Book of the week: Olympics: The India Story Boria Majumdar and Nalin Mehta HARPERCOLLINS RS 695 PP 505
By K. Arumugam
Getting adequate funding to send Indian teams to the Olympics used to be a tough business. When Charles Newham, who was involved in mobilising funds for the 1932 Indian Olympics hockey team to Los Angeles, approached Mahatma Gandhi, then in talks with Lord Irvin in Shimla, the Mahatma's' response was blunt: "What is hockey?"
Clearly, the disconnect between polities and sports in India goes back a long time. But as authors Boria Majumdar and Nalin Mehta argue in this pioneering and long awaited book, sports did, at one point of time, stand for nationalistic sentiments, especially in the pre-Independence era. Referring to the 1951 and 1962 Asian Games, the authors show how Jawaharlal Nehru and Indonesian President Sukarno vied for the title of 'Emerging Asian Country' that used sports as a tool.
Another startling fact is revealed. At the opening ceremony of the 1936 Berlin Olympics, the Dhyan Chand-led Indian Olympics contingent did not offer the Nazi salute - the Americans being the only other exception. There are many such revelations and anecdotes that should keep any Indian sports and sports history enthusiast enthralled.
"Olympics: The lndia Story" is a bag of facts, much of them sourced from the International Olympic Committee's archives at their museum in Lausanne, Switzerland. The first 150 odd pages, in particular, are replete with little known, lively and telling details presented in an enchanting manner as the authors map the early years of India's Olympic Movement. Indian hockey, the Asian Games, the profiles of India's Olympians and the impact of television make up the bulk of this gripping narrative.
Sir Dorabji Tata, founder President of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) in 1927, funded India's contingents both for the 1920 and 1924 Olympics. But soon, he decided to step down and stuck to his guns despite repeated entreaties from the International Olympic Committee (IOC). The reason? He was 70 years old and felt it was time for someone else to take over. A fine example, surely, for our present-day sports parasites who cling on to power for decades.
Not surprisingly, since the sport fetched 11 medals at the Olympics for India, hockey dominates the Indian Olympic story. However, there is more information on the origin and growth of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the All-India Football Federation (AIFF) than on the Indian Hockey Federation (IHF). For the IHF story, one has to rely on IHF Vice-President C.E. Newham's personal account.
One feels that the 1926 Indian tour of New Zealand merited more emphasis, for it was this tour that was the motivation for the 1928 Amsterdam beginnings of our Golden Age of Olympic gold medals. Why India excelled in hockey during those glory years is still a mystery As much is the mystery of why Jaipal Singh, the first Indian Olympic hockey captain, walked away before the semifinals.
But the book firmly asserts in line with my own earlier finding about Hitler not ever having met Dhyan Chand at Berlin. The story of the Fuhrer offering the Indian hockey wizard a post in the German army is a complete cock and bull story. Unlike the parts of the book dealing with Olympic movement, the chapters dealing with hockey revolve around known sources, mainly books by players and officials. The manner in which all the material has been brought together in a lucid manner is where the book scores.
As much as the authors emphasise that the introduction of synthetic playing surfaces is the sole reason behind Indian hockey's decline, there are equally valid arguments against this theory. In particular, clueless coaches and antipathy towards the import of knowledge as exemplified by the recent Ric Charlesworth hulaballoo - have resulted in the fall from grace of Indian hockey.
As far as the larger picture goes, regional bickerings have effectively killed Olympic sports in India. The painstaking reconstruction of a seven-year feud between the IOA and Indian Swimming Federation officials is an eye-opener However, hockey's case is different. The succession war between 'North' and 'South' following Ashwini Kumar's exit in the 1970s is just an aberration. Olympics: The Indian Story, by virtue of its depth, dimension and erudition opens up numerous debates and fresh areas of research - besides being a delightful read.
K.Arumugam is co-author of Great Indian Olympians
Clicky
In other hockey news, four coaches from India will go 2 beijing to watch the other teams play. And strategize from there on. Lets see.. K Arumugam also claims that there is a lot of internal feuding in IHF and Ajitpal Singh {whom he brands as a KPS Gill clone} has taken over and thrown away Aslam Sher Khan to do KPS' bidding. He also has no nice words for Balkishen Singh, the former star of Indian hockey, who is against furrin coaches in general. Esp against RicC. Arumugam has fond feelings for RicC, so his opinions have to be taken with a pinch of gravy. But the funny part is there is some truth to what he claims, as in, there is no bloody news about IHF these days. What are our national players doing? Are they practicing, if so for what tournament? Are they on a break, and if so, for how long? WTH is going on, I have no clue.
Ever since the IOA handed over Indian hockey's charge to an ad-hoc committee, people have been expecting overnight changes, but newly-appointed selection committee Chairman Ajit Pal Singh said the process will take time. "It has been only three months since we have taken the charge, one should not expect overnight changes. It's a lengthy and time taking process." Ajit Pal said. "We have to form many committees and then coach, trainer, physio and other support staff has to be appointed. After that we will hold a meeting with all concerned persons and then only I will be able to tell you whether Indian hockey is going in right direction or not. Let us first draw the roadmap," added the World Cup winning captain. {And it takes three months to draw a roadmap. Jeezus H christ.}
He also said that the ad-hoc committee in charge of the game was open to suggestions from all quarters. "We are open for suggestions. We will take opinion from former players, experts and media as well." In an unexpected move the ad-hoc committee has replaced Aslam Sher Khan as the Chairman of the selection panel with Ajit Pal. However, the newly-appointed selection committee chief does not want to read much between the lines.
"I was one of the members of the selection panel. Aslam will continue as a member. There is nothing like ego clashes. We have to work together to bring back the old glory of Indian hockey." Asked about his priority, the former centre-half said the first and foremost need is to prepare an annual calender and training programme for the players. "We don't have a systematic training programme for our senior and junior players. We will chart out a national and international calender. A pool of upcoming players has to be created." opined the veteran.
"My priority would be to bring transperency in day-to-day functioning. So there will be no scope for complaints," he said. Although, the selectors are emphasing on youth, the selection committee Chairman reiterated that the doors of the national team are not closed for old players like Dilip Tirkey, Gagan Ajit Singh or Arjun Halappa. {That only means it is closed from the decoding of the message.}
"Now all selections will be purely performance based. Whoever performs well, will get a chance. Doors are not closed for anyone. There is no criteria of old and new," said Ajit Pal. India's failure to qualify for Olympics after 80 years hurts him no end, but he is optimistic about the team's chances in 2012 London edition of the Games. "We could not qualify for the Olympics for the first time in 80 years. It hurts me but it is a harsh fact and you can not undo it. Let us forget the past and start afresh. "I am sure that we will not only qualify for the London Olympics but will be a strong medal contender as well." he said.
Clicky
Same as in football, we have this..
The National hockey championship may be a much shorter, keener affair if the ad hoc committee of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) studies the recommendation of the Olympians with due seriousness. With the Indian Hockey Federation bursting at its seams with 39 full members and around 15 associate members, the Nationals were always long-drawn and cumbersome, leaving the federation with few choices as the number discouraged states from hosting the event.
Olympians at the IOA meeting on Thursday said the very concept of associate members, conjured up by the federation around 13 years ago at an entry fee of Rs 5 lakh, diluted the National championships, making it far more club-centric than it actually was. The Olympians felt that by restricting the Nationals to the states and the four institutional members - Services, Indian Railways, Indian Airlines and Combined Universities-the IOA would only strengthen the state teams. "Right now, no state is keen on the Nationals," said former goalkeeper AB Subbaiah. "With their cream taken away by the associate members, they are forced to field their B or C strings. With the associate members gone, the states would automatically get back their best players."