narayanan wrote:Pah! Hu are they calling "Terrist", hain?
Inspired by the Great RAPE Mullah Ejaz Haider, I suddenly achieved great clarity of thought and have a few things to say about "terrorism" - especially of the type blamed on Bakistan.
This "terrist" is a yindoo-yehudi-yamrican invention to take away the nu-clear bum from the light of ummah -- Bakistan. Also western nation becauje of their immorality do not understand Bakistanis. Much of the allegation of terrism is because Bakistanis always struggle for justice.
I think Bakistan should take a principled stand in calling a spade a spade. Let us examine three classes of violence
1. More bious killing less bious - it ij clearly an "internal matter" of the bious. Bakistanis had internal matters in Bangladesh, NWFP, Balwaristan, Balochistan and now Swat. That is clearly not terrorism. For example, death sentences are handed out in Yamreeka. Do we call that terrorijm ?
2. Peelevers killing Yehudis and Yindoos - it is not terrorism. It is clearly non state actors doing phreedom phyting.
3. Peelevers killing Westerners who gave us money - it is not terrorism, it is struggling for justice and H&D. The western nations are all smug about giving aid to Bakistan. But on the other hand, Bakistan should take a principled stand that because Bakistan is light of ummah, it ij our birthright to demand more money from the western nations. This does not mean that Bakistanis give up their right to struggle against injustice. For example, it is understandable if some of our population thinks that western nations give us less and then get angry and explode a bum or two. On the other hand, some of us might think they gave us too much and insulted our H&D by aid, and so explode a few bums against injustice. In this context, western nations might ask "why give money at all", the reason is because the alternative is worse - if western nations dont give us money, all of us will explode bums.