LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
^^^
Second line coming into play according to AK.
Second line coming into play according to AK.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
It has been in play from SP2 onwards.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Tejas successfully test-fires BVR missile From Rediff
Tejas, the Light Combat Aircraft, today successfully demonstrated an Air-to-Air Beyond Visual Range missile firing capability by releasing Derby Air-to-Air BVR missile in RADAR guided mode.
The missile launch was performed in Lock ON after Launch mode for a BVR target in the look down mode and the target was destroyed.
The objective of the test was to assess the Derby integration with aircraft systems on-board Tejas including the aircraft avionics, fire-control radar, launchers and Missile Weapon Delivery System and to verify its performance.
The test was conducted on a Manoeuvrable Aerial Target at the Interim Test Range (ITR), Chandipur. The sensors at ITR also tracked the target and missile.
A safe separation was followed by missile guidance towards RADAR acquired target.The flawless launch was demonstrated with all on-board systems performing satisfactorily and the missile scored a direct hit on the target with complete destruction of it.
The test firing achieved all its planned objectives.
The Derby firing is a major step towards clearing BVR capabilities on LCA aircraft for FOC. -- ANI
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Why not Astra? Even MK-I has higher or similar range as Derby.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: 01 Jan 2010 21:41
- Location: Engaging Communists, Uber-Socialists, Maoists, and other pro-poverty groups in fruitful dialog.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Could you please elaborate if possible? As in, there are probably 4 (perhaps 6?) jigs at what we shall call final assembly shed 1, and let's say two more at shed 2 (or Kiran hangar). At seven months integration time (plus?) with 45 days final equipping, they will be able to churn out 12 every 18 months if all suppliers have had enough time to ramp up supplies. Is this more or less the situation, if not what are we missing?Indranil wrote:It has been in play from SP2 onwards.
To add, SP5 is from line 2 while SP 6-9 would be from the first line. So would 10,11 be from line 2 and 12-15 from line 1 and so on? Basically we should four more in 3 months if the earlier pace holds. If they are taking a month more for each, then the schedule delay cascades...
Please help me understand this set up.
Last edited by Marten on 12 May 2017 22:15, edited 1 time in total.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Will happen later.Bheeshma wrote:Why not Astra? Even MK-I has higher or similar range as Derby.
This is to qualify Derby with 2032 radar.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Astra was conceived for LCA IIRC, so its a given. All in good time. But currently its not a mature missile and LCA cannot wait anymore.Bheeshma wrote:Why not Astra? Even MK-I has higher or similar range as Derby.
We are going so slow on all our projects.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Good to see Tejas progressing so well towards FOC. Is there anything else pending for FOC other than missile and gun trials?
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: 01 Jan 2010 21:41
- Location: Engaging Communists, Uber-Socialists, Maoists, and other pro-poverty groups in fruitful dialog.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Qualification of the refuelling probe in all regimes?
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 866
- Joined: 17 Oct 2016 14:18
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Does that mean FOC will get cleared before actual mid air refueling test happens ?Marten wrote:Qualification of the refuelling probe in all regimes?
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Depends on what the IAF and ADA agree on I'd guess.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: 01 Jan 2010 21:41
- Location: Engaging Communists, Uber-Socialists, Maoists, and other pro-poverty groups in fruitful dialog.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
How so? Didn't understand your question.ashishvikas wrote:Does that mean FOC will get cleared before actual mid air refueling test happens ?Marten wrote:Qualification of the refuelling probe in all regimes?
Rather, if it is a critical part of FOC, would it not have to be completed? Would qualification not include refuelling itself at least once?
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 866
- Joined: 17 Oct 2016 14:18
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Indranil wrote it earlier - "3. IFR testing: IAF wants the aircraft with the probe to be cleared for all parts of the envelop. Actual refueling in air has been pushed beyond FOC (shouldn't be a hassle)."Marten wrote:How so? Didn't understand your question.ashishvikas wrote: Does that mean FOC will get cleared before actual mid air refueling test happens ?
Rather, if it is a critical part of FOC, would it not have to be completed? Would qualification not include refuelling itself at least once?
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: 01 Jan 2010 21:41
- Location: Engaging Communists, Uber-Socialists, Maoists, and other pro-poverty groups in fruitful dialog.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Finally got what you are saying: So if gun trials and in air refuelling are not part of FOC... perhaps lungi dance time?
Would like to hear for sure though!
Would like to hear for sure though!
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
I thought AI-17 news was that refuelling probe is for nos. 21-40 which will be built to FOC standard. Nos. 3-20 are IOC2 standard without the probe.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
The pics of LSP-4 prior to departure show that it carried a camera mounted on the airframe. So we should probably get another video of the Derby launch, as seen from the onboard camera.
But this is a big milestone. No one can take pot shots at the Tejas anymore, citing lack of BVR capability. It clears the way for almost full combat capability. A few more test launches will be required to test out all test points for BVR capability. Also important to note that the target was maneuvering and the missile was fired with the radar in look-down mode- clearly more complicated than the clutter free look-up mode.
And program officials are confident of achieving FOC by Dec 2017, that's another 6 months. Quite an achievement, when one considers that it was accorded induction into the IAF only mid last year. But the FOC SOP (Standard of Preparation) will be finalized this June, which is crucial in allowing HAL to begin the build of the second batch of 20 FOC standard Tejas Mk1s.
By comparison, the Gripen E will begin to enter Brazilian and SwAF service in 2019 and only reach FOC in 2023, a full 4 years after deliveries start to the SwAF and 2 years after they begin to be delivered to the FAB. Supposedly the Gripen E's delivered to the FAB will be IOC capable Gripen E's, as per the head of FAB.
But this is a big milestone. No one can take pot shots at the Tejas anymore, citing lack of BVR capability. It clears the way for almost full combat capability. A few more test launches will be required to test out all test points for BVR capability. Also important to note that the target was maneuvering and the missile was fired with the radar in look-down mode- clearly more complicated than the clutter free look-up mode.
And program officials are confident of achieving FOC by Dec 2017, that's another 6 months. Quite an achievement, when one considers that it was accorded induction into the IAF only mid last year. But the FOC SOP (Standard of Preparation) will be finalized this June, which is crucial in allowing HAL to begin the build of the second batch of 20 FOC standard Tejas Mk1s.
By comparison, the Gripen E will begin to enter Brazilian and SwAF service in 2019 and only reach FOC in 2023, a full 4 years after deliveries start to the SwAF and 2 years after they begin to be delivered to the FAB. Supposedly the Gripen E's delivered to the FAB will be IOC capable Gripen E's, as per the head of FAB.
Last edited by Kartik on 13 May 2017 00:32, edited 1 time in total.
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 866
- Joined: 17 Oct 2016 14:18
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
^^ That maneuvering Target was Banshee Drone. (Confirmed today by Tejas-LCA Facebook Admin)
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Since its non retracting IFR probe, its effect on entire flight envelop needs to be qualified.Marten wrote:Qualification of the refuelling probe in all regimes?
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Wowsrai wrote:
I hope the IAF gets some sense and orders more Mk1As instead of waiting for unobtainium in the form of some MII this or that.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
I think AK was talking from this pov:Indranil wrote:It has been in play from SP2 onwards.
HAL sets up second Tejas production line
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
It seems they chose one of the more difficult BVR engagement profiles in the first attempt itself. Rest should be a breeze.Kartik wrote:...
A few more test launches will be required to test out all test points for BVR capability. Also important to note that the target was maneuvering and the missile was fired with the radar in look-down mode- clearly more complicated than the clutter free look-up mode.
...
If I remember correctly, Barak-8 was "qualified" after only 4 firings. It just shows if most of the stuff can be proven through simulation (or other on-the-ground proofing) the flight tests can be limited to a handful. By maximizing each sortie through the combination of more difficult test points, the system can be proven much quicker. I read an article long time ago on F-22 weapons testing and it had mentioned that it took one-month of preparation per weapon qualification sortie. They were able to reduce the number of sorties required for qualification through simulation and combining test points, which directly/in-directly proved bunch of intermediary test cases without having to test each case separately.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Great point. I believe they will conduct launch against a supersonic, receding targetKartik wrote:Also important to note that the target was maneuvering and the missile was fired with the radar in look-down mode- clearly more complicated than the clutter free look-up mode.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Typical test cases:
- far/near boundary
- crossing
- receeding/approaching
- subsonic/supersonic
- maneuvering
- high/low altitude
- ECM
- LOBL/LOAL
- off-bore sight
- look up/look down
- single/multi target(s)
- single/multi sensors
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
if we see the akash trials, literally all were tested, tough stds for desi product and relatively inexpensive missiles.
for derby, my take is some 4 tests (at max) will be done, for the corner cases (hardest ones).
for derby, my take is some 4 tests (at max) will be done, for the corner cases (hardest ones).
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Why not the Lakshya?ashishvikas wrote:^^ That maneuvering Target was Banshee Drone. (Confirmed today by Tejas-LCA Facebook Admin)
Is the Banshee superior since i had assumed that we would be pretty much indiginised in the PTA atleast.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
the banshee is likely cheaper. we have had them for a while now.
mirach is faster and we can expect it to be used in trials as well.
lakshya PTA et al effort will all truly take off once we get more of our own engines of different types.
ADE is not that focused on UAVs either right now. mandate is Nirbhay, Rustom & PGMs.
mirach is faster and we can expect it to be used in trials as well.
lakshya PTA et al effort will all truly take off once we get more of our own engines of different types.
ADE is not that focused on UAVs either right now. mandate is Nirbhay, Rustom & PGMs.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
lakshya is in service btw. its just that with OTS drones available now for training DRDO is focused on weaponry more and more.
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 5353
- Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
I'm hoping for exactly this at foc Or bigger order for more FOC std. Would be a shame if this doesn't happenKaran M wrote:Wowsrai wrote:
I hope the IAF gets some sense and orders more Mk1As instead of waiting for unobtainium in the form of some MII this or that.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Saars bliss to identify the new things on LSP-04 during the BVR test(apart from drop tanks, high speed camera)
https://scontent.fmaa1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/ ... e=59BFCEA2
https://scontent.fmaa1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/ ... e=59BFCEA2
-
- BRFite
- Posts: 866
- Joined: 17 Oct 2016 14:18
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
^^ LSP04 is having Cobham Quartz Radome ??
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
yes. Second aircraft to be fitted with the same.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
More progress towards the FoC. Yay !!
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Smoke vs no smoke
R-73
Derby
Astra
R-73
Derby
Astra
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
I have yet to see 2+ tejas fighters in one room. My guess is that they take it apart completely and use the parts on the upgraded prototype. This also makes economic sense. Wonder why they'd leave a million dollar engine resting on an old prototype at the hanger for years. Simple logic says that they are using it again and again. Although I agree that open source does not track deliveries data.Indranil wrote:This cannot be correct, can it? We have had 2 TDs, 5 PVs, 7 LSPs, 2 NPs, and 4 SPs already. That's 20 engines already.nvishal wrote:A good way to understand the progress of tejas:
As per stockholm arms transfer register: sipri.org/databases/armstransfers
Engine orders since 1990-2016 from USA to india - Three instances total
F404 Turbofan
2004 - 20 units (5 units delivered in 2016). 15 maybe cancelled and deal abandoned
2007 - 24 units (no deliveries yet) Maybe order never concluded
-
- BRF Oldie
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: 01 Jan 2010 21:41
- Location: Engaging Communists, Uber-Socialists, Maoists, and other pro-poverty groups in fruitful dialog.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
>>I have yet to see 2+ tejas fighters in one room.
TejaS main hoon, woh Mark (1A) hai!
Props: "Teja main hoon, mark idhar hai' "
TejaS main hoon, woh Mark (1A) hai!
Props: "Teja main hoon, mark idhar hai' "
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Well I don't know which room exactly you are talking about. But surely the LCA hangers in IAF hold more than 2 at any time. But even seeing 100 LCAs in a big room, says anything about how many of them have engines inside..?nvishal wrote:I have yet to see 2+ tejas fighters in one room. My guess is that they take it apart completely and use the parts on the upgraded prototype. This also makes economic sense. Wonder why they'd leave a million dollar engine resting on an old prototype at the hanger for years. Simple logic says that they are using it again and again. Although I agree that open source does not track deliveries data.Indranil wrote:
This cannot be correct, can it? We have had 2 TDs, 5 PVs, 7 LSPs, 2 NPs, and 4 SPs already. That's 20 engines already.
Up to 5 have been seen flying together, at least once. I have never seen more than 5 flying at a time. But then does that corroborate your data point of 5 engine deliveries..?? But then I have never seen more than 6 Su-30MKI flying at a time.
Simple logic is OK, but oversimplification can get you in trouble sometimes.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Saab is still pumping away putting out announcements to the effect that "Saab is ready to build 200 Gripens for India".
Everyone and their mom is ready to build 200 planes and send India the bill.
However if the single engine aircraft market is not preserved for domestic players and the IAF keeps flooding the country with foreign wares, there will be no indigenous R&D aerospace industry.
There is near zero effort on the civilian front at aircraft design & development.
If they "gift" away the military market to foreign arms manufacturers, there will be nothing left.
Meanwhile the IAF seems to have resumed its efforts at single engine foreign plane import lobbying.....
Everyone and their mom is ready to build 200 planes and send India the bill.
However if the single engine aircraft market is not preserved for domestic players and the IAF keeps flooding the country with foreign wares, there will be no indigenous R&D aerospace industry.
There is near zero effort on the civilian front at aircraft design & development.
If they "gift" away the military market to foreign arms manufacturers, there will be nothing left.
Meanwhile the IAF seems to have resumed its efforts at single engine foreign plane import lobbying.....
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
IN Lakshya and Banshee at INS Dega, Vizag for Eastern Fleet use. IAF and DRDO have separate stocks.
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
Astra is conceived as an R-77 replacement, has a Russian seeker and interfaced to the Russian datalink and Bars radar.JayS wrote:Astra was conceived for LCA IIRC, so its a given. All in good time. But currently its not a mature missile and LCA cannot wait anymore.Bheeshma wrote:Why not Astra? Even MK-I has higher or similar range as Derby.
We are going so slow on all our projects.
Derby is interfaced to Israeli datalink and Elta 2032.
Marriage of Astra to 2032 with different DNA is possible, but would take time.
Simpler to use similar DNA - Litening, DASH, Derby, Griffin, 2032, 8222...
Re: LCA: News & Discussions - October 2016
nvishal wrote:...
I have yet to see 2+ tejas fighters in one room. ...