Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.
Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 17949
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Karan M » 30 May 2019 16:41

Overhaul is a given.

What we do have in our local/imported kitty so far are:
  1. 6 channel RWR to prevent Blanking Eagle eye (on order, in induction) and DR118 (trials)
  2. HBJ pod to replace Russian/Israeli jammers (status awaited)
  3. MAWS (ready for fitment, trials?)
  4. i-Derby ER (order yet to be placed)
  5. ASRAAM (2x Su-30s modified as testbed, initial integration work cleared, orders yet to be placed)
  6. Brahmos (orders placed)
  7. Spice 2000 (being added)
  8. Desi weapons - all in development but which will make a radical change to the Su-30: PGHSLD (450/500kg), GPS bombs (500kg/1000kg), Glide bombs (500kg-1Ton, 30km-100km range), NGARM, Rudra M2, SAAW
  9. New avionics architecture + 2x wide area displays (DARE has proposal ready)
  10. Software defined radio (orders placed, to replace/supplant existing Russian radios which are capable but lower bandwidth etc).

Additional "missing" items:
  1. New IRST (program for domestic one has merely received DAC clearance)
  2. Radar upgrades, run to Russia (which ideally IAF should have funded LRDE for, to at least progress domestic capability for the future)
  3. Engine upgrades (Russians are putting in 117S variants into Su-30 SM)
  4. New weapons from Russia e.g. VRLAAM for AWACS etc (RVV-BD, 300km range)
  5. Towed decoy package (a bunch available) + expendable decoys (eg Brite Cloud)

Sumeet
BRFite
Posts: 1380
Joined: 22 May 2002 11:31

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Sumeet » 01 Jun 2019 01:56

Who is supplying MAWS for MKI upgrade ? Is it Radar based or IIR ?

Desi IRST will take long time to be integrated, is it possible to get PAK FA IRST in the mean time ?

Sid
BRFite
Posts: 1634
Joined: 19 Mar 2006 13:26

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Sid » 01 Jun 2019 02:22

^^There is RWR installed, but no MAWS. DRDO is developed a dual color MAWS for Super Su 30 upgrade program.

abhik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2435
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 17:42

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby abhik » 01 Jun 2019 11:50

Sumeet wrote:Who is supplying MAWS for MKI upgrade ? Is it Radar based or IIR ?

Desi IRST will take long time to be integrated, is it possible to get PAK FA IRST in the mean time ?


What is so special about the PAK FA IRST? Russians aren't known for having the best IR sensor tech no?

Austin
BRF Oldie
Posts: 23315
Joined: 23 Jul 2000 11:31

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Austin » 03 Jun 2019 18:00


gunnvant
BRFite -Trainee
Posts: 29
Joined: 05 Sep 2017 10:40

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby gunnvant » 03 Jun 2019 18:37

Austin wrote:Vishnu Som wrote about MKI upgrade

https://twitter.com/VishnuNDTV/status/1 ... 7028307968


Mods, please delete/move if irrelevant. Opening tweet seems to suggest that the AESA is operational, quick google search suggests it started integration tests in 2015, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-b ... hter-12777
Isn't the twitter thread a bit sensationalist?

Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 17949
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Karan M » 03 Jun 2019 18:50

Definitely sensationalist and sky is falling. :roll:

abhik
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2435
Joined: 02 Feb 2009 17:42

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby abhik » 03 Jun 2019 19:01

Standard scaremongering tactics to push for new equipment, expect some more articles on the same lines .

JTull
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2615
Joined: 18 Jul 2001 11:31

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby JTull » 03 Jun 2019 21:25

Austin wrote:Vishnu Som wrote about MKI upgrade

https://twitter.com/VishnuNDTV/status/1 ... 7028307968


Seems lifafa courier service has restarted. Or perhaps someone can track any recent phoren yatra.

Let's avoid giving airtime to this guy.

MeshaVishwas
BRFite
Posts: 259
Joined: 16 Feb 2019 17:20

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby MeshaVishwas » 03 Jun 2019 22:50


ramana
Forum Moderator
Posts: 52582
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby ramana » 03 Jun 2019 23:30

MeshaVishwas wrote:IAF to equip 40 Su-30 MKIs with BrahMos cruise missile in next 3 years
https://zeenews.india.com/india/iaf-to-equip-40-su-30-mkis-with-brahmos-cruise-missile-in-next-3-years-2208745.html/amp



Are these 40 Su-30MKIs the special squadrons that were required a few years back?

MeshaVishwas
BRFite
Posts: 259
Joined: 16 Feb 2019 17:20

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby MeshaVishwas » 03 Jun 2019 23:38

Not very sure but the numbers and lack of any news regarding "SFC looking at......." kinda news indicates that they could be specialised for the deterrence role.

kit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3029
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 18:16

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby kit » 03 Jun 2019 23:50

so then what will the even more specilaised Rafales do ? .. in addtion to these specialised Su 30 s they are also nuclear capable ..that combo is an overwhelming force ..esp with the nuke tipped Brahmos.. dont think even uncle has deployed such a combo in South Asia

Karan M
Forum Moderator
Posts: 17949
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 00:58

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Karan M » 04 Jun 2019 00:17

Those 40 Su-30s can carry heavy centerline loads but will also be heavier, slower, less agile than regular MKIs. If additional EMP/EMI/EMC hardening is part of the package, they could also be ALA carriers. See discussion here.

Prithwiraj
BRFite
Posts: 161
Joined: 21 Dec 2016 18:48

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Prithwiraj » 04 Jun 2019 06:30

Is it possible from Radar signature to differentiate between Regular Su-30MKI and Brahmosized Su-30MKI based on radars at the disposal of both western and eastern front adversaries

kit
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3029
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 18:16

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby kit » 04 Jun 2019 22:59

Prithwiraj wrote:Is it possible from Radar signature to differentiate between Regular Su-30MKI and Brahmosized Su-30MKI based on radars at the disposal of both western and eastern front adversaries



i think quite a few have RCI reduction features ; bottom line its not advertised and no one is going to know..lets leave it at that

tsarkar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2709
Joined: 08 May 2006 13:44
Location: mumbai

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby tsarkar » 04 Jun 2019 23:49

Prithwiraj wrote:Is it possible from Radar signature to differentiate between Regular Su-30MKI and Brahmosized Su-30MKI based on radars at the disposal of both western and eastern front adversaries

No. The fuselage strengthening is internal with no external changes to the outer mould line. Also the 42 fighters with BrahMos strengthening won’t be carrying BrahMos all the time to preserve airframe and engine fatigue life.

tsarkar
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2709
Joined: 08 May 2006 13:44
Location: mumbai

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby tsarkar » 05 Jun 2019 00:13

Having a heavy load on a fighter is a bad idea increasing fatigue of a versatile multi role platform. Adding a booster to BrahMos or a longer range dedicated missile like Shourya or “tactical” Agni 4 is a much better option.

The Russian Tochka missiles are used for similar outcomes quite economically and effectively in Ukraine, Syria and Yemen. The older Scud used by Afghanistan Najibullah regime after Soviet withdrawal inflicted a crushing defeat to the Pakistanis when they mounted an invasion with regular army under Hamid Gul in the Battle of Jalalabad in 1989.

Bishwa
BRFite
Posts: 299
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Bishwa » 05 Jun 2019 05:46

The battle of Jalalabad 1989 is documented in this WP article from that time.. The Pakistanis suffered badly then..
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/ ... ee8f2e99f8

ashishvikas
BRFite
Posts: 393
Joined: 17 Oct 2016 14:18

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby ashishvikas » 09 Jul 2019 18:23

Indian Air Force seeking to acquire 18 more Su-30MKI fighters from Russia

https://www.janes.com/article/89763/ind ... rom-russia

[i]The Indian Air Force (IAF) is seeking to acquire an additional 18 Sukhoi Su-30MKI multirole fighter aircraft from Russia, according to Vladimir Drozhzhov, the deputy director of Russia's Federal Service for Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC).

Briefing reporters in Moscow on 8 July, Drozhzhov said that the FSMTC is "processing" a request from New Delhi to procure 18 more of these fighters for the IAF in kit form for assembly in India.

The platforms will supplement the 13 squadrons totalling 272 Su-30MKIs that the IAF intends to operate by 2020-21, thus taking to 14 the number of squadrons with this fighter type.

That said, the indigenous content in the HAL-built Su-30MKIs is around 50%, according to HAL sources.

Meanwhile, Drozhzhov said that Moscow is also processing New Delhi's requests to acquire 20 additional upgraded MiG-29UPG fighters.
[/i]

Aditya_V
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10783
Joined: 05 Apr 2006 16:25

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Aditya_V » 09 Jul 2019 18:42

So HAL will be making Su-30's for the next 2 years, That's 290 minus 8 crashes for Su-30s. Hope the next 36 we are building can carry Brahmos and we do some plans on upgrades.

Vivek K
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2015
Joined: 15 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Vivek K » 09 Jul 2019 22:57

ashishvikas wrote:Indian Air Force seeking to acquire 18 more Su-30MKI fighters from Russia

https://www.janes.com/article/89763/ind ... rom-russia

........
Meanwhile, Drozhzhov said that Moscow is also processing New Delhi's requests to acquire 20 additional upgraded MiG-29UPG fighters

Nyet!

Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7354
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Rakesh » 09 Jul 2019 23:20

Vivek, if these purchases can retire a few MiG-21 and MiG-27 squadrons then I am all for it.

Ashokk
BRFite
Posts: 425
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Ashokk » 10 Jul 2019 01:24

Indian Air Force’s Integration Of British ASRAAM Missile On Sukhoi Su-30 MKI Irks Russia
The Indian Air Force’s (IAF) move to integrate British Advanced Short Range Air-to-Air missile (ASRAAM) to Russian-origin Sukhoi Su-30 MKI fighter jets has not gone down well with the Moscow, reports LiveFist.

“No country would allow this,” said Vladimir Drozhzhov, deputy director of Russia’s Federal Service of Military-Technical Cooperation (FSMTC). He said this while answering queries of a group of visiting Indian journalists at the Rosoboronexport offices in Moscow.

“This is mostly out of concern for the security of the technology. We are concerned about a foreign manufacturer invited to integrate anything on our equipment,” he added.

According to the report, Drozhzhov also indicated that Russia usually informed its customers that liabilities and after-sales support on supplied equipment stood jeopardised if the customer embarked on “any conrtact, modernisation or upgrade” that didn’t involve the “participation of the OEM.”

He also confirmed that Russia had received no formal communication from the IAF about the move.

As per the report, IAF is looking to replace the Russian-made Vympel R-73 missile with the ASRAAM in phases, and then standardise the British missile across its fleet of fighter aircraft.

Cybaru
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2294
Joined: 12 Jun 2000 11:31
Contact:

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Cybaru » 10 Jul 2019 02:44

Rakesh wrote:Vivek, if these purchases can retire a few MiG-21 and MiG-27 squadrons then I am all for it.


IMO anything that helps keep the type in the inventory is ok! More mig29 if can be inducted in a year and a half helping retire more Mig-21s would be awesome. More LCA should always be the first option, but adding more mirages/mig29/mki isn't a bad idea either. Instead of 18/20 MKIs, the order should be for another 18/20 more MKI's (total 40 more). This will help alleviate force depletions for a long while and help stabilize the MK1A and Mk2 lines.

Vivek K
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2015
Joined: 15 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Vivek K » 10 Jul 2019 04:48

Rakesh - read about the Russian reaction to British missiles being added to “our” aircraft!! And this is for deep TOT!

So why waste money on foreign fighters? Build more MK1s!! Add another line. Have the freedom to add whatever weapon or hardware to “our” aircraft!!

Katare
BRF Oldie
Posts: 2475
Joined: 02 Mar 2002 12:31

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Katare » 10 Jul 2019 07:35

gunnvant wrote:
Austin wrote:Vishnu Som wrote about MKI upgrade

https://twitter.com/VishnuNDTV/status/1 ... 7028307968


Mods, please delete/move if irrelevant. Opening tweet seems to suggest that the AESA is operational, quick google search suggests it started integration tests in 2015, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-b ... hter-12777
Isn't the twitter thread a bit sensationalist?


Opening tweet says “ a prototype fitted with AESA radar” in what world can this be read as AESA operational?

Some amount of sensationalism is needed to get the attention of larger audience and authorities. Typical massa land jingo tactic....

Cain Marko
BRF Oldie
Posts: 3507
Joined: 26 Jun 2005 10:26

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Cain Marko » 11 Jul 2019 01:10

Sometimes, journalists love sensation. Pity Vishnu is trying a similar tactic, he was a tad more sober. The MKI has seen constant improvement.... As has the BARS, this is not the Bars of 2001.

An upgraded BARS will be as good or better than the Irbis in many ways. The Irbis was a result of a more powerful TWT, something that the russkis were working on in the 90s but managed successfully around 2008. They managed to increase the transmit power to 20 kw from 7 on the BARS iirc. Don't see why this or similar solution can't be easily don'e on the bars since the Irbis is an evolved BARS to begin with.

BTW there are indications that something of this nature has already happened.... Per some Russian literature.

Rakesh
Forum Moderator
Posts: 7354
Joined: 15 Jan 2004 12:31
Location: Planet Earth
Contact:

Re: Su-30MKI: News and Discussion - August 9, 2014

Postby Rakesh » 19 Jul 2019 03:57

HAL Doubles LCA Tejas Production Capacity, Sukhoi SU-30 MKI Repair And Overhaul Capability Enhanced
https://swarajyamag.com/insta/hal-doubl ... y-enhanced

HAL has also enhanced its repair and overhaul (ROH) capability of the Sukhoi Su-30 MKI aircraft along with expediting the integration of the air variant of BrahMos supersonic missiles to the frontline fighter at its Nashik unit. HAL has also proposed an enhancement of ROH capability for the AL-31FP engines used in the Su-30 MKIs along with plans to establish ROH facilities for RD-33 MK engines of MiG-29K/KUB fighter aircraft.


Return to “Military Issues & History Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MeshaVishwas, mody, rajkumar and 50 guests