Postby Philip » 04 Apr 2012 08:35
Surya,I have known of upright officers in the past,who in the real world (today) would've never signed on the dotted line as Gen.VKS did,never did,one sacrificing even his promotion prospects which would've led him to the top of the heap.I'm not here accusing Gen.VKS on what he did,he did it in good faith,blinked,but took out no "insurance".He also similarly gave his boss,(St.) Anthony only a verbal complaint about the 14 cr. bribe offer! Why didn't he also put it in writing when such an outrageous offer was made to him? AKA would've been forced to take immediate action.There is perhaps something more in the conversation between the two that we are unaware of.Perhaps Gen.VKS also wanted to see the reaction from "The Saint" before taking further course of action,whether "The Saint" was already in the know of matters!
Coming to the media features on the whole affair. While the cover titles IT-"Gen.Singh's War on India",Outlook-"Disgrace" (condemning both Gen.VKS and AKA),the Week-"Gen.VKS,shooting from the hip",are sensational,they need to sell copies after all,one must read the fine print inside the articles to get a broader picture.Let me give for the benefit of those abroad without access to the issues,a better picture of the debate and accusations.
IT (Sandeep U):
1.Condemns Gen.Singh for plotting his act of "revenge" after the Feb.10th SC verdict.
2.Says he revealed the existence of the IFF (top secret unit operating under RAW with Tibetan guerillas) which the GOI had earlier denied,that too when the Chinese head honcho was in India.
3.Deny the prospects of his successors who are against him,by instigating reports/actions against them but the real target is (St.) Anthony!
4."The Saint",says IT, is unconvincing for his inaction when Gen.VKS informed him about the alleged bribe offer.Though AKA claims that the general didn't want to pursue the matter,it was "his to take".
BJP leader Jaswant Singh is livid that the general didn't arrest TS on the spot,He says that a precedent was made with the case of Lt.Gen.Avadesh Prakash in the Sukna land scam (retd in 2010,dismissed in 2011,stripped of rank,etc.).
5.The chief's secret letter to the PM.Implication that "corruption and inactivity" had eaten into defence preparedness.Target AKA.
6."Astonishing virtual revolt",indicates that the "govt. has proved itself totally inept at handling a major crisis....The weakness of the govt. has eroded its moral authority;it is impotent before an army chief on the rampage."
7.Separate box report (MG Radhakrishnan) on "Marked Anthony".His inability to take tough decisions harks back to his days as CM.tenure had major corruption scandals,sex scandals,communal carnage.AKA did nothing,failed to take tough action against the accused.When he was Civil Supplies minister,he resigned when his min. was involved in the sugar import scam,evidence ofhim being a "quitter".He should've booked the crooks instead of leaving in a huff .
Says "the Saint's" ability to "float" above the chaos and corruption in his ministry may have earned him a reputation for personal integrity,but he lacked the "gravitas to transform the ministry".The label of inactivity during his 6 yr. tenure will be his legacy.
Lt.Gen Tejinder Singh:Chief recommended me to the NSA.says he was on a "good wicket" with the chief.Did not offer a bribe,wasn't a rep for the companies mentioned,just had tea with him-a 15 min meeting,"I'm not his bum chum"!
Maj-Gen Surjit Singh retd.: (fine words about the gen.who has got into an unfortunate situation.Says his age matter should've been settled long ago,but he shouldn't have made it an issue,"no matter who you are").Complete breakdown between services and govt. "Civilian control shouldn't become civilian dictatorship". Unfair to sack him as was done with Adm.Bhagwat.Recommends sending him on leave for 30 days.De-stress the situ.Both govt. and Gen.VKS "must no more than ever exercise equanimity and act sagaciously".
Other mags content later on.