Sir , fantasy world
But the concept looks fantastic for sure
Aaron spent 12 months making modifications to the helicopter including strengthening the airframe, shifting its center of gravity to make it more maneuverable and modifying the fuel and oil system.
But of all the parts that make up the helicopter, Aaron says the most important is the piece of forged titanium that is the rotor head.
The solid titanium rotor head on the Bo105 is the heart of the "rigid rotor" system that allows Aaron to perform aerobatics. .. The main rotor of a helicopter is the most complex part of the aircraft. Most helicopters allow the main rotor blades to either flap up and down or pivot forward and back as they spin. Some allow the blades to do both. The Bo105 doesn't allow either.
"Between the rigid head and the composite rotor blades is the key to how this thing can do what it does," Aaron says.
Why I used the word "hype" in some posts. Don't shoot the postman! Nevertheless,there is often the glint of gold in the pan along with the sand..
As the debate rages about Joint Strike Fighter life-cycle cost, Lockheed Martin officials are raising a previously unheard point to bolster their low-price claims — a new low-observability (LO) substance called fiber mat.
Lockheed officials avoided the need to use stealthy appliqués and coatings by curing the substance into the composite skin of the aircraft, according to Tom Burbage, executive vice president of F-35 program integration for the company. It “makes this airplane extremely rugged. You literally have to damage the airplane to reduce the signature,” he said in an interview with AVIATION WEEK. This top-fiber mat surface takes the place of metallic paint that was used on earlier stealthy aircraft designs.
The composite skin of the F-35 actually contains this layer of fiber mat, and it can help carry structural loads in the aircraft, Burbage adds. The F-35 is about 42% composite by weight, Burbage says, compared to the F-22 at 22% and the F-16 at 2%.
Lockheed Martin declined to provide further details on fiber mat because they are classified. But the disclosure of this new substance comes at a time when Lockheed Martin officials are arguing that maintenance costs for the F-35 will be lower than anticipated by operators.
Lockheed officials are lifting the veil on a classified technology to bolster their claims that maintaining the stealthy Joint Strike Fighter will be less expensive than operators may anticipate.
The move to reveal its existence comes amid mounting criticism of the JSF because of huge cost overruns and schedule delays. Estimated life-cycle cost is just the latest point of contention.
The technology is a low-observability (LO) material called “fiber mat.”
Tom Burbage, executive vice president of F-35 program integration, says fiber mat is the “biggest technical breakthrough we’ve had on this program,” and it occurred around 2004. Fiber mat avoids the need for stealthy appliques and coatings by curing the substance into the composite skin of the aircraft, he says. “When you take the composite out of the mold after it has been through the autoclave and cured, the top surface is the fiber mat,” he says. It “makes this airplane extremely rugged. You literally have to damage the airplane to reduce the signature.” This fiber mat surface takes the place of metallic paint used on earlier stealthy aircraft designs.
Coatings on the Northrop Grumman B-2 and Lockheed Martin F-22, by contrast, require manpower-intensive care. Nicks in the coating can significantly compromise the aircraft’s low radar cross section. Repairs are costly and can reduce aircraft availability if maximum LO is needed for a mission.
Fiber mat features a “nondirectional weave, which is also important from an LO standpoint,” Burbage tells Aviation Week. There are “characteristics in the fiber itself that allow us not to have to put coatings on top of the airplane.” Before 2004, he says, the F-35 design called for appliques, which would have required more maintenance.
As the composite skin of the F-35 contains this layer of fiber mat, it can help carry structural loads and vary in thickness as demanded by the design, Burbage says. “We put the [fiber mat] into the composite mold first, and then we have the thickness-controlled composites on the skin,” he says. The F-35 is about 42% composite by weight, he says, compared to the F-22 at 22% and the F-16 at 2%.
Lockheed Martin declines to provide further details on fiber mat because they are classified. But disclosure of this new material comes as the company is arguing that maintenance costs for the F-35 will be lower than anticipated by operators.
The Pentagon's developmental sixth-generation jet engine featuring greater fuel efficiency and thrust than existing military engines is initially being built for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), a senior agency official said on 17 March.
"There are a number of threshold platforms," Alan Shaffer, the principal deputy assistant secretary of defense, research, and engineering, told IHS Jane's at the Precision Strike Association's annual conference in Springfield, Virginia. "[This is] the one that we're going to build it around because we'll have the extra orange airplanes is JSF," he added, referring to test aircraft.
"But it would work for Long-Range [Strike] Bomber (LRS-B), it would work for the [Boeing] F/A-18 [Super Hornet], it would work for basically anything that requires a tactical, high-end turbine," he said regarding the Adaptive Engine Technology Program (AETP).
AETP is developing a military aircraft engine in the 20,000 lbf (89 kN) thrust class. Shaffer said the Pentagon wants the new power plant to achieve 35% better fuel efficiency than existing engines. This improvement in fuel efficiency over the F135 engine would provide the F-35A and the F-35C a range of over 1,600 miles and the F-35B a range of over 1,200 miles compared to the current 1,200 miles and 900 miles, respectively.
In contrast to fixed-cycle engines, sixth-generation technology features variable cycles, which alter the airflow and pressure ratios in the engine, enabling transition between fuel-efficient cruise modes and high thrust for high-speed and even supersonic flight during the same flight. Shaffer likened variable geometries to the changes in torgue created by a figure skater as she pulls her arms toward her body while spinning.
Shaffer said the Pentagon plans to "develop engines with two vendors, and by 2019 or maybe 2020 have the capability to enter directly into [engineering and manufacturing development]".
About a year ago, the Pentagon signaled a push toward completion of the AETP effort with a surprise request for an additional USD1.5 billion in funding for the work in its fiscal year 2015 budget request. This is the first time the Pentagon has acknowledged which aircraft it has in mind for the new power plant.
Shaffer said the DoD is aiming for a 35% improvement in fuel consumption efficiency over fifth-generation engines with AETP. He said that this metric is largely aimed at providing greater range to its aircraft as the US turns its attention toward the vastness of the Pacific Ocean.
It is widely expected that General Electric (GE) Aviation and Pratt & Whitney (P&W) will continue to be the two major players in the Pentagon's propulsion technology push. GE Aviation's projected timeline for developing its variable-cycle design to completion coincides well with the DoD's plans. Company officials have said that their engine could be production-ready in the 2022-24 timeframe. They have acknowledged spending upwards of USD1 billion on the effort in the decade since they offered the variable-cycle F120 to the Pentagon for the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. They have claimed that variable-cycle technology alone cannot achieve the 35% fuel-burn improvement desired by the DoD. To achieve that metric, GE Aviation has invested in ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) for the engine's hot section, advanced aero designs in the compressor, and lightweight 3D-printed components, a list of components they claim is unique to GE Aviation's design.
Meanwhile, P&W has been building on its variable-cycle experience under a separate AETP contract. The company built the J58 engine that powered the USAF's Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird strategic reconnaissance aircraft in the 1960s, so it also has a long history of effort with the technology. The J58 was the first engine designed to operate for extended periods using its afterburner, and the first flight qualified at Mach 3 for the USAF.
P&W acknowledged that integration work for the F-35A is already part of the AETP programme but that it is also working on an F135 block upgrade strategy separately. "The AETP programme as currently laid out by the government includes significant work to integrate the engine on an F-35A," company spokesman Matthew Bates told IHS Jane's on 17 March. "In addition to that effort, P&W is uniquely positioned to leverage that technology into future upgrades of the F135 at lower risk and cost. We'll continue to assess opportunities to provide additional options to the government to provide greater flexibility, which is important in the current budget environment."
Philip wrote:Why I used the word "hype" in some posts. Don't shoot the postman! Nevertheless,there is often the glint of gold in the pan along with the sand...
For another futuristic hype/hope,read this.Ck the link for pics/videoclip of the superb concept of the proposed mega-transport.
The first production Boeing QF-16 optionally manned target drone has been delivered to the US Air Force (USAF), the service announced on 20 March.
Aircraft QF-007 arrived at Tyndall Air Force Base (AFB) in Florida on 11 March, ahead of being pressed into service by the 82nd Aerial Targets Squadron (ATS).
Boeing has delivered six pre-production QF-16s and is under contract to deliver 13 low-rate initial production (LRIP) platforms, of which QF-007 is the first. The LRIP drones should all be with the USAF by 9 October.
In all, the USAF expects to receive 126 QF-16s to replace the BAE Systems QF-4, the last of which was delivered in November 2013. The new drone is being introduced because QF-4 numbers are running low and the unmanned McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II is no longer truly representative of the air-to-air threats USAF pilots are likely to encounter on future operations.
The QF-16 will be able to represent threats in the class of the MiG-29 'Fulcrum' and Sukhoi Su-27 'Flanker'.
Although the USAF currently has a requirement for the QF-16 to be used for training purposes (either as an unmanned target or as a manned 'red air' asset), Boeing recently touted the possibility of fielding it as an unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV) in its own right.
The proposal, put forward in May 2014, would see the aircraft equipped with improved datalinks and other systems to give it a fully fledged combat capability.
The leading benefit of such a QF-16 UCAV would be its likely ability to operate in contested airspace, unlike current-generation systems such as the Reaper.
However, the speed of the F-16 comes at the expense of range and endurance, in comparison with Reaper-class unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), calling into question the utility of the QF-16 for such a role (especially as unmanned aerial refuelling is still very much in its infancy).
It is also hard to gauge the USAF's precise advantages from a QF-16 UCAV, which would offer little manpower savings. The aircraft would still have to be flown, albeit by a ground-based pilot, and an unmanned F-16 would cost the same as a manned F-16 to operate.
To date, there has been no word from the USAF on possible levels of interest, but with the service set to retire its F-16s over the coming years as the F-35 comes online, there will be plenty of airframes ripe for conversion.
DALLAS, March 25, 2015 – Lockheed Martin [NYSE: LMT] has purchased a wind tunnel that is one of only two of its kind in the United States, and is planning key improvements to the facility.
Since 1958, Lockheed Martin and its heritage companies have used the High Speed Wind Tunnel (HSWT) in Grand Prairie, Texas, for subsonic, transonic and supersonic research-and-development testing. Although the company is the long-time operator of the HSWT, it has leased the facility from Triumph Aerostructures. The purchase will enable Lockheed Martin to invest in upgrades and manage scheduling, including testing by other companies and government agencies.
“The High Speed Wind Tunnel in Grand Prairie is an aerospace engineering treasure, serving as a proving ground for hundreds of flight vehicles designed over the last six decades for everything from space exploration to national defense,” said HSWT manager Mike McWithey. “We made this purchase to ensure that development legacy extends well into the future.”
The HSWT and a facility in Missouri are the only two polysonic (subsonic-transonic-supersonic), adjustable Mach-number wind tunnels in the U.S.
A RATTLRS cruise-missile inlet undergoes testing at the High Speed Wind Tunnel at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control in Grand Prairie. Lockheed Martin recently purchased the facility and plans numerous upgrades.
The Saudi jet apparently suffered some mechanical problem forcing the pilots to eject. A U.S. Air Force Pave Hawk special operations helicopter and crew were dispatched from Djibouti to rescue the Saudi pilots.
Although their conditions are unknown, they were reported to be ambulatory. The Saudi jet and the two pilots went down in international waters. The rescue operation was coordinated by the USS Sterett, a guided-missile destroyer.
The entire operation took two hours. Saudi Arabia Thursday announced it bombed military installations in Yemen to weaken the Shiite rebels who chased the president out of the country.
Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) has been named as preferred bidder in the USD8 billion programme to complete development of the Korean Fighter Experimental (KFX) aircraft.
South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) announced the decision following a steering committee meeting chaired by Defence Minister Han Min-koo on 30 March.
DAPA added at the meeting that it had also approved a plan to upgrade existing Patriot Advanced Capability-2 (PAC-2) air-defence missiles as well as procured PAC-3 systems to enhance the country's anti-ballistic missile capabilities. Raytheon has been selected to upgrade the PAC-2 missiles, while Lockheed Martin is expected to provide the PAC-3s.
The announcement about the missiles follows the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency's notification in November about a possible sale of 136 PAC-3s to South Korea in a programme estimated to cost USD1.405 billion.
In relation to the KFX, DAPA said KAI had been selected to enter negotiations to undertake the development programme ahead of rival airline Korean Air. In bidding for the KFX programme, KAI has partnered with Lockheed Martin while Korean Air has teamed with Airbus.
"After reviewing their development plan, ability and bid price by the evaluation team comprised of government officials and experts, we have selected KAI as the preferred bidder," DAPA said. It added that it plans to make a final selection on the KFX developer during the first half of 2015 following negotiations with KAI that will be focused on "price and technologies".
KAI and Korean Air, which undertakes military programmes through its Aerospace division, submitted their respective bids for the KFX programme in February. An earlier tender was aborted by DAPA when only one company, KAI, submitted a bid. South Korea's defence procurement rules dictate that at least two companies must bid for contracts.
KAI was, however, always considered favourite to win the programme. It had previously partnered with Korea's Agency for Defense Development in the early development phase of the KFX, and has also previously collaborated with Lockheed Martin on the development of the T-50 Golden Eagle advanced jet trainer aircraft and its light fighter variant, the FA-50.
The KFX development programme runs from 2015-25 and is intended to develop a future combat aircraft to replace the Republic of Korea Air Force's (RoKAF) ageing McDonnell Douglas F-4 and Northrop F-5 fighters. It is envisaged that the KFX will be a single-seat, twin-engine, multirole aircraft. KAI officials have previously said they expect South Korea's requirement to stretch to about 250 aircraft, with further exports of about 350 platforms envisioned. This number includes platforms intended to enter service with Indonesia as the IFXL. Seoul and Jakarta signed a joint engineering and development agreement in October 2014 under which South Korea will pay 80% of the costs and Indonesia the remaining 20%.
In developing the aircraft, Lockheed Martin is expected to offer significant design and technological assistance, with some of the work to be undertaken through defence offset attached to South Korea's programme to procure the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. The fact that the F-35, like the proposed KFX, features low-observable 'stealth' technologies is likely to be factor in KAI and Lockheed Martin's selection as preferred bidder.
A Lockheed Martin spokesman told IHS Jane's in September 2014 that this commitment would include "technical documentation, design expertise, and development investments. Specifically, Lockheed Martin will provide several hundred man-years of engineering expertise to assist Korea in the KFX design and development."
He added: "Lockheed Martin will also provide several hundred-thousand pages of fighter aircraft technical documentation derived from existing Lockheed Martin programmes."
Shreeman wrote:If you have controls (remember MH370 cargo cabinet hacking) someone will misuse them. If you dont, may be someone will disable remote controls.
Aloha snackbar is out of the cage. Stop flying altogether?
edit -- It is a weird world. When there is an incident where two pilots go nuts (who says MH370 wasnt it already), the sole defense facade is gone. Two people are not really safer than one person if one of them is determined to do what they want (in a previous incident, I think two pilots fought for control). The level of irrationality is going to be very high. They already tackle any passangers acting out at the slightest excuse. Now the crew will be watching each other with suspicion too (they do already, but this might increaSe it to paranoia).
Singha wrote:Boy am i glad indigo does not feature metal cutlery. Flying to goa in a month in full dhoti shiber mode.
DARPA is soliciting innovative research proposals for developing a 100 Gb/s airborne RF communications link capable of distances exceeding 100 km and 200 km for air-to-ground and air-to-air, respectively, within a single radio frequency channel. The proposed program, 100G, seeks innovative approaches for using high-order modulation together with spatial multiplexing to achieve those goals by attaining spectral efficiencies greater than 20 bits-per-second-per hertz.
The prototype 100G system developed and tested in Phases 2 and 3 will include an airborne and a ground node. The airborne node SWaP will be compatible with high-altitude unmanned air vehicles (UAVs), as specified in Table 2 of Section 1.11. The ground node will be designed to allow installation and operation at a forward operating base. The 100G airborne and ground systems each require the integration of spatial multiplexing and high-order modulation capabilities; pointing, acquisition, and tracking (PAT); autonomous node discovery and link formation; link reliability mechanisms for reliable data exchange; and network interfaces.
The 100G prototype will operate in the 71-76 GHz and 81-86 GHz bands, using high-order modulation and spatial multiplexing. Use of the millimeter-wave frequencies enables high signal power gain from compact apertures to overcome modest weather impairments on the signal. It also enables the system to take advantage of spatial multiplexing due to the relationship between wavelength and Rayleigh range [See Appendix 4]. High-order modulation further increases spectral efficiency, potentially enabling a 5 b/s/Hz signal in the 5 GHz channel bandwidths to attain 25 Gb/s between each pair of transmit and receive apertures. Thus a 100G prototype with two (2) transmit and two (2) receive apertures, with each aperture transmitting or receiving two orthogonally polarized signals, would create four (4) independent streams and attain a spectral efficiency of 20 b/s/Hz.
System operation and the range of potential operating environments drive much of the requisite system capabilities. In particular, the system must be able to adapt to channel capacity changes resulting from aircraft orientation changes, sudden signal attenuation, and atmospheric scintillation effects. Aircraft maneuvers (e.g., flat or banked turns) will cause aperture blockages and changes in correlation among the spatially multiplexed signals at the airborne and ground nodes. Furthermore, changes in weather conditions affect channel capacity and scintillation near the ground station could cause significant received signal power fluctuations. These phenomena will cause channel effects that may be predictable at times (e.g., aperture array aspect changes during steady flight) but unpredictable at others (e.g., transmission through a localized rain storm or scintillation). Finally, the system must be able to operate at reduced data rates and extended link ranges where a 100 Gb/s link is beyond the system design.
These operational factors similarly influence the design of the spatial multiplexing algorithms, modem, and network interface. The spatial multiplexing algorithms must autonomously adapt to changes in signal strength, signal correlation, and number of available apertures to achieve optimal channel capacity given the link conditions. The modem must be able to support a 100 Gb/s data rate—not including any coding overhead needed to achieve a bit error rate of 10-8 —at the objective ranges while also supporting variable data rates based on link conditions. Finally, the 100G system must be robust against link disruptions and compatible with airborne networking protocols.
While the 100G program is focused on developing data link technologies rather than airborne networking technologies, it is still important that the prototype provide a reliable link that is compatible with airborne networking protocols. Link reliability mechanisms need to ensure that the link can adapt to the impediments described previously. The system must also provide or support network reliability protocols that allow intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) payloads or hosted networks to adapt traffic flows to prevailing link conditions. It is important that the 100G system incorporate or demonstrate mechanisms (e.g., outage prediction and detection, local queuing, retransmission, and flow control) to allow ISR payloads and networking protocols to adapt to rapid changes in link conditions.
vasu raya wrote:Brar saab maybe you can pen your thoughts on LO/VLO stuff in some article in BR Monitor and also about the direction technology within US aviation is taking, funding issues aside.
Here are a couple of scenarios for the unmanned trainer,
1) Not sure if Choppers have 'MALD support' so if they need escort to mask their RCS, an UAV or unmanned trainer putting out a higher RCS and matching their speeds is useful. The primary threat of MANPADs would be redirected towards this escort. if CMDS is integrated with the UAV or the trainer it increases its own survival. In addition if Luneburg lenses were integrated then the RCS could be 'dialed' with the platform's original RCS at the lower end and all the way to a Mi-26 or a Chinook at the higher end. A low RCS UAV to start with makes much sense in that respect and even Panchi (wheeled version of Nishant) with a matching endurance to a chopper would be a good fit.
2) Afghan air force currently only has Mi-17's and any fixed wing aircraft are denied to them, a start could be made here by providing trainers to them. The difference is instructors (second seat) could be remote while the trainee is in the cockpit, how different is it from flying a Predator?
Japan to test fly F-3 stealth fighter this summer
Staff Reporter 2015-04-07 17:22 (GMT+8)
A prototype of Japan's F-3 stealth fighter jet. (Internet photo)
The highly anticipated F-3, Japan's first domestically-made stealth jet, is aiming to conduct test flights this summer, reports the PLA Daily, a China-based media outlet for the People's Liberation Army.
If the tests are successful, the F-3 will represent a breakthrough for Japan in terms of stealth capabilities and high-powered engine technology, the report said. The advanced fifth-generation fighter, which originates from Japan's advanced technology demonstrator-experimental (ATD-X) program, has been designed to deliver superior performance in the four major quality indicators of stealth, supersonic cruise capability, maneuverability and integrated avionics systems.
In terms of stealth technology, the F-3's exterior is said to contain absorbing materials that can reduce radar reflection. Apart from evading radar detection, the aircraft also aims to eliminate visible light signals, electronic signals, heat and noise in order to minimize detectability.
The cruise capability of the F-3 will rely on its 15-ton-level high-powered engine co-developed by Japan's IHI Corporation and the Technical Research and Development Institute of the country's Ministry of Defense. The engine will reportedly feature XF5-1 low-bypass turbofan technology and composite ceramic materials highly resistant to heat.
Ordinarily, fighter jets need to make a compromise between stealth and maneuverability, but the F-3's design is said to be able to resolve the conflict. The jet has been designed to be light and multi-purpose, with diamond-shaped wings with no empennage. It has also borrowed advantageous designs from other American fighter jets, with an intake ramp similar to that of the X-32 and a Y-shaped tail that resembles the YF-23.
The F-3's avionics system integrates a high-performance active phased array radar, electronic warfare systems and multi-function RF sensors, with fiber cables to enable high mobility control and improved radar technology to expand the detection area and distance.
Despite its impressive design, the F-3 still faces many practical obstacles before it can become a reality, the PLA Daily said. Researchers are still exploring engine capabilities and need to figure out problems such as compressors and burners for such a high-powered engine. The fact that engines in the older F-2, which are less powerful than those in the F-3, have malfunctioned during flights, with reports of strong vibrations during high speeds, demonstrates that Japan's engine technology is not sufficiently mature, the PLA Daily added.
The aircraft's avionics system is also problematic because it is split into software and hardware, and Japan's lack of experience dealing with complex air flows could make the system vulnerable to poor weather conditions. The hydraulics system is also believed to be a concern for a stealth jet designed to be so agile.
Additionally, Japan's fighter materials technology has reached a bottleneck. The US F-15, for instance, has a titanium proportion as high as 26.5%, but it is not practical for Japan to simply copy the Americans as the former is completely reliant on imports for such raw materials.
The development of the F-3 carries significant strategic meaning for Japan, the PLA Daily said. On the one hand, the aircraft is viewed upon as a return to form for Japan's aviation industry and represents a show of strength against China, especially given Tokyo's efforts to lift its constitutional prohibition against collective self-defense. On the other, a successful F-3 program shows that Japan can stand on its own in developing a superior fighter. Japan has been over-reliant on the US in developing fighter jets in the past, rendering its own technologies lagging. America's guarded attitude towards Japan has led to the US suspending cooperation on multiple occasions, so the F-3 could end up being a bargaining chip in future negotiations.
I think the good news recently was that the USAF was to continue with A-10 ops/upgrades.You need a tough heavily armoured tankbuster to survive in the current era of anti-air weaponry available with ground forces
Despite comments from naval aviation leaders in recent months that stealth has become irrelevant, it remains the key ingredient in new combat aircraft design, Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh said Wednesday. “Stealth has not gone by the wayside. The idea that stealth is somehow dead is just wrong,” he told defense reporters at a Washington, D.C., breakfast. While he allowed that an enemy may be able to develop a radar that could detect a stealth aircraft at long-range, “stealth is about breaking kill chains.” While an acquisition radar “may be able to see you ... when they try to transition that track to a tracking radar, it fades and they can’t actually do any targeting, or they launch a weapon and somewhere during the weapon flight [it] ... loses track, because of some aspect of your stealth characteristics,” he said. “As long as we have that capability, stealth is a good thing. And, we’ll continue to develop it.” Welsh added that, “The good news is, we’re getting much better at this. We understand the technology better, ... how the pieces of stealth interact, ... how it affects threat systems, ... our own systems, ... how to communicate better, ... operate better, and maintain stealth, and ... deliver weapons ... All that stuff is getting better and better and better.” Moreover, there is “no comparison between the stealth capabilities of the F-35 and … the F-117.” The difference is like “night and day. It’s a new world. And that will continue.”
China's new early warning aircraft can track 60 targets
Staff Reporter 2015-04-12 12:31 (GMT+8)
A Chinese KJ-500 early warning aircraft. (Internet photo)
China's new KJ-500 early warning aircraft, designed by Shaanxi Aircraft Corporation, is capable of tracking about 60 aircraft within a range of 470 kilometers, according to the Washington-based Strategy Page.
With a round radar dome on the top of the fuselage, the KJ-500 looks more like a US early warning aircraft replica. It is distinguished by a smaller frame and a design based on the Y-9 four-engine turboprop aircraft.
The KJ-500 will eventually replace the People's Liberation Army Air Force's 11 KJ-200, carried by the smaller Y-8 aircraft with a long box-like radar.
In addition to the aircraft under Chinese service, three export versions of the KJ-200, known as the ZDK-03, have been provided to the Pakistan Air Force.
The development of Chinese early warning aircraft began in the 1990s when the United States stopped Israel from selling the Phalcon, developed with American technology, to China. Around the same time, Beijing purchased four Russian-built A-50 early warning aircraft, developed based on Il-76 cargo plane, and converted them to equip radar systems similar to the KJ-200. China is not satisfied with the technology yet, but claims that it has a better phased array radar system than Phalcon.
PS A-10/CAS.If its the "mission" not the aircraft,then at what affordable cost do you perform the mission? With a bomb truck or sports car?
I guess only Gator and MD and I have flown CAS. And over 75% of my combat missions were CAS or LZ prep or escort.
What a wonderful world if we could keep perfect, point-design aircraft for every enemy capability and desired national interests that require the use of force. Need SgtMac and his philosophy huh?
If you can find my 1974 letter to AvWeek that got me in serious trouble, it was the point that the Warthog would be great ( with 1960's OFTS avionics like we had in the Sluf) for CAS and CSAR, but not viable for interdiction. At the time we had the 'vaark and the Sluf and the Double Ugly for interdiction. I also questioned survivability in the future scenarios. I will guarantee the Warthog would been slaughtered over Hanoi in 1972 when I had my few mission there. We survived because we could hit within 25 - 30 meters from 8,000 feet release and be at 400 - 500 + knots. Jamming and such helped, but one pass, haul a$$ was the way to go.
So back in 1974 we were developing a neat jet to replace the Sluf and F-100 and F-4 ( name of this website). The 'vaark was being phased out except for the Spark Vaark and the ones SAC had. The A-10 had been selected for production but we still had a stoopid flyoff with the Sluf ( my boss was there developing the "rules" and said the whole thing was a sham). USAF had sold the thing as a jet-powered A-1. No electronics, just a WW2 gunsight, big gun, armored cockpit and slow!!! Sheesh. The A-7D/E avionics could have been added for prolly a million bucks right outta the store. But NOOOOOOoooo...... we had sold it to Congress as the uber-attack plane and did not need all the fancy electronics and such.
The guys I knew in the A-9 and A-10 flyoff had not flown the A-7D ( not quite fielded, but close). They would have DEMANDED a subset of the A-7D system, especially the INS and NAVWD computer. They already had a HUD. Doppler? Nope. Cosmic ground map radar - nope. Radar altimiter - prolly. Projected map - yep. Aux radio - maybe. The INS, computer and A-7D HUD at the time came in well under $1 million. You could have had a literal "plug and play" weapon system with almost zero development and such. But then ( 1974)a lotta high ranking USAF folks would have to beg, and Congress would ask why they had not asked for this in the beginning. And they likely would have gotten it, as the Sluf was already doomed by the new "air combat fighter" and it was already being transferred to the Guard and Reserve ( Hell, my first student in 1973 was from the ABQ Taco outfit and the next was from the Swampfox outfit in Carolina. We were already getting assignments to the new Guard and Reserve outfits checking out in the jet).
Many of us from The Beach went to the Hog, and my squad was the first operational Hog outfit and flew in The Storm. I escaped by volunteering for duty at Air University and then politic for a Viper in 2 or 3 years - made it, too, first squad in the world. Heh heh.
The CAS missions that I flew 40 years ago are rare today ( the one from the video I posted). Ones I have seen lately are in urban environments or the bad guys are a mile away and you nail them with a LGB or JDAM. There may be a day when we see something like Viet Nam or even the Storm, but that does not justify zillions of bucks and limited capability to do anythng else with the jet.
The premier air combat mission of USAF and the USN and even the USMC is to prevent the enema from dong CAS versus our friendly forces. After that, we can use the capabilities of our own planes to help the grunts. And we should not forget the embedded helos that both the USMC and Army have. We simply cannot have a strategy that depends upon airpower to come to the rescue on a regular basis.
Sorry to rant, so will step down.
Agree Gums, and this was proven in Desert Storm when A-10s were sent on interdiction sorties past the FEBA to go hunt mobile Scud missiles that Saddam was lobbing into Israel. They were pulled back from this duty by General Horner due to damage and losses they were taking; interdiction just not being a viable mission for Hogs for the survivability purposes you mention. CAS and CSAR? Sure. Especially CSAR. CAS, it's just one of many tools in the toolbox now, and excels at specific duties in specific situations. Otherwise, nowdays.....with all it's upgrades in the past 10 years......the A-10 is little more than a 300 knot F-16 technology-wise.
It's funny, the latest I keep hearing from many of the current A-10 guys is how the gun is such a primary weapon. Granted, in my day we shot the gun on every range sortie, but still our primary anti-armor weapon was the AGM-65. Always was. The biggest focus points for us was the AGM-65, due to the complexity in employing it.....you had to be good at discerning targets in the TV screen and knowing what limitations and gotcha's there were for both the EO as well as the IR versions. I can remember days when the sun was setting and it was thermal crossover. The EO Mav would be useless as there wasn't enough light to see anything in the EO picture, and the IR Mav would be useless due to the thermal cross. Both Mav's being carried being unable to use for about a 1-2 hour period of time. Second focus for us was low level CBU diving deliveries, such as 10 pop, due to the severe number of mils required, nearly at the bottom of the HUD.....banana that pass by a few degrees, or make slow/shallow errors, and you'll never get a HUD solution prior to passing release altitude and the very-close-to-it abort altitude. Gun was practiced, but as it was boresighted at 41 mils, it was point and shoot; unlike bombing where you had to work the bomb triangle correctly, therefore it was relatively easy.
Singha wrote:If the a10 has a lot of life left India could use 100 if us wants to dump them.
If they want to dump it, they will dump it in Porkistan so that they can fight regiments and armored units operated by Talibunnies. That too for free!! free!!!! free!!!!!!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests