The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
This is a thread to track all occurences of DDM(*)'itis. Clear demonstration of why a news report is afflicted by DDM'itis is desirable when posting in this thread. Pointing out of factually incorrect data ( with relevant sources / backups ) is also encouraged.
To start, I would like to cross post shiv'ji's post in the LCA thread.
shiv wrote:This maybe for the humor thread. From DDM ToI - poor quality cellphone close-up pic of two different versions of the "Tejas" labelled "Winged beauties" with their "listening pods"
The Tejas Light Combat Aircraft programme has received a major fillip with the first successful flight test using the 'Listening Pod' which can provide the pilot with day and night pictures of terrain by laser technology.
This Listening thing shows how much knowledgeable our defence reporters are and how much cut copy paste happens in our defence reporting. On the other hand this shows somebody who prepared the primary report was using a word processor like MS Word with auto-correct mode on.
On the other hand it would be nice to follow the Listening meme. It will show which news papers share the same source, how much they modify the report or present the same without alteration. For eg. Frontier India, Outlook and Deccan Herald have presented the news As given to them by source, NO change in any thing
ToI has modified it, making it look like an "original" report, though goofed up big time with photo of Mig-21.
I dont know of any who have presented the correct form. FI might have corrected it by now.
Editors want to cram in all the news that flows via wire with gramatical and space edits. It is because of the work pressure. Defence journos too get letargic and are bound to errors, every one has good day or bad day. Every one has prespectives. Thats why I go slow on yelling at them.
yes, they are lazy, incompetent, lethargic, corrupt. Throw the first stone, if you are not one of those. I am not trying to defend anyone, I just put in my prespective.
Editors want to cram in all the news that flows via wire with gramatical and space edits. It is because of the work pressure. Defence journos too get letargic and are bound to errors, every one has good day or bad day. Every one has prespectives. Thats why I go slow on yelling at them.
How about the "winged beauties"? Do they take the cake then on human error!
gopal
Any comment on my post?
There is some thing called proof readers. The thing is while defence journos err, you would hardly find any corrigendum or erratum being published the day later.
My grouse against them is not that they err but they dont even correct it. FI has a good short feedback loop with BR and also wants to improve. But such kind of thing is rare in other media.
ToI publishing an image of Mig-21 instead of LCA after so many Aero-Indias etc is a blunder to say the least, that the editor or proof reader was lazy in that case is an understatement.
Last edited by K Mehta on 12 Dec 2007 20:01, edited 1 time in total.
I am not trying to defend them. I just said, thats why I go slow on them.
disha,
My understanding with mainstream media is that its huge and short staffed. they do not mind mis quoating or over quoting anything. Sensationalismis business.
There other is specialised media. They get it 60-90% correct.
K Mehta,
proof readers are proof readers. they are not authorities. Litsening and litening pod does not make sense to them as long as "listening" spelling is correct. FI type is run by someone who wants to do something for a cause and others just want to earn a living. Some people in BR full time enthusiasts, this kind of broadrange knowledge alludes most people.
Like wise, a handful of posters are good at thesubjects in BR, some are moderate and some even less.
As I said, its not for defence of them, its why I don't bother about it much. We can stil post the DDM news here
making mistakes is common and fine by me. But repeating such mistakes and not even trying to correct them is not.
I have said earlier that the mistake has arose due to use of a word processor, thats fine by me. That it was copied over and over on almost all media is also fine by me.
The problem is are you going to find a correction tomorrow in ToI over the Mig photo? Is Outlook which got an award over defnce journalism going to correct the spelling? Will they not make the same mistakes over and over again.
The Listening meme has been created. It would be interesting to see its spread, reproduction and death if ever that happens.
Last edited by K Mehta on 12 Dec 2007 21:34, edited 1 time in total.
Lessons for the DDM. Take a look at the enlarged picture and the guns and read the caption below.
Not all Gorkha/Gurkha troops are with the Indian Army - they are there with the British and Nepal army as well. In this case its a British Army picture
The AAD, which is 7.5 mts long and has a solid rocket propeller with siliconised carbon jet vanes, has a range of over 150 kms and could achieve a maximum velocity of 1400 m/s
On the heels of conducting trials of interceptor missiles, India on Thursday revived its surface-to-air nuclear-capable Akash missile programme by carrying out its fresh test firing near Balasore in Orissa.
The multi-target missile with a strike range of 25 km and capable of carrying a nuclear warhead of 50 kg was test fired from a mobile launcher, defence sources said.
The missile targeted a flying object using Pilotless Target Aircraft Lakshya as support system, they said, adding that the PTA was flown at 1136 hours and Akash missile test-fired at around 11.55 am from the ITR.
Comparable to the US-made Patriot, the Akash missile has better features and it is completely mobile with capability to be launched from a battle tank too, they said.
out of nowhere TechSAR became Indo-Israeli Spy Satellite just coz PSLV is launching it. http://www.timesnow.tv/NewsDtls.aspx?NewsID=4674 The Indo-Israeli spy satellite -- TechSAR -- with a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) was aborted literally at the launch pad stage on Monday (Dec 3).
Images from the satellite would have significantly boosted India's intelligence gathering abilities.
gopal.suri wrote:yes, they are lazy, incompetent, lethargic, corrupt. Throw the first stone, if you are not one of those. I am not trying to defend anyone, I just put in my prespective.
I have met some of the journos who write for Mumbai press periodicals. I cannot say that they are lazy.
At the best I can say that they are ill informed
At the worst I say they are absolutely ignorant. I had been to the aero exhibition held at Mumbai airport a few years ago. A highly knowledgble journo smuggled me on the reserved day. In no time my highly knowledgble friend and myself were giving a guided tour to the rets of the journos.
My first AE experience was same. The local DECCAN HERALD had 4 Mig27 on the front page with the title of 4 Jaguars. If Bangalore journos can be bad the rest of them maybe @#$%%@.
But do not forget one thing. The defence top brass WANT such journos who do not (cannot) ask relevant revealing questions. They simply print the press releases.
Okay this may not be shiv aroors fault as he says its the direct replication of the IAF PRO's press release (and photos) - Maybe they should share the award 50-50 (PRO for releaseing the photo and aroor for not catching the error)
I wonder if there is a lack of new and periodic release of IAF photos. Sensationalist medias might want new photos every sing le time. Again, I might be wrong.
HariC wrote:Okay this may not be shiv aroors fault as he says its the direct replication of the IAF PRO's press release (and photos) - Maybe they should share the award 50-50 (PRO for releaseing the photo and aroor for not catching the error)
Prithvi II (Dhanush) is the Air Force version of 250 kms range and capacity to carry a payload of 500kg,
For the above to be true the IAF must deploy ships which fly in the air and launch the Dhanush missile.
For those who dont know Dhanush missile is a naval variant of Prithvi missile which consists of a stabilization platform and the missile which is launched from naval ships.
JCage wrote:Just look at the cammo and the US ALQ 101 EW pods on the outer pylons. Those are RAF Jags IMO.
Is it a IAF or a RAF Jaguar ? What is the Jaguar carrying over/under the wings and fuselage ? It cannot be of French Air Force. All the weapons / pods under the over/under the wings and fuselage seem to be different or new to me.
Port Outer : Looks like as Tusker EW pods developed by DRDO
Port Inner : ?
Fuselage : Fuel tank ?
Starboard Inner : Same as Port Inner ?
Starboard Outer : Is the same Phimat ECM pod ?
I hope some knowledgble soul enlightens us by filing the blanks.
I wonder if there is a lack of new and periodic release of IAF photos. Sensationalist medias might want new photos every sing le time. Again, I might be wrong.
This could be the prime factor for DDMitis. The lack of material in suitable format forces the DDM to resort to silly practices like splicing US footage to DRDO footage in order to jazz up their reports. I think it comes from a desire to inform the public, but lack of local resources and have to agree with Gopal.
The services should have a periodic unit attachment for the reporters to get them familiar with what they do. The many Service schools can run short familiarisation course for the accredited reporters. A good thing would be to rotate the editors thru such courses so that they can pick up the errors.
Another action would be to write to the Editors that in a globalized world their credibility suffers beyond borders and if they want to be par tof that decline.
PTI seems to be the primary source of these eff-ups and they are also the source of our earlier listening pod woes. Kinda takes the 'Trust' out of PTI...
India says it has begun production of the 700-km Agni-I and the 2,500-km Agni II after development work and tests that lasted over a decade. A test of the longer range Agni-III, earlier this year, ended in failure.
It was in an ancient desi aviation annual,when the LCRA (light canard research aircraft) was rolled out.It was described as "an aircraft with its wing tip udders".Gives meaning to the old poem about the cow jumping over the moon!
