Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Locked
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

SSridhar wrote:
Peregrine wrote:ACTUAL RESERVES – SBP : 01.7021 – COMM BANKS : 06.4940 – TOTAL : 08.1961
Peregrine ji, where do you get the actual reserves details from? It looks way too high for me.
SSridhar Ji :

The "Phigures" are from the State Bank of Pakistan - Domestic Markets & Monetary Management Department. Next similar post will mention "State Bank of Pakistan aka Terroristan!

B T W : The Figures "crediting SBP" are Foreign Exchange Loans as well as Coalition Funds Ityaadi, Ityaadi & Ityaadi! :rotfl:

Cheers Image
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

OYEZ, OYEZ, OYEZ!

Pakistan’s debt and liabilities surge to Rs31 trillion - Shahbaz Rana

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s debt and liabilities rose to nearly Rs31 trillion at the end of September 2018 with an addition of Rs984 billion in just three months.

The increase comes amid concerns over a rapid rise in the debt burden in coming months owing to currency depreciation and interest rate hike.

Statistics released by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) showed that by the end of first quarter of the current fiscal year, the country’s total debt and liabilities soared to Rs30.9 trillion. Within a span of just three months, there was an increase of Rs984 billion, or 3.3%, in the overall debt.

Of the Rs30.9 trillion, the gross public debt, which is the direct responsibility of the government, stood at Rs25.8 trillion. There was an increase of Rs839 billion in the gross public debt in three months, which was far higher than the overall budget deficit of Rs542 billion for the period.

One of the key reasons behind the higher debt was the increase in interest rate and depreciation of the rupee during July-September 2018.

A single rupee devaluation adds Rs97 billion to the public debt. Similarly, a 1% increase in interest rate increases the cost of debt servicing by roughly Rs180 billion. This ultimately increases borrowing requirements of the finance ministry.

The impact of currency depreciation and interest rate hike after September will be visible in next bulletin of the central bank. Since January, the central bank has let the currency weaken by one-third and has jacked up the interest rate by 4.25%. Total debt and liabilities also include the public sector enterprises’ (PSEs) debt, non-governmental external debt and inter-company external debt from direct investors abroad. Excluding liabilities, the country’s total debt swelled to Rs29.4 trillion.

The Ministry of Finance has not yet initiated the formal process to amend the Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Limitation Act 2005 to correct an anomaly created by the previous government. Former finance minister Ishaq Dar had twice amended the law to understate the debt. Because of the change in definition, the public debt, reported by the finance ministry, is Rs2 trillion lower than the actual debt burden.

Finance Minister Asad Umar has promised to address the issue.

The government’s domestic debt surged to Rs16.9 trillion with an addition of Rs507 billion in first three months of the current fiscal year.

The government’s external debt increased to a record Rs8.1 trillion by the end of September, a net addition of Rs327 billion in three months. The total external debt and liabilities surged to Rs12 trillion on the back of currency devaluation. The non-government external debt has also crossed Rs2 trillion.

The PSEs’ total debt grew to Rs1.5 trillion at the end of September, registering an increase of Rs80.7 billion or 6% in just three months. Their domestic debt soared from Rs1.07 trillion to Rs1.12 trillion. Their external debt also increased by Rs29 billion to Rs353.6 billion.

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government has promised to reform the loss-making enterprises. It has announced that it will set up Pakistan Sarmaya Company to separate these entities from the line ministries. The debt taken by Pakistan from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) remained unchanged at Rs741 billion in the three months due to currency devaluation. This was despite the fact that Pakistan returned nearly $133 million to the IMF during the first quarter.

Total liabilities, which are indirectly the responsibility of the finance ministry, slightly decreased to Rs1.42 trillion by the end of September. Domestic liabilities dropped from Rs820 billion to Rs809 billion. External liabilities decreased from Rs622 billion to Rs620 in the three months. Owing to a massive increase in the debt stock, the country’s interest payments have increased significantly.

Interest payments on debt stood at Rs362.8 billion at the end of first quarter. The government paid Rs298.3 billion in interest payments on domestic debt and Rs64.5 billion on external debt, which was quite a high figure. The external debt servicing in the first quarter of the last fiscal year was only Rs40 billion.

The depreciation of the currency has also significantly increased the cost of external debt servicing.

Image

Cheers Image
yensoy
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2494
Joined: 29 May 2002 11:31
Location: USA

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by yensoy »

abhijitm wrote:
sudhan wrote:But the pakis do. Have always done.
they are one desperate step away from adding pak diaspora's assets to that list.
After the 1998 nuke tests, they forcibly converted all their non-resident Paki assets held in Paki banks in dollars to rupees at the official rate. India, on the other hand, didn't tamper with FCNR accounts (which are foreign currency deposits held by Indians in Indian banks). The only action to raise forex to tide over imminent sanctions was a pretty generous interest rate offered to NRIs to park their funds in India. See https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/econ ... 1998-06-24

So the desperate step you allude to has precedence, and might very well happen.
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25093
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by SSridhar »

abhijitm wrote:they are one desperate step away from adding pak diaspora's assets to that list.
:rotfl:
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25093
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by SSridhar »

Taqiyya by PA and possibly a plant by the Americans.

Facing Trump attacks, Pakistan military seeks peace with India - Chris Kay, Bloomberg
Pakistan’s military is making an unusually strong effort to mend ties with arch-rival India, as top generals worry about a deteriorating economy amid fractious relations with U.S. President Donald Trump.

Current and former Pakistani military officials have told Bloomberg that both a slowing economy and pressure from Beijing to improve ties with the West is prompting the shift on India. At the same time, they said, Pakistan is also wary of becoming too dependent on China after Trump cut some $2 billion in security aid.

Among the proponents of a detente with India is Pakistan’s powerful army chief, General Qamar Javed Bajwa
, who once served under an Indian general during a stint with a United Nations peacekeeping mission and is seen as more moderate than his predecessors {We have heard this for every COAS, haven't we? Every Pakistani General has been called a 'Moderate', "a General's General" etc. They are all number one scumbag terrorists}. Entering his final year in office, Bajwa last week called a move to ease border controls with India for visiting Sikh pilgrims “a step towards peace which our region needs.”

The army chief has publicly supported China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which has unleashed financing for more than $60 billion worth of projects -- adding to debt that has forced Pakistan to seek another International Monetary Fund bailout. But he is thought to be uneasy about Pakistan’s over-reliance on Beijing, according to Western diplomats who asked not to be identified so they could speak freely about senior generals.

“From the outset of his term, General Bajwa was heavily inclined to end the state of ‘No Peace, No War,’ but recognized that shifting views inside the huge Pakistan army would take time,” said Shuja Nawaz, author of a book on the armed forces and a former IMF official who is currently a distinguished fellow at the South Asia Center at the Atlantic Council in Washington. “This may be another incentive to launch a peace initiative.”

The military’s press department didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, who surprised many by calling for talks with India in his July election victory speech, said last week his political party and the military are “all on one page” in wanting to mend ties and resolve the conflict over the disputed region of Kashmir. His government is in the midst of negotiating Pakistan’s 13th IMF bailout since the late 1980s.

Since taking office in August, Khan has sparred repeatedly with Trump. Just a few weeks ago they traded barbs after Trump said the U.S. no longer gives Pakistan billions of dollars because “they don’t do a damn thing for us” in fighting terrorism.

So far, there’s no indication that Pakistan’s outreach will prompt Trump to reconsider aid money, which was cut due to insufficient efforts to deny extremist groups safe haven and freedom of movement. A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad declined to comment.

But there are small signs that relations are improving. This week Trump sent Khan a letter asking for Pakistan’s help in facilitating talks with the Taliban to end the 17-year war in neighboring Afghanistan, a move welcomed in Pakistan. {Now, bringing India to the table for peace talks might be a carrot dangled in front of the Pakistanis by Trump *& Co}/b] And Lieutenant General Kenneth McKenzie, nominee to become commander of U.S. Central Command overseeing Pakistan, said the military relationship between the countries was “strong.”

“It is important to remember that we are asking Pakistan to focus a significant fraction of their national power away from what they perceive to be an existential threat,” he said. {One can already see a veneer of sympathy & justification for Pakistani actions creeping in}


Fear of Indian dominance continues to dictate strategy in a military that has directly ruled Pakistan for almost half its 71-year history. Since partition, Pakistan has fought {thrust} three major wars with its larger neighbor and both nations accused the other of supporting cross-border insurgencies.

Pakistan’s military is the most powerful organization in the country, and has long been seen as one of the main obstacles to peace with India. Leaders in New Delhi have accused Pakistan’s generals of stoking tensions with India in part to justify military spending that -- along with debt servicing -- consumes nearly 60 percent of the annual budget.

Any detente with India would face deep skepticism that has endured since the British left the subcontinent in 1947. Both India and the U.S. see Pakistan as providing safe haven for terrorist groups, and often bring up the fact that the leadership of Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the gruesome Mumbai attack in 2008, still live freely in Pakistan.

Saying that the military is on board suggests to the Indians that this time it will be different, since Pakistan’s military and intelligence apparatus has been perceived as disruptors to formal rapprochement processes,” said Shamila Chaudhary, a former White House and State Department official and now a fellow at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.{Ah, really?}

Though with elections due in the first half of next year “re-establishing dialogue with Pakistan absent any progress on justice for the Mumbai attacks or actions on terrorism is too much of a political football for India,” she said.

India so far has dismissed Khan’s efforts to mend ties, and blasted his latest statement for an “unwarranted reference” to Kashmir. One serving army officer in Pakistan said the military was well aware New Delhi was unlikely to reciprocate before elections, but the olive branch was a diplomatic maneuver to win global goodwill.{He spoke the truth and 'international analysts' sitting in the US aren't capable of understanding that. Pakistan has openly said that it has bowled a googly}

India views Pakistan’s overtures as insincere, according to an Indian government official who asked not to be identified. Pakistan is simply seeking to convince the international community that it’s genuinely working toward peace even though there’s no actual movement on India’s demands for more action to arrests terrorists, particularly those involved in the Mumbai attacks, the official said.

While Khan appears sincere {Does he? How?} , he and Pakistan’s generals must realize India won’t reciprocate unless something is done about Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to Madiha Afzal, the author of ‘Pakistan Under Siege’ and a visiting fellow at The Brookings Institution in Washington.

“This is an easy win for both Khan and the army,” she said of the outreach to India. “And one they can both agree on without changing the army’s fundamentals vis-a-vis India.” {Exactly. Pakistanis understand better}
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

abhijitm wrote:they are one desperate step away from adding pak diaspora's assets to that list.
SSridhar wrote: :rotfl:
SSridhar Ji :

Terroristani Diaspora's Assets are "Parked" in the Terroristani Commercial Banks and as of 30 Nov 2018 stand at the Mouth Watering Amount of US$ 6.4940 Billion.

Cheers Image
sudhan
BRFite
Posts: 1157
Joined: 01 Jul 2009 17:53
Location: Timbuktoo..

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by sudhan »

Peregrine wrote:
SSridhar wrote: :rotfl:
SSridhar Ji :

Terroristani Diaspora's Assets are "Parked" in the Terroristani Commercial Banks and as of 30 Nov 2018 stand at the Mouth Watering Amount of US$ 6.4940 Billion.

Cheers Image
So they are already including the private citizen's Foreign currency assets in private banks..

Can't sink lower.. I think
Vips
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4699
Joined: 14 Apr 2017 18:23

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Vips »

SSridhar wrote:Taqiyya by PA and possibly a plant by the Americans.

Facing Trump attacks, Pakistan military seeks peace with India - Chris Kay, Bloomberg
Pakistan’s military is making an unusually strong effort to mend ties with arch-rival India, as top generals worry about a deteriorating economy amid fractious relations with U.S. President Donald Trump.

Current and former Pakistani military officials have told Bloomberg that both a slowing economy and pressure from Beijing to improve ties with the West is prompting the shift on India. At the same time, they said, Pakistan is also wary of becoming too dependent on China after Trump cut some $2 billion in security aid.

Among the proponents of a detente with India is Pakistan’s powerful army chief, General Qamar Javed Bajwa
, who once served under an Indian general during a stint with a United Nations peacekeeping mission and is seen as more moderate than his predecessors {We have heard this for every COAS, haven't we? Every Pakistani General has been called a 'Moderate', "a General's General" etc. They are all number one scumbag terrorists}. Entering his final year in office, Bajwa last week called a move to ease border controls with India for visiting Sikh pilgrims “a step towards peace which our region needs.”

The army chief has publicly supported China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which has unleashed financing for more than $60 billion worth of projects -- adding to debt that has forced Pakistan to seek another International Monetary Fund bailout. But he is thought to be uneasy about Pakistan’s over-reliance on Beijing, according to Western diplomats who asked not to be identified so they could speak freely about senior generals.

“From the outset of his term, General Bajwa was heavily inclined to end the state of ‘No Peace, No War,’ but recognized that shifting views inside the huge Pakistan army would take time,” said Shuja Nawaz, author of a book on the armed forces and a former IMF official who is currently a distinguished fellow at the South Asia Center at the Atlantic Council in Washington. “This may be another incentive to launch a peace initiative.”

The military’s press department didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, who surprised many by calling for talks with India in his July election victory speech, said last week his political party and the military are “all on one page” in wanting to mend ties and resolve the conflict over the disputed region of Kashmir. His government is in the midst of negotiating Pakistan’s 13th IMF bailout since the late 1980s.

Since taking office in August, Khan has sparred repeatedly with Trump. Just a few weeks ago they traded barbs after Trump said the U.S. no longer gives Pakistan billions of dollars because “they don’t do a damn thing for us” in fighting terrorism.

So far, there’s no indication that Pakistan’s outreach will prompt Trump to reconsider aid money, which was cut due to insufficient efforts to deny extremist groups safe haven and freedom of movement. A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad declined to comment.

But there are small signs that relations are improving. This week Trump sent Khan a letter asking for Pakistan’s help in facilitating talks with the Taliban to end the 17-year war in neighboring Afghanistan, a move welcomed in Pakistan. {Now, bringing India to the table for peace talks might be a carrot dangled in front of the Pakistanis by Trump *& Co}/b] And Lieutenant General Kenneth McKenzie, nominee to become commander of U.S. Central Command overseeing Pakistan, said the military relationship between the countries was “strong.”

“It is important to remember that we are asking Pakistan to focus a significant fraction of their national power away from what they perceive to be an existential threat,” he said. {One can already see a veneer of sympathy & justification for Pakistani actions creeping in}


Fear of Indian dominance continues to dictate strategy in a military that has directly ruled Pakistan for almost half its 71-year history. Since partition, Pakistan has fought {thrust} three major wars with its larger neighbor and both nations accused the other of supporting cross-border insurgencies.

Pakistan’s military is the most powerful organization in the country, and has long been seen as one of the main obstacles to peace with India. Leaders in New Delhi have accused Pakistan’s generals of stoking tensions with India in part to justify military spending that -- along with debt servicing -- consumes nearly 60 percent of the annual budget.

Any detente with India would face deep skepticism that has endured since the British left the subcontinent in 1947. Both India and the U.S. see Pakistan as providing safe haven for terrorist groups, and often bring up the fact that the leadership of Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the gruesome Mumbai attack in 2008, still live freely in Pakistan.

Saying that the military is on board suggests to the Indians that this time it will be different, since Pakistan’s military and intelligence apparatus has been perceived as disruptors to formal rapprochement processes,” said Shamila Chaudhary, a former White House and State Department official and now a fellow at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.{Ah, really?}

Though with elections due in the first half of next year “re-establishing dialogue with Pakistan absent any progress on justice for the Mumbai attacks or actions on terrorism is too much of a political football for India,” she said.

India so far has dismissed Khan’s efforts to mend ties, and blasted his latest statement for an “unwarranted reference” to Kashmir. One serving army officer in Pakistan said the military was well aware New Delhi was unlikely to reciprocate before elections, but the olive branch was a diplomatic maneuver to win global goodwill.{He spoke the truth and 'international analysts' sitting in the US aren't capable of understanding that. Pakistan has openly said that it has bowled a googly}

India views Pakistan’s overtures as insincere, according to an Indian government official who asked not to be identified. Pakistan is simply seeking to convince the international community that it’s genuinely working toward peace even though there’s no actual movement on India’s demands for more action to arrests terrorists, particularly those involved in the Mumbai attacks, the official said.

While Khan appears sincere {Does he? How?} , he and Pakistan’s generals must realize India won’t reciprocate unless something is done about Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to Madiha Afzal, the author of ‘Pakistan Under Siege’ and a visiting fellow at The Brookings Institution in Washington.

“This is an easy win for both Khan and the army,” she said of the outreach to India. “And one they can both agree on without changing the army’s fundamentals vis-a-vis India.” {Exactly. Pakistanis understand better}


Why should India accomadate Pakistan when we know that they seek time just to recoup and get over their problems to be in a position to cause greater harm to India in the future?

Im the Charsi is thinking he is too smart. He gave interview today to Washington Post and played the role of someone who only seeks peace. Trying to be too smart by half he pre-empted the possible riposte on paksitan supporting terrorism and Mumbai attack by indulging in classic taqiyya by saying "he wants something done about the bombers of Mumbai", while not committing anything concrete on it.

India more then ever needs the Modi/Doval team for another 5 years atleast. I say deliver the fatal blow now when they are down or else we will only repent.
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

Peregrine wrote:SSridhar Ji :

Terroristani Diaspora's Assets are "Parked" in the Terroristani Commercial Banks and as of 30 Nov 2018 stand at the Mouth Watering Amount of US$ 6.4940 Billion.

Cheers Image
sudhan wrote:So they are already including the private citizen's Foreign currency assets in private banks..

Can't sink lower.. I think
sudhan Ji :

One can think that the Terroristan Establishment has reached its Nadir but lo and behold they have already found a lower one!

Cheers Image
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

SSridhar wrote:Taqiyya by PA and possibly a plant by the Americans.

Facing Trump attacks, Pakistan military seeks peace with India - Chris Kay, Bloomberg
Pakistan’s military is making an unusually strong effort to mend ties with arch-rival India, as top generals worry about a deteriorating economy amid fractious relations with U.S. President Donald Trump.

Current and former Pakistani military officials have told Bloomberg that both a slowing economy and pressure from Beijing to improve ties with the West is prompting the shift on India. At the same time, they said, Pakistan is also wary of becoming too dependent on China after Trump cut some $2 billion in security aid.

Among the proponents of a detente with India is Pakistan’s powerful army chief, General Qamar Javed Bajwa
, who once served under an Indian general during a stint with a United Nations peacekeeping mission and is seen as more moderate than his predecessors {We have heard this for every COAS, haven't we? Every Pakistani General has been called a 'Moderate', "a General's General" etc. They are all number one scumbag terrorists}. Entering his final year in office, Bajwa last week called a move to ease border controls with India for visiting Sikh pilgrims “a step towards peace which our region needs.”

The army chief has publicly supported China’s Belt and Road Initiative, which has unleashed financing for more than $60 billion worth of projects -- adding to debt that has forced Pakistan to seek another International Monetary Fund bailout. But he is thought to be uneasy about Pakistan’s over-reliance on Beijing, according to Western diplomats who asked not to be identified so they could speak freely about senior generals.

“From the outset of his term, General Bajwa was heavily inclined to end the state of ‘No Peace, No War,’ but recognized that shifting views inside the huge Pakistan army would take time,” said Shuja Nawaz, author of a book on the armed forces and a former IMF official who is currently a distinguished fellow at the South Asia Center at the Atlantic Council in Washington. “This may be another incentive to launch a peace initiative.”

The military’s press department didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, who surprised many by calling for talks with India in his July election victory speech, said last week his political party and the military are “all on one page” in wanting to mend ties and resolve the conflict over the disputed region of Kashmir. His government is in the midst of negotiating Pakistan’s 13th IMF bailout since the late 1980s.

Since taking office in August, Khan has sparred repeatedly with Trump. Just a few weeks ago they traded barbs after Trump said the U.S. no longer gives Pakistan billions of dollars because “they don’t do a damn thing for us” in fighting terrorism.

So far, there’s no indication that Pakistan’s outreach will prompt Trump to reconsider aid money, which was cut due to insufficient efforts to deny extremist groups safe haven and freedom of movement. A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad declined to comment.

But there are small signs that relations are improving. This week Trump sent Khan a letter asking for Pakistan’s help in facilitating talks with the Taliban to end the 17-year war in neighboring Afghanistan, a move welcomed in Pakistan. {Now, bringing India to the table for peace talks might be a carrot dangled in front of the Pakistanis by Trump *& Co}/b] And Lieutenant General Kenneth McKenzie, nominee to become commander of U.S. Central Command overseeing Pakistan, said the military relationship between the countries was “strong.”

“It is important to remember that we are asking Pakistan to focus a significant fraction of their national power away from what they perceive to be an existential threat,” he said. {One can already see a veneer of sympathy & justification for Pakistani actions creeping in}


Fear of Indian dominance continues to dictate strategy in a military that has directly ruled Pakistan for almost half its 71-year history. Since partition, Pakistan has fought {thrust} three major wars with its larger neighbor and both nations accused the other of supporting cross-border insurgencies.

Pakistan’s military is the most powerful organization in the country, and has long been seen as one of the main obstacles to peace with India. Leaders in New Delhi have accused Pakistan’s generals of stoking tensions with India in part to justify military spending that -- along with debt servicing -- consumes nearly 60 percent of the annual budget.

Any detente with India would face deep skepticism that has endured since the British left the subcontinent in 1947. Both India and the U.S. see Pakistan as providing safe haven for terrorist groups, and often bring up the fact that the leadership of Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the gruesome Mumbai attack in 2008, still live freely in Pakistan.

Saying that the military is on board suggests to the Indians that this time it will be different, since Pakistan’s military and intelligence apparatus has been perceived as disruptors to formal rapprochement processes,” said Shamila Chaudhary, a former White House and State Department official and now a fellow at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies.{Ah, really?}

Though with elections due in the first half of next year “re-establishing dialogue with Pakistan absent any progress on justice for the Mumbai attacks or actions on terrorism is too much of a political football for India,” she said.

India so far has dismissed Khan’s efforts to mend ties, and blasted his latest statement for an “unwarranted reference” to Kashmir. One serving army officer in Pakistan said the military was well aware New Delhi was unlikely to reciprocate before elections, but the olive branch was a diplomatic maneuver to win global goodwill.{He spoke the truth and 'international analysts' sitting in the US aren't capable of understanding that. Pakistan has openly said that it has bowled a googly}

India views Pakistan’s overtures as insincere, according to an Indian government official who asked not to be identified. Pakistan is simply seeking to convince the international community that it’s genuinely working toward peace even though there’s no actual movement on India’s demands for more action to arrests terrorists, particularly those involved in the Mumbai attacks, the official said.

While Khan appears sincere {Does he? How?} , he and Pakistan’s generals must realize India won’t reciprocate unless something is done about Lashkar-e-Taiba, according to Madiha Afzal, the author of ‘Pakistan Under Siege’ and a visiting fellow at The Brookings Institution in Washington.

“This is an easy win for both Khan and the army,” she said of the outreach to India. “And one they can both agree on without changing the army’s fundamentals vis-a-vis India.” {Exactly. Pakistanis understand better}
SSridhar Ji :

It not only Taqiyya but Taqiyya and Kitman :



Immy the Dimmy is trying to send a Trojan Horse to India and he will use the Kartarpur Corridor! INDIA BEWARE!!

Cheers Image
Last edited by Peregrine on 08 Dec 2018 03:51, edited 1 time in total.
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by anupmisra »

Pakistan not your ‘hired gun’ anymore: Imran tells Trump
Enjoy the hara-kiri:
Prime Minister Imran Khan in his first foreign interview to the Washington Post has told President Donald Trump that Pakistan is not US’ hired gun anymore.
he wanted a ‘proper relationship’ with Washington.(Yeah! we want more money for our services)
There are no sanctuaries in Pakistan, he added.
Peace in Afghanistan is in Pakistan’s interest.
they called me “Taliban Khan.”
The US has basically pushed Pakistan away(like a used condom)
We got some relief from the UAE and China but they wanted to keep it confidential. We raised money, but we are talking to the IMF [International Monetary Fund].
PepsiCo has put extra investments because we are a clean government.
the ruling [BJP] party has an anti-Muslim, anti-Pakistan approach
I want to make Pakistan an equitable, just society. I believe in a welfare state.
Bushra Bibi is not a man....no wait. That's for another confession.
The more this dimwit opens his mouth, the deeper the hole he digs for himself.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/40293 ... ells-trump
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by anupmisra »

Jo lawhore mein ***** woh France mein bhi *****

Irish lecturer stabbed to death in Paris had 'insulted the Prophet Mohammed', says his Pakistani killer
He also confessed he held a personal grudge against Dowling for failing him
The 66-year-old academic, named locally as John Dowling, was attacked and stabbed 13 times outside the Paris university where he worked on Wednesday.
Ali R., a 37-year-old Pakistani national, has confessed to the killing
Ali harboured an ‘obsessive resentment’ against the university for kicking him out in September 2017
‘He came to France two years ago to join the management school, but did not pass his first year
Since then he had been returning to the college, and had become unwanted to the point that he was not allowed in any more
Ali R. was not known to the intelligence services, but was an ‘obsessive patriot’ from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. :roll:
Despite this, detectives have so far ruled out any links between the attacker and jihadi groups. :shock:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... iller.html
chetak
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32378
Joined: 16 May 2008 12:00

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by chetak »

Vips wrote:
SSridhar wrote:Taqiyya by PA and possibly a plant by the Americans.

Facing Trump attacks, Pakistan military seeks peace with India - Chris Kay, Bloomberg
Why should India accomadate Pakistan when we know that they seek time just to recoup and get over their problems to be in a position to cause greater harm to India in the future?

Im the Charsi is thinking he is too smart. He gave interview today to Washington Post and played the role of someone who only seeks peace. Trying to be too smart by half he pre-empted the possible riposte on paksitan supporting terrorism and Mumbai attack by indulging in classic taqiyya by saying "he wants something done about the bombers of Mumbai", while not committing anything concrete on it.

India more then ever needs the Modi/Doval team for another 5 years atleast. I say deliver the fatal blow now when they are down or else we will only repent.
fundu khan is saying that whatever happened in the past is not his fault and those things should not be held against him. So he demands that India totally ignores/forgets the past, in the interest of "peace".

he says deal with me with a clean slate and deal with me as an international celebrity. He imagines that he has ummah street cred and that should suffice for everyone to take him at face value and also that pak is a nuclear state, a familiar litany like the doomsday dirge that musharaff used to sing at every opportunity and from every forum.

and finally, just because it is the great ummah champion imran khan niazi asking, India should very simply hand over cashmere to the pakis, no questions asked and a little while later, hand over hyderabad+telangana followed by junagadh and whatever city/state that strikes their fancy at the time.

the paki army is in sheer and utter panic about the waters from the j&k rivers under India's firm control. the pakjabis and the paki punjab will take the major hit eventually as internal water sharing fights escalate to unmanageable levels.

there certainly is a hidden eu+brit+ameriki hand is all this paki play and has been there for the longest time, the brit+ameriki hand since independence at least.
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by CRamS »

Guys, don't know if this was posted before, but when it comes to shady dealings and terror, one can always count on Pakis. Aus cricketer, Usman Kwaja was arrested for framing somebody else for fake terror plot. Now this guy is under strict surveillance. What also strikes me about this story is how ruthless Aussies police are in incarcerating any p!ssful suspected with terror links, no politically correct BS

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/cri ... 50k0s.html
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by CRamS »

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25093
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by SSridhar »

CRamS wrote:Guys, don't know if this was posted before, but when it comes to shady dealings and terror, one can always count on Pakis. Aus cricketer, Usman Kwaja was arrested for framing somebody else for fake terror plot.. . .
CRS, I think you meant to say, "Usman Kwaja's brother".
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by CRamS »

Thx SS, that was an inadvertent miss. Indeed it his brother.
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

X Posted on the I W T Thread

India’s next weapon - Eric Sharoon Shahzar

With the government’s braggadocios on the 100-day performance stealing all headlines, we are constantly neglecting our most pivotal security challenge — water. Climate change has struck us hard. Low precipitation levels, droughts and heatwaves have aggravated our water challenges. However, we are missing one crucial development here — a headline nowhere to be seen in Pakistan’s mainstream media. In an unprecedented move, India is using water as a weapon to further exacerbate relations with Pakistan — this time in Afghanistan.

In the Char Asiab district of Kabul, New Delhi is funding an ambitious dam that could reduce water flow to Pakistan’s downstream. The proposed Shahtoor dam will hold 146 million cubic metres of potable water for two million Kabul residents and irrigate 4,000 hectares of land. It is important to mention that the Kabul River empties into the Indus River near Attock, Punjab. As a result, there will be a 17%-20% reduction in Pakistan’s water flow. Using water as a weapon could easily trigger war in the fragile South Asian region.

Amid President Trump’s controversial South Asian Policy and India’s major investments in Afghanistan’s infrastructure in recent years, it is evident that India wants to use the Afghan soil to terrorise Pakistan. As the most water-stressed nation in South Asia, we are reaching towards dangerously low water levels, even below the crucial threshold of 1,000 cubic metres — a standard given by the World Bank. Water shortages are often root causes of war. Lack of water leads to food shortages, price increases and famine — all beget economic and politic turmoil. War-torn countries like Syria and Yemen are recent examples where absolute water shortages, along with other factors, led to total war.

Not to forget, India’s recently inaugurated Kishanganga dam also violated the historical Indus Water Treaty of 1960. The controversial dam has been constructed in the disputed territory of Kashmir. Adding more fuel to the conflict, New Dehli now has plans to debilitate our already paralysed water status through the Afghan soil.

Here, an extensive debate in parliament will serve to be extremely auspicious. A water caucus must be set up to investigate the depleting water levels and initiate a robust strategic plan to tackle this debacle. Pakistan should also intensify its water advocacy and diplomacy. The UN needs to know about India’s malicious attempts at deteriorating our water levels that might lead to a war in the region. As a low riparian state, the IWT allows us to contest these developments.

The question here is: Can Pakistan depend on river flows to curtail its precipitous water demands? With our population boom and unsustainable economic challenges, we need to explore alternative avenues. A country blessed with a 700km coastline must invest in water desalination plants. Faced with severe water scarcity by 2025, we must initiate long-term solutions. The Middle East has been a leader in desalination. India has already started a national mission on it. What is Pakistan waiting for?

To avoid a major conflict, Pakistan and Afghanistan must urgently start working on hydro-diplomacy. Both countries should look for joint solutions on common problems. Border challenges like climate trauma, water woes and diseases must be countered in coordinated forums. In an era where prospects of a peaceful Afghanistan are the priority of the world, New Delhi must not use the Afghan soil to hinder any peace process. Indo-Pak tensions over access to shared waterways have escalated in recent times — the last thing we need to see is war-torn Afghanistan becoming a part of this.

The 21st century is full of challenges for Pakistan. We cannot afford another major conflict based on water security. India’s animosity will only be counterproductive for South Asians.

Cheers Image
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

X Posted on the P E S W Tread

Turkey using Screw Driver to make Terroristan cough up the Damages i.e. US$ 760 Million as awarded by the CSID

Pakistan’s overseas assets at risk after court verdict

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s overseas assets are at risk of being taken over as a security to enforce the verdict of an international arbitration court in the Karkey rental power case, which may lead to serious financial complications for Pakistan.

Talking to The Express Tribune, sources pointed out that the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) started proceedings on March 23, 2018 in the case filed by Turkish company Karkey. The court gave the ruling against Pakistan on August 22, 2018, asking it to pay $760 million in damages along with interest.

Following the verdict, Karkey went to the US, UK and Germany to get the court decision enforced against Pakistan. Now, Pakistan’s assets abroad are at major risk of being taken over as a security to implement the court’s ruling.

Earlier, Karkey had installed a 232-megawatt ship-mounted rental power plant during the tenure of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP)-led government. It signed a rental services agreement in April 2009 under the Rental Power Policy 2008 for electricity production along with Lakhra Power Generation Company. Following the agreement, the Government of Pakistan also issued sovereign guarantees to meet payment obligations.

Pakistan suffers setback in Karkey case as stay order vacated

The Turkish company started commercial operations in April 2011 but in the meantime, the Supreme Court of Pakistan took suo motu notice of expensive rental power projects in 2012 and declared all the rental plant agreements illegal. The court also directed the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) to initiate probe into the matter which, during investigations, restricted the rental power plant carrying ship of Karkey from leaving Pakistan.

Karkey then filed arbitration claims against Pakistan in the ICSID under the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT). Karkey was among 12 rental power companies that were awarded electricity production contracts by the PPP government in 2009 to tackle acute power shortages.

According to NAB, the rental power ship was brought to Karachi Port in April 2011 to provide electricity to the national grid under the government’s rental power policy in order to overcome the energy crisis. However, NAB said, Karkey failed to generate 231MW, as required under the agreement, although $9 million worth of capacity charges were paid to the company in advance.

The plant produced only 30-55MW and that too at a cost of Rs41 per unit, which was very expensive and a serious breach of contract. This led to a 50% increase in refund claims by the government from $80 million to $120 million.

Govt offers incentives to raise remittances

Following the international court’s ruling, Pakistan government constituted a committee tasked with negotiating with the Turkish firm and finding an out-of-court settlement to ensure minimum penalty payment compared to the $760 million ordered by the ICSID.

According to sources, Pakistan believes that government-to-government engagement could deliver desired results. However, no success has been achieved so far. Now, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government wants to challenge the enforcement of the court decision. Terroristani Establishment are a Bunch of Lunatics. This is not a Court Case. It is an Arbitration Case and most probably the Arbitrators have Barred further Referrals such as House of Lords etc.

Cheers Image
menon s
BRFite
Posts: 721
Joined: 01 May 2010 09:51
Location: Bangalore

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by menon s »

Veteran Reporter Javed Nusrat Survives, assassination attempt........
https://www.nayadaur.tv/2018/12/senior- ... ly-attack/

From the report:
javeed said he hadn’t filed a report with the police. “Which police do I report to? This Imran Khan’s police?”

He said he had ‘absolutely no’ intentions to report this incident to the police.
This chap is not known to be sober at all times.....sometime earlier he had said to a PTI chap, that i dont sniff like your leader (Imran sniffs...what? i dont know?)
Vips
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4699
Joined: 14 Apr 2017 18:23

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Vips »

This chap may appear reasonable compared to the bearded mullahs. When it comes to India he is just like any other RAPE A S S H O L E.
Bart S
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2938
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 00:03

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Bart S »

He is a guy who speaks his mind. The PTI+ISI combine has gotten rid of all the independent minded anchors who criticize them (actually most of them have been quite fair, but it seems like any negative coverage cannot be tolerated):
Nusrat Javed's show shut down.
Gul Bukhari and Jibran Nasir almost gone from appearances on TV as is Marvi Sirmed
Murtuza Solanki's show shut down and he was booted out (the guy is a former director of Pakistani state radio/broadcasting, so if it can happen to such a senior guy nobody is safe)
Talat Husain
Matiullah Jan (guy was actually pinpointed as anti-national/enemy agent on an ISPR briefing LOL)
Vips
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4699
Joined: 14 Apr 2017 18:23

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Vips »

I am surprised Rauf Klasra is still being allowed to continue with his show Muqabil. He always raises uncomfortable questions about the establishment in Pakistan and is very blunt in stating how India is much better of compared to Pakistan. I predict he will become either like Hamid Mir and Muhammad Malik (appear to be independent but part of the Psy ops) or suffer fate of Raza Rumi and Gul Bhukari and either go abroad or stop being a critic.
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

Nusrat Javeed corrects himself: a tire burst, not an attempt on life

JournalismPakistan.com
December 08, 2018
Published 3 hours ago

ISLAMABAD – Journalist and analyst Nusrat Javeed who until Saturday morning claimed he survived an attempt on his life had by the evening realized it wasn’t so.

In a series of tweets in the wee hours of the day, he said his car was fired upon as he headed home. It resulted in two burst tires, and then six men in plain clothes tried to take him away and planned to kill him.

Javeed, who has a taste for alcohol, corrected himself later in the day after police conducted a probe.

“Islamabad police have done through (sic) probe, and they say that my tyre got burst for hitting a stone and damage happened due to skidding. The post-accident trauma made me suspect otherwise,” he tweeted.

He said that the police also believe that the men in plain clothes came around to help “…but the post-accident trauma and paranoia made me suspect otherwise. I have no choice but accept the Police version.”

Javeed apologized to his fans, friends, and colleagues. “I render sincere apology to people who must have felt deeply hurt for my paranoia. Also feel too grateful to a huge crowd of friends and well-wishers who deeply felt upset about my pain. Have no words to thank them,” he tweeted.

In the initial hours after the accident, he denied he was under the influence. He quickly accused Prime Minister Imran Khan of what he thought was an attempt to kill him. “Imran Khan, the Prime Minister of Pakistan, tried to kill me here and now. But I mstill alive,” he alleged in a tweet.

Javeed was laid off by DawnNews Television last month because of financial crunch.

Terroristani Army has issued him a WARNING!

Cheers Image
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by anupmisra »

Trouble in paradise? Sheikh Chilli at it again.

Controversy erupts over information portfolio; Chaudhry offers to step down in Rashid's favour
In an interesting turn of events on Saturday, Information Minister Fawad Chaudhry offered to voluntarily step down from his post in favour of Railways Minister Sheikh Rashid after the latter reportedly claimed that Prime Minister Imran Khan had discussed a proposed portfolio "reshuffle" with him.
Sheikh Rashid’s ‘controversial’ comments were aired by a section of private media channels, showing him talking to a person before the start of a press conference in Lahore.
the railways minister claimed that the prime minister had called him four times to deliberate on the matter.
Moreover, passing remarks about Chaudhry's recent trip to the United Kingdom, Rashid reportedly said that the minister was having a “picnic in London”.
Later in the day, Rashid appeared on a private media channel and tried to issue a ‘clarification’ about his earlier remarks, saying Chaudhry was like a younger brother to him.
“I have no intention to take over the information ministry. Even if the premier offers me the portfolio I will politely refuse,” Rashid said :roll:
Sheikh Chilli did this even when he was with other political parties (in power). This is his modus operandi.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1450243/contr ... ids-favour
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by anupmisra »

"Cylinder" blast in k'rachi.

6 injured in blast at Milad gathering in Karachi's Gulistan-i-Jauhar area
The Mehfil-i-Milad was organised by MQM-Pakistan, DawnNewsTV reported. IT Minister Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui and MQM leader Khawaja Izharul Hasan were in attendance at the event.
Police said that the gathering was being held without taking prior permission from relevant authorities.
Moreover, initial reports suggested that suspects riding a motorbike threw cracker and fled away, Mahesar said.
Bomb Disposal Squad was called to examine and clear the area
https://www.dawn.com/news/1450273/6-inj ... auhar-area
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by anupmisra »

Lies, damned lies and then there are paki lies.

Indian officials offered Rs20m to drop out of 2014 Asian squash championship: Farhan Mehboob
Pakistani squash player Farhan Mehboob on Saturday claimed that he had been offered Rs20 million by Indian officials to drop out of a match during the 2014's Asian Squash Team Championship, DawnNewsTV reported.
Mehboob said he was approached by the Indian officials who pretended to be match-fixers during the 2014 tournament.
The squash player claimed that he had refused the offer and told the officials that he "would not sell [his] country even if [he's] offered a billion rupees". :roll:
https://www.dawn.com/news/1450242/india ... an-mehboob
anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9203
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by anupmisra »

Oye hoye!

Arthur calls on beaten Pakistan to toughen up for Tests
Disgruntled coach Mickey Arthur demanded his players toughen up and seize key moments in Test matches after sloppy batting handed New Zealand an away series win over Pakistan for the first time in 49 years
New Zealand pulled off a come-from-behind 123-run victory in the third and final Test in Abu Dhabi on Friday to end their long wait for a 2-1 series win.
Pakistan lost all ten wickets on the final day in both the defeats. They have now lost all ten wickets on the final day six times since Arthur joined in May 2016.
Apart from the three occasions in Abu Dhabi -- against Sri Lanka last year and twice against New Zealand in this series -- they also collapsed at Birminghm, Hamilton and Melbourne -- all in 2016.
https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/40341 ... -for-tests
Bart S
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2938
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 00:03

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Bart S »



As expected the police have given up on the Sami the Sandwich case as they have no leads. Not at all surprising since, as many here surmised, it was likely an ISI job.
CRamS
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6865
Joined: 07 Oct 2006 20:54

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by CRamS »

Admins, hope this belongs here. If not, please delete

Guys, is this ex military office Gen. Hooda another Ajai Shukla in the making? The guy comes out and makes the allegation that ModiJi over-hyped the surgical strikes, they should not be politicized etc etc. Not only that, when low-IQ toadies like Burka bibi start praising him to show their phony respect for Indian military, whom they otherwise berate for killing dreaded terrorists like Burhan Wani, then he is suspect in my eyes :-).

https://indianexpress.com/article/india ... s-5483929/

While Hooda laments politicization, his remarks themselves seem political. He forgets to mention who started the politicization:

1. Soon after Uri, thugbandhan were mocking ModiJi for 56" chest instead of grieving for the lives of the soldiers who were martyred or any sense of outrage against Pakis. Can there be a more crass, insensitive expression of political opportunism bordering on sedition?

2. There was anger and humiliation both within public and within army ranks that time and again, Pakis make Indian army look impotent unable to hit back

3. So ModiJi/DovalJi challenged the Indian army to come up with a plan to hit TSP, and the army presented a plan with all the attendant risks. ModiJi/DovalJi took the risky gambit and authorized the strikes. It was a strategic decision to show TSP that India can do it and there is a price to pay for their murderous actions. The strikes were executed with machine-like precision.

4. Post strikes, thugbandhan first mocked Indian army and govt's claim and then asked for proof. Congoons were saying 'metoo'. It was sour grapes everywhere. Nothing could have please Paki army/ISI more than this. The entire strategic value of the strikes evaporated into thin air the moment Indian opposition traitor politicians surrendered at the alter of political greed what the military had achieved on the battle field. (I only shudder to think how much damage to India would have been done by these traitors had the strikes not succeeded). Sorry for my self flagellation, but among all world religions, only Hindus are capable of such self-inflicted treachery. So basically, this was the politicization, which Pappu's latest military friend Hooda does not recognize or deliberately side steps.

5. Once the issue went political, like Kartarpur, BJP was not going to sit by idly and let the nation's honor and their own hard work and risk taking go waste. They went to the other extreme, and started hyping the strikes as though it was a military conquest of TSP, and started briging in religious connotations like invoking Lord Hanuman etc, which p!ssed the thugbandhan off even more.

6. As a result of #4, and #5, TSPA/ISI pretty much escaped the abject humiliation that was heaped on them, and undeterred, continued on with their evil designs, scores of terror attacks followed, Nagrota being the most dastardly, and continues to this day. And Indian politicians continue to fight with each other like brainless dogs, and now as I predicted aeons ago, its now TSPA/ISI/thugbandhan Vs BJP/RSS.

7. In a sense I agree with Col. Hooda, I think there indeed was hype over the strikes, but the full context needs to be understood, and it was the thugbandhan that politicized the surgical strikes, not BJP. They reacted and went overboard. As I explain in another post above, there is a huge constituency that does not want to see India, under a Hindu nationalist govt, win outright against TSP.
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

Imran Khan’s first 100 days in charge of Pakistan

The prime minister’s first innings has been marked by chaos, conflict and capitulation. Hugh Tomlinson, Haroon Janjua and Aoun Sahi report

As he closed in on victory at Pakistan’s general election this summer, Imran Khan set an ambitious agenda for his first 100 days in office. On the brink of claiming the job he had sought since entering politics in 1996, the World Cup-winning cricketer arrived in the prime minister’s office a man in a hurry.

The 66-year-old former star promised he would create ten million new jobs, build five million affordable new houses, stamp out corruption and reboot Pakistan’s floundering economy without seeking the foreign loans that had left previous government’s mired in debt. “I would prefer to die rather than beg for loans,” Mr Khan said.

Ordinary Pakistanis did not expect miracles but set against those lofty ambitions, Mr Khan’s first 100 days have been chaotic and concrete achievements sparse.

The new prime minister has offered peace talks with India, warred with Donald Trump on Twitter and been forced into an string of policy U-turns, fuelling claims by opponents that Mr Khan is out of his depth and has no true principles.

The pious vow to die rather than accept foreign loans lasted mere days. Once the new premier and his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party had grasped the parlous state of the economy they had inherited, Mr Khan opened negotiations with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a bailout of up to $12 billion (£9.5 billion). True to current form, however, Mr Khan has continued to send mixed messages over whether he would take the IMF’s money, seeking alternative loans from China, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Most damaging have been the moves to appease Islamist groups in the early days of his administration that left Mr Khan open to attack when the greatest crisis of his first 100 days struck. The acquittal of Asia Bibi, a Christian woman held on death row since 2010 on blasphemy charges, has provoked uproar and nationwide protests among conservatives demanding she be hanged.

Mr Khan emerged as a staunch defender of Pakistan’s draconian blasphemy laws on the campaign trail, lurching to the right in what rivals derided as a cynical appeal for conservative votes.

Now in office, however, the protests represent a direct challenge to Mr Khan’s authority and, since Ms Bibi was acquitted in October, the prime minister has veered between pandering to the Islamists and cracking down. Ms Bibi, released from jail but barred from fleeing Pakistan, remains in hiding, fearing for her life, while Islamist leaders are rounded up and charged with treason. In the process, Mr Khan has conceded the moral high ground and infuriated all sides.

So fearless as a cricket captain, the former star offered a curious defence of the indecisiveness that has characterised his first 100 days.

“Adolf Hitler and Napoleon Bonaparte would not have suffered losses in wars in Russia if they had taken U-turns,” Mr Khan said last month. “Leaders should always be ready to take U-turns according to the requirement of their duties and best interests of the nation.”

Some of the chaos of the past three months can be attributed to circumstances beyond Mr Khan’s control. The state of the economy bequeathed to him, in particular, was disastrous.

He inherited a yawning current account deficit of $18 billion, while foreign currency reserves stood at $10 billion, enough to cover just two months of imports. After the extravagant promises of the campaign, Mr Khan’s first address as prime minister warned the nation to tighten its collective belt for a period of austerity.

Pakistan in numbers

Total population 212.7 million - 95-98% who are Muslims

Average life expectancy in Pakistan : 66 years - Average life expectancy in the UK : 81 years

GDP per capita in Pakistan : $1,614 - GDP per capita in the UK : $42,514

Since then the new leader has launched a string of eye-catching initiatives to bolster tax revenues and the public purse.
The vast fleet of cars belonging to Nawaz Sharif, the former prime minister, was sold at auction and Mr Khan has pressed on with efforts to seize his predecessor’s assets abroad, including the portfolio of Park Lane real estate that led to Mr Sharif’s downfall on corruption charges last year.

Mr Khan’s vow to eschew the trappings of office, in contrast to Mr Sharif’s extravagance, was undermined when it emerged he was using a helicopter to travel home at weekends to his villa outside Islamabad. The controversy might have blown over but for the bungled response from the new administration, with Fawad Chaudhry, the information minister. claiming the helicopter was cheaper than travelling by car, at just 55 rupees (35p) per kilometre.

The PTI’s capacity for self-inflicted wounds was further underlined when Mr Khan sacked the respected economist Atif Mian from his economic council. Despite the looming financial crisis, the prime minister caved in to pressure from Islamist hardliners who had denounced Mr Mian as a member of the minority Ammadi community, considered heretics by some conservatives.

Two more members of the council resigned in protest but the decision appeared to establish a precedent for Mr Khan’s dealings with Islamist groups and the priorities of his administration. In October, the PTI withdrew a bill before parliament that would have toughened punishments for false blasphemy allegations, introduced by the previous government.

While he has alienated many moderates with his defence of the blasphemy laws, however, Mr Khan has also failed to convince extremists such as the Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), which emerged as Pakistan’s fifth-largest national party at the general election, that he is tough enough. The stage was set for a confrontation then, when Ms Bibi was acquitted and released by the Supreme Court after a decade-long case that has divided the nation.

Within hours of the verdict, the TLP had brought thousands on to the streets in protests. Riots in several cities left cars and buildings torched.

Mr Khan at first stood up to the protesters denouncing them as “enemies of the country” but the prime minister quickly capitulated again, cutting a deal with the Islamists. In exchange for the rioters disbanding, the government said it would apply to place Ms Bibi on the “exit control list”, barring her from leaving the country.

The result is a bitter stalemate. Ms Bibi now cannot leave the country despite receiving offers of asylum abroad. And while Mr Khan’s government blocked her departure to appease conservatives it has cracked down on them, arresting Khadim Hussain Rizvi, the TLP leader, and other senior Islamists on sedition and terrorism charges.

“The government has made so many U-turns on this case . . . but still Asia Bibi is suffering despite her acquittal,” said Sherry Rehman, an opposition MP.

“Mr Khan has lost all credibility, he cannot make decisions to uphold the rule of law . . . Imran Khan’s politics revolve around religion and U-turns.”

The government has defended its record, however. A website, outlining progress on the agenda for the first 100 days has belatedly been updated, though many goals remain “in progress”.

“The economy is still a challenge but the previous government left us nothing in the exchequer,” Mr Chaudry told The Times. “So we have had to prioritise. The last government had no priorities, everything revolved around Nawaz Sharif.”

Mr Khan himself has vowed to press on, with a speech last week that emphasised challenges ahead rather than tasks accomplished and warmed to a familiar theme.

“I have taken just a single day off in the first 100 days,” he said. “I did not know the extent of theft and corruption until I came to power. Every day something new comes up.”

Image

Cheers Image
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6919
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by habal »

tyre burst or bullet hole
nusrat javed's car tyre
Image
RCase
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2251
Joined: 02 Sep 2011 22:50
Location: Awaiting the sabbath of Fry djinns

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by RCase »

habal wrote:
tyre burst or bullet hole
nusrat javed's car tyre
It was only a high pressure tire explosion! TFTA Pakistanis inflate their tires to high pressures.
habal
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6919
Joined: 24 Dec 2009 18:46

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by habal »

the bullet may have caused car to skid and driver losing control and car hit the pavement resulting in tyre burst
mappunni
BRFite
Posts: 364
Joined: 14 Jul 2017 19:07

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by mappunni »

RCase wrote:
habal wrote:
tyre burst or bullet hole
nusrat javed's car tyre
It was only a high pressure tire explosion! TFTA Pakistanis inflate their tires to high pressures.
Inflated to high pressure by Pindi Channa gas :rotfl: :rotfl:
g.sarkar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4382
Joined: 09 Jul 2005 12:22
Location: MERCED, California

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by g.sarkar »

Peregrine wrote:
sanjaykumar wrote:At this rate, can the Paki Air Force even afford to keep their Chinese rejects flying? Or will the sonic booms be only from the Pindi Channa?
Bart S wrote:As someone (Christine Fair?) pointed out, they are basically an army with a country. So the Paki airforce/military will have first choice of available bit of resources while their awaam will be kept busy with Jeehard, Islam, and attacking India.

Unlike the Soviet Union, that finally collapsed under the weight of its contradictions and rebuilt (because they were 100% literate, had scientific temper rather than out of control religious lunacy), the Pakis will probably never collapse, just get more and more pathetic and messed up.
Bart S Ji:

With due respect and reverence it was the late Jawahar Lal Nehru who stated AFAICR "Every Country has an Army In Pakistan the Army has the Country!
Cheers Image
Sirji, as far as I can remember, the quote is:
Where some states have an army, the Prussian Army has a state.
― Voltaire
Gautam
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

Peregrine wrote:Bart S Ji:With due respect and reverence it was the late Jawahar Lal Nehru who stated AFAICR "Every Country has an Army In Pakistan the Army has the Country!
Cheers Image
g.sarkar wrote:Sirji, as far as I can remember, the quote is:
Where some states have an army, the Prussian Army has a state.
― VoltaireGautam
Gautam Sarkar Ji :

Dhanyavad, Babu Moshai.

Cheers Image
Peregrine
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8441
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by Peregrine »

habal wrote:
tyre burst or bullet hole
nusrat javed's car tyre
RCase wrote:It was only a high pressure tire explosion! TFTA Pakistanis inflate their tires to high pressures.
RCase Ji :
From the little I know of the Terrorist Army the T A Officers can tell PORKIES without moving their Lips :lol:
Cheers Image
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25093
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by SSridhar »

RCase wrote:
habal wrote: tyre burst or bullet hole
nusrat javed's car tyre
It was only a high pressure tire explosion! TFTA Pakistanis inflate their tires to high pressures.
The correct (aka as Pakistani) way of saying this is "High pressure tyre explosion in vacuum"
SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 25093
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terroristan - October 8, 2018

Post by SSridhar »

Bart S wrote:As expected the police have given up on the Sami the Sandwich case as they have no leads.
My post on Jan 4, 2014.
That was in connection with the gunning down of general secretary of JUI-S along with his driver and a personal guard "by unknown miscreants" on Karachi’s Sharae Faisal .
. . . . Maulana Sandwich now joins the illustrious list of Benazir, Col. Imam, Khalid Khwaja, Maulana Fazl-ur-Rehman, Qazi Hussain et al. . . . . I predict that sooner rather than later, Maulana Sandwich himself would be targetted.
Locked