All uber-faithfuls, nice going, but it is getting a bit tiring. I am sure the Supreme Court will be very impressed with your fatwas. (yawn)
Yes, I knew the example from 1960s Southern US would cause a burr up the musharraf. It was used to show that the mindset if it can be called that, is pretty-much exactly the same. Enough perfectly faithful, religions, totally good people who preach
Luv thy neighbor/his wife as thine own
felt in the 1960s that they were TOTALLY right in not allowing riffraff into their schools, colleges, not to mention churches, restaurant, public restrooms, hospitals, until the SC ruled, and then the 82nd Airborne came in. The agitators then too were "old women, children, church-going saints" etc. PERFECTLY decent people.
As recently as the 1990s I have been asked by Perfectly Fair Leaders why I supported the candidacy of (the best qualified applicants) for certain positions.
What about defending "Western Culture"?
I asked them what they planned to do when the EEOC asked them what that was. You see Harvard today is trying to defend in court why they have been discriminating against people like us to protect their "diversity" and their ambience. Instead of going by merit.
The bigots always have very impressive arguments. At the end of the day they are still what they are.
The trick is to try and not get boxed into being that. By thinking of the rights of those whom you are screaming to deny rights. Maybe there are win-win solutions which Alla* won't allow you to see as long as you are yelling.
I note that Jaitley took his time coming out with what is essentially a
"Miaow!" instead of some good growling and teeth-baring due 3 weeks ago, so hold ur breath for Center to come to the rescue...
That is because they cannot deny the essential inevitability of the SC judgement. Indian citizens have the right to enter public places, regardless of race, color, gender (yes, creed too but we won't go there yet). The case is that simple. Is it a public place? Then all are welcome. If it is not, well, who does it belong to? And why are they denying rights to citizens? They can be sued into destruction or tossed in jail. IOW, they can be banned from all public places.
Yelling and screaming and being Offended on Internet forums does not change that fact one bit.
If the SC judgement is dissed, those dissing it get dragged in for Contempt of Court. That is the law of the land.
If it is to be overturned, Kerala must bring an Ordinance - which will be challenged as unconstitutional. Will Center bring an Ordinance? Sorry, I don't think so. Right now, it is win-win for BeeJayPee National to let the LDF face the curses, and lose the votes. Why should they bail the commies and their voters out? If it hasn't occurred to you, India is very much a North-dominated country. They are a bit afraid of the TN ppl because of the DMK/ history of riots. No such fear of Malloos any more than Northeasterners.
Can Malloo yindoos turn this into another Vimochana Samaram? It must be evident even to the most asleep yindoo that they need to wake up and win the next election for Hindu interests, which cannot happen with CPI(M), CPI, Congress, Kerala Congress, Muslim League etc etc. It's not whether the CPI(M) is for or against present issue: it is that with CPI(M) running the govt, KL has no influence at all at Center. And KL yindoos have no influence at all anywhere even with a Hindootva govt at Center.
(If this had been, say, Somnath, the High Court would have taken 65 years to render a verdict and the SC would be pondering for the next 100). Because they are afraid of riots. No such fear of Malloo yindoos rioting. Funny thing is, wimmens are not allowed anywhere NEAR the front 3 rows when certain Holies are present (I think this is true of the Akshardham gang's Big Cheese). But no one has sued yet. Wonder how they manage that: Guj wimmens are no less assertive than Malloo wimmens. Recently for an event in Khanstan, someone tried to invite said Big Cheese. They came in with above condition. My Evil 6th Coujin showed them single-finger pranaam and told them to go sit in their Boys Club treehouse. End of story. It would have been illegal just as in Sabarimala to impose any such conditions.
If yindoo interests win the next election then they can mitigate the effects of the SC judgement with intelligent decisions. But face facts: Women between the ages of 10 and 50 will be allowed to go on pilgrimages to worship Shri A at SabariMala.
They will have the right. Whether they choose to exercise it or not, depends on (a) fear of violent yahoos or (b) devotion and decency, a sense of history and ritual etc. I think (a) will just increase their determination and kill chances for (b). Not sure at all that (b) is better long-term for anyone.
). But such an outcome will not be good for Hindu society, especially in KL. It's like fighting a defensive battle on home soil, and pulling back inch-by-inch like at Uri. Instead, closing the temple and re-opening scores elsewhere is like opening another front to take Lahore 
.
