Very, very true. Must watch.
Thanks
Very, very true. Must watch.
Sudeep Ji, I think we make the same points. I'm saying a max of 50,000 cr (about 15% of the estimated BM held in cash) would have been launderedsudeepj wrote:What is the basis of this theory? Only about 33,000 crores was exchanged over the counter and Jan Dhan accounts saw an influx of ~60,000 Crores. Both these amounts are within reason.Deans wrote:1. Far too much money has already some back. As posted earlier, an estimate for 3.79 lac crore in BM was a credible estimate and it was believed most of it would not come back. Now it appears almost all of it would. If the amount not coming back is anything under 100,000 cr. either BM holders have defeated the system, or the amount of BM held in cash has been hopelessly overestimated. The conventional means of laundering that we have discussed here (which my banker / economist friends agree) like using dormant JDY accounts. salary advances/ loans etc would not account for more than 50,000 cr (net, after people get their cut). Of course, increased deposits mean increased ability to tax unreported income, but given GOI's flip flops I am becoming sceptical of that too. Some of the proposals to tax may not withstand legal challenges.
We will find the truth soon enough, but I think majority of white money has already made its way back to the deposits/exchanges and we will see that a large amount be 'extinguished'. We will find out in a few months.
Suraj, I agree that people are, by and large, hoarding notes. However, my point is that not enough notes have been issued in the first place. If there is no `stock', there can't be a flow.Suraj wrote:The people are primarily the reason for this. Have you seen this thread and especially the politics threads ? People are hoarding cash *and* demanding that GoI print more cash. They're making the classic mistake of feeding a liquidity crunch with actions that worsen it. And the 'fix' ? Force GoI to print more, a lot of which gets also hoarded or goes right back into black economy.Deans wrote:1. Far too much money has already some back. As posted earlier, an estimate for 3.79 lac crore in BM was a credible estimate and it was believed most of it would not come back. Now it appears almost all of it would. If the amount not coming back is anything under 100,000 cr. either BM holders have defeated the system, or the amount of BM held in cash has been hopelessly overestimated.
Beyond a point this is irredeemable madness of crowds behavior. Of course they will self righteously blame the government and ask them to 'do something'. But the situation is primarily created by hoarding. Enabling the existing cash base to circulate better would address problems, but peoples' response to a cash crunch is to hoard the cash instead. There are some notable folks who are doing their bit to do the right thing, but it seems most don't/won't.
that's Rs 2000 in PPP terms.Deans wrote:Suraj, I agree that people are, by and large, hoarding notes. However, my point is that not enough notes have been issued in the first place. If there is no `stock', there can't be a flow.Suraj wrote: The people are primarily the reason for this. Have you seen this thread and especially the politics threads ? People are hoarding cash *and* demanding that GoI print more cash. They're making the classic mistake of feeding a liquidity crunch with actions that worsen it. And the 'fix' ? Force GoI to print more, a lot of which gets also hoarded or goes right back into black economy.
Beyond a point this is irredeemable madness of crowds behavior. Of course they will self righteously blame the government and ask them to 'do something'. But the situation is primarily created by hoarding. Enabling the existing cash base to circulate better would address problems, but peoples' response to a cash crunch is to hoard the cash instead. There are some notable folks who are doing their bit to do the right thing, but it seems most don't/won't.
An additional point about the Rs 2000 note is that if it were not printed there would be no way to replenish the money stock in 50 days. The Rs 1000 note was introduced in 2001 and even with 4.5% p.a inflation , that is worth Rs 2000 today (or $ 30, which is not a very high amount for the critics to get worked up about).
It need not be only new accounts that can be used for laundering. The total deposits in JD accounts increased by 30k crores. Any amount up to that could be BM.Deans wrote:The livemint article on JDY is interesting. Not more than 1 million accounts are likely to be misused (as proxies for BM holders) assuming that the
trend for the first 15 days continues at a decreasing rate. At a max Rs 50,000 / account, that only 5000 cr laundered - that too at a high risk.
Even that makes the unlikely assumption that the actual account holder will have nothing to deposit. My concern however is why over 50 million
accounts continue to have 0 balance - that needs to be audited by each branch.
At the same time, only 2 million new accounts will be opened (less than a 1% increase in total accounts), which indicates to me that almost every household who needs an account has one. All the media talk of X % of Indians being un-banked misses the point that every Indian does not need an account. There are approx 800 million adult Indians of which 25% live in absolute poverty (unlikely to need high value notes).
There are 300+ million bank accounts for these 600 million (or 1 per household of 2 adults). There are also 700 million debit cards and excluding
multiple cards held by individuals like you and I, the number of Indians with a debit card is around 650 million.
Philip wrote:This reduction in purchasing by every household is also having a dramatic effect on the Indian economy which is in a tailspin.E have the news today that after 137 yrs. Bombay Dyeing,a household name for quality,is finally closing down in Bombay.
Bombay dyeing closing down is not about Demonetization, but about re Monetization.disha wrote:Philip wrote:This reduction in purchasing by every household is also having a dramatic effect on the Indian economy which is in a tailspin.E have the news today that after 137 yrs. Bombay Dyeing,a household name for quality,is finally closing down in Bombay.
Now the mills Bombay Dyeing closing down is also blamed on DeMonetization. Lovely! Nusli wadia and his sons must be spending more time uncovering the models on gladrags instead of covering them!!
30 years back., the reputation of Bombay Dyeing mills was "Bombay Mills Dying". It was not if but when., good tidings that it is closing down.
I don't expect all of them to be 100% clean. But that also does not mean 100% of them are corrupt, and due to which every single black money hoarder out there would just pay some bribe and get away with their money. Secondly, I feel GoI of today has now got a much more higher responsibility to ensure that this demonitisation drive succeeds. Or else their H&D is at stake. So there would also be much more higher scrutiny on the conduct of the IT officers. Alarm bells would start ringing when every big deposit out there is getting passed by IT officers stating that these are all legally acquired money. Again, I also don't assume that every single paisa of unaccounted money out there would get cleaned up by this drive. Their would be gaps, and there would be spillages. But it is better than doing nothing, IMHO.ShauryaT wrote:What is your confidence level that IT officers will not be corrupt. Percentage of officers or cases that they go after and do not settle for corruption money?
Would that be again part of a deliberate strategy? Say if 86% of the cash was of Rs.500 & Rs.1000 notes, and if GoI just prints the same percentage of new Rs.500 & Rs.2000 notes, the smart alecs would be just able to exchange the new ones with the old ones even without visiting a bank. The BM hoarders would just exchange the demonetisted notes to the poor 'mules' and get the new notes. The 'mules' may have to face the music, when IT folks ask them how they got so much of demonitised currency with them. So I feel a kind of cash crunch (of the new notes) is deliberately induced, so that people will have to put their money into the banks (so that they don't lose the money worth of Rs.500 & Rs.1000), and can only make small withdrawals.Deans wrote:However, my point is that not enough notes have been issued in the first place. If there is no `stock', there can't be a flow.
An attack on a currency is an act that reduces its value. It directly leads to that currency buying less of what it could buy before the attack.ShauryaT wrote:Nothing much just about 86% denotifiedSuraj wrote: What were all the previous attacks on the Indian currency ?
There are a total of approx. 220 million JDY accounts. Excluding the 55 million which still have a 0 balance, it means 165 million accounts havehanumadu wrote:It need not be only new accounts that can be used for laundering. The total deposits in JD accounts increased by 30k crores. Any amount up to that could be BM.Deans wrote:The livemint article on JDY is interesting. Not more than 1 million accounts are likely to be misused (as proxies for BM holders) assuming that the
trend for the first 15 days continues at a decreasing rate. At a max Rs 50,000 / account, that only 5000 cr laundered - that too at a high risk.
Even that makes the unlikely assumption that the actual account holder will have nothing to deposit. My concern however is why over 50 million
accounts continue to have 0 balance - that needs to be audited by each branch.
At the same time, only 2 million new accounts will be opened (less than a 1% increase in total accounts), which indicates to me that almost every household who needs an account has one. All the media talk of X % of Indians being un-banked misses the point that every Indian does not need an account. There are approx 800 million adult Indians of which 25% live in absolute poverty (unlikely to need high value notes).
There are 300+ million bank accounts for these 600 million (or 1 per household of 2 adults). There are also 700 million debit cards and excluding
multiple cards held by individuals like you and I, the number of Indians with a debit card is around 650 million.
New notes worth Rs 4.7 crore seized in I-T raids in BengaluruPeople hoarding cash? No way! There's scarcely enough cash to go round.People are desperate for cash for day-to-day expenses,hospital emergencies,etc.
How will the cost be recovered. People have employment here, 1-2 percent for transaction fee to vendor is better than 50% money to corrupt contracts.Nitesh wrote:Why cant gov make notification for ALL cards (debit/credit) to not use surcharge in petrol pumps, and reduce merchant charges across the board. Should not be more then 1%. I know for petrol pumps, government has directed before, but it seems it was not done till now.
Manish_Sharma wrote:
I am asking about the surcharge which bank charges, not trying to get rid of merchant fees, with the number of transactions going upward using PoS/online, banks/card companies keep low fees and make up the number by volumes. This will encourage more people to use cardsragupta wrote: How will the cost be recovered. People have employment here, 1-2 percent for transaction fee to vendor is better than 50% money to corrupt contracts.
This is what I have been saying. Modi asked for 50 days and he will make full use of those 50 days to push India towards a digital economy. Its been 23 days and if printing was done with full earnest, it should have enough to replace all the previous bills. But cash is being squeezed more and more. This month, the banks disbursed only 5k for my dad though they are not complaining. Last month after DeMo it was 10k.Gus wrote:Sachin - you are right that crunch is deliberate.
At this point , the BM outside is the ones that cannot go into bank.
From a control pov, It makes no sense to have lots of new notes out , that a secondary exchange is set up outside of banks. I know this 30℅ fee for exchange is there but I believe it is limited in scope and not for scale.
The govt is going to have bare minimum new cash outside ..just enough to prevent riots. Until Dec 31. After that they may increase supply
I wonder who takes these decisions at a micro level, in terms of how much new notes to be printed and released. PMO or RBI?hanumadu wrote:This is what I have been saying. Modi asked for 50 days and he will make full use of those 50 days to push India towards a digital economy. Its been 23 days and if printing was done with full earnest, it should have enough to replace all the previous bills. But cash is being squeezed more and more. This month, the banks disbursed only 5k for my dad though they are not complaining. Last month after DeMo it was 10k.Gus wrote:Sachin - you are right that crunch is deliberate.
At this point , the BM outside is the ones that cannot go into bank.
From a control pov, It makes no sense to have lots of new notes out , that a secondary exchange is set up outside of banks. I know this 30℅ fee for exchange is there but I believe it is limited in scope and not for scale.
The govt is going to have bare minimum new cash outside ..just enough to prevent riots. Until Dec 31. After that they may increase supply
We will know in a few days.James wrote:I wonder who takes these decisions at a micro level, in terms of how much new notes to be printed and released. PMO or RBI?hanumadu wrote:
This is what I have been saying. Modi asked for 50 days and he will make full use of those 50 days to push India towards a digital economy. Its been 23 days and if printing was done with full earnest, it should have enough to replace all the previous bills. But cash is being squeezed more and more. This month, the banks disbursed only 5k for my dad though they are not complaining. Last month after DeMo it was 10k.
Also from a legal perspective, if some a/c holder wants to withdraw cash from his own a/c, for how long can the bank refuse to allow it? What will happen if the a/c holder sues the bank and / or RBI?
Also, for how long are the restrictions for withdrawal from one's own a/c legally tenable? After all, how can one reasonably put a long time / amt. restriction on withdrawing one's own money? I wonder what the outcome would be, if some a/c holder were to approach the courts for relief?
Not trying to stir sh!t here, but can any learned gurus enlighten on this?
I pay my property tax online too - but that is only 1(or 2) times a year. Water+ Electricity= 24 bills a yearPrasad wrote:Shivji
It isn't just power and water bills. Even property taxes are paid online. I remember my dad doing the halfday long visit to pay these things at local corporation office. Now he sits at home and does it on his ipad. Quicker,less stress for all.
The news that Bombay Dyeing is closing is bullshit. What they are doing is getting out of the mills business, and probably selling their factory (which BTW isn't even in Bombay but in Ranjangaon) to some smaller hungrier company who can compete in that low-margin business.disha wrote:Philip wrote:This reduction in purchasing by every household is also having a dramatic effect on the Indian economy which is in a tailspin.E have the news today that after 137 yrs. Bombay Dyeing,a household name for quality,is finally closing down in Bombay.
Now the mills Bombay Dyeing closing down is also blamed on DeMonetization. Lovely! Nusli wadia and his sons must be spending more time uncovering the models on gladrags instead of covering them!!
30 years back., the reputation of Bombay Dyeing mills was "Bombay Mills Dying". It was not if but when., good tidings that it is closing down.
So what you are essentially saying is that by starting an enterprise (for Profit), you are helping the government by giving employment to people and those people would pay the taxes instead. You promise to pay them high salaries (which may also eat into your profits), which makes them pay more taxes to the government . And for the services you provide to the government you should be allowed to retain the entire profit you make, and nobody should question you on those profits. Is my understanding correct?TKiran wrote:Now I would be really free to do business and concentrate on providing more value added Products or Services, my aim is still PROFIT (Not Tax). The environment for the Businesses is brutal to say the least. you have to line up all the Ducks, then only you can make any profits.
Here's my paradigm. Pay your bloody taxes. If you can't manage to stay in black after paying taxes, unlike the rest of us, then find a line of work where you will.TKiran wrote:
End of my paradigm: