Bharat Rakshak Forum Announcement

Hello Everyone,

A warm welcome back to the Bharat Rakshak Forum.

Important Notice: Due to a corruption in the BR forum database we regret to announce that data records relating to some of our registered users have been lost. We estimate approx. 500 user details are deleted.

To ease the process of recreating the user IDs we request members that have previously posted on the BR forums to recognise and identify their posts, once the posts are identified please contact the BRF moderator team by emailing BRF Mod Team with your post details.

The mod team will be able to update your username, email etc. so that the user history can be maintained.

Unfortunately for members that have never posted or have had all their posts deleted i.e. users that have 0 posts, we will be unable to recreate your account hence we request that you re-register again.

We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
Seetal

China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.

ArjunPandit
BRFite
Posts: 315
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 06:37

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby ArjunPandit » 17 Jul 2017 19:18

chinese-army-conducts-live-fire-drills-in-tibet

There is a message to India as the article says, but the message should be to conduct a full scale fire exercise rather than DS.
That reminds me that IA hasnt done any major exercise in our eastern borders for long. I know IAF has done ex pralay but there is not much news about it. This thing has always intrigued me why is it so. Could be be our pacifist policies or lack of infra or our active exercises on western border that give us adequate exposure to avoid replicating the effort.

brar_w
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby brar_w » 19 Jul 2017 17:46

New BVRAAM may have entered PLAAF service



Images have emerged on Chinese online military forums showing a People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) Chengdu Aircraft Industry Corporation (CAC) J-10C combat aircraft armed with what appears to be a new beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM).

The fighter was photographed carrying two PL-10 short-range AAMs on its outer underwing pylons and two of the new missiles on its mid-underwing pylons.

Although nomenclature is uncertain as no official information is forthcoming, it is likely that the new missile is the one being referred to unofficially as the PL-15, with its appearance on the underwing pylons of a J-10C possibly reflecting that it is now in service.

The missile is estimated to be around 3.7 m long, with a diameter of 200 mm. It is fitted with low aspect ratio aerodynamic stabilising surfaces (trapezoidal wings) on its mid-section and at the moveable control surfaces (clipped delta fins) at its tail.

The respective surface spans approximately 390 mm and 515 mm. There is no visible evidence of a thrust vectoring control (TVC) system present at the rear of the new missile, as can clearly be seen on the PL-10, so control appears to be aerodynamic only. Additionally, there are no air intakes that would be necessary if propulsion was provided by a ramjet, so it can be assumed that a standard form rocket motor is being used.

Photographs of a similar missile carried by a Shenyang Aircraft Corporation J-16 emerged in 2012, which is thought to be undergoing development trials. Like the recent sighting, the missile’s aerodynamic surfaces are the same low aspect ratio planform, which facilitates loading in the internal weapons bay of the CAC J-20 'fifth-generation' fighter.

Images appeared in 2013 of a J-20 carrying the missile, which has the capacity to take up to four of them in its weapons bay. It would seem a second of the new missiles was present in the bay, albeit without its aerodynamic surfaces attached.

Currently, the PLAAF’s principal in-service BVRAAM is the PL-12, which was introduced around 2005 and is thought to have a range of 60-70 km and a maximum speed at altitude of approximately Mach 4. The export version of the PL-12 is believed to be the SD-10.

Characteristics of the new missile are inevitably speculative, although it is reasonable to expect improvements over the PL-12. One usually well informed and reliable source assesses that the missile has a dual pulse rocket motor that may extend its range out to 200 km. It is also thought to be equipped with active/passive electronically scanned array radar and datalinking, which would support long-range engagements and make the missile less vulnerable to electronic countermeasures.

The recently photographed missile is not the same as another long-range AAM seen under the wing of a J-16 in December 2016 when it was thought to be undergoing trials. The nomenclature for this missile is also unknown, so it is commonly referred to as PL-X.

At around 5.8 m in length and 300 mm in diameter, it is much larger than the missile seen carried by the J-10C and has control surfaces only at the tail, although the short extension at the rear of the missile could possibly be some form of TVC system.

Having been photographed being carried by J-10, J-16, and J-20 aircraft, it is reasonable to assume that the new missile is intended to become the PLAAF’s main BVRAAM, and that it will be used by naval combat aircraft as well.

It is thought that targeting data for the missile can be supplied over the datalink by airborne early warning and control aircraft such as the KJ-500 and KJ-2000. Not only will this offer potentially longer-range detections than those achievable using the launch aircraft's radar, but it will also reduce the likelihood that the firing platform will be detected by the target aircraft.



Image

chola
BRFite
Posts: 1135
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby chola » 19 Jul 2017 19:38

^^^
Probably using the same Russian seeker head as the R-77. Nothing to worry about.

brar_w
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5401
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby brar_w » 19 Jul 2017 19:45

This report seems to imply that it using a new seeker, different from their other BVRAAM/PL-12 which borrows the seeker and data-link from the R-77.

DavidD
BRFite
Posts: 790
Joined: 23 Jun 2010 04:08

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby DavidD » 20 Jul 2017 09:09

Some news on the PLA orbat reform (from Forbin on SDF), not sexy topic but quite important operationally.

The red line outlines disbanded corps:

Image

The remaining corps are undergoing brigadization, including the formation of combined arms brigades as following:

4 x combined arms battalion (合成营)
- each battalion (31 IFV + 40 MBT/Assault vehicle + 6 x 120mm mortar): 3 x IFV (装步连) company, 2 x tank (坦克连) company (only for 2 battalion) or assault vehicle (突击车连) company, 1 x 6x120mm mortar (炮兵连) company.

1 x artillery battalion (火炮营)
- comprising 4 x 9 gun (炮兵连) company or 2x9 gun (炮兵连)+ 2x 9 MRL company (火箭炮连), 1 x 4 ATGM (反坦克连) company

1 x air defence battalion (防空营)
- comprising 2 x 9 AAA (高炮连) company, 2 x 9 SAM (防空导单) company

deejay
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby deejay » 20 Jul 2017 10:31

DavidD wrote:Some news on the PLA orbat reform (from Forbin on SDF), not sexy topic but quite important operationally.

...


Is their any info on UAV orbat on the Chinese side?

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32516
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 23 Jul 2017 20:33

A list of major Chinese military installations, radar sites and logistics hubs near the border with India with coordinates. Will provide kmz file later
https://youtu.be/KtCb2P_KOgA

deejay
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby deejay » 23 Jul 2017 20:56

^^^ Tweet it sir.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 32516
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 23 Jul 2017 21:11

^^Done

AdityaM
BRFite
Posts: 1722
Joined: 30 Sep 2002 11:31
Location: New Delhi

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby AdityaM » 26 Jul 2017 00:37

From twitter:

https://twitter.com/hdevreij/status/889842784584294400

Dutch civilian airline pilot witnessed a presumed Chinese (ABM?) missile launch over the Himalayas. Pics copyright: Christiaan van Heijst

Image

Image


https://twitter.com/defconwsalerts/stat ... 2504283136
Transporter vehicles carrying equipment for the firing of a ballistic missile were seen arriving in Kusong, North Pyongan Province


More info and pics from the pilot
https://jpcvanheijst.com/blogs/2017/07/ ... over-china

http://liuqiankktt.blog.163.com/blog/st ... 495336818/

Prasad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6352
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 00:53
Location: Chennai

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Prasad » 26 Jul 2017 01:24

What the heck are these that require boring through hills to form a line that stretches all along the TsangPo river?
From 29°17'04.7"N 91°09'05.3"E to 29°17'21.4"N 91°02'58.9"E

Also looks like a massive subterranean whatever - Two tunnel entrances at Shannan -29°12'28.0"N 91°44'43.7"E

Another slightly to the north, on the other side of the hill - Two entrances again (at different levels?) 29°14'31.7"N 91°44'13.6"E

Note the racetrack type whitish road structure close to both tunnels? What are those? And are those orange trucks construction trucks ?

And what are these at 29°13'01.2"N 91°42'08.4"E ? Also at 29°12'34.6"N 91°43'09.1"E

Holy whatever - Look at the trucks in this compound right next to the hill into which those tunnels lead to - 29°11'56.8"N 91°45'28.0"E
Power Substation (I think. Looks that way with all the transmission lines leading from/to it) - 29°15'43.3"N 91°52'57.4"E There is a small track leading E from the SE corner to some 'thing'. Can anyone ID what that is? 4 holes in the ground surrounded by 4 mounds?

Possible SAM locations? North side of the Tsangpo of Shannan - Mountainside tracks leading up to hilltop with tunnels - 29°18'53.8"N 91°48'06.1"E
Possible massive barracks complex - 29°16'49.6"N 91°53'13.7"E There are 5 such complexes on the north bank in a line.

Bing maps appears to have older images than google. That last structure isn't present in bing. Same with all those trucks at that compound in Shannan. Guess Shannan, sitting at that tri-junction with the S202 that leads to border/Bum La pass will be figure quite extensively in our target list. Electricity being a prime target. And dams. Wrecking the Lhasa river might starve the city but flood everything downstream pretty quickly.


Return to “Military Issues & History Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AlapArya, Devendra, shivatar, shravanp and 31 guests