Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

All threads that are locked or marked for deletion will be moved to this forum. The topics will be cleared from this archive on the 1st and 16th of each month.
Locked
chola
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5136
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by chola »

Very disappointed. Was prime for some action involving the USN and some yellows (noko and maybe cheen) which is usually a wee bit more exciting (and bloody) than massa going after some beardos in caves.
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by UlanBatori »

Patience, patience! Remember that it took Al Quolin Bin Powell a full 9 months to start Operation Dejert Shiela.
Now this: US Carrier Group practises hiding behind Japanese Destroyer screen. Look at all the domes on that destroyer: Must have Sony, Panasonic, Onkyo, all competing to provide Surround Sound Dolby Theater.

This is really smart scare tactics. This "drill" was planned years ago, and the WHOTUS merely drew attention to it and "allowed" SeeEnnEnn to spread the panic. No cost at all. But today to me it looks like a clear anti-missile shield for carrier-based air campaign. The NoKo forces near the DMZ are as exposed as the Pakiban on the Shomali Plain, and their submarine bases and nuke facilities are ticking bums.

Also, Japanese destroyer screen added to US destroyers may be a counter to "Chinese BOMBERS on high alert". That was a blatant missile threat to the US carrier group, IMO. All the books I have read on gung-ho WW3 have a phase where hordes of strategic bombers launch missiles at the fleets from way BVR. If 100 are launched, about 10 will get through any defences, which is enough to more or less wipe out a carrier group. That is the PeeAllSee advantage: huge numbers of aircraft and mijjiles to counter the threat of RoundEye Gunboat Diplomacy.

Imagine:
Pakistan threatens to start war.
Mongolia says: We are sending an Army.
Pakistan salwar-browns.
Army was being sent to bring a few bottles of hooch to Ulan Bator.

Long time ago, the yahoos in Sri Lanka went on a rampage, burning a few Hindu priests etc. Polis totally incapable of handling riots.
Someone pointed to INS Nilgiri pulling into Colombo Harbour to get Maasi fish and good coconut arrack for its provisions.
"INDIAN INVASION!!" :eek:
Riots stopped as if a switch was thrown.
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by UlanBatori »

Now comes the negotiation...
Why don't they send a former SoS there for Track 3 I wonder. :mrgreen:
Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 11242
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Gagan »

ArjunPandit wrote:
Gagan wrote:"
Are the SoKo soldiers as battle hardened as their singpore cousins? If so, this will not be a very long lasting battle
Singaporeans battle hardened, when? where?
Ah!
They are battle hardened all right...
Image
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by UlanBatori »

"Training Using GPS App to Find Suitable Bivouac Locations". Like Sir Edmund Hill-ery (He Hu Climbed Hill in Malloostani) conquered Mt. Everest on the shoulders of Tenzing Norgay.
kapilrdave
BRFite
Posts: 1566
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 13:10

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by kapilrdave »

Rather than looking at what US is doing for war preparation to gauge whether the war is happening or not, shouldn't we look at what Japan and SoKo are doing? Afterall, it's *their* war and US is supposed to be just a supporter.

Also, if US is seriously preparing for the war, one would think they would send lot more firepower than merely a one odd CBG. US has always used disproportionate power against their minnow-ish foes. No reason to believe that they would take on NoKo AND potentially China with just one CBG even along with other local allies. A lot is at stake for US if it enters this theatre. It would enter with full force without a doubt.

So, I'm not buying my popcorn and pepsi just yet :(( :((
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by UlanBatori »

Asvamedha YAga 2017? Waiting for someone to throw a stone at The Horse? Trumpistani style may be to let Japan and SoKo fend for themselves and take the brunt of NoKo artillery while hitting away from CONUS-based bombers, sub-based cruise missiles and some carrier-based fighters. After air superiority is established, bombers from Guam may start coming in.
Big question is how far PeeAllSee will go if NoKo is attacked. Gen. McArthur found out, but will Gen. Mattis revisit the issue?
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Lalmohan »

this sabre rattling serves only one purpose - and that is to keep the public gaze averted from what director comey is doing
the deal with china is about ensuring that no one accidentally starts a real war
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by UlanBatori »

If The Horse returns without anyone lobbing a missile or sending a magnetic mine, it is a non-event. Is DT going to say: <<<<<<IF YOU DO THAT ONE MORE TIME, I WILL TELL MY BIG BROTHER! >>>>>>, roll his eyes and return? If NoKo retains mijjiles and nukes after The Horse returns, then the WHOTUS/COTUS look like they are weaker than BO, who at least did not send any carriers. So like Sardarjis meeting in Dilli, it is not possible satisfy H&D and go home without some blood being drawn. What 2 do? This is not India in the middle, agreeing to keep mouths shut. My bet is one NoKo submarine meeting with unfortunate accident, rendering sub-launched IRBM impossible for a year. But without an Ossirak type demolition of nuke facilities, no one is going to feel reassured. Now DHS boss has opened mouth and said that NoKo will develop capability to hit US with ICBM <<<< B4 DT STARTS 2ND TERM>>> which is as good as saying:
War Now! Either that or DHS/TSA comes out with new rule banning nuclear-Armed Baby Strollers inside airline cabins.
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Singha »

UlanBatori wrote:"Training Using GPS App to Find Suitable Bivouac Locations". Like Sir Edmund Hill-ery (He Hu Climbed Hill in Malloostani) conquered Mt. Everest on the shoulders of Tenzing Norgay.
Afaik hillary was a good man and carried his weight. Unlike many other sahibs. He lived in india for 4 years as high commissioner of nz.
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Lalmohan »

UlanBatori wrote: Either that or DHS/TSA comes out with new rule banning nuclear-Armed Baby Strollers inside airline cabins.
or you have answered your own question about the sagacity of the beloved orange billi grabber in chief
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by UlanBatori »

Next turn of the screw: Boomer sub heads out to NoKo.
What's the point? This is not to threaten NoKo, but their sponsors. Oh wait, it's a cruise missile carrier, not a "boomer" any more.
Armed with tactical missiles and equipped with superior communications capabilities, the Michigan is one of four US Navy subs that began service as a ballistic missile submarine, loaded with nuclear missiles as part of the US strategic nuclear deterrent.
In the 2000s the Navy converted four of the Ohio-class subs into land-attack platforms armed with conventional weapons.
Each of the four submarines can carry up to 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles. They are also outfitted to stealthily deploy up to 66 Navy SEALs or other special operations troops and their equipment.
symontk
BRFite
Posts: 920
Joined: 01 Nov 2001 12:31
Location: Bangalore

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by symontk »

UlanBatori wrote: This "drill" was planned years ago, and the WHOTUS merely drew attention to it and "allowed" SeeEnnEnn to spread the panic. No cost at all. But today to me it looks like a clear anti-missile shield for carrier-based air campaign.
Unlike other countries US plans every drill with lots of political components. For an onlooker it would seem that it is only another scheduled drill. But there will be activities that happened behind the screens by that time and situation is ripened for confrontation

We also had that moment during operation brasstacks. Same is the case of US carrier passing thru Bay of Bengal during 1971. It would seem innocuous but not so
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Singha »

one of these converted ohios unloaded thawks on day1 of the libya adventure to spread piss and democrazy

the result is libya is split into 10 fragments now (isis has its share) and slave markets sell captured black refugees in the streets.
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59798
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by ramana »

BBC was claiming a little while ago NoKo might test a nuke. Trump is frantically calling for UN sanctions if they test further nukes or Missiles.
Standard template.
Vayutuvan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12077
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 04:36

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Vayutuvan »

Noko nukular horse has bolted long ago. Chinese horseman. Likewise Pakisatani missile horse bolted too.
chola
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5136
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by chola »

Singha wrote:one of these converted ohios unloaded thawks on day1 of the libya adventure to spread piss and democrazy

the result is libya is split into 10 fragments now (isis has its share) and slave markets sell captured black refugees in the streets.
Considering that Qaddaffi had blown up an Pam Am airliner, why would the Ohio not take its pound of flesh? What happens afterwards was up to the people of Libya.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 21538
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Philip »

Trump's praise for China shows the US's fundamental weakness. India should take a leaf out've China's book. Sell N-weapons tech to a friendly nation ,anti-China,say Vietnam/Taiwan for example, and watch the US kowtow to it to keep the peace! The US only recognises rogue,powerful nations which can wound it. An accelerated plan for our ICBM inventory,both land and sub-launched is required s no. 1 priority.

NoKo is at this moment a besieged nation,threatened with annihilation by the US and its East Asian allies. Remember that the US has never left the Korean peninsula after the Korean War,which technically still exists.
chola
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5136
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by chola »

Philip wrote:Trump's praise for China shows the US's fundamental weakness. India should take a leaf out've China's book. Sell N-weapons tech to a friendly nation ,anti-China,say Vietnam/Taiwan for example, and watch the US kowtow to it to keep the peace! The US only recognises rogue,powerful nations which can wound it. An accelerated plan for our ICBM inventory,both land and sub-launched is required s no. 1 priority.

NoKo is at this moment a besieged nation,threatened with annihilation by the US and its East Asian allies. Remember that the US has never left the Korean peninsula after the Korean War,which technically still exists.
Philip, I have no idea what you are trying to say. You want India to be rogue nation that threatens the US for what? For the same "respect" that the USA gives Cheen? With American military bases all around us and USN ships and aircraft probing a few miles off our coasts?

The problem with Cheen compared to the other rogue nations like Iran and NoKo is that it doesn't operate like a rogue nation 95% of the time. It wouldn't be the world's largest trading nation if it were.

It has a printing press that allows it to invest/bribe insane amounts around the globe and also allows it to make itself economically indispensable to even anti-china states like Japan, SoKo and Vietnam and Taiwan. To have them accept our nukes, we'll need to give the same economic access and benefits that Cheen gives them. And we can't even give enough access to Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh to keep those insects dependent on our orbit.

In the end, it all comes down to moolah.
A_Gupta
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12102
Joined: 23 Oct 2001 11:31
Contact:

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by A_Gupta »

The point is that China uses its utterly dependent client state North Korea to provoke a crisis whenever the potential of the US turning the screws on trade goes up. The US needs China to defuse the crisis, and so yields on trade.

And China is building up a second client state in Pakistan.
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Lalmohan »

chola wrote: Considering that Qaddaffi had blown up an Pam Am airliner,
yes this is a strange one. the americans said he did, yet every non-US investigating agency said it was Assad senior's boys. Gaddafi for reasons best known to himself took the credit

the ways of allah are mysterious only...
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Singha »

Noko carried out one of its feared artillery drills on coast today afternoon, using 400 pieces.
You have seen a older video...hellacious amt of mlrs and sp koksan howitzers
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by UlanBatori »

I think by now every one of NoKo's Feared Artillery pieces has a present dedicated to it. My guess is 5 mins max life expectancy.
Trump's praise for China shows the
With all respect, Phillipji, ask yourself: Would YOU wish to be a recipient of Trump's "Praise" based on recent performance? Having pondered the answer to that, pls ask what it implies for US-PRC relations. :eek:
I think it is a dance of world-class liars. 11 Praises US, Trump Praises 11. Both look for best place to plant the knife. I too have learned from hard Mongolian experience that it is no deal to try to deal honestly with the PeeAllSee and its experts, as BO etc might have tried to do (I doubt it: actually US has been cheating NoKo quite nicely for decades). Smile, praise, compliment, all the time holding back your nausea. Plan your real actions elsewhere and HOPE that you Do Unto Them Before They Do Unto You.
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Lalmohan »

NoKo and Libya perform an useful function in geopolitics
their total destruction helps no one
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59798
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by ramana »

Lalmohan wrote:NoKo and Libya perform an useful function in geopolitics
their total destruction helps no one

Please explain for all.
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Lalmohan »

pls see my earlier comment about gaddafi taking credit for assad's actions (so much for global baathist revolution)

noko likewise is a useful pawn for china to threaten others by proxy
and the us to rattle sabres at without having to actually start a real war

gadaffi was always useful to bomb so that the US could be seen to be doing something against the goddamn a-rabs
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by UlanBatori »

Trump lays it out for UNSC.
chastised the UN Security Council for underperforming and called on it to “impose additional and stronger sanctions” on North Korea during a meeting with UNSC ambassadors at the White House. "The status quo in North Korea is also unacceptable, and the council must be prepared to impose additional and stronger sanctions on the North Korean nuclear and ballistic missile programs,” Trump said during the luncheon.
"This is a real threat to the world, whether we want to talk about it or not. North Korea is a big world problem and it's a problem that we have to finally solve," he said. “People put blindfolds on for decades and now it’s time to solve the problem.”
In saying all that, the zee has painted himself into a corner from where the only escape is via military action - or UN inspectors removing NoKo nukes, mijjiles and fijjile material. Since I don't see 11 agreeing to the latter, unilateral US military action becomes the only option left. Trump can say that he tried all he could to get the UN to act - like IG going around the world before ordering the liberation of BD. Once the military option is approved, quicker is better than waiting longer, hain?
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Lalmohan »

or china will come and save the day
which will result in a major loss of influence for the US in the pacific rim
ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 59798
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by ramana »

UB, I once tweeted to zee that Politics is not business.



There are wheels within wheels. I didn't say this part.
Rudradev
BRF Oldie
Posts: 4226
Joined: 06 Apr 2003 12:31

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Rudradev »

Lalmohan wrote:pls see my earlier comment about gaddafi taking credit for assad's actions (so much for global baathist revolution)

noko likewise is a useful pawn for china to threaten others by proxy
and the us to rattle sabres at without having to actually start a real war

gadaffi was always useful to bomb so that the US could be seen to be doing something against the goddamn a-rabs
There is another side to this.

Bombing Qaddafi with F111s (Reagan) was one class of US response. Type 1.

Invading a country and toppling its regime as with Saddam...or consistently, aggressively propping up an entity like ISIS to topple its regime while suffocating the same regime with sanctions, etc. is another class of US response. Type 2.

Type 1 response has the advantage of giving political props to the targeted regime. Qaddafi cried and wailed that one of his grandchildren (?) had been killed in the Reagan-ordered bombing. True or not, who knows. But it made him an even bigger herrow to his people and to Soviet-bloc sympathizers internationally. Reagan meanwhile got to look tough on national security. There is a kind of win-win in Type 1 operations.

Type 2 response happened to Qaddafi at the behest of Hillary Clinton/Huma Abedin in concert with France, UK and others. Raped with a bayonet and country sliced up into mini caliphates.

So far Trump's response to Syria has been Type 1.

With NoKo the game has been to keep the Kim regime and his PRC sponsors guessing. What is coming? Type 1 or Type 2?

NoKo's bluff has always been... even if Type 0.5 response comes, we will unleash all hell upon Tokyo and Seoul. Now the Dear Leader doesn't know which way to posture. If a Type 1 response comes, should he react with an artillery barrage against Seoul, or perhaps with nukes? Is that the best choice for him? If he plays that card in response to Type 1, then the US might escalate to Type 2. The nuclear deterrent is meant to stave off a Type 2 response... but Dear Leader has threatened to use it even in retaliation for Type 0.5!!

NOT responding to a Type 1 US attack could bring benefits by making Dear Leader more beloved in the eyes of his people (as with Qaddafi in 1983), and may even win him some sympathy from SoKo. It would also bring diplomatic benefits to PRC, who would be viewed as having managed the situation in statesman-like fashion in the interest of international stability. BUT it would also call into question ANY of Dear Leader's future threats... including the threat to use nukes, and hence undermine the value of NoKo's nuclear deterrent.

Interesting game, this brinkmanship.
UlanBatori
BRF Oldie
Posts: 14045
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by UlanBatori »

Typical American response is a planned, massive hit that "does the job". "No comebacks". So I would expect something that draws down the inventory of SLCMs, ALCMs, HARMs, anti-artillery missiles, JDAMs, 2000-pounders, 250-pounders, 500-pounders, and spare parts for F-18s, V-22s, AEGIS etc.
The one sub carries "up to 66 SOF", enuf said. Plus some 150+ cruise missiles.

ANY action by the US is going to bring on loud :(( :twisted: from UNGA, UNSC, etc etc. So there is no difference between an isolated 2-aircraft intercept mission, and a week-long fireworks display that leaves 90% of NoKo military installations smoking and the DMZ open to a SoKo walkover. Except SoKo will not walk over, for fear of Yalu repeat. It will be Hyoomaneateran missions.

ramana: I read what you wrote but I don't see an exit strategy without expending significant ammo. NoKo may swear solemnly -on the head of the Roundeye Evil American President - to give up nukes, NBC, missiles and artillery and become peaceful farmers, but for how long? They have so far operated on an exact POTUS election cycle as pointed out long ago in infamous PeeAref SRR paper - and by many others since.
hnair
Forum Moderator
Posts: 4635
Joined: 03 May 2006 01:31
Location: Trivandrum

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by hnair »

One suspects the whole THAAD "routine" deployment routine is but Khan's version of Cold Start. Being ready and waiting, instead of a longish buildup like the past Gelfaaars :D
Singha wrote:Noko carried out one of its feared artillery drills on coast today afternoon, using 400 pieces.
You have seen a older video...hellacious amt of mlrs and sp koksan howitzers
The older video was kind of interesting. The artillery barrels were shuddering all over the place, instead of the orderly, single axis recoil movement of a Dhanush/Bofors 155 or the MH777s. The general wisdom here that "even if one out of a 100 rounds, lands, it is a win", might not work for a full-spectrum dominant entity like khan, who will have all sorts of counter-battery "options" on hair-trigger alert. What might work is sneaky SDRE stuff, but I digress.

I suspect "phyjjicks packages" are being dusted from PANTEX shelves and maalished to its original mirror finishes. Will not be a good scene to watch, if Kimmy decides to launch a largish rocket and Shree Trump decides to honk "La cucracha".

For me, the biggest gain is watching that NoKo Newsreadaar Auntyjee. Her fake-Os when reading a mijjile launch is what every General 'Buck' Turgidson would want in a crisis
Lalmohan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 13262
Joined: 30 Dec 2005 18:28

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Lalmohan »

the issue is that much of SoKo army's wives and children live within range of that artillery barrage
kmkraoind
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3908
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 00:24

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by kmkraoind »

Sam Kim @samkimasia
North Korea's answer to US aircraft carrier: Lots and lots of artillery neatly assembled on a beach bloomberg.com/politics/artic…
Image
Manish_P
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5457
Joined: 25 Mar 2010 17:34

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Manish_P »

^ Nice juicy target for cruise missiles (i suppose MOAB or tactical nukes would be an overkill)
Karthik S
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5381
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 12:12

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Karthik S »

Does NoKo think that khan will show up with wooden ships armed with cannons as in 19th century?
Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 66601
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: the grasshopper lies heavy

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Singha »

That was for yesterdays firing drill. They would disperse thereafter.
Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23387
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Austin »

Looking at the Nuclear Test Conducted by North , Total 5 of them

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_n ... orth_Korea

They have tested yeald ranging from Sub Kiloton 0.2 to 30 kt , This is good enough of range and test they have to build Nuclear Weapon for Sub Tactical to Strategic Needs , Now the only question is numbers and amount of fissile material they have.

See no reason they would need to do more test other then to give Trump some goose bumps.
Karthik S
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5381
Joined: 18 Sep 2009 12:12

Re: Morbid Rubbernecking: New Korean War?

Post by Karthik S »

Looks like if deployed, Taepodong-2 and KN-14 missiles can reach west coast.
Locked