UlanBatori wrote:Kiran, The Lynch Mob's characteristic is that they arrogate all duties of the prosecutor, defense, judge, jury, jailer and executioner to themselves, assume that they know more than anyone else, and jump to conclusions, wrong more than right]
Do you have any actual instances ? Ms Ford asked for FBI investigation and testified under oath - she, by all means a successful woman, was willing to risk prison for her words. And she absolutely had no power to be jury, judge or executions here.
These fit the Left perfectly. And yes, the lynch mobs of the USA, including the KKK etc, were the roots of the Democrat Party. After the Civil War, these were the ones who opposed Lincoln's Republicans, and ruled the South as soon as the Northern Armies withdrew/ stepped down from the military government phase (and stopped hanging the KKK perps).
It doesnt matter the hoary past of democrats or republicans. Right wing left wing are different from democrat/republican whatever the lip service maybe. Republicans in recent past have always increased govt deficits while just cutting expenses a little bit here and there. And democrats especially Clinton was known to be very rough on black crime. They are just political parties and do what fetches them votes.
But currently left wing politics are clearly about women and racial minorities issue. And alt-right is all about white solidarity.
John Kennedy was an aberration. Which is why he was rubbed out. There was a difference between the Northern Democrats (mostly labor unions) and the Southern Democrats (more KKK). Ultimately many of the Southern Democrats decided that they were more Republican (uber-Capitalist, against social programs, against (free) minorities). But the rest of the Democrats joined with the California and New York commies to form the New Democrat Party. They have brought a fine merging of the Lynch Mob with the Communist/Naxal mob. Just a precise, factually based descriptor.
Clubbing Democrats - many of them uber capitalists owning and running businesses and whose commitment to fight against soviets cannot be doubted- with commies is quiet a stretch in my opinion.
Interesting, your comparison of Clinton, who denied using the Ovary Office for what was termed "pizza delivery" until Ms. Tripp revealed the MonicaL tapes (and was sent to jail by the Democrat Regime for revealing sexual abuse by powerful people!!!). You say be was "almost impeached" IOW, nothing at all happened to him, he served 2 terms as POTUS and retired to run one of the biggest multinational scams in the world. Despite CLEAR PROOF of gross misconduct.
Compared to Judge Kavanaugh who was cleared by the FBI. 7 times. Zero evidence of wrongdoing, zero CONCERNS.
Nice going, the sense of fair play exhibited in the comparison.... isn't that the same mentality exhibited by a lynch mob?
This is where I find your moral compass very strange. There was never an accusation of sexual abuse against Clinton. Monica never claimed that. It was clearly consensual relationship between two adults and by most current moral standards a victimless crime (despite presence of rarely enforced adultery laws) But nevertheless Clinton was severely prosecuted. WHat do you mean nothing happened to him ? He was held in contempt of court, fined 90,000 and had his license to practice law suspended for "misleading testimony".
Compared to that Kavanugh accusation were far more serious - a sexual assualt and attempted rape. And what do you mean cleared by FBI ? the statue of limitation against Kavanagh long expired. FBI didnt do legal investigation it conducted back ground verification of sorts within four days. And even before FBI gave any report the repubs were pretty clear they will back him irrespective of the report.