Firstly:
But not all SG are BJP ruled and even there only few like Himanta and Yogi are fearless. Rest are just too busy with being politically correct.
I agree with that. BJP at centre and in many states is chickening out to do things as per law (as I said before Yogi and recently Hemanta, perhaps Bommai are exceptions), forget doing some undue favours to hindus. Because they already accepted the "Hindu Nationalist tag" as a stigma, and don't want to make it even more pronounced by acting as they should. And they deserve to be blamed and chastised for falling into that fallacy.
Secondly, Hindus coming out and showing strength in various situations - I agree that a lot more can be done by Hindu log which we don't due to tolerance, lethargy, indifference, insouciance, cowardice, fear... and the mere fact that there is a Hindu crowd is oftentimes enough to dissuade the peacefuls or others from provocative, illegal and immoral acts. We should get out and protest more, definitely. We should have taken out massive rallys in support of Kashmiri Pandits, Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Afghani Hindus, especially when they are murdered and their temples are targeted, like recent attacks on ISKON in BD. I personally consider Sihks not as a separate religion but as a part of Hinduism itself, all their Gurus without exception were Ram bhakts. So I'd raise up to defend them as well, as long as they are loyal to Bharat Maata (this should be needed to be said, but recent events have shaken my trust in them).
As many have said, when you do such Hindu rallies or protests today, even in BJP ruled states you can be stopped, arrested, in Non-BJP states, also beaten by the police and jailed. Which will inevitably lead to violence embolden other communities. Unless the Hindus escalate to post Godhra level against other communities and police etc do this all across the country, it will lead to incomplete results at best. What PK is suggesting show fo strength and threat of force by Hindu groups taking to streets may work tactically here and there but won't give major or lasting results. Lets say we take on all that, to achieve what? To free temples ? To stop public namaz ? To vacate occupied temple lands ? To stop illegal cattle smuggling? To reclaim temples on which mosques were built? To achieve what the Govt - especially this one - should be doing by default, on which its sometimes defaulting ?
So to sum up, visible, vocal hindu activism in large numbers for hindu causes is needed to establish a different equilibrium or entente with other religious communities. No one is asking the Govt to do that job, they cant. Its up to us.
But solving long standing systemic problems rooted in laws, administrative tangles, state control etc, dealing with civil, criminal law breaking, violence by any community according to law, and continually applying existing provisions to not erode the state's authority is and has to be the Govt's job. And its also the Hindu community's duty to put pressure on ANY Govt to do their job, including this one, and to collectively vote for what we consider as best the placed party to defend us and further our causes.
If Hindu society is being asked to substitute itself for the Govt to do the Govt's job, then whoever is defending the present Govt on these matters and asking for unquestioning support is sitting on so big a contradiction that they can't even see it.
The argument I would make is, if any party, any leader in power starts sincerely defending and delivering on Hindu Dharmic Civilisational Agenda, Hindus will jump up and rally behind and ahead and all around to support, strengthen and secure that party and that leader.
If Hindus as a community have to take all matters into their own hands, fine, we can do that as well. Then don't come around posturing as a party or as a leader of Hindu causes. We don't need you. You are just another political party, just another leader, and Hindus will vote for you or not as they see fit and take what comes.