Indian Space Programme Discussion
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Congrats ISRO
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Congrats to ISRO. You make us proud.
Any news on the relight event for the 4th stage?
Any news on the relight event for the 4th stage?
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
PSLV weighs 321 tons. I suspect the fuel alone weighs 300 tons.
300 tons of fuel = 0.3 kilotons of explosive = 1 Nasr
300 tons of fuel = 0.3 kilotons of explosive = 1 Nasr
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
I missed the Laanch. I have been watching all the ISRO's laanches since SLV-3 in August 1979. I really really want to be at SHAR on 2019, hopefully seeing the RLV coming back.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
if you compare the size of launch pad and PSLV, looks like launch pad will host bigger cousins of PSLV. Hope to see them in next 20 - 30 years
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
More like 2 Nasr or 0.6 kilotons of TNT or higher - since the propellents have higher energy density than TNT (IMVHO in order of 2x).shiv wrote:PSLV weighs 321 tons. I suspect the fuel alone weighs 300 tons.
300 tons of fuel = 0.3 kilotons of explosive = 1 Nasr
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
good description of the launch and payload from here
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2016/06 ... atellites/
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2016/06 ... atellites/
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 6112
- Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
ISRO's launch campaign has certainly speeded up. Great stuff. GSLV Mk II coming up later in the year. Scramjet test next month.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
From the link:Jayram wrote:good description of the launch and payload from here
https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2016/06 ... atellites/
The primary payload for Wednesday’s launch was Cartosat-2C, an Earth observation satellite which will provide India’s military with high-resolution optical imagery. It is the fifth spacecraft in the Cartosat series and the third dedicated to military reconnaissance.
2016-06-22-030813Cartosat-2C follows the Cartosat-2A and 2B military satellites launched in 2008 and 2010 respectively. These were based on 2007’s Cartosat-2 civilian imaging satellite, itself a successor to 2005’s Cartosat-1.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 6112
- Joined: 16 Oct 2005 05:51
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Apparently resolution sufficient to identify individuals. Plus video.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Excellent news. I will rub it in in a few groups where they worship RR and such.shiv wrote:naarmal, naarmal, naarmal. Like makhmal
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2178
- Joined: 03 Jan 2010 23:26
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
First report(?) of the successful on-off switching manoeuvre with the PSLV's 4th stage engine:
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/scienc ... epage=true
PSLV C-34, besides putting 20 satellites in orbit, performed two tricky experiments of the same nature. Fifty minutes after the satellites were injected into the orbit from the fourth stage of the vehicle, the rocket's engine was re-ignited for five seconds. Then it was shut down for 50 minutes and re-ignited for another five seconds, according to K. Sivan, Director, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Thiruvananthapuram
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/scienc ... epage=true
PSLV C-34, besides putting 20 satellites in orbit, performed two tricky experiments of the same nature. Fifty minutes after the satellites were injected into the orbit from the fourth stage of the vehicle, the rocket's engine was re-ignited for five seconds. Then it was shut down for 50 minutes and re-ignited for another five seconds, according to K. Sivan, Director, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Thiruvananthapuram
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Any pix of how the 22 sats were pkged together in payload section? Are there some spring loaded devices or gas thrusters to release them one by one?
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
http://www.isro.gov.in/sites/default/fi ... lv_c34.pdf
Third page of the PDF has schematic.
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/scienc ... 758848.ece
Here too the same one
Third page of the PDF has schematic.
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/scienc ... 758848.ece
Here too the same one
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
ISRO uses the spring one I believe, but there are other methods too. Most different kind of mechanism exists in spaceshuttle, which uses the flywheel to rotate the satellite and deploy them into the orbit
Still remembering the iconic video of INSAT 1B's insertion from shuttle
Still remembering the iconic video of INSAT 1B's insertion from shuttle
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
What I haven't understood is related to what Singha asked. Each time a satellite is ejected there must surely be a reaction that nudges the rest of the mass of course no? Or does nit not matter much?Bheeshma wrote:http://www.isro.gov.in/sites/default/fi ... lv_c34.pdf
Third page of the PDF has schematic.
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/scienc ... 758848.ece
Here too the same one
Unless of course the sat carrier is rotating and release of a door causes the sat to float out
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Read page 84 in this book, it has the photo of INSAT 1B drifting away too
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Ppg ... SAT&f=true
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Ppg ... SAT&f=true
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Yes there would be a reaction to every action, final stage thrusters will be used to course correct. If that is not possible, there would be small thrusters which would do the jobshiv wrote:What I haven't understood is related to what Singha asked. Each time a satellite is ejected there must surely be a reaction that nudges the rest of the mass of course no? Or does nit not matter much?Bheeshma wrote:http://www.isro.gov.in/sites/default/fi ... lv_c34.pdf
Third page of the PDF has schematic.
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/scienc ... 758848.ece
Here too the same one
Unless of course the sat carrier is rotating and release of a door causes the sat to float out
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
video link for INSAT 1B insertion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nx0lHe6JrdE
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Spring loaded. All falling bodies are weightless only ...Singha wrote:Any pix of how the 22 sats were pkged together in payload section? Are there some spring loaded devices or gas thrusters to release them one by one?
Gas thrusters are heavy., generally liquified nitrogen is used as gas thrusters. However it is bulky.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
"Kicked out"/"popped out" is a colloquial word I would use - it is a spring loaded mechanism., note that all falling bodies are weightless. To prove that, put a heavy body over a lighter body with a spring in between, such that the spring is compressed and your jugaad is still together - drop it down a pipe - and ask the question why the three bodies (incl. spring) arrive separated?shiv wrote: What I haven't understood is related to what Singha asked. Each time a satellite is ejected there must surely be a reaction that nudges the rest of the mass of course no? Or does nit not matter much?
Unless of course the sat carrier is rotating and release of a door causes the sat to float out
The PE in the spring kicks out the sats., note that in a free fall, the mass is zero and hence 'mv = MV' equation does not apply. That is there is no reaction.
Of course the adapter has to reorient itself - for several reasons - like putting the sats in different trajectories, avoiding collision etc.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
[/quote]disha wrote:
The PE in the spring kicks out the sats., note that in a free fall, the mass is zero and hence 'mv = MV' equation does not apply. That is there is no reaction.
maybe i did not pay much attention in school .. but i would think mass is not zero , the weight is zero ( probably ) hence weightless
and i think mv = MV also applies , otherwise rockets wont propel in space !
Re: Orbit Injection
If it can help:
From PSLV C7 launch brochure.
Shows the maneuvours of Launch Adapter for launching 3 sats
( Mods .. Please remove duplicate post )
From PSLV C7 launch brochure.
Shows the maneuvours of Launch Adapter for launching 3 sats
( Mods .. Please remove duplicate post )
Last edited by SSSalvi on 23 Jun 2016 02:15, edited 2 times in total.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 103
- Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
For for the space experts in here, what is ISRO trying to do here? 50 mnts shut down & re-ignite? Are they trying to place the rocket in a orbit and raise it, instead of directly flying? Using gravity & pulse rocket to reach the height?Varoon Shekhar wrote:First report(?) of the successful on-off switching manoeuvre with the PSLV's 4th stage engine:
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/scienc ... epage=true
PSLV C-34, besides putting 20 satellites in orbit, performed two tricky experiments of the same nature. Fifty minutes after the satellites were injected into the orbit from the fourth stage of the vehicle, the rocket's engine was re-ignited for five seconds. Then it was shut down for 50 minutes and re-ignited for another five seconds, according to K. Sivan, Director, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Thiruvananthapuram
It is fasinating how dual pluse on Barak 7 is considered cutting edge, where as in here we have multi-pulse motors on old PSLV workhorse...
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
^^^
After one satellite is launched in a particular orbit the launcher will be re-ignited to menuvour to a new orbit. When that orbit is achieved shau the engine and release 2nd sat. In this way satellites can be launched in multiple orbits.
A few facts :
1. There is a misconception ( BRFites excluded ) that the sat is 'thrown' in the required orbit.
No.. the launcher carrying satellite is brought to the required orbit and engine is shut off .. it is now in the orbit around body moving under gravity of main body just like the satellite would be .. and theeeeen the satellite is released and launcher is moved out of its collision path.
2. Then the Launcher can be re-ignited and turned to a new orbit which can be totally different. After it has attained the new orbit again the procedure is repeated. Here is a graphic for PSLV C34 launch of 20 satellites:
As of now PSLV is launching satellites in the very similar orbit as one can see a flock of sats together even after about 12 hours after sats are released.
In fact under normal launch the last PSLV component also would be with the sat bunch after 12 hours but in this particular launch the launcher is far away and in a different orbit ( slightly lower .. about 460 kms as compared to about 510 kms as shown in the figure here.
After one satellite is launched in a particular orbit the launcher will be re-ignited to menuvour to a new orbit. When that orbit is achieved shau the engine and release 2nd sat. In this way satellites can be launched in multiple orbits.
A few facts :
1. There is a misconception ( BRFites excluded ) that the sat is 'thrown' in the required orbit.
No.. the launcher carrying satellite is brought to the required orbit and engine is shut off .. it is now in the orbit around body moving under gravity of main body just like the satellite would be .. and theeeeen the satellite is released and launcher is moved out of its collision path.
2. Then the Launcher can be re-ignited and turned to a new orbit which can be totally different. After it has attained the new orbit again the procedure is repeated. Here is a graphic for PSLV C34 launch of 20 satellites:
As of now PSLV is launching satellites in the very similar orbit as one can see a flock of sats together even after about 12 hours after sats are released.
In fact under normal launch the last PSLV component also would be with the sat bunch after 12 hours but in this particular launch the launcher is far away and in a different orbit ( slightly lower .. about 460 kms as compared to about 510 kms as shown in the figure here.
Last edited by SSSalvi on 23 Jun 2016 04:38, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
You are correct - Or maybe I paid too much attention in school and regurgitating after decades with addled brains ...chilarai wrote:maybe i did not pay much attention in school .. but i would think mass is not zero , the weight is zero ( probably ) hence weightlessdisha wrote:
The PE in the spring kicks out the sats., note that in a free fall, the mass is zero and hence 'mv = MV' equation does not apply. That is there is no reaction.
and i think mv = MV also applies , otherwise rockets wont propel in space !
So yes., mass is not zero. The weight is zero.
The relative velocity is also zero. Both are falling at the same velocity.
The Potential Energy (PE) in the spring nudges the sat from the adapter with just enough relative velocity that it's effect on the launch adapter is not major.
SSSalvi'ji - thanks for linking PSLV-C7 - I remembered that one for my post. All the separations are at different orientation at the same orbit. With such a maneuver - I think different inclinations are achieved. With PSLV-C34., the inclination is same (all are in SSO) and that might be the launch requirements for EO satellites (like a tag team of satellites called FLOCK from US launched with PLSV-C34).
Of course., some launch parameters require different orbits (and different inclinations and permutations thereof), at that stage, the last stage is fired multiple times.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
That could be because of stage reorientation and firing so that the stage orbit is degraded (and then it can burn up) and also experiment the start-stop-start-stop sequence of the engines?SSSalvi wrote: In fact under normal launch the last PSLV component also would be with the sat bunch after 12 hours but in this particular launch the launcher is far away and in a different orbit ( slightly lower .. about 460 kms as compared to about 510 kms as shown in the figure here.
PS: I have noticed this unique to ISRO., the launch is 'consolidated' that is in this case they took on a new experiment which can improve their engine designs. Not sure about NASA and we do not have information about other space agencies doing something similar.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
What is missing from the mainstream narration is the emotions of the students and faculty making those small satellites. Imagine you are part of a team building a small craft weighing 1.5kg and it is placed into orbit.
Stories about them, in addition to ISRO stories remain untold or on page 16 of newspapers.
Stories about them, in addition to ISRO stories remain untold or on page 16 of newspapers.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Yes, ejecting a satellite will require a force (proportional to the satellite mass) to push it out of the sat carrier. This force pushing out the satellite will create a reaction force (actually a moment i.e. a force that does not pass through the c.g. of the body) on the sat carrier and hence causes it to rotate (speed of rotation depends on the magnitude of the reaction force and where it is applied relative to the c.g.). From the Hindu link above, here is a quote by Dr. Sivan about the need to re-orient vehicle after satellite ejection.shiv wrote:What I haven't understood is related to what Singha asked. Each time a satellite is ejected there must surely be a reaction that nudges the rest of the mass of course no? Or does nit not matter much?Bheeshma wrote:http://www.isro.gov.in/sites/default/fi ... lv_c34.pdf
Third page of the PDF has schematic.
http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/scienc ... 758848.ece
Here too the same one
He does not say how the vehicle is re-oriented, but I assume it is via gas thrusters or some sort.Dr. Sivan said: “After each satellite is injected into orbit, the vehicle will be re-oriented if required and the next satellite will be put into orbit with a varying velocity so that the distance between the satellites grows monotonically. We will do this to ensure that there is no collision of satellites. Then, after a huge gap of 3,000 seconds, PS-4 [the fourth stage] will be re-ignited for five seconds. Then, it will be switched off for another 3,000 seconds. It will be re-ignited for another five seconds.”
I believe a satellite rotated during release is to give it stability and not to release it.Unless of course the sat carrier is rotating and release of a door causes the sat to float out
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Very true .. but who will? That too in this Military Issues & History ForumSwamyG wrote:What is missing from the mainstream narration is the emotions of the students and faculty making those small satellites. Imagine you are part of a team building a small craft weighing 1.5kg and it is placed into orbit.
Stories about them, in addition to ISRO stories remain untold or on page 16 of newspapers.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
What I haven't understood is the mechanism by which a distance is created between the payload and the launcher. One person said a spring is used and another said thrusters. According to that fellow whose head was affected by falling apple, I expect that the two masses would not float apart unless a force is applied to oneSSSalvi wrote:
No.. the launcher carrying satellite is brought to the required orbit and engine is shut off .. it is now in the orbit around body moving under gravity of main body just like the satellite would be .. and theeeeen the satellite is released and launcher is moved out of its collision path.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
^^^I hope you were not referring to me with 'thrusters'. I dont know the mechanism by which the two are pushed apart. I do know that when the satellite is pushed out, the reaction pushes the carrier as well, and both move (one more than the other).
Last edited by SriKumar on 23 Jun 2016 05:29, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
shiv, the confusion comes from two things, IMHO. One is the new experiment to switch on & off the PS4 engine itself for getting different orbits in the same single launch. Let us leave it aside as that is for some future launch. In the present case, PS4 engine is cutoff after attaining the required orbital parameters as determined by onboard computer. It is *NOT* reignited for launching each one of these 20 satellites. The satellites are released into orbit by just reorienting the fourth stage before releasing each satellite. The PS4 engine provides pitch & yaw control through engine gimbal, but the engine is cutoff now. It uses Reaction Control System (RCS) which is a set of small thrusters is used to provide roll control. The spacecraft is reoriented through RCS for every release in a different direction. The actual release mechanism is through spring loading or clamps.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Thanks.That clears things up a bit but has suddenly created new questions. CARTOSAT was 700 plus kg an probably constituted nearly half the mass. Ejecting that would accelerate both launcher and satellite in opposite directions. So that means that with every satellite release there must be a small change of orbit. Maybe it is not significant, but it makes me wonder how much "wiggle room" any body orbiting the earth gets - I guess that a few dozen meters "up" or "down" may not make much of a short term difference to the orbit? Of course it may not be "up" and "down" it may be a release off to one side without change in orbit altitude. Just intriguing to me.SSridhar wrote: The actual release mechanism is through spring loading.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
shiv, two points. I do not know how much a spring loaded release would decelerate the fourth stage. It certainly would add a delta to the velocity of the released object and that is required to avoid collision. Secondly, how accurate can be ranging that a small difference can be measured?
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
You guys need to watch DD sometimes ! Stage separation process explained yesterday in the telecast (in English & Hindi !). Jump to 36:40 or thereabouts
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
Aha - you have just exposed a hole in one of my assumptions. If the launcher and satellite combine is oriented so that the launcher is in "front" - i.e. the direction of movement and the satellite is at the "back" then a light spring will gently "slow down" the satellite from 7.4 km/sec to maybe 7.399 km/sec and speed up the launcher a bit so they separate safely. My assumption was that the satellite will be released orthogonal to the direction of orbit. It can, as you point out, also be in the same direction as the orbit with no "up/down" or "side to side" displacement.SSridhar wrote:shiv, two points. I do not know how much a spring loaded release would decelerate the fourth stage. It certainly would add a delta to the velocity of the released object and that is required to avoid collision. Secondly, how accurate can be ranging that a small difference can be measured?
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
See this post in the previous page with a diagram. You can see the satellite being released in the same direction.shiv wrote:My assumption was that the satellite will be released orthogonal to the direction of orbit. It can, as you point out, also be in the same direction as the orbit with no "up/down" or "side to side" displacement.
As you can see in the fairing photo released by ISRO (and the video posted above), the CartoSat is on top, below which there is a ring on which are mounted various satellites within another shroud. CartoSat is ejected axially.
Re: Indian Space Programme Discussion
That's correct. The spring will basically take out a small momentum from the launcher and give it to the separating satellite. Since mass it small for the satellite it will have bigger delta V while the launcher will have lesser delta V in opposite direction owing to its larger mass. But (mass*deltaV) for both will be same but with opposite sign. The momentum of the system is still conserved. Thrusters will be slightly different since they add/generate some momentum through chemical/pressure energy. (So no conservation of momentum. Of coarse in real life there is not a simple force on the launcher but a moment due to off-centre force. But I am ignoring this.)shiv wrote:Aha - you have just exposed a hole in one of my assumptions. If the launcher and satellite combine is oriented so that the launcher is in "front" - i.e. the direction of movement and the satellite is at the "back" then a light spring will gently "slow down" the satellite from 7.4 km/sec to maybe 7.399 km/sec and speed up the launcher a bit so they separate safely. My assumption was that the satellite will be released orthogonal to the direction of orbit. It can, as you point out, also be in the same direction as the orbit with no "up/down" or "side to side" displacement.SSridhar wrote:shiv, two points. I do not know how much a spring loaded release would decelerate the fourth stage. It certainly would add a delta to the velocity of the released object and that is required to avoid collision. Secondly, how accurate can be ranging that a small difference can be measured?