The corruption/nexuses between elitemen and regulations, senators, president etc is not new. It has been for over 100 years. The ONLY reason for this nexuses has been -- the citizens in US dont have procedures to expel/replace regulators like Fed Chairman, FCC Chairman etc. and there is no JurySys in regulator's tribunals and no JurySys over regulators and their staff.Nandu wrote:New York Fed chairman resigns over conflict of interest with Goldman Sachs
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 04276.html
This highlights the continued corruption at the very top levels of the US financial system.
The information about nexus did not become public as elitemen owned all Economists and also owned all mediamen. The Economists who wrote textbooks never mentioned this Fed-elitemen nexus and important role it plays in enriching elitemen at the cost of commons. And anyone who gave information on Fed-elitemen nexus was silenced by usual "do you have any proof" argument. Thanks to internet, Economists and mediamen dont have control over information spread and so details about unholy nexus of Fed-elitemen is now coming public.
Now US can go to hell - we should not worry about US. For us, US itself is one of the biggest problem. So we should not waste even one second on how problems of Americans can be solved. We should confine our gray matter to solving India's problem only. But lessons to be learned from nexuses between Fed and elitemen are
1. Indian RBI officials and Indian elitemen too have same unholy nexuses. And in India too, the information on this nexus is suppressed as elitemen pay tons of money to intellectuals and mediamen. The intellectuals and mediamen use "do you have proof" argument to suppress the information on RBI-elitemen nexus.
2. Unless we enact procedures by which citizens can replace/expel RBI Chairman, the nexuses between RBI-elitemen will keep growing and keep hurting us. What is worse is that RBI officials also have nexuses with videshi elitemen, a problem not seen in US as American elitemen are much stronger than non-American elitemen. So RBI will keep ruining India big time unless we enact replacement procedures.
==================================
The bank-owners have paid assorted intellectuals to create an illusion that money manufacturing will solve problems i.e. let banks manufacture E100, act like Russian customer, give E100 to someone and then take it back. There are two reasons why above example never ever worked in real worlddurgesh wrote:Got in mail, too many assumptions there but nontheless , interesting,
========
It is August. In a small town on the South Coast of France, holiday season is in full swing, but it is raining so there is not too much business happening. Everyone is heavily in debt.
Luckily, a rich Russian tourist arrives in the foyer of the small local hotel. He asks for a room and puts a Euro100 note on the reception counter, takes a key and goes to inspect the room located up the stairs on the third floor.
The hotel owner takes the banknote in hurry and rushes to his meat supplier to whom he owes E100.
The butcher takes the money and races to his supplier to pay his debt.
The wholesaler rushes to the farmer to pay E100 for pigs he purchased some time ago.
The farmer triumphantly gives the E100 note to a local prostitute who gave him her services on credit.
The prostitute goes quickly to the hotel, as she owed the hotel for her hourly room use to entertain clients.
At that moment, the rich Russian is coming down to reception and informs the hotel owner that the proposed room is unsatisfactory and takes his E100 back and departs.
There was no profit or income. But everyone no longer has any debt and the small town people look optimistically towards their future.
=======================
COULD THIS BE THE SOLUTION TO THE Global Financial Crisis? Or, is there a catch here?
1. Interest : Say Russian had charge E10 as interest. Now he gave E100 and next day, he demands E110. Pray, how the hell would villagers come up with extra E10? IOW, bank-owners manufacture money equal to the principal amount when they give loans and money to pay interest is not manufactured. This INCREASES the debt.
2. Siphoning out of funds : In above example, Russian paid money to hotel owner , who pays to B, who pays to C, who pays to D who pays to A who pays to the Russian. Say one person say B in chain elopes with money. The hotel owner will be royally screwed when Russian comes back to collect E100. He will have to declare bankruptcy and Russian may be able to buy whole hotel for peanuts as no one else has cash.
Thats exactly how bank-owning individuals have been becoming wealthier and wealthier in terms of real assets. They will manufacture money and suddenly stop the manufacturing. This creates credit crisis and default, and enables them to buy real assets for cheap.
The fact that bank-owners have unlimited power to manufacture money means eventually bank-owners will own everything and everyone else will be slave of bank-owners. There is NO escape, unless you change the rules of the game itself.