Rule number 1 in diplomacy is you never bring in points extraneous to the question raised. Such rejoinders may have the effect of derailing the discussion, or worse, for follow-up questioning which can take a life of its own and conclusions which are not in your favour. Best to stick to the specific argument to refuse the question asked, and you have rehearsed.manjgu wrote:while i like Akbaruddins twinkling of eyes and mischievious smile i think he should have hammered the following points 1) how Paki army scuttled UN resolutions by not implementing point a and b of the resolutions due to which it is now defunct. b) how paki army inspired/funded/trained terrorists did ethnic cleansing of hindus from kashmir 3) how pakistan army has ethnically cleansed Pakistan of its minorities 4) how pakistan army gave up part of indian kashmir to chinese 5) how it altered the demographics of POK 5) gave safe havens to terrorists from all over the world including OBL . should have rubbed the bloody bastars into the ground.
Today's Paki papers (all of them) are full of spin. Even the whole Paki cricket team can't spin as much. Gist of discussion:
Pak: I am sick, I can't come in to work
India: You aren't sick, get your ass in to work today
Pak: I am sick, I will prove it with a doctor certificate
(makes an appointment with doctor)
Doctor: Paki, you aren't sick. Go to work, don't waste my time. No doctor certificate. Nothing wrong with you, I am not even going to note it in your report.
(Paki returns from doctor)
Paki: See, I am sick. I even went to the doctor. Doesn't it show that I am sick?