Bharat Rakshak

Ardeshir wrote:

Karan M wrote:Yes, you are right. The same project likely extends to the NYT and other channels. Explains their visceral reaction to any strong Govt in India or cultural awakening, centripetal forces.

It is quite possible that they are loony leftists, but on the balance of probability, it is perhaps a lot more than this as has often been speculated here.

• The NYT Company has two large blocks of shareholders. One is Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim. He owns Class A shares, that are traded publicly but have limited voting rights.
• The Ochs-Sulzberger Trust owns about 90% of the Class B shares, which are privately held and have all the voting power.
• Even the board of directors are split into Class A and Class B directors.
• The Class B board consists of Ochs-Sulzberger family members and long time associates, mostly of Jewish and/or WASP descent.
• Also something to remember/file for later use, this year, the NYT ran distinctly anti-Jewish cartoons, suggesting a strong split between elite Amreeki-Yahoodi elite and Israeli Yahoodis might have finally occurred.

Perhaps we could track all this in its own thread or a separate Wiki given that this is going to be a long term and recurring issue for us.

Singha wrote:https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/jyotira ... eststories

so it seems scindia had flown to usa to attend his sons graduation from yale.

ramana wrote:

Singha wrote:https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/jyotira ... eststories

so it seems scindia had flown to usa to attend his sons graduation from yale.

I think Kamalnath sabotaged him effectively. hence showing his pique like a entitiled raja and leaving the shores to attend son's graduation.

Karan M wrote:Steps have to be taken though, its high time. Can't just wish it all away using silly analogies of car purchases and what not.

We believe the BSP + SP + RLD will win 54 seats in Uttar Pradesh. We may be wrong about 8 seats. The BSP will win 27. The SP will win 22. The RLD will win 2. We have a few more weak projections for the BSP than for the SP.
We believe the BJP will win 21 seats. This may go up by 9 seats we have currently projected for other parties.
We believe the INC will win 4 seats.
We believe the PSP(L) may win 1 seat — though it could easily swing the SP’s way.

chetak wrote:

Atmavik wrote:looks like the BIF have shifted their attack from Modi to Yogi. he is a future PM.

I don't know where people are getting such ideas.
....
That said, YA seems to be an OK guy, I like him for what he is but I am not one of those ra ra cheerleaders who thinks that he can or will take ever over from Modi who, BTW, still has some ways to go.

Ardeshir wrote: [*]Also something to remember/file for later use, this year, the NYT ran distinctly anti-Jewish cartoons, suggesting a strong split between elite Amreeki-Yahoodi elite and Israeli Yahoodis might have finally occurred. [/list]

Manu wrote:

Ardeshir wrote: [*]Also something to remember/file for later use, this year, the NYT ran distinctly anti-Jewish cartoons, suggesting a strong split between elite Amreeki-Yahoodi elite and Israeli Yahoodis might have finally occurred. [/list]

Controlled Opposition.

Mollick.R wrote:

Ashokk wrote:Chandrababu Naidu calls on Mamata Banerjee, discusses formation of non-BJP govt in case of hung verdict

Confidence of this backstabber opportunist & amount of political capital he is spending makes me nervous.

Does he have some extra special information which even exit polls failed to count????

Doodh ka jala , chach bhi fukk fukk kar piyee

Have not forgotten 2004.

Ps:- BJP will lose only

CRamS wrote:I don't understand Queen madam, her pappu and their thugbandhan slaves. They are completely justified in downplaying exit polls for obvious reasons. But in the next breath, they are whining about EVMs. I mean if they are so confident that exit polls are bogus, then the paranoia over EVMs? In fact how are exit polls even related to EVMs?

I don’t trust Exit Poll gossip. The game plan is to manipulate or replace thousands of EVMs through this gossip. I appeal to all Opposition parties to be united, strong and bold. We will fight this battle together

• Media channels not beholden to her (read Times Now, R, and Zee News (Not the Zee 24 Ghanta, though)) have enticed people, or the pollsters to put made up numbers favouring the NDA
• NDA and a pliant EC will doctor the count of the EVM results to match these numbers.

ramana wrote:Dileep I am going to issue a warning for flame baiting members with your barbecue preferences.

Folks don't respond or you will get a warning too.

Kati wrote:This will give the LibTurds a shiver...

Muslims on Exit Polls: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxPB1oB80v4

Manish_Sharma wrote:

Karan M wrote:Steps have to be taken though, its high time. Can't just wish it all away using silly analogies of car purchases and what not.

This is what Rajiv Malhotra says "usa used to send Chinese a human rights report of China doing human rights violations every year, then China started doing same thing and started sending human rights violations by usa, RESULT WHITE SUPREMACIST usa wimped out and stopped sending human rights reports to china .." but in Bharat these leftist liberal types try to stop Bharatvarsh from doing it.... "

nachiket wrote:sudeepj, I have deleted your personal attack on Dileep. If you find a post offensive, report it and admins will take action. Responding with a personal attack is not tolerated. You have been warned as well.

New Delhi:
Former President Pranab Mukherjee complimented the Election Commission over its "perfect" handling of the Lok Sabha polls on Monday, taking a starkly divergent stand on the matter from that of the Congress and other opposition parties.
"If we want to strengthen institutions, we've to keep in mind that institutions are serving well in this country, and if democracy has succeeded, it's largely due to perfect conduct of elections by all Election Commissioners starting from Sukumar Sen to the present Election Commissioners. All are appointed by the executive and they are doing their job well. You can't criticise them. It was perfect conduct of the elections," he said at an event held to launch "Defining India Through Their Eyes", a book by NDTV's Editorial Director Sonia Singh.
Pranab Mukherjee, who was the Finance Minister in the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government before being elected as the country's 13th President in 2012, also appreciated the wholehearted manner in which the country took part in the electoral process. "As many as 67.3% participated in this Lok Sabha election -- that's more than 2/3rd. And after many years, I got to cast my vote in a booth as citizen Pranab Mukherjee," he said.
The former President's endorsement of the Election Commission comes a day after Congress chief Rahul Gandhi accused it of yielding to the ruling BJP despite having the constitutional responsibility of providing a level playing field to all political parties. "From electoral bonds and EVMs to manipulating the election schedule, NaMo TV, Modi's Army & now the drama in Kedarnath; the Election Commission's capitulation before Mr Modi & his gang is obvious to all Indians. The EC used to be feared & respected. Not anymore," Rahul Gandhi tweeted soon after polling ended at 6 pm.

UlanBatori wrote:Aiyyooo! THAT prediction from UBCN is coming all too true. Time to head for the caves. Until 23?

New Delhi:
Former President Pranab Mukherjee complimented the Election Commission over its "perfect" handling of the Lok Sabha polls on Monday, taking a starkly divergent stand on the matter from that of the Congress and other opposition parties.

Kati wrote:This will give the LibTurds a shiver...

Muslims on Exit Polls: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxPB1oB80v4

vimal wrote:If there is an eskimo consolidation behind Congis then it might be a tougher fight in UP/Bihar than expected. This seems like eskimos have abandoned the SP/BSP ship and climbed on to Congis one.

vimal wrote:This morning, I got up at night and saw a TV interview. A YSR guy was saying that they will support NDA if they get special status for AP. I was like you still at it dawg!

banrjeer wrote:UP Nishada vote:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cit ... 423721.cms

KL Dubey wrote:

vimal wrote:If there is an eskimo consolidation behind Congis then it might be a tougher fight in UP/Bihar than expected. This seems like eskimos have abandoned the SP/BSP ship and climbed on to Congis one.

It is exactly the opposite effect. In almost all UP seats barring Amethi and Rae Bareli, the main contest is between BJP and MTB. The INC is not really in the picture and would be in third place. If a significant number of the greens are switching votes from SP to INC, that is classic vote-cutting and will ensure more seats for the BJP.

In BH, not only the chemistry, but also the "arithmetic", is way too strong in favor of the NDA. Additionally, I think Owaisi keeps putting up random candidates in "green areas" of BH...another classic vote-cutter effect that will screw the UPA.

ramana wrote:https://twitter.com/ramana_brf/status/1 ... 19968?s=19

The other set of analysts tend to portray Modi as a strong leader capable of taking tough decisions, a tireless worker, an excellent communicator who has turned the aspirational middle class into his permanent vote bank and has extended appeal among the poor with wide-ranging welfare schemes with excellent ‘last-mile delivery’ mechanism. For Modi’s core voters, he is a Hindutva icon who offers an alternative reading of the idea of India, triggering Hindu nationalism as the bulwark of a new Hindu awakening and establishing true secularism in a country that draws inspiration not from imported ideas but its own civilisational past.

It seems likely that Modi’s popularity — that far outstrips that of his party — is a combination of these factors and another phenomenon that is readily overlooked. Modi enjoys a huge amount of trust among the electorate. Conducted in April this year, Firstpost Trust Survey pointed towards this phenomenon. At that time, Modi had quadrupled his ‘trust’ factor over Rahul Gandhi, his nearest competitor.

The problem with ‘trust’ as a measure of a leader’s popularity is that it does not easily lend itself to metrics that may be analysed. Yet, downplaying this factor leaves large gaps in analyses. Many analysts are confounded how Modi, despite the lack of well-paying jobs, rural distress, stuttering economy and teething issues over Demonetisation and GST manages to hold on to, and even increase his popularity.

The often-overlooked reason is trust, which allows Modi more leeway among the electorate compared to his peers. This trust factor also enables Modi to make mistakes and get away relatively lightly, because the masses interpret his mistakes as those committed by an individual who is dedicated in his work and is at least trying to do something for the nation instead of just plotting for power or enjoying its perks.

Kati wrote:This will give the LibTurds a shiver...

Muslims on Exit Polls: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxPB1oB80v4