This side show of Jamia protests is only used to suit that narrative, nothing will change their minds. Only electoral defeat can silence them.
Times of India @timesofindia
#CAA2019
ANI quotes Delhi Police: Former Congress MLA Asif Khan has been named as an accused in the FIR, for involvement in #JamiaMilliaIslamia incident that took place on 15 December.
Lo jee ...Times of India @timesofindia
#JustIn | Qasim Usmani, CYSS Jamia University named as one of the main accused in the Jamia riots.
CYSS is the Aam Aadmi Party's student wing.
Now the last one is very interesting .. chalo jeePrashant Kumar @scribe_prashant
BREAKING: Former Congress MLA Asif Khan named by police in the initial FIR in the Jamia Violence case. Functionaries of the CYSS (AAP student Wing), AISA too named.
Akhilesh Mishra @amishra77
Important statement by Amit Shah
1) NO member of BJP will be member of proposed Ram Mandir Trust (trust to be made as per SC direction)
2) Government will not spend any money on construction of Ram Temple. It will be financed by donations from ordinary people.
Liberal Idiot: Why the hell allow Hindus, Sikhs and others to enter India but keep out just the Muslims?
You: Hey idiot, the Act doesn’t allow anyone to enter, but it deals with people who have already entered India. Not just that, only people who entered India before 31st December 2014 are covered under this act. Any Hindu, whom you hate from your bottom of your heart, will NOT become citizen of India if he came to India on are after 1st January 2015. So imagine, sometime in 2015, a Hindu in Pakistan decides to come to India because a strong “Hindu government” is in power, but he will NOT become citizen of India under this act. That should make you happy, idiot.
So forget Hindus from Pakistan, Afghanistan or Bangladesh rushing into India in future due to this Act, many among those who are already here are not getting any benefits. They will continue to be treated as illegal immigrants and can be jailed or deported back to the Islamic countries, where they will be killed or converted, something that should calm down your frayed tempers.
Liberal Idiot: Even Muslims like Ahmediyas and Shias are persecuted in Pakistan, why not allow them?
You: (Refer to the answer above that the Act is not about ‘allowing’ anyone. Now let’s proceed to the second part) Okay, I agree that Ahmediays and Shias are persecuted in Pakistan, but can you show me A SINGLE MEDIA REPORT that talks about Ahmediyas or Shias living in some refugee camps in India? Your own secular media has reported about Pakistani Hindu refugee camps in places like Delhi and Jodhpur other places, but where are the reports on Ahmediyas or Shias coming to India as refugees?
Where are those refugee camps? Where are those people whom you want to give citizenship? Remember idiot, this Act is all about those who are already here by 31st December 2014, not about people currently in Pakistan or elsewhere. Show me a single Indian secular media report that talks about even one refugee camp, or even a report on some Ahmediya or Shia families who came to India as religiously persecuted group and who are thus excluded from this Act.
iMac_too
@iMac_too
Only firm grip on political power will save us from being Lebanon. We are no match to them on street power
iMac_too
@iMac_too
·
सर्वधर्मसमभाव भजन singing Hindus simply don't have any idea what goes behind closed doors in "organised" communities. Especially on Friday & Sunday
Theeran wrote:I'd like the government to look at changing the weekly holidays. Sundays were primarily a Christian thing.
Tuesdays and Saturdays are better. There should be flexibility on when Hindus can attend schools and offices. It will help people go to the temple and take part in the rituals.
The violent protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in Muslim-dominated areas and minority institutions like Jamia Milia Islamia, and Aligarh Muslim University can be interpreted in two ways: one is that they have misunderstood the intent of CAA, and the other is that they do not care much for persecuted minorities in Islamic countries.
But that is not what we are seeing in the violent Muslims protests - sometimes joined by other “secularists” - against CAA.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself was forced to point out this fact in the light of the mainstream media trying to cover up these anti-national acts under the garb of democratic protest and student activism.
The usual suspects, the champions of Nehruvian secularism, tried hard to paint these as secular protests but the cameras told us something else. Many of the protesters mouthed openly Islamist slogans, as if to indicate that they are Jinnah’s children now risen from slumber.
Tens of millions of Hindus are wondering what wrong the government did to pave a faster path to citizenship for those persecuted minorities in the Islamic states of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. They are witnessing the torching of public property because the government is not giving the same rights to those who are part of the system of persecution in these states.
Of course, the protestors would have us believe that they are outraging for the sake of equality. But no one is fooled and the silent majority is witnessing, on their TV screens, some of the communal horrors witnessed during partition days by Muslim separatists.
Many secularists and even some Hindus may still deny this reality, but this would mean we haven’t learnt any lessons from partition, and the Islamist sentiment that drove it.
Writing in 1940, Ambedkar rightly diagnosed the weakness of the Congress in its dealings with the Muslim community. The Congress has failed to realise, he wrote, that “the policy of concession has increased Muslim aggressiveness, and what is worse, Muslims interpret these concessions as a sign of defeatism on the part of the Hindus and the absence of the will to resist.”
The Indian state retained the autonomous regulatory regime for minority schools and colleges while imposing punishing rules on those run by Hindus. It took over religious institutions of Hindus with impunity and used their money for its secular schemes.
On the other hand, it provided for building infrastructure on waqf properties from taxpayer funds. It opened its purses to finance madrassas and minority institutions which are dens of communal education and are today leading the protest against the government’s humanitarian gesture of giving refuge to the minorities persecuted by Islamic states.
The separatist chickens bred, fed, promoted and celebrated by the Indian state are coming home to roost. The violent CAA protests in demographically sensitive areas are testament to India’s failed minority policies. Where broadly inclusive social security schemes and uniform civil code would have benefited all communities equally, including the underprivileged, by targeting the minorities for special benefits minds have been partitioned once again.
It’s time to course correct. There is no nirvana in continuing with separatist policies which favour the same mentality and ideology of Jinnah which divided the nation. It will lead to nothing but another partition. Most of the anger today that is bursting forth from the expected quarters is precisely because the present government has stopped appeasing them.
dentity Of The ‘Sheroes’
Barkha Dutt revealed the identity of the two girls as Ladeeda Farzana and Ayesha Renna. This has been disputed by other media reports which identity Farzana as Ladeeda Sakhaloon.
Renna who hails from Kerala’s Malappuram is a second year MA History student and Sakhaloon is a first year BA Arabic student. She hails from Kerala’s Kannur.
The media coverage also includes soundbytes from the duo who speak about the need to protest and how they have been taught to resist injustice by their parents.
Radical Views Of The ‘Sheroes’
While a section of the media was busy glorifying the girl students, some social media users took it upon themselves to investigate them and their political, religious views. The results were disturbing.
After going through the Facebook profile of Renna, one finds that she had condemned the hanging of terrorist Yakub Memon and called India a “fascist country” for executing the terrorist.
Ayesha Renna lamenting the hanging of Yakub Memon (Screenshot via Twitter) Ayesha Renna lamenting the hanging of Yakub Memon
Incidentally, Renna is married to an individual named Afsal Rahman CA who has supported terrorist Afzal Guru on multiple occasions by positing messages like, “remembering Afzal Guru” and “struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting”.
When one turns to the Facebook profile of Sakhaloon, one finds even more radical views.
In a Facebook post on 14 December Sakhaloon criticised liberals for asking her ilk to refrain from chanting slogans like “Allahu Akbar” and stressed that she has abandoned “secular slogans” long back.
vijayk wrote:CAA Protests Indicate Khilafat 2.0 Is Here - A Lost Cause Backed By The Elite
. So in areas where there is significant peacefool population Khilafat 2.0 is a possibility.pankajs wrote:https://twitter.com/Ram_Guha/status/1206588522724917248https://twitter.com/Ananth_Krishna_/status/1206589461556912128Ramachandra Guha @Ram_Guha
A vow Gandhi asked his compatriots to take in 1919: "With God as witness we Hindus & Muslims declare that we shall behave towards one another as children of the same parents, that we shall have no differences, that the sorrows of each will be the sorrows of the other ..." (1/2)Ananth Krishna Subhalaksmy Chittayal @Ananth_Krishna_
And two years later, Gandhi justified the Moplah Riots in Malabar, and Ambedkar called him out on it.
Anand Rangamathan just quoted Gandi on the Mopla riots.Katare wrote:pankajs wrote:https://twitter.com/Ram_Guha/status/1206588522724917248
https://twitter.com/Ananth_Krishna_/sta ... 1556912128
That’s a lie about Gandhiji, Gandhi justifying violence is kinda oxymoron.
TIMES NOW @TimesNow
.@INCIndia is watching another possible division of India: @ARanganathan72, Author tells Rahul Shivshankar on INDIA UPFRONT. | #PeaceNotPolitics
Don't know if the GOI set a trap or not.Sachin wrote:Citizenship Amendment Act: Govt busts myths
Looks like GoI actually waited for all the various shady characters to come out and reveal their true colours. Now they have given a kind of 10 point list highlighting what CAA would do, and what it would not do. The "seculars" had in the mean while pretty much supported the Islamist cause, and abetted the Islamists to run riot.
The CAA is for those people who came to India from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh before December 31, 2014. They will be granted citizenship and it will not affect the Muslims living in India. The Muslim refugees who came to India from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh will not get Indian citizenship. It has nothing to do with the Muslims living in India," Bukhari said.
Sachin wrote:No stay on CAA.. In a "major blow to secularism", Supreme Court did not stay CAA. Case to be heard only after Jan 22, 2020. GoI can respond with its points by then.
pankajs wrote:Sachin wrote:No stay on CAA.. In a "major blow to secularism", Supreme Court did not stay CAA. Case to be heard only after Jan 22, 2020. GoI can respond with its points by then.
CJI needs to be very careful. The last 2 CJIs, who refused to toe the LiLe lines, where tarnished even when they where more lenient. This one is far more rule bound and has already flobbed them off on 2 critical occasions just into his term.
He wa smeared with sexual assault allegation. Nothing came of it because government stayed neutral.Karthik S wrote:pankajs wrote:CJI needs to be very careful. The last 2 CJIs, who refused to toe the LiLe lines, where tarnished even when they where more lenient. This one is far more rule bound and has already flobbed them off on 2 critical occasions just into his term.
But nothing happened to Gogoi, he is the one who headed historic judgement on RJB. Everyone needs to shed their fear of liles.
Vikas wrote:Do Bhai-wood actors genuinely feel about CAA ?
Sumeet wrote:What is that ?
syam wrote:One small thing I am not getting.
Why some people wore shirts with 'uninstall ola and uber apps' printed on?
Something happened?
CRamS wrote:Guys, regarding Burka Bibi's Ladeeda Farzana and Ayesha Renna (Ladeeda Sakhaloon) whom she glowing profiled in her WP puke and p!ssing on India, my take is she was trying to be a Dexter Filkins wannabe. Recall that clown glowingly and condescendingly profiled his Burka Rana Bibi taking on ModiJi. And wanting to be seen as colonial liberal honcho like Filkins, Burka Bibi picked up 2 Jihadis taking on the mighty 'fascist' ModiJi-led Indian govt.
I would like you guys to go to Burka's twitter line and in her first tweet linking her WP puke, Kiran Mazumdar (who is turning out to be another Lutyen mafia elite) has a cryptic reply saying this is a slur on the nation. To me it was not clear whether she was saying Burka Bibi's puke was a slur on the nation, or she was in consonance with Burka that CAA and police action targeting Jihadi rioters was a slur on the nation.
Return to “Strategic Issues & International Relations Forum”