vina wrote:anmol wrote:ChromeOS WILL take off. Just add the 600,000 Android app in existing ChromeOS.. and they have native apps. Many of the apps on tablets & phones are so good that it makes sense to use those on SmartTV, Desktop and Notebooks.
Chrome OS aint going anywhere. It is a dead duck. And no, adding 6000000000000 Android apps into it aint going to save it either. Linux has more than the 60000000000 apps anyway and look where linux desktop went.
I dont have a horse in the race, but I am curious to know why you think that? Is it because you think Windows/Mac is too entrenched in the Laptop space?
Well, if you see, iPad, tablets and mobile devices have put a dent in the laptop market. Various phones and tables started with an app ecosystem of zero and are now a credible competitor to PCs and Laptops (there was a survey that showed that most young people's first computers are their mobile phones now!). The reason is not because that they do everything a laptop can, but
because they can do most things that users want while offering other benefits. So if you think of the PC revolution, tablets and phones are to PCs what PCs were to Mainframes!
Is it because you think that browser is a bad way to deliver apps and services? The usual stick people use to beat ChromeOS is that it cannot run photoshop. I have three opinions about that. (a) It doesnt run photoshop now. Might in the future, given Mozilla's efforts like OdinMonkey and asm.js. In any case, I have used pixlr and it is a credible replacement for gimp! (b) It is akin to arguing that instagram is no substitute for photoshop. It is true. But how many people use instagram and how many use DLSRs and photoshop hainji? The ratio should be 10:1 if not worse. (c) iPads and mobile phones dont run photoshop either, and they are punching laptop sales in the face.
The same Chromebook vs Conventional OS debate was played out in "Cloud vs Native app" debate and "Tablets vs Laptop" debate. The question to ask is "Does Chromebook solve a set of problems well enough while offering other benefits". I think so due to two reasons: Increasingly when enterprise develops new (not legacy) apps, they will develop for the browser. It is a reliable way to ensure that it will run on all platforms. You can forecast this with a reasonable confidence, given the amount of investment in cloud infrastructure, tools and development effort. They will move their apps and services to the cloud for interoperability. Secondly, administering these machines will become increasingly easy.
For a set of enterprise/centrally administered use case. I believe that something like Chromebooks will win out. The reason are not because (a) Chromebooks are cheap (b) Chromebooks cannot run native apps (c) Other laptops cannot run browser-based apps. It is because they are easy to deploy and administer. I expect other vendors (like M$, FruitCo) to offer solutions like Chromebooks (lockdown on locally installed apps and a browser to access cloud apps only). Then the competition will become real interesting.
You might find this interesting:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerkay/20 ... aking-off/