X Posted on the Pakistan Armed Forces: News & Discussion Thread
As stated in my Post of 29 April 18 03:50 – the known and admitted Terroristani Defence Budget is NOT T. R. 1.100 TRILLION BUT T. R. 1.460! I now, reluctantly but unequivocally agree that the “Good Daackter” is firmly in The Terroristani Army’s KONTROL!
The defence budget
We are in the midst of a hybrid war which is the ‘synchronised use of multiple instruments of power tailored to specific vulnerabilities across the full spectrum of societal functions to achieve synergistic effects.’ The principal objective behind this hybrid war is to weaken Pakistan through a synchronised attack that includes economic warfare, supporting domestic unrest, diplomatic onslaught, along with regular and irregular military operations. We need to replace a uni-dimensional National Security Strategy focused singularly on military security with a synchronised strategy of a counter attack.
Yes, Budget 2018-19 has increased defence allocation by 10 percent, Rs1.1 trillion, while the hike in current expenditures is 20 percent (development expenditure down by 20 percent). Here is an account of a few popular myths about our defence budget.
Myth number 1: Our largest expenditure item is defence. Not true. The largest expenditure item in the budget is debt-servicing. The second largest expenditure, which is deliberately hidden in budget figures, will actually be eaten up by losses of Public Sector Enterprises like PIA, the Pakistan Steel Mills, power sector and Pakistan Railways. The third largest chunk will go for the Public Sector Development Programme (federal plus provincial). And the fourth largest allocation will go towards ‘Defence Affairs and Services’.
Myth number 2: The defence budget takes away the lion’s share of the total budgetary outlay. Not true. In Budget 2018-19, ‘Defence Affairs and Services’ will consume around 18 percent of all the government expenditures. What this means is that a full 82 percent of all government expenditures are not defence related.
Myth number 3: The defence budget has been increasing at a high rate. Not true. In the financial year 2001-02, 17 years ago, the allocation for defence amounted to 4.6 percent of GDP. In 2003-04, the defence budget dropped to 3.9 percent of GDP. Budget 2018-19 has allocated Rs1.1 trillion for ‘Defence Affairs and Services’ which is 3.2 percent of our Rs34 trillion GDP.
Myth number 4: The Pakistan Army consumes almost the entire defence budget. Not true. In the 1960s, Pak Army’s budget as a percentage of our national budget had hit a high of 42 percent. In Budget 2018-19,
Pak Army’s budget as a percentage of our national budget has dropped sharply, and it now amounts to 9.6 percent.
Myth number 5: Pakistan spends a very high percentage of its GDP on defence. Not true. There are at least four dozen countries that spend a higher percentage of their GDPs on defence. They include: India, Egypt, Sri Lanka, United States, United Kingdom, South Korea, France, Eritrea, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Liberia, Brunei, Syria, Kuwait, Yemen, Angola, Singapore, Greece, Iran, Bahrain, Djibouti, Morocco, Chile, Lebanon, Russia, Colombia, Zimbabwe, Turkey, Georgia, Guinea-Bissau, Ethiopia, Namibia, Guinea, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Algeria, Serbia and Montenegro, Armenia, Botswana, Ukraine, Uganda, Ecuador, Bulgaria, Lesotho and Sudan.
And now the two facts.
Fact number 1: The accumulated amount of the circular debt almost equates the current year’s defence allocation. And what that means is that if we can somehow manage losses within the power sector the savings will cover one year’s defence allocation.
Fact number 2: Pakistan’s armed forces are the 6th largest in the world, but our expenses per soldier are the lowest. The US spends $460,000 per soldier, Saudi Arabia $340,000, India $33,000, Egypt $18,000 and Pakistan $12,000.
Terroristani Armed Forces' Capacity i.e. Man Power and Weapons are NEARLY HALF the Indian Armed Forces' Capacity. Thus the Terroristani Annual Defence Budget CANNOT be Less than US$ 25 BILLION
Cheers
. If I had known that they are not then I'd have never done this work"
