Bharat Rakshak Forum Announcement

Hello Everyone,

A warm welcome back to the Bharat Rakshak Forum.

Important Notice: Due to a corruption in the BR forum database we regret to announce that data records relating to some of our registered users have been lost. We estimate approx. 500 user details are deleted.

To ease the process of recreating the user IDs we request members that have previously posted on the BR forums to recognise and identify their posts, once the posts are identified please contact the BRF moderator team by emailing BRF Mod Team with your post details.

The mod team will be able to update your username, email etc. so that the user history can be maintained.

Unfortunately for members that have never posted or have had all their posts deleted i.e. users that have 0 posts, we will be unable to recreate your account hence we request that you re-register again.

We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
Seetal

International Naval News and Discussion

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16749
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

International Naval News and Discussion

Postby Philip » 16 Feb 2009 15:56

Since there is no thread for international naval matters,only a general thread for all military matters,it would be preferable of the frequent posts on naval news is on this thread.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstop ... antic.html

Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 59380
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: Lupine but moderately dharmic

Re: International naval news.

Postby Singha » 16 Feb 2009 16:00

I wonder how their paths crossed in the vast ocean. must have been doing some drill together.

Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19148
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Austin » 16 Feb 2009 16:09

This actually proves the limitation of Low Frequency passive sonar when dealing with Very Quite Nuclear submarine.

We have soon reached a stage with major nuclear power where detecting very quite nuclear submarine with passive sonar will be very difficult to impossible , specially when the weather gods are not on your side.

sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9461
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: International naval news.

Postby sum » 16 Feb 2009 19:52

Two gigantic N-subs loaded with BMs collide mid way( they must have been at decent speeds) and neither have any damage? :-?

kit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2003
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 18:16

Re: International naval news.

Postby kit » 16 Feb 2009 20:40

Would you really expect these countries to admit that their 'security' is compromised in any way ?? even if there WAS a total disaster ? i think their silencing tech are better than their sonars ! or can the high seas affect sonars ..?

NRao
BRF Oldie
Posts: 15646
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Illini Nation

Re: International naval news.

Postby NRao » 16 Feb 2009 20:51

Nuclear submarines collide in Atlantic

A Royal Navy nuclear submarine and a French vessel have been damaged in a collision deep below the surface of the Atlantic Ocean.

HMS Vanguard and Le Triomphant, which were carrying nuclear missiles, are believed to have collided while submerged on 3 or 4 February, according to reports. The submarines had a total of around 250 sailors on board

KiranM
BRFite
Posts: 575
Joined: 17 Dec 2006 16:48
Location: Bangalore

Re: International naval news.

Postby KiranM » 16 Feb 2009 20:52

Or may be they were engaged in a cat and mouse game to learn about each other and got too hot. NATO camaraderie not withstanding, Royal Navy and Marine Nationale are not exactly chaddi dost, too much history.

Remember reading a newspaper snippet ~10 years back about some Brit leaking some sub info to a French. And the Brits worried about Frenchies improving their system over that of the Brits. Details too hazy to recollect.

Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19148
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Austin » 16 Feb 2009 21:31

Two SSBN wont be playing cat and mouse game against each other , most likely they might be on a patrol in the same area in Atlantic , and since both were deaf and could not hear and knew about the others presence in the area , they simply collided , happens very rarely but it did happen.

Reminds me about similar collision between a US LA class SSN Baton Rouge and Russian Sierra -1 SSN , the damage to LA was bad enough to decommision it quite early.

Since both these submarine were very modern and both would have used passive sonar as a means of detection , it just goes on to show how silent modern submarines have become that they actually realise about the other presence only after a collision.

I am sure bad weather i.e. wind condition and sea state in Atlantic played a major role as well in hiding the subs signature.

vina
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5941
Joined: 11 May 2005 06:56
Location: Doing Nijikaran, Udharikaran and Baazarikaran to Commies and Assorted Leftists

Re: International naval news.

Postby vina » 16 Feb 2009 22:10

In the vastness of the ocean and that too, increasing the "space" since submarines go underwater unlike surface ships, colliding randomly is close to statistically impossible. Well, these two have done the impossible. Collisions of any type happen typically even with surface ships in busy lanes, near ports etc where there is crowding and separation becomes less. But in the middle of the atlantic?. Something very fishy there.

Brando
BRFite
Posts: 676
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 06:18

Re: International naval news.

Postby Brando » 16 Feb 2009 22:16

Austin wrote:
I am sure bad weather i.e. wind condition and sea state in Atlantic played a major role as well in hiding the subs signature.


How do wind conditions and bad weather affect submerged sub's signature ?

Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19148
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Austin » 16 Feb 2009 23:37

Brando wrote:How do wind conditions and bad weather affect submerged sub's signature ?


Weather related ambient noise can be caused by sea state i.e noise caused by surface wave , precipitation , and sound transmission loss in such conditions

Modern submarine have reached a noise level which is equal to less than the noise of ocean , making detection by LF Passive sonar exteremly difficult in favourable weather conditions to almost impossible in bad weather condition.

I remember looking at a figure where a LA submarine would detect a Akula submarine at ~ 10 Km in very favourable weather condition which reached to ~ 0 in adverse weather condition

There is a thinking in USN that to detect modern submarine they may soon have to go active , or end up playing blind man bluff

I think the combination of factors like ambient noise , weather condition , low noise signature of the submarine itself and limitation of LF passive sonar has lead to this accident.

But on a positive note it shows the almost invulnaribility of modern SSBN and its ability to avoid detection as a crucial arm of Nuclear triad .

Sanku
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12530
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 15:57
Location: Naaahhhh

Re: International naval news.

Postby Sanku » 17 Feb 2009 00:29

Where are all the folks cursing the bear for sloppiness when the oh so elegant french and their stiff english cousins manage to do this sort of stuff.

I mean Le Triomphant and Vangaurd colliding... wow... this beats the Russians Nuke sub disasters as simply pedestrian.
:rotfl:

Rahul M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 16164
Joined: 17 Aug 2005 21:09
Location: woh log gawad hai, unpad hai !
Contact:

Re: International naval news.

Postby Rahul M » 17 Feb 2009 00:38

what do you mean by "stiff english cousins" ? :lol:

Sanku
BRF Oldie
Posts: 12530
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 15:57
Location: Naaahhhh

Re: International naval news.

Postby Sanku » 17 Feb 2009 00:55

You really don't want me to spell that out, do you, and that too to a Mod. :wink:

KiranM
BRFite
Posts: 575
Joined: 17 Dec 2006 16:48
Location: Bangalore

Re: International naval news.

Postby KiranM » 17 Feb 2009 01:55

^^^ I think it should be more like 'stiff upper lip' English cousin. Though after this incident many parts of the English anatomy will be stiff.

Vipul
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3727
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 03:30

Re: International naval news.

Postby Vipul » 17 Feb 2009 02:12


SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35291
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: International naval news.

Postby SaiK » 17 Feb 2009 04:36

finding even the quietest sub is most important tech that the future needs to seek after. can any type of underwater optics/laser detection help, in terms of sounding an alarm at least within about 100s of meters.?

SaiK
BRF Oldie
Posts: 35291
Joined: 29 Oct 2003 12:31
Location: NowHere

Re: International naval news.

Postby SaiK » 17 Feb 2009 04:45

We put a carrier frequency on the light beam, and at the sensor the acoustic pressure signal will shift the phase of the light,".. "It is these phase shifts that we pick up."

works by connecting arrays of optical sensors with optical fiber. These interconnected arrays, in turn, connect via optical fiber with signal-processing gear on shore, aboard ships, or inside submarines.

"Once we convert the optical signal back into a voltage signal, we format it to whatever someone might want, such as fast Ethernet," ... "We rely on the signal-processing people to process it however they want. We just give it to them in the right format for the processing."

With optical sensors on submarines, "the beauty is the previous system had electronics external to the pressure hull," Andersen explains. "It is difficult to maintain them, even in port. We had to dry-dock them. Now we have optical fiber outboard and the electronic maintenance issues involve simply changing out a printed circuit card. They can do that even underway."

http://mae.pennnet.com/articles/article ... tical&p=32

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7475
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Gerard » 17 Feb 2009 05:28

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldne ... antic.html

'The Atlantic is very big, but most navies use the same nesting grounds, quiet areas, deep areas, roughly the same distance from their home ports. 'These station-grounds have got quite a few submarines, meaning there is always the risk of a crash.'


Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7475
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Gerard » 17 Feb 2009 07:17


kit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2003
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 18:16

Re: International naval news.

Postby kit » 17 Feb 2009 07:51

Anti sonar tech as in quieting technology or active sonar jamming ? it was not too long that a sub ran into a warship in the malacca straits ! Anyhow this underscores how much countries are willing to go to keep their nuclear subs top secret and their deployments as well.

Lee Willett, of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, said that Britain and France would be very reticent to share information on what their nuclear submarines were up to. "Despite how close these relations are, they are the ultimate tools of national survival in the event of war," he said.

ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 46924
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: International naval news.

Postby ramana » 17 Feb 2009 10:31

Maybe they are getting ready for a redux o the Hundred years War!

KrishnaMu
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 81
Joined: 02 Jul 2003 11:31
Location: UK

Re: International naval news.

Postby KrishnaMu » 18 Feb 2009 02:12

Huge oil slick from Russian ship heads for British coastline
Few days back middle of Atlantic there is collision of two submarines, now russian leaked oil on
south west or Ireland/wales shores. (cough. Cough may be British or French ducking down for russians?) For these military mights Atlantic is play ground I guess...

French sub unaware it rammed Royal Navy vessel in mid-Atlantic nuclear crash
Lee Willett, of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, said that Britain and France would be very reticent to share information on what their nuclear submarines were up to. “Despite how close these relations are, they are the ultimate tools of national survival in the event of war,” he said.


Despite being allies in NATO members Christan Economic Club(EU), both have no clues whereabouts of each other...

Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19148
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Austin » 18 Feb 2009 10:34

KrishnaMu wrote:Despite being allies in NATO members Christan Economic Club(EU), both have no clues whereabouts of each other...


That is the whole idea of having SSBN , nobody has an idea where it is , except for few people on subs :mrgreen:

krishnan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 7345
Joined: 07 Oct 2005 12:58
Location: 13° 04' N , 80° 17' E

Re: International naval news.

Postby krishnan » 18 Feb 2009 10:46

But a a direct collision? Thats something.

andy B
BRFite
Posts: 1569
Joined: 05 Jun 2008 11:03
Location: Gora Paki

Re: International naval news.

Postby andy B » 18 Feb 2009 10:54

krishnan wrote:But a a direct collision? Thats something.


It wasnt a direct collision more like they brushed against each other from what has come out until now also it was at very low speed.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7892294.stm

sum
BRF Oldie
Posts: 9461
Joined: 08 May 2007 17:04
Location: (IT-vity && DRDO) nagar

Re: International naval news.

Postby sum » 18 Feb 2009 11:01

andy B wrote:
krishnan wrote:But a a direct collision? Thats something.


It wasnt a direct collision more like they brushed against each other from what has come out until now also it was at very low speed.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7892294.stm

Some reports mentioned extensive damage to the sonar dome of "Le Triomphant" . Not sure if "extensive" damage occurs in low speed scrapes....

Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19148
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Austin » 18 Feb 2009 11:25

Frankly speaking it does not matter if they had a head on collision , or a brush , the fact remains that both these modern SSBN ( both these are the newest type from French and British ) could not detect each others presence and the only time they knew about the other is when they hit or scrapped.

finding even the quietest sub is most important tech that the future needs to seek after. can any type of underwater optics/laser detection help, in terms of sounding an alarm at least within about 100s of meters.?


We have reached a stage in sub silencing where the noise of submarine at tactical speed is as quite as the Ocean Noise and at very silent speed lower than that , the primary sensors of the subs are the Low Frequency passive sonar , they represent the eyes and ears of the sub , there are other sonars and non-acoustic sensors but they aid the passive sonar specially the non-acoustic sensors.

For obvious reason the sub would not like to go active as it may betray its presence , although they are toying with the idea of using UUV or torpedo with active sensor suite , the non acoustic sensors might be one possible way to detect a submarine presense but they are limited in the scope of use and can be aid the subs primary sensors.

Every sub would like to take cover of natural protection that sea offers and using the temperature variance to mask itself , which limits the enemy sensors in detecting them but also limits their own sensors.

So a combination of factors including the subs own inherent strength and environmental factor will lead to a stage where the sub are almost invisible to a broad range of ASW platforms in open ocean , but at the same time runs a risk of bumping against each other

Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19148
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Austin » 18 Feb 2009 15:58


Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19148
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Austin » 18 Feb 2009 22:14

Russian Strategic Submarine Patrols Rebound


Russia sent more nuclear-armed ballistic missile submarines on patrol in 2008 than in any other year since 1998, according to information obtained by Federation of American Scientists from U.S. naval intelligence.

The information shows that Russian missile submarine conducted ten patrols in 2008, compared with three in 2007 and five in 2006. In 2002, no patrols were conducted at all.


The United States, France and Britain, in contrast, continuously have at least one SSBN on patrol. In the case of the United States, two-thirds of its 14 SSBNs are at sea at any given time, of which four are on alert.

Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16749
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: International naval news.

Postby Philip » 19 Feb 2009 18:56

US Navy orders new electric hyper-kill railgun
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/18 ... eal_inked/

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7475
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Gerard » 19 Feb 2009 23:14

Ship sinks in Russia, 7 missing
But the Global Times, a Chinese language newspaper based in Beijing, said yesterday the ship was fired on by the Russian navy before it sank, citing a Russian newspaper.

New Star, the cargo ship, was sequestered at the Russian port of Nakhodka earlier this month for alleged smuggling. It left the port not far from the Sino-Russian border without permission from Russian authorities last Thursday and was chased by a cruiser, the newspaper said.

Later, the warship shot at least 500 rounds onto the ship and forced it to sail back toward the port in force 6 winds.


Raj Malhotra
BRFite
Posts: 997
Joined: 26 Jun 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Raj Malhotra » 19 Feb 2009 23:59

andy B wrote:
krishnan wrote:But a a direct collision? Thats something.


It wasnt a direct collision more like they brushed against each other from what has come out until now also it was at very low speed.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7892294.stm



Low speed also means that they cannot claim that sonars were not effective which happens when the speed goes above 10kts

Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19148
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Austin » 20 Feb 2009 12:43

Raj Malhotra wrote:Low speed also means that they cannot claim that sonars were not effective which happens when the speed goes above 10kts


Raj , both must have been on passive sonar , so lower the speed less is the chance that they might be heard and heard from a good distance , the environment conditions can degrade the capability of passive sonar considerably.

More ever modern SSN like Seawolf and Akula-2 have capability where their passive sonar remain effective at high tactical speeds , which is 25 knots ,before a washout occurs.

Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16749
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: International naval news.

Postby Philip » 21 Feb 2009 13:22

OZ;s ne $15 Billion programme to counter Chinese and Indonesian naval sub threats.Good to see that India is not mentioned in the list!

Excerpts:

http://www.smh.com.au/national/jobs-boo ... tml?page=2

Jobs boost from new $15b submarine fleet
Last edited by Gerard on 21 Feb 2009 18:41, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: copyright

Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 19148
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Austin » 22 Feb 2009 10:05

Sineva Missile Launch from North Pole 8)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhI9F0WW3eU

Bulava ground tests, first surfaced and submereged launches
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkKPDSICMQQ

Gerard
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7475
Joined: 15 Nov 1999 12:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Gerard » 24 Feb 2009 05:09

Report: Cheating found on aircraft carrier
The incident involving personnel from the aircraft carrier's nuclear reactor department, occurred during the written portion of an exam administered while the ship was on duty last year, several U.S. Navy sources familiar with the matter told the newspaper.

Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 16749
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: International naval news.

Postby Philip » 24 Feb 2009 17:03

Russian Navy's sub fleet and its current condition as it attempts to reinvigorate its once enormous Cold War nuclear sub fleet.

The Russian Navy Crawls Out Of The Cellar
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htsub/ ... 90222.aspx
Last edited by Gerard on 24 Feb 2009 17:41, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: copyright

Jayram
BRFite
Posts: 259
Joined: 14 Jan 2003 12:31

Re: International naval news.

Postby Jayram » 25 Feb 2009 00:16

Stealth Boat to be auctioned off by USN

USN wants to scrap this.. circa 1980 technmology.. Makes you wonder what tech is available now with them..

S.K. Gupta, now a vice president at Lockheed Martin Space Systems, was in the crew. He recalls watching a glass of Coke on the bridge barely ripple in 12-foot waves. In war games with the Navy off San Diego, he says, "We operated during the night with impunity. We could disappear and sneak up on whomever we wanted. Nobody thought we could do it. A ship is usually hard to hide."


Return to “Military Issues & History Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: anjan, Baidu [Spider], rahulm, Shakthi and 30 guests