Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
aditya
BRFite
Posts: 144
Joined: 18 Dec 2005 03:15
Location: Sub-sector Jingopura

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby aditya » 24 May 2009 03:35

Arjun wrote:
Tilak wrote:Now we have guess what ?


Found this in the disclaimer section - REDIFF.COM.PK IS AN AUTONOMOUS ORGANIZATION AND HAS NO ORGANIZATIONAL LINK TO REDIFF.COM OR NASDAQ:REDF, REDIFF.COM.PK IS PART OF NAXAF INTERNATIONAL INC.

Hopefully Rediff plans on taking some legal action on this knockoff..


Hahahaha, legal action against a .PK domain? It's not like you're ever gonna have a situation where someone says "OOOH, I was looking for Rediff's website and my natural instinct was to type rediff.com.PK"!

shaardula
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2590
Joined: 17 Apr 2006 20:02

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby shaardula » 24 May 2009 03:53

what is gul yapping about per capita water going down? how much has their population increased? he expects water to magically increase as their population grows?

Arjun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4264
Joined: 21 Oct 2008 01:52

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Arjun » 24 May 2009 04:52

aditya wrote:Hahahaha, legal action against a .PK domain? It's not like you're ever gonna have a situation where someone says "OOOH, I was looking for Rediff's website and my natural instinct was to type rediff.com.PK"!

Try googling for Rediff and Pakistan together...Say I am looking for articles on rediff regarding Pakistan- which site do you think comes out on top?


Rohit_K
BRFite
Posts: 532
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 22:53
Location: atop Sukkur Barage

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Rohit_K » 24 May 2009 07:59

meanwhile, all is well in Karachi -

Four killed in Karachi strike-related violence
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=22317

KARACHI: Four people were killed and more than 15 vehicles torched from late Friday night till Saturday morning following a shutter-down call given by the Jeay Sindh Qaumi Mahaz (JSQM) against allowing the internally displaced persons (IDPs) to settle in Sindh. The call was supported by the Muttahida Qaumi Movement and nationalist parties.
...
A complete shutter-down strike was observed throughout Karachi on Saturday.
...
Aerial firing, arson and other incidents of violence were reported from many parts of the city, including Aisha Manzil, Shah Faisal Colony, Korangi, Shoe Market, Garden, Gulistan-i-Jauhar, Quaidabad, Gulshan, Clifton Town, Saddar Town, and Gadap Town.
...
Moreover, unidentified men set on fire fruit and vegetable stalls in Shah Faisal Colony.



Strike against IDPs in Sindh: 24 vehicles torched, women burnt alive
http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=145701

KARACHI: A woman was burnt alive, while about two dozens of vehicles were charred as a strike call given by Jeay Sindh Quami Mahaz, and supported by the Muttehida Quami Movement (MQM) and other nationalist parties against arrival of displaced persons of Swat in Sindh accorded a mixed response in Karachi, while a shutter down strike was observed in many cities of the interior Sindh on Saturday.

Unknown miscreant torched about two dozens of vehicles in different parts of Karachi on Friday night and Saturday morning as a number of commercial and business hubs remained closed. Transport was also scanty.
....
Miscreants resorted to aerial firing in various parts of Karachi on Friday night and Saturday morning forcing the shopkeepers to pull their shutters down. Mobs took to streets on Saturday morning in various parts of Karachi and started torching the vehicles as contingents of police continued to patrol only.

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby arun » 24 May 2009 08:11

shiv wrote:


No problem. India is ready to phase out nukes if the rest of the world does he same.


You are indeed correct.

India’s vision on nuclear disarmament, as indeed on most issues, is far more comprehensive than that of Pakistan.

India is for the complete elimination of nuclear weapons, a vision that has been in place for over 20 years:

STATEMENT BY MR. HAMID ALI RAO, PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF INDIA TO THE CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT, GENEVA, AT THE GENERAL DEBATE OF THE FIRST COMMITTEE OF THE 63 RD SESSION OF THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY ON OCTOBER 10, 2008

...………....... India attaches the highest priority to the goal of nuclear disarmament, as enshrined in the Final Document of SSOD I. This year we mark the 20 th Anniversary of the “Action Plan for Ushering in a Nuclear-weapon free and Non-Violent World Order” proposed by Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi, to the Third Special Session on Disarmament of the General Assembly. India‟s commitment to universal, non-discriminatory nuclear disarmament leading to the total elimination of nuclear weapons was reiterated by our Prime Minister on June 9, 2008 as well as by our External Affairs Minister on September 5, 2008. Speaking at the 63 rd session of the General Assembly on 26 th September, Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh reiterated India‟s proposal for a Nuclear Weapons Convention prohibiting the development, production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons and providing for their complete elimination within a specified time frame ……….................

UN

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23589
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby SSridhar » 24 May 2009 08:26


Rohit_K
BRFite
Posts: 532
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 22:53
Location: atop Sukkur Barage

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Rohit_K » 24 May 2009 08:30

French tourist kidnapped in Balochistan

QUETTA, Pakistan (AFP) — Gunmen kidnapped a French tourist in Pakistan on Saturday, snatching him from a group of compatriots, who included women and children, in the southwestern province of Baluchistan, police said.

The 41-year-old man was kidnapped in an area where ethnic Baluch separatist groups and Islamist fighters linked to Al-Qaeda and the Taliban are known to operate, around 80 kilometres (50 miles) from the border with Afghanistan.
...
Six kidnappers armed with Kalashnikovs stopped the two French men, two women and two children travelling by car near Landi, a small town around 200 kilometres east of the Iranian border, said police officer Merrullah.

The six tourists had left the provincial capital Quetta and were heading for Iran, said Karar Shah, another police officer also from Dal Bandin, where the tourists alerted the Pakistani authorities to the abduction.

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby arun » 24 May 2009 08:36

Rohit_K wrote:meanwhile, all is well in Karachi -

Four killed in Karachi strike-related violence
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=22317

KARACHI: Four people were killed and more than 15 vehicles torched from late Friday night till Saturday morning following a shutter-down call given by the Jeay Sindh Qaumi Mahaz (JSQM) against allowing the internally displaced persons (IDPs) to settle in Sindh. The call was supported by the Muttahida Qaumi Movement and nationalist parties. {snip}


Strike against IDPs in Sindh: 24 vehicles torched, women burnt alive
http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=145701

KARACHI: A woman was burnt alive, while about two dozens of vehicles were charred as a strike call given by Jeay Sindh Quami Mahaz, and supported by the Muttehida Quami Movement (MQM) and other nationalist parties against arrival of displaced persons of Swat in Sindh accorded a mixed response in Karachi, while a shutter down strike was observed in many cities of the interior Sindh on Saturday.{Snip}


The disinclination of non Pashtun Pakistani’s to shelter the Pashtun’s in their time of difficulty is not restricted to Sindhi’s and Mohajirs.

The Punjabi’s of Pakistan (aka Pakjabi’s) are also similarly disinclined to be hospitable.

See the post on page 7 of this topic by Tripathi reporting that Punjab was not going to allow the establishment refugee camps for displaced Pashtun’s in Punjab province.

Time for the Pashtun’s of Pakistan to realise that they are unwanted trash in Pakistan and move on to establish their own state.

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby arun » 24 May 2009 09:00

From Lebanon’s Daily Star.

What really comes first for Pakistan's citizens: flag or faith? :

The vast majority of the country's so-called "educated elite" seem to have no qualms about identifying themselves as Muslims first and Pakistanis second. Some feel that their religion is the most important thing to them, and that that's where their first loyalty will always lie. Others admit to having scant regard for religion, but say that Pakistan has come to mean so little to them that their religion supersedes their loyalty to the country.

This willingness to subordinate the state to God, even among the highly educated, lies at the heart of Pakistan's crisis.



The modern Pakistani identity is shaped largely by the negation of an Indian-Hindu identity and the adoption of a global pan-Islamic charter. Economic advancement is taken to mean Westernization or worse, Indianization.


CLICKY

pgbhat
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4071
Joined: 16 Dec 2008 21:47
Location: Hayden's Ferry

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby pgbhat » 24 May 2009 09:21

From the above article ....
Nothing will be solved by searching for the "true Islam" or by quoting the Koran.
:rotfl:
I guess Hamid Gul and his ilk will disagree.

Pakistan's selfhood must be expanded ad maximum and made so capacious that it accommodates its Punjabis, Sindhis, Pathans, and Balochis, and their religions - Sunni, Shiite, Hindu, Christian, Parsi, Qadhianis - until it is possible to call them all equally "Pakistani." That must be the ultimate goal, and step one in the long, winding battle to save Pakistan.
:mrgreen:
If this is the true idea of Pakistan, then Pakistan is India.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35017
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby shiv » 24 May 2009 09:26

arun wrote:CLICKY



This is a super article that deserves a place in the list in the first post of every Paki thread.
OTOH it means well for Pakistan and that irritates me... :twisted:

Amber G.
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6372
Joined: 17 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Amber G. » 24 May 2009 09:29

Tilak wrote:Bharat Verma tears a new one.. this time its Hamid "Bravado" Gul :rotfl: :(( :rotfl: Enjoy !! Jingoes!!

Video :
Quick thanks for posting it. Enjoyed it, but more than that, even if a single paki saw the light, we will have one less potential jehadi.

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23589
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby SSridhar » 24 May 2009 10:01

arun wrote:From Lebanon’s Daily Star.

CLICKY


From the above,
Jinnah's idea of Pakistan - South Asian Muslim nationalism - has been overrun by the dogma of Islamic universalism.

Nobody is clear what Jinnah wanted out of Pakistan. He himself was very confused. At different times, he spoke of different things. His lack of clarity allowed him to be interpreted by different people differently to suit their own conveniences like the seven blind men of Hindoostan. Even granting he opted for 'South Asian Muslim Nationalism', obviously 'Global Pan Islamism' or 'Islamic Universalism' was nothing but the next logical step. The Islamists have to have a reason to expand the frontiers and they cannot be simply satisfied with South Asia. Why should they ?

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23589
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby SSridhar » 24 May 2009 10:24

Complexity - Ejaz Haider

When do you know a country is complex (consider ‘complex’ a four-letter word)? There can be many benchmarks but I have here two for you: (a): when its supposedly best fast bowler is discovered with genital viral warts and has to be axed; and (b) when its president goes away to a foreign land and stays there so long one begins to think he is never coming back.

arun
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10248
Joined: 28 Nov 2002 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby arun » 24 May 2009 11:24

The habit of blaming everyone else but themselves for their difficulties is deeply ingrained in Pakistan.

Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, President PML-Q blames India:

India conspirator-in-chief of Swat battle: Shujaat

Published: May 24, 2009

…………….“The armed forces are fighting a war for the survival of the country, and they must be supported. India is the conspirator-in-chief. Army is fighting an insurgency orchestrated by India. The situation demands national unity and it must be reflected in every one’s words and actions”…………..

The Nation


And for variety Jamaat-e-Islami Secretary General Liaquat Baloch blames the US:

Sunday, May 24, 2009
By Our Correspondent

Operation put off friendly countries: JI

………………… Addressing a media workshop at Mansoorah on Saturday, Baloch said the military operation was part of a US plan to deprive Pakistan of its military assets and making India regional superpower.

He demanded the government stop military operation in the light of the Parliament’s unanimous resolution and resolve the issues through dialogue.

The military operation and disorder in Pakistan suit the enemies, he said, adding that the US having failed in Afghanistan, was now targeting Pakistan.

The US divided Afghanistan on ethnic, regional and racial bases whereas in Pakistan, efforts were being made to create sectarian divide between Shias and Sunnis, and Barelvi and Deobandis. …………..

The News

IndraD
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6940
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 15:38
Location: भारत का निश्चेत गगन

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby IndraD » 24 May 2009 11:49

SSridhar: How correct are news like this.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Paki ... 571347.cms
Is Paki army making any advances or just another psy-op by TOIlet for Bakistan?

harbans
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4883
Joined: 29 Sep 2007 05:01
Location: Dehradun

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby harbans » 24 May 2009 11:50

Just goes to prove Pakis cannot run a stable state without recourse to deciet and lies. Want to trust these same people more than the NK leader to handle Nukes in a mature manner? I don't. The biggest nuclear threat to the world comes not from the Taliban, AQ or NK, it comes from the present Paki setup.

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23589
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby SSridhar » 24 May 2009 11:51

Pakistan set to increase its defence budget by 16%

We know that Pakistan's defence budget numbers are extremely understated and fudged. When it says 16%, it will be not less than three times that number. When Pakistan is reeling under an economic meltdown, from where is it getting the money ? From the generous Americans, of course. Pakistan's belligerence against India, its nuclear weapons and its support for terrorism are a direct result of the irresponsible and reckless, and sometimes even wanton, support from the US. Obama, it appears, will overtake earlier US Presidents in this nefarious activity.

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23589
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby SSridhar » 24 May 2009 12:57

IndraD wrote:http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Pakistan-forces-advance-in-Swat-Army/articleshow/4571347.cms
Is Paki army making any advances or just another psy-op by TOIlet for Bakistan?


IndraD, IMHO, there are three parts to the answer.

The first one is that the inner-most core that makes policy decisions for Pakistan, is not going to abandon or even change its implacability towards India. Their aim is India must be defeated. They have to use all resources on hand, knowing fully well that the task otherwise is absolutely impossible. The jihadis and the Taliban are therefore tools that cannot be forsaken. There could be tactical decisions that appear to be counter to the above but strategically there is no wavering in the aim at least among the core.

Now, to the second part. There are still some credible reporters/analysts within Pakistan. As per them, there have been quite a few engagements between the Taliban and the PA and several Taliban have been killed. The PA's numbers may be overstated but there is no denying the fact that in the latest round which is variously referred to Rah-e-Haq 4 or Rah-e-Rast, the PA has shown some spine. Again, they have only used stand-off weapons, like the artillery, gunships, fighters and tanks rather than infantry. The collateral damage is very heavy and this is also being shown as proof of Pakistani determination !! Most of the Taliban have melted away, as they always do, and will re-appear after some time, as they always do. With no possibility of independent verification, the PA numbers cannot be believed. However, PA is fighting (or appearing to fight) under US pressure and for the dollars that it sorely needs. It is not due to a change in ideology or strategy. The US wants to eliminate as much as possible the 'extremist' Taliban before it can hand over power to moderate Taliban and devise an exit strategy.

This is the third part. So, the inner-most core deliberately sends some troops to fight the Taliban, draws up military plans that look convincing, lets some of its soldiers killed in order to hoodwink the Americans. But, they carefully choose whom to fight. They fight the Uzbeks, Tajiks, Chechens and Arabs in whom the PA and the ISI have no strategic interest/value. They may also fight some local or Afghan Taliban whom they consider renegade or who have no utility value. But, generally, the tendency is to preserve the useful ones. The PA makes pre-attack announcement of its proposed action plan giving date, place and duration of its operation so that the Taliban can evaporate. This is ostensibly being done to minimize civilian deaths. Later, PA claims it killed so many Taliban without ever showing any proof.

Mullah Omar, the Supreme Leader, has been categorical. He doesn't want the Taliban to fight the PA. He asked an old and ill Jalaluddin Haqqani to oversee the cementing of ties between Maulvi Nazeer and Gul Bahadur on the one hand (who are sarkari Taliban from Waziristan) and Baitullah Mehsud on the other hand. Kayani has recently referred to the Taliban as 'strategic assets'. The CJCSC of PA, Tariq Majeed, readily accepted the Taliban offer to fight the IA, after 26/11. It is very clear therefore where matters lay and who are members of the inner-most core.

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23589
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby SSridhar » 24 May 2009 13:09


SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23589
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby SSridhar » 24 May 2009 13:16

Without any comments . . .

DT: Is the police used for influencing the election process?

SJ: The police is not used in an organised way in elections. The governments fulfil their plans by making use of the intelligence agencies and the civil bureaucracy. Normally, the agencies pay money to individual candidates against the ‘anti-government’ candidates. They also appoint their favoured people as polling staff at particular polling stations to rig the elections. Normally, secret polling schemes are formulated with the help of the Election Commission, and the police is not used in this process.

DT: Did you plan to join police force or did it just happen?

SJ: Actually by 1971, I had not determined my destination, when I appeared in the CSS. Before the announcement of the result, I applied to join the army as a commissioned officer. A week prior to the result of the CSS, the army called me and I joined the course on May 12, 1971 and went to Kakool. During my training as a cadet, my CSS result was also declared, and I passed. But, I did not quit the army as a recruit and preferred to complete the course. Although I am the only son of my parents, they left it to me to decide about my career and I decided to join the police force after getting a rank in the army. After the completion of the 8th graduate course, I passed out with the 47th Long Course in November 1971 and was posted in East Pakistan. Only two days after my joining, on November 23, 1971, war started with India. After being detained for two years in Bangladesh, my fellows and I returned to Pakistan in November 1973. In 1975, after quitting the army, I joined the police service through competitive examination as one of the first PSP Common Batch members.

DT: What were your feelings at the time of arrest by India?

SJ: I was the most junior of all the arrested officers, but all of the Pakistan Army soldiers were quite confident that they he would succeed in escaping from there. We were kept at Fatehgarh in Uttar Pardesh. In the leadership of Major Nadir Parvaiz, we dug a 200-meter tunnel to escape from there. However, only five of us, including Major Nadir Parvaiz were successful in fleeing. About 150 personnel of our battalion of 750 were martyred in that war.


IndraD
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6940
Joined: 26 Dec 2008 15:38
Location: भारत का निश्चेत गगन

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby IndraD » 24 May 2009 13:37

Excellent analysis SSridhar, keep up the good job, your posts are absolute delight.

Babui
BRFite
Posts: 161
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Shrewsbury, MA

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Babui » 24 May 2009 15:52

Ahmed Rashid on Pakistan on the Brink (nothing new for BR folks; but Rashid sums everything nicely) http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22730

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23589
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby SSridhar » 24 May 2009 17:32

Musharraf & Shortcut are stealing electricity

The Iesco {Islamabad Electric Supply Co.} avoided challenging or refuting the fact that the houses of Musharraf, Shaukat Aziz and several others had been provided D-2(1) tariff, which is not only the cheapest available tariff, but specific for agricultural purposes only. It tried to hide behind technicalities and routine procedures, but avoided the main issue.

The News had even printed the scanned copies of the Iesco bills in the case of Musharraf and Shaukat Aziz, which clearly showed that they were still enjoying the agricultural tariff. In case of installation of a transformer free of cost at the residence of a retired general, it was the Iesco SDO himself, who admitted the fact. This correspondent also got documents of this particular case, which showed that the Iesco demand note sought from the consumer a deposit of only Rs 10,700, whereas the cost of the transformer was over Rs 500,000.

SSridhar
Forum Moderator
Posts: 23589
Joined: 05 May 2001 11:31
Location: Chennai

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby SSridhar » 24 May 2009 17:42

Kalabagh Dam scrapped

Federal Water and Power Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf has said that Kalabagh Dam project has been scrapped and that he is making this statement with authority.

He was talking to journalists at a rest house here on Saturday after addressing a workers’ gathering.

Kalabagh Dam project has been scrapped and I am making this statement as minister of water and power. The government has rejected this project,’ he said when his attention was drawn to a statement of Deputy Chairman of Planning Commission Sardar Aseff Ahmed Ali that Kalabagh Dam project had not been scrapped. :lol:

The power minister didn’t answer when pressed why Mr Aseff had made such a statement while talking to journalists after the Annual Plan Coordination Committee (APCC) meeting in Islamabad.

anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8279
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby anupmisra » 24 May 2009 17:51

pgbhat wrote:If this is the true idea of Pakistan, then Pakistan is India.


Bite your tongue, Sir! :wink: That's blasphemy in many circles including ours.

anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8279
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby anupmisra » 24 May 2009 18:01

SSridhar wrote:Pakistan set to increase its defence budget by 16%

We know that Pakistan's defence budget numbers are extremely understated and fudged.


The first order of the day for a pooki budget forecaster will be to adjust for annual inflation, going forward. That, as self-admitted, hovers around 30%. So the 16% budget raise is actually a reduction in terms of today's real $$ value. However, your contention of pooki numbers being fudged is correct. Thats why they never reveal their budget details.

Secondly, as the pooki character has repeatedly shown, there will be massive skimming of western aid $$ which will be chanellized into "non-war-related military" uses including salaries and housing of troops. That will reduce the burden of "essential but non-war related military" overheads on the budget.

Thirdly, don't overlook the 10% "fee" charged by DusPercenti. That has to be adjusted accordingly with Uncle Sam looking over the pooki sholders.

anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8279
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby anupmisra » 24 May 2009 18:07

SSridhar wrote:Without any comments . . .
What were your feelings at the time of arrest by India?


Is that what the pookies are calling "shameful surrender" now?

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7532
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Gerard » 24 May 2009 18:12

What were your feelings at the time of arrest by India?


Criminals are arrested. Are they acknowledging their genocidal, criminal nature?

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7532
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Gerard » 24 May 2009 18:53

Krishna talks tough on Pak
After being entrusted with the External Affairs portfolio on Saturday, S M Krishna reiterated New Delhi’s seven-month-old refrain that India was unlikely to restart the peace-process with Pakistan unless the latter takes “credible and determined” actions against the menace of terrorism.

Krishna termed the terror infrastructure in Pakistan as a “stumbling block” for the peace-process between New Delhi and Islamabad to resume.

p_saggu
BRFite
Posts: 1058
Joined: 26 Nov 2004 20:03

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby p_saggu » 24 May 2009 19:06

The most interesting thing that has come out of the Mere Mutabik programme was Hamid Gul NOT using the N-word !!!
A Paki talking to an Indian strategic expert, with the argument clearly going against the Paki, and the paki NOT using the N word??? Is that even possible???

All that Hamid Gul could manage was 'Pakistan is not a little country we are very powerful' line. No Boomblastic boistrous statements. And when Verma-ji directly pointed that fingers at Gul, he was truely melancholy.

Bottom line - Pakistan is NUKE NOOD.

Tilak
BRFite
Posts: 733
Joined: 31 Jul 2005 20:19
Location: Old Lal Masjid @BRFATA (*Renovation*)

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Tilak » 24 May 2009 19:53

p_saggu wrote:The most interesting thing that has come out of the Mere Mutabik programme was Hamid Gul NOT using the N-word !!!
A Paki talking to an Indian strategic expert, with the argument clearly going against the Paki, and the paki NOT using the N word??? Is that even possible???

All that Hamid Gul could manage was 'Pakistan is not a little country we are very powerful' line. No Boomblastic boistrous statements. And when Verma-ji directly pointed that fingers at Gul, he was truely melancholy.

Bottom line - Pakistan is NUKE NOOD.


I am sure you didnt miss the "Bharat is Dar-ul-harb" bit. :((

Arun_S
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2800
Joined: 14 Jun 2000 11:31
Location: KhyberDurra

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Arun_S » 24 May 2009 21:14

Amber G. wrote:
Tilak wrote:Bharat Verma tears a new one.. this time its Hamid "Bravado" Gul :rotfl: :(( :rotfl: Enjoy !! Jingoes!!

Video :

Quick thanks for posting it. Enjoyed it, but more than that, even if a single paki saw the light, we will have one less potential jehadi.


Ha haa look at the title of he description
Gen. (R) Hamid Gul Forme President ISI and Bharat Varma Editor Indian Defence General in fresh episode of Meray Mutabiq and talk with Dr Shahid Masood.

Journal becomes General.

and Hamid Gul is "Forme President ISI" ; Even ISI has a separate President, and Hamid Gull is forme(r) President


anupmisra
BRF Oldie
Posts: 8279
Joined: 12 Nov 2006 04:16
Location: New York

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby anupmisra » 24 May 2009 21:42

Tilak wrote:I am sure you didnt miss the "Bharat is Dar-ul-harb" bit. :((


Or, "pookistan saved India from the Ruskies".

Hey for all you know, the porki mard-e-momeens are the last thin line between civilization and chaos. After that, total annhilation of the civil world as we know it. Thank you, O'porkies.

RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 15996
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby RajeshA » 24 May 2009 22:45

Zardari for Pak-Af-Iran front to ensure regional stability: IANS

Zardari has been away from Pakistan since 5th May, when he had a meeting with Obama & Karzai in Washington. Almost 3 weeks!!!! That too, when TSPA is supposedly fighting a war against the Taliban.

Now on his crawl back from Washington, he has almost reached the Land of the Pure. He is in Tehran already, spreading his regional instability there also. But the good news is he has traveled around the world in less than 80 days onlee!

Can it be that the "Brejident aph Bakistan duj naat like Bakistan"?! :eek:

RajeshA
BRF Oldie
Posts: 15996
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 19:30

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby RajeshA » 24 May 2009 23:31

None Of Your Business, Mr. Qureshi: Pakistan Daily

I hope all Pakistanis have by now heard the latest joke: That our Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi has called on the government of Burma to release opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi from jail.


The only reason I can think of that made Pakistani Foreign Minister Qureshi issue this unusual statement is because that's what Washington wants.

This would also be a clear signal to Beijing that Islamabad is firmly in the US orbit.

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7532
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Gerard » 25 May 2009 00:28

By Pakistani standards, this must rank with Monte Cassino and Iwo Jima.

'Bloody intersection' secured by Pakistani troops

Rohit_K
BRFite
Posts: 532
Joined: 09 Nov 2006 22:53
Location: atop Sukkur Barage

Re: Terrorist Islamic Republic of Pakistan - May 16 2009

Postby Rohit_K » 25 May 2009 02:00

There's another IDP related strike in Karachi today (Monday). I'm banking on the MQM and its sidekick JSQM to continue the festivities they started on Saturday morning.


Return to “Trash Can Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests