So Pakis have had only 4 COAS in last 21 years and add 3 more to it, this is one COAS every 6 years. Don't rest of the corps commanders feel frustrated or Jealous as the glass ceiling of COAS not leaving sort of never shatters.
Q: With Pak getting so much of water in Aug, Is Indian obligation to release water to Pak over now ? Pakis should be happy that they got all the water they were crying about. See, Damns do not block water.
Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Indeed, but "compensation" for these "crore" commanders should cover most, if not all their disappointments.Vikas wrote:So Pakis have had only 4 COAS in last 21 years and add 3 more to it, this is one COAS every 6 years. Don't rest of the corps commanders feel frustrated or Jealous as the glass ceiling of COAS not leaving sort of never shatters.
Q: With Pak getting so much of water in Aug, Is Indian obligation to release water to Pak over now ? Pakis should be happy that they got all the water they were crying about. See, Damns do not block water.
-
Vikas
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 6828
- Joined: 03 Dec 2005 02:40
- Location: Where DST doesn't bother me
- Contact:
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Bajwa I think will outlast I'mdim by a long margin. Do CNS and CAM also get extensions in Pa_istan like COAS does ?chetak wrote:Indeed, but "compensation" for these "crore" commanders should cover most, if not all their disappointments.Vikas wrote:So Pakis have had only 4 COAS in last 21 years and add 3 more to it, this is one COAS every 6 years. Don't rest of the corps commanders feel frustrated or Jealous as the glass ceiling of COAS not leaving sort of never shatters.
Q: With Pak getting so much of water in Aug, Is Indian obligation to release water to Pak over now ? Pakis should be happy that they got all the water they were crying about. See, Damns do not block water.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
they are mere housekeeping staff.Vikas wrote:Bajwa I think will outlast I'mdim by a long margin. Do CNS and CAM also get extensions in Pa_istan like COAS does ?chetak wrote:
Indeed, but "compensation" for these "crore" commanders should cover most, if not all their disappointments.
they do not exist in the paki army scheme of things
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
3 Pakistan ex ambassadors openly calling for terrorism in JK on TV!
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Really?abhijitm wrote:So new name now running the rounds
Imrand
Can also be read as i-m-rand
If it does then i shall lay claim to it for BRF onlee
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=6901&p=2285154&hili ... d#p2285154
Post dated 26 Jul 2018 21:02
Manish_P wrote:bye de waye, i hab herd Kaptaan dozent laik to be kaalled ass 'Im the Dim'
He pheels he haj rizen in statess now
I hab sunoed dat sum oph hij supparters addrejj him ass 'I-m-rand di Gaand'
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Sad commentary but if ones country is well known for spreading raita around some of it is going to splash on its own citizens.
https://twitter.com/HniaziISF/status/11 ... 9289231364
https://twitter.com/HniaziISF/status/11 ... 9289231364
Hassaan Niazi @HniaziISF
Pakistan’s Ambassdor in Mexico you should be answerable for this. You must apologise to nida for the ordeal she went through.Infact foreign office must question Mexico representative in Pakistan for this suffering.Exactly same happened with me #ProudPakistani #SayNoToHumiliation
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
It just breaks my heart. Let us welcome them and give all of them Indian passports for the trouble that they have faced.pankajs wrote:Sad commentary but if ones country is well known for spreading raita around some of it is going to splash on its own citizens. ]
Gautam
-
ArjunPandit
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 4056
- Joined: 29 Mar 2017 06:37
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
i sense there's more to story. Her passport/visa looks discolored, which with a newly arrived visa is always suspicious. Being a pakistani adds napalm to the fire..she's still a proud pakistani btw
PS: Gauti ji.only if they sign on integrity of India (including PoK and GB)
PS: Gauti ji.only if they sign on integrity of India (including PoK and GB)
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
^Mexico is where a lot of Pakis try to illegally enter the US from. With Trump in the White House, the Mexicans are feeling the pain and burden of having to deal with these yahoos and hence are taking a strict line. The 'we would let you in if you had a US visa' line also points to this.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Bartji,Bart S wrote:^Mexico is where a lot of Pakis try to illegally enter the US from. With Trump in the White House, the Mexicans are feeling the pain and burden of having to deal with these yahoos and hence are taking a strict line. The 'we would let you in if you had a US visa' line also points to this.
I think that the rule has been US visa before Mexican visa for at least 30 years. No one believes that a Pakistani is coming to Mexico for tourism. About that time (30 years ago) a Bangladeshi I know tried to get a Canadian visa. He was told, if you have a green card you do not need a visa. If you do not have a green card you will not get a visa. You will have to apply from Bangladesh.
Gautam
Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Trump asks Imran Khan to moderate rhetoric against India and deescalate conflict - Chidanand Rajghatta | TNN
HIGHLIGHTS
- The President’s comments followed separate phone calls to the two leaders, first with Prime Minister Modi followed by a call to Imran Khan
- Donald Trump asked Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan to moderate his rhetoric and avoid escalating conflict with India over the Kashmir issue
- Close allies like Saudi Arabia and UAE have not rallied behind Pakistan over its Kashmir stand
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Monday asked Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan to moderate his rhetoric and avoid escalating conflict with India over the Kashmir issue, implicitly urging Islamabad to move on from its hand-wringing over New Delhi’s legislative and administrative changes removing special status for the region.
“Spoke to my two good friends, Prime Minister Modi of India, and Prime Minister Khan of Pakistan, regarding Trade, Strategic Partnerships and, most importantly, for India and Pakistan to work towards reducing tensions in Kashmir. A tough situation, but good conversations!” Trump said in a cryptic tweet that coming from someone not known for subtlety was quite nuanced.
The President’s comments, which followed separate phone calls to the two leaders, first with Prime Minister Modi followed by a call to Imran Khan, gave no comfort to Pakistan, which went ballistic over constitutional charges relating to Jammu and Kashmir that India says is its internal matter. If anything, there was admonition for Khan for some of the vituperative language he employed in a series of tweets, which Modi told Trump was not conducive to peace in the region.
Trump spoke by telephone with Khan to discuss “the need to reduce tensions and moderate rhetoric with India over the situation in Jammu and Kashmir,” the White House said in a readout of the Imran Khan call, adding that the US President “reaffirmed the need to avoid escalation of the situation, and urged restraint” on both sides, the White House said.
The telephone diplomacy that essentially asked Pakistan to get back on the bilateral track with India followed a setback for Islamabad in its effort to generate greater US and global mediation and intervention over its claims in Kashmir, despite having committed in greements with India to resolve the matter bilaterally. New Delhi says it will only talk to Pakistan if the country abjures its use of terror groups against India and acts against perpetrators of attacks in India that it coddles.
In a series of rage-filled tweets, Imran Khan on Sunday railed against what he called a “fascist racist Hindu Supremacist Modi Govt” and its “doctrine of hate & genocide” that he suggested endangered Muslims because of the move to effect constitutional chances regarding Jammu and Kashmir.
But in perhaps an unintended smackdown of Islamabad, Saudi Arabia, whose hand feeds Pakistan, showed no support or sympathy for Pakistan as it went ahead with a massive $ 15 billion deal with India’s Reliance Industry. Modi is also scheduled to visit the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain for state visits later this week on his way back from Paris for bilateral exchanges with France. He will return to Biarritz, France, to attend the G-7 summit, where he will be special guest of French President Emmanuel Macron. In fact, it is likely he will meet President Trump informally on the margins.
Such vigorous global engagement, particularly with Gulf and Muslim countries, belies Pakistan’s efforts to project Modi and his governing party as Islamophobic.In fact, in UAE, Modi will receive the Order of Zayed, the country’s highest civil decoration that was conferred on him in April for giving a boost to bilateral relations. The award is named after Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, the UAE’s founding father, and acquires special significance as it was awarded to Modi in the birth centenary of Sheikh Zayed. China’s President Xi Jin Ping shared the award with leaders of Ethiopia and Eritrea last year. In Bahrain, the ruling Al Khalifa royal famly will host a banquet dinner for the Indian Prime Minister, who will also launch the renovation of Shreenathji (Shree Krishna) temple in Manama.
So much as Islamabad attempted to put India in the dock for its legislative and administrative action in Kashmir, the effort has only highlighted Pakistan’s diminishing profile and marginalization in the international area, including the Gulf. “Pakistan’s reaction appeared to be limited to high-level hand-wringing… it increasingly feels like a nation with its back against the wall, with few options to protect its existential interests,” the New York Times said in a report last week, noting that “Its economy is teetering on the brink of collapse, and its international allies have either stayed silent over Kashmir or defected in support of India.”
“Muslim nations have usually supported Pakistan’s claims on Kashmir. But with their own economic and political troubles at home, many have tilted toward India, looking to secure lucrative deals with the ascending economic power. The biggest blow came from the influential United Arab Emirates, which stated that Kashmir was an internal matter for India, withdrawing any support to raise the issue internationally,” the report noted.
It has now emerged that even Pakistan’s patron China stood isolated at the UN Security Council last week as it sought to back its protege. None of the 14 other members backed Beijing’s efforts to generate a statement from what was essentially an informal consultation on the situation in Kashmir. Reports that Britain sided with China or was ambivalent have turned out to be false. Absent any formal outcome, representatives of China and Pakistan (which was not present at the UNSC meting) had made statements misrepresenting the sentiments of the UNSC.
While there is widespread concern about the human rights situation in the Kashmir Valley given the crimp by the Indian government on communication apprehending violence, global opinion appears to take cognizance of India’s difficulty in containing what New Delhi says is a jihadist insurrection sustained from Pakistan. President Trump’s cryptic reference to “tough situation” was seemingly in reference to this dilemma.
Cheers
HIGHLIGHTS
- The President’s comments followed separate phone calls to the two leaders, first with Prime Minister Modi followed by a call to Imran Khan
- Donald Trump asked Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan to moderate his rhetoric and avoid escalating conflict with India over the Kashmir issue
- Close allies like Saudi Arabia and UAE have not rallied behind Pakistan over its Kashmir stand
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Monday asked Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan to moderate his rhetoric and avoid escalating conflict with India over the Kashmir issue, implicitly urging Islamabad to move on from its hand-wringing over New Delhi’s legislative and administrative changes removing special status for the region.
“Spoke to my two good friends, Prime Minister Modi of India, and Prime Minister Khan of Pakistan, regarding Trade, Strategic Partnerships and, most importantly, for India and Pakistan to work towards reducing tensions in Kashmir. A tough situation, but good conversations!” Trump said in a cryptic tweet that coming from someone not known for subtlety was quite nuanced.
The President’s comments, which followed separate phone calls to the two leaders, first with Prime Minister Modi followed by a call to Imran Khan, gave no comfort to Pakistan, which went ballistic over constitutional charges relating to Jammu and Kashmir that India says is its internal matter. If anything, there was admonition for Khan for some of the vituperative language he employed in a series of tweets, which Modi told Trump was not conducive to peace in the region.
Trump spoke by telephone with Khan to discuss “the need to reduce tensions and moderate rhetoric with India over the situation in Jammu and Kashmir,” the White House said in a readout of the Imran Khan call, adding that the US President “reaffirmed the need to avoid escalation of the situation, and urged restraint” on both sides, the White House said.
The telephone diplomacy that essentially asked Pakistan to get back on the bilateral track with India followed a setback for Islamabad in its effort to generate greater US and global mediation and intervention over its claims in Kashmir, despite having committed in greements with India to resolve the matter bilaterally. New Delhi says it will only talk to Pakistan if the country abjures its use of terror groups against India and acts against perpetrators of attacks in India that it coddles.
In a series of rage-filled tweets, Imran Khan on Sunday railed against what he called a “fascist racist Hindu Supremacist Modi Govt” and its “doctrine of hate & genocide” that he suggested endangered Muslims because of the move to effect constitutional chances regarding Jammu and Kashmir.
But in perhaps an unintended smackdown of Islamabad, Saudi Arabia, whose hand feeds Pakistan, showed no support or sympathy for Pakistan as it went ahead with a massive $ 15 billion deal with India’s Reliance Industry. Modi is also scheduled to visit the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain for state visits later this week on his way back from Paris for bilateral exchanges with France. He will return to Biarritz, France, to attend the G-7 summit, where he will be special guest of French President Emmanuel Macron. In fact, it is likely he will meet President Trump informally on the margins.
Such vigorous global engagement, particularly with Gulf and Muslim countries, belies Pakistan’s efforts to project Modi and his governing party as Islamophobic.In fact, in UAE, Modi will receive the Order of Zayed, the country’s highest civil decoration that was conferred on him in April for giving a boost to bilateral relations. The award is named after Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, the UAE’s founding father, and acquires special significance as it was awarded to Modi in the birth centenary of Sheikh Zayed. China’s President Xi Jin Ping shared the award with leaders of Ethiopia and Eritrea last year. In Bahrain, the ruling Al Khalifa royal famly will host a banquet dinner for the Indian Prime Minister, who will also launch the renovation of Shreenathji (Shree Krishna) temple in Manama.
So much as Islamabad attempted to put India in the dock for its legislative and administrative action in Kashmir, the effort has only highlighted Pakistan’s diminishing profile and marginalization in the international area, including the Gulf. “Pakistan’s reaction appeared to be limited to high-level hand-wringing… it increasingly feels like a nation with its back against the wall, with few options to protect its existential interests,” the New York Times said in a report last week, noting that “Its economy is teetering on the brink of collapse, and its international allies have either stayed silent over Kashmir or defected in support of India.”
“Muslim nations have usually supported Pakistan’s claims on Kashmir. But with their own economic and political troubles at home, many have tilted toward India, looking to secure lucrative deals with the ascending economic power. The biggest blow came from the influential United Arab Emirates, which stated that Kashmir was an internal matter for India, withdrawing any support to raise the issue internationally,” the report noted.
It has now emerged that even Pakistan’s patron China stood isolated at the UN Security Council last week as it sought to back its protege. None of the 14 other members backed Beijing’s efforts to generate a statement from what was essentially an informal consultation on the situation in Kashmir. Reports that Britain sided with China or was ambivalent have turned out to be false. Absent any formal outcome, representatives of China and Pakistan (which was not present at the UNSC meting) had made statements misrepresenting the sentiments of the UNSC.
While there is widespread concern about the human rights situation in the Kashmir Valley given the crimp by the Indian government on communication apprehending violence, global opinion appears to take cognizance of India’s difficulty in containing what New Delhi says is a jihadist insurrection sustained from Pakistan. President Trump’s cryptic reference to “tough situation” was seemingly in reference to this dilemma.
Cheers
-
Vikas
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 6828
- Joined: 03 Dec 2005 02:40
- Location: Where DST doesn't bother me
- Contact:
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
^^Good for her.
Mexico saved itself from potential terrorist or someone bringing her whole family to Mexico in next 2-3 years and then demanding Shariah. Potential terrorists don't deserve any sympathy.
I hope Immigration at Indian airports treat Pakistanis exactly the same as the one did in Mexico.
Mexico saved itself from potential terrorist or someone bringing her whole family to Mexico in next 2-3 years and then demanding Shariah. Potential terrorists don't deserve any sympathy.
I hope Immigration at Indian airports treat Pakistanis exactly the same as the one did in Mexico.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Mexican border has been favorite for pakis to enter in US for decades with support network provided by tons of BD and paki folks in federal and state systems like bases, prisons, etc. Combine that with the islamic NGOs that work hand in hand with latino NGOs.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Chinese support to Pak on 370 was nothing to do with helping the taller than the sea friend.
It was all about showing support for a "Muslim issue", to deflect the noise over it's concentration camps in xinjiang.
It was all about showing support for a "Muslim issue", to deflect the noise over it's concentration camps in xinjiang.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
That's precisely what is weird. There was NO noise being made about Xinjiang by Pa_istan, GCC, Iran, Turkey or anybody else. So what was there to deflect?
Especially with both Xinjiang and Hong Kong repression in full swing, you'd think these idiots would have recognized they're in enough of a glass house not to throw stones. The fact that they did regardless shows how spooked they are by what Art 370 Abrogation and J&K bifurcation has signaled to them.
Especially with both Xinjiang and Hong Kong repression in full swing, you'd think these idiots would have recognized they're in enough of a glass house not to throw stones. The fact that they did regardless shows how spooked they are by what Art 370 Abrogation and J&K bifurcation has signaled to them.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
No, as pointed out elsewhere it is to derail any efforts by India to get permanent membership in the UNSC (as a result of expansion of UNSC). Raising FUD around India will weaken our position, and delay the inevitable.nam wrote:Chinese support to Pak on 370 was nothing to do with helping the taller than the sea friend.
It was all about showing support for a "Muslim issue", to deflect the noise over it's concentration camps in xinjiang.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Just a noob pooch
Should TSP be renamed
I mean from Pakistan to East/West Pakistan to Islamic republic of Pakistan to something more appropriate
TUSS(Terrorism fomenting Union of Shit Stans)after they loose POK which is bound to happen
TUSS also represents their much famed Diwali Pataka which has gone TUSS after multiple jhappads courtesy Doval Doctrine
Should TSP be renamed
I mean from Pakistan to East/West Pakistan to Islamic republic of Pakistan to something more appropriate
TUSS(Terrorism fomenting Union of Shit Stans)after they loose POK which is bound to happen
TUSS also represents their much famed Diwali Pataka which has gone TUSS after multiple jhappads courtesy Doval Doctrine
Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Modi Trump Conversation over Imran Khan's Reckless Tweets - Tahir Gora's Commentary
Cheers
Cheers
Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Pakistan to take Kashmir dispute with India to International Court of Justice - Reuters | Dawn.com
The government announced on Tuesday it would take the Kashmir dispute with India to the International Court of Justice, after New Delhi revoked special status for occupied Kashmir earlier this month, to the fury of Islamabad.
“We have decided to take Kashmir case to the International Court of Justice,” Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi told ARY News TV.
“The decision was taken after considering all legal aspects.”
Examine: Kashmir: India’s Afghanistan
Separately, Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Information Firdous Ashiq Awan confirmed to reporters following a cabinet meeting that an in-principle approval had been granted by the cabinet to take the issue to the world court.
She said that the case will be presented with a focus on the violation of human rights and genocide in occupied Kashmir.
A panel of lawyers of international repute would be engaged to pursue the case on behalf of Pakistan at the United Nations' top court, Awan added.
A decision by the court would be an advisory only. However, if both countries agreed before-hand, the ruling would become binding.
On August 5, the government of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi stripped Kashmiris of the special autonomy they had for seven decades through a rushed presidential order. An indefinite curfew was imposed in occupied Kashmir and elected leaders were put under house arrest.
By repealing Article 370 of the constitution, people from the rest of India will now have the right to acquire property in Kashmir and settle there permanently. Kashmiris as well as critics of India’s Hindu nationalist-led government see the move as an attempt to dilute the demographics of Muslim-majority Kashmir with Hindu settlers.
Furthermore, Indian Home Minister Amit Shah, who is also president of the BJP, moved a bill — passed by the Indian parliament — to bifurcate the state into two union territories to be directly ruled by New Delhi.
Pakistan angrily slammed the decision, expelling India's ambassador, suspending bilateral trade, and taking the matter to the United Nations Security Council.
The country observed a 'Black Day' on Thursday to coincide with India's independence day celebrations, in solidarity with the people of occupied Kashmir.
Prime Minister Imran Khan, meanwhile, has pledged to take up the responsibility of raising voice of the Kashmiri people at every forum of the world. “I will be the ambassador of your cause across the globe,” he said last week.
The premier also questioned the international community's silence on occupied Kashmir and warned that should ethnic cleansing of Muslims take place in the region, there would be "severe repercussions" in the Muslim world.
Cheers
The government announced on Tuesday it would take the Kashmir dispute with India to the International Court of Justice, after New Delhi revoked special status for occupied Kashmir earlier this month, to the fury of Islamabad.
“We have decided to take Kashmir case to the International Court of Justice,” Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi told ARY News TV.
“The decision was taken after considering all legal aspects.”
Examine: Kashmir: India’s Afghanistan
Separately, Special Assistant to the Prime Minister on Information Firdous Ashiq Awan confirmed to reporters following a cabinet meeting that an in-principle approval had been granted by the cabinet to take the issue to the world court.
She said that the case will be presented with a focus on the violation of human rights and genocide in occupied Kashmir.
A panel of lawyers of international repute would be engaged to pursue the case on behalf of Pakistan at the United Nations' top court, Awan added.
A decision by the court would be an advisory only. However, if both countries agreed before-hand, the ruling would become binding.
On August 5, the government of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi stripped Kashmiris of the special autonomy they had for seven decades through a rushed presidential order. An indefinite curfew was imposed in occupied Kashmir and elected leaders were put under house arrest.
By repealing Article 370 of the constitution, people from the rest of India will now have the right to acquire property in Kashmir and settle there permanently. Kashmiris as well as critics of India’s Hindu nationalist-led government see the move as an attempt to dilute the demographics of Muslim-majority Kashmir with Hindu settlers.
Furthermore, Indian Home Minister Amit Shah, who is also president of the BJP, moved a bill — passed by the Indian parliament — to bifurcate the state into two union territories to be directly ruled by New Delhi.
Pakistan angrily slammed the decision, expelling India's ambassador, suspending bilateral trade, and taking the matter to the United Nations Security Council.
The country observed a 'Black Day' on Thursday to coincide with India's independence day celebrations, in solidarity with the people of occupied Kashmir.
Prime Minister Imran Khan, meanwhile, has pledged to take up the responsibility of raising voice of the Kashmiri people at every forum of the world. “I will be the ambassador of your cause across the globe,” he said last week.
The premier also questioned the international community's silence on occupied Kashmir and warned that should ethnic cleansing of Muslims take place in the region, there would be "severe repercussions" in the Muslim world.
Cheers
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Yeeeh, more free $$ to India.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Impotent Rage of assorted pakis and anal..ysts - Enjoy...( hope that its not posted before)
https://youtu.be/jMFIXhrdkbA
https://youtu.be/jMFIXhrdkbA
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
twitter
If Imran Khan could have resolve disputes with dialogue, he wouldn’t have married Three times
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
.. and since Terrorism = Pakistan, the T can be replaced by P so the acronym is PUSS.Rsatchi wrote:Just a noob pooch
Should TSP be renamed
I mean from Pakistan to East/West Pakistan to Islamic republic of Pakistan to something more appropriate
TUSS(Terrorism fomenting Union of Shit Stans)after they loose POK which is bound to happen
TUSS also represents their much famed Diwali Pataka which has gone TUSS after multiple jhappads courtesy Doval Doctrine
-M
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
https://www.dawn.com/news/1337974/numbe ... enate-told
Half Hermit aka BB tweeting Bihari loss Ghafoora claims less than handful
Dawn report: can’t disclose exact numbers
The usual ‘slight of Hand’ and fool the Aam Abduls
Half Hermit aka BB tweeting Bihari loss Ghafoora claims less than handful
Dawn report: can’t disclose exact numbers
The usual ‘slight of Hand’ and fool the Aam Abduls
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
From what I understand, ICJ has no jurisdiction re: Atlantique incident.abhijitm wrote:Yeeeh, more free $$ to India.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Dimran is desperately to manage the fallout of Modi's play. Even the opposition that he had nearly bulldozered has gotten hold of a potent issue to beat him with.
ICJ is another ploy to deflect blame.
ICJ is another ploy to deflect blame.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
What a dimwit! What will ICJ say - restore 370? What a fool he has turned out to be. Should have stuck to gilli-danda!
Terroristan - May 1, 2019
X Posted on the P E S W Thread
Cheers
Cheers
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Wasn't Bushra bibi predicting that Imran will lead pakistan to greatness? Now will Imran utter the talaq word three times or act like a porki mulsi and perform qurbani?pankajs wrote:Dimran is desperately to manage the fallout of Modi's play. Even the opposition that he had nearly bulldozered has gotten hold of a potent issue to beat him with.
ICJ is another ploy to deflect blame.
There is only so much pressure that he can take when the charas/hashish supply runs out.
Last edited by Vips on 21 Aug 2019 03:35, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Imran/Qureshi has no other option but have to be seen to be doing something after Modi/Shah/Doval has thrown the gauntlet to the pakistanis and shown them (including paki army) as being able to do nothing about it.mmasand wrote:From what I understand, ICJ has no jurisdiction re: Atlantique incident.abhijitm wrote: Yeeeh, more free $$ to India.
They know if the the kool aid of approaching ICJ is fed to the aam abdul and ayesha they can get some time (it takes at least some weeks for the formalities to be done) to find another excuse or issue and live till then.
Last edited by Vips on 21 Aug 2019 03:37, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Vivek K wrote:What a dimwit! What will ICJ say - restore 370? What a fool he has turned out to be. Should have stuck to gilli-danda!
I think that for Dimran this is a H&D issue and Modi has made him nanga by this move. No other PM "lost" Kashmir, but now he will be accused of losing it by ab abdul pakis. That explains his crazy antics. He feels he has to go for broke now like he did in the World Cup 1992 and won. He very well knows ICJ will do jack but he wants to be seen trying so he can play victim again and blame "international community" for the "injustice".
Standard paki fare if one has been following them for long like we have here.
Terroristan - May 1, 2019
BRF NOMENCLATURE BEING USED IN U N GENERAL ASSEMBLY!
India at UN Pakistan is now 'Terroristan, a land of pure terror'
Cheers
India at UN Pakistan is now 'Terroristan, a land of pure terror'
Cheers
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
^^^ it is the other way round. BRF changed the name of this thread after this UN speach
-
MeshaVishwas
- BRFite
- Posts: 872
- Joined: 16 Feb 2019 17:20
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
I have my doubts on this part.Peregrine wrote:Reports that Britain sided with China or was ambivalent have turned out to be false.
The actions by the UK government on our I day celebrations in London indicates a sinister ploy.
Not to forget the fact that UK also hosts a lot of separatists (Khalisthanis/Pakjabi Cashmeris) and the coverage by BBC in the valley is Barkha Dutt to the power of Barkha Dutt.
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Vivek K wrote:What a dimwit! What will ICJ say - restore 370? What a fool he has turned out to be. Should have stuck to gilli-danda!
KJo Ji:KJo wrote:I think that for Dimran this is a H&D issue and Modi has made him nanga by this move. No other PM "lost" Kashmir, but now he will be accused of losing it by ab abdul pakis. That explains his crazy antics. He feels he has to go for broke now like he did in the World Cup 1992 and won. He very well knows ICJ will do jack but he wants to be seen trying so he can play victim again and blame "international community" for the "injustice".
Standard paki fare if one has been following them for long like we have here.
Sir Ji : The Niazi Family is a Bunch of Losers!
"Uncle" lost East Pakistan! Now "Nephew" Loses KASHMIR - LOOSING IS IN THE BLOOD - INDEED IN THE GENES - OF THE NAZI NIAZI TRIBE!
Cheers
Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Atmavik Ji :Tholly! Me thoughted it was coined on this Forum.Atmavik wrote:^^^ it is the other way round. BRF changed the name of this thread after this UN speach
Cheers
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
At 14:45 onwards the Paki says that if we are not in a position to fight a war with India, then we should have a no war pact with India under the condition that Kashmir be made independent.RajD wrote:Impotent Rage of assorted pakis and anal..ysts - Enjoy...( hope that its not posted before)
https://youtu.be/jMFIXhrdkbA
A porki is imposing condition even when he is powerless. They are born chuityas.
Terroristan - May 1, 2019
Peregrine wrote:Reports that Britain sided with China or was ambivalent have turned out to be false.
MeshaVishwas Ji :MeshaVishwas wrote:I have my doubts on this part.
The actions by the UK government on our I day celebrations in London indicates a sinister ploy.
Not to forget the fact that UK also hosts a lot of separatists (Khalisthanis/Pakjabi Cashmeris) and the coverage by BBC in the valley is Barkha Dutt to the power of Barkha Dutt.
Well, they voted against Terroristan at the UN and Abmivalent means "Both to be Strong!
Cheers
Re: Terroristan - May 1, 2019
The above would be taqiya.Vips wrote: At 14:45 onwards the Paki says that if we are not in a position to fight a war with India, then we should have a no war pact with India
And the above is an extension of taqiya, into the realm (as you pointed out) of c*****a. It takes a Paki to make such an astounding improvement on the original concept.under the condition that Kashmir be made independent.
A porki is imposing condition even when he is powerless. They are born chuityas.