allegedly furthering Panda's agenda in Australia from inside.....(a deep cover agent?)

Kati
BRFite
Posts: 1197
Joined: 27 Jun 1999 11:31
Location: The planet Earth

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby Kati » 15 Sep 2019 05:47


Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7635
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby Peregrine » 16 Sep 2019 02:45

Pentagon steps up efforts to counter China's rising power – AFP

WASHINGTON: Maritime operations, missile tests, landing exercises: the Pentagon has been sharply stepping up its efforts to counter China's growing military power, seen increasingly as a threat.

On Friday an American warship approached the Paracel Islands, an island chain claimed by Beijing in the South China Sea, to affirm international "freedom of navigation" in the region.

The USS Wayne E Meyer, a guided-missile destroyer, passed near the islands to contest Beijing's sweeping claims to the seas around the archipelago, which is also claimed by Taiwan and Vietnam.

The Chinese claim would block "innocent passage" by other countries' ships and is "not permitted by international law, " a US Seventh Fleet spokeswoman, Commander Reann Mommsen, said.

Friday's was the sixth "freedom of navigation operation" — or FONOPS in naval jargon — this year, a clear acceleration in pace.

There were a total of eight in 2017 and 2018, and only six during the entire Obama presidency.

On Wednesday, the US Marine Corps announced it had conducted exercises on the Japanese islet of Tori Shima, hundreds of miles south of Tokyo, to practice landings on "hostile" shores and the seizure of landing strips.

The exercises were clearly designed to highlight the ability of the American military to invade a disputed island and establish a supply base for aerial operations.

"This type of raid gives the commanders in the Indo-Pacific region the ability to project power and conduct expeditionary operations in a potentially contested littoral environment, " one of the officers in charge, Commander Anthony Cesaro, said in a statement.

Such a forthright description, coming from a Pentagon hardly known for unguarded talk, reflects the fresh impetus Defence Secretary Mark Esper has given to the US policy of "strategic rivalry" with China and Russia.

Esper, who chose Asia for his first overseas trip only weeks after being sworn in as Pentagon chief, has made clear that the US wants to rapidly deploy new missiles in Asia — possibly within months — to counter China's rising military power.

On Thursday, acting US army secretary Ryan McCarthy, speaking in a Senate confirmation hearing, defended the development of such new missiles.

He said the new medium-range conventional missiles Washington wants to develop — now that the US is no longer constrained by the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, which the Trump administration abandoned last year — would "change the geometry within Southeast Asia."

"If we can get the appropriate partnerships, expeditionary basing rights with partners within the region, " McCarthy said, "we can change the geometry and basically reverse anti-access, area-denial capabilities that have been invested by near-peer competitors" — jargon for pushing back against sovereignty claims by China and Russia.

Last month the Pentagon chose the Pacific Ocean for its first test of a conventional medium-range missile since the end of the Cold War — effectively driving a nail into the coffin of the INF treaty, which banned the use of land based missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,400 miles).

And in late August, Washington formally established its Space Command, or Spacecom, a new unified command charged with ensuring US domination in space, where China has been increasingly active.

Beijing rattled US military officials in 2007 when it launched a missile that located and then destroyed a Chinese satellite, in a dramatic demonstration of China's growing ability to militarize space.

Cheers Image

chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19768
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby chetak » 16 Sep 2019 18:27

Why China fears India’s move on Article 370



Why China fears India’s move on Article 370

Arvind Kumar
September 14, 2019,

India’s action of making Article 370 toothless has set the alarm bells ringing in the corridors of power in China and has elicited strong reactions from them. It is wrong to interpret their reaction merely as a friendly gesture towards Pakistan. Rather, it is the result of the Chinese leadership feeling threatened about their stranglehold over power. In their view, India’s move is a step towards a war against them by a coalition consisting of India, the United States, and other countries.

The Chinese government views the world as a stage for its exclusive use and every other country except Pakistan as an adversary. Even in the case of Pakistan, it is not treated as an ally or a friend but as a pawn that will advance the Chinese government’s interests. Pakistan has willingly become part of this abusive relationship as it is driven by the singular goal of opposing India. It is very likely that China has even forced Pakistan to share the F-16s in its possession and has replicated them. Thus, Pakistan may actually be telling the truth when it claims that it did not use any F-16 aircraft against India in February 2019 when it brought down an Indian plane in a dogfight. That aircraft used by Pakistan was probably a copy of an F-16 made by China.

In recent years, China has pursued a policy of making its presence and influence felt all around the world and it has done this in an aggressive and deceptive manner. For example, it financed and built Sri Lanka’s Hambantota port, and Sri Lanka rapidly found itself in debt that could not be redeemed and was forced to cede control of the port to China. This method of engineering a debt trap by both financing and building infrastructure projects around the world has become the standard operating procedure for China in its Belt and Road Initiative (earlier, One-Belt-One-Road, OBOR). Such an aggressive and expansionist program to control and monopolise world trade is viewed dimly by America. In 2017, James Mattis, the then American Defense Secretary, stated that US did not agree with the idea of one country putting itself in a position of dictating one belt and one road as the world had many belts and many roads. He also opposed the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) that would connect the belt to Gwadar port, and highlighted the fact that the corridor passed through the disputed territory of Gilgit-Baltistan.

China’s presence in Gilgit-Baltistan has turned Jammu and Kashmir into an extremely important place from the geopolitical perspective. Stability in Kashmir valley makes China nervous as it is right next to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. On the other side of CPEC is Afghanistan where an American-led effort to strike a deal with the warring groups and install a government is underway. That effort could result in China being completely shut out of Afghanistan. A government in Afghanistan that does not kowtow to Beijing’s line combined with a stable Jammu and Kashmir would impede China’s hegemonic ambitions as the corridor would be in an extremely vulnerable position in case of a conflict involving India and other powers.

Mattis did not restrict his opposition to just BRI. He also targeted China in general when he stated, “[W]e should be under no illusions. There are areas where, also, strategically, we need to confront China where we think it’s unproductive—the direction they’re going in.” Apart from Mattis, American President Donald Trump too has expressed his displeasure with China. In particular, he has attacked China for manipulating its currency and is now engaged in a trade war against them. No one knows the details of China’s currency manipulation schemes as their policies are kept secret and they have created multiple currency systems without much transparency.

China’s goal of controlling the world’s trade has also manifested itself in other ways, chiefly in the form of their confrontational actions in the international waters of the South China Sea. Ships passing through the shipping lanes of the South China Sea account for more than one-third of the global maritime commerce and China seeks to hold this region hostage and dictate its terms to the world. It routinely intimidates ships belonging to other countries and has taken over and built illegal military bases on islands and reefs that do not belong to it. Steve Bannon, who worked on Donald Trump’s election campaign in 2016 and then worked in the White House, has advocated going in and dismantling these bases. Bannon has cited a ruling against China by an international tribunal to justify such an action.


The US is not alone in its concern over China’s attempt to take over the international waters of the South China Sea. Russia, Japan, South Korea and India share this concern along with other countries in the region such as Vietnam and Philippines. Russia has another reason for its unhappiness against China. Russia’s far east has been flooded with Chinese nationals and China is attempting to take over this region by altering its demographics.

China’s hostility towards other countries and its general lack of ability to realise that it is in the wrong can create conditions for a conflict. A single incident could trigger such a conflict with other powers, and China will be isolated in any such conflict with only Pakistan on its side.

Such a conflict will not occur and China’s expansionist ambitions will even be encouraged if the old guard in the US consisting of the proteges of pro-China leaders such as Henry Kissinger, George H.W. Bush, Zbignew Brzezinski, John McCain and John Kerry return to power in 2020. It is never easy to predict how the future will unfold, but there is an old Chinese curse wishing interesting times upon one’s opponents, and that curse may now be casting its spell on China, which should fear interesting times.

Arvind Kumar can be reached at arvindk@uchicago.edu

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23692
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Neutering & Defanging Chinese Threat (15-11-2017)

Postby SSridhar » 17 Sep 2019 12:57

IAF to operationalise air field in Arunachal Pradesh near China border - ANI
SHILLONG: In a bid to bolster military infrastructure along the China border, the Indian Air Force is set to operationalise its Vijaynagar Advanced Landing Ground (ALG) in Arunachal Pradesh on Wednesday.

Eastern Air Commander Air Marshal R D Mathur and Eastern Army Commander Lieutenant General Anil Chauhan will jointly inaugurate resurfaced Vijaynagar ALG on September 18, Defence Spokesperson (Shillong) Wing commander Ratnakar Singh said today.

The officials will land at Vijayanagar ALG in AN-32, a turboprop twin-engined military transport aircraft.

Vijaynagar is situated in a remote corner of the state and is not connected with any motorable road. The area is important as it is close to the borders with China and Myanmar.

A total of eight ALGs have been revived for operations by the Indian Air Force as part of steps to strengthen military infrastructure along the China border.

Other seven ALG which have been made operational by EAC are Pasighat, Mechuka, Walong, Tuting , Ziro , Along and Tawang .


Vijaynagar ALG has been non-operational for fixed-wing operations since 2016 due to want of repair and upgradation its facilities there.


Return to “Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chaitanya, Chandra, Kritavarman and 74 guests