The reasons may be whatever, the fact is ... FGFA = PAK FA. So then why not wait for it to complete and then test it against the F-35.Philip wrote:So if we want the FGFA from now on,it will be more of buying the T-50 in much the same way that we bought the MKI,with some minor tweaks."Opportunity knocks but once".
In either case, we can negotiate a deal that delivers two squadrons off-the-shelf to the IAF by 2020.
That's where the MoD needs to step in and ensure that the Tejas program stands firm. Bolster it with additional orders for force multipliers if necessary.The LCA's birth pangs-the baby has been for so long in "confinement",with the definitive MK-2 still about 4-5 years away,is why the IAF is so desperate about the Rafale."A bird in the bush is worth two in the hand". If the defence budget is raised,then the Raffy will make the cut,but there could be a cut in the final numbers.120 may be the max.
Unlike the IN, the IAF is unfortunately not invested, truly invested, in the Tejas program. And since its got a fixed squadron strength rather than fixed budget authorized, the financial burden on the exchequer is not an issue for the IAF brass either.
You may not like the outcome Philip, but it doesn't change the fact that total orders for the F-35 have increased, despite cuts from Europe.Just as US allies are cutting down on JSF numbers,the US too,so too will we have to review the situ once the 120 are almost home.
Agreed.As far as the entire evaluation process goes,the Rafale has won fair and square.Plan "B"s or "C"s might require another round of byzantine bargaining,taking even more time.Nevertheless,the GOI must review the entire IAF's future force plans and modify them if required. With so many demands for economic growth ,etc.,the primary task of the new dispensation has clearly been spelt out as revitalising the economy.