Bharat Rakshak Forum Announcement

Hello Everyone,

A warm welcome back to the Bharat Rakshak Forum.

Important Notice: Due to a corruption in the BR forum database we regret to announce that data records relating to some of our registered users have been lost. We estimate approx. 500 user details are deleted.

To ease the process of recreating the user IDs we request members that have previously posted on the BR forums to recognise and identify their posts, once the posts are identified please contact the BRF moderator team by emailing BRF Mod Team with your post details.

The mod team will be able to update your username, email etc. so that the user history can be maintained.

Unfortunately for members that have never posted or have had all their posts deleted i.e. users that have 0 posts, we will be unable to recreate your account hence we request that you re-register again.

We apologise for any inconvenience caused and thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
Seetal

China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

The Military Issues & History Forum is a venue to discuss issues relating to the military aspects of the Indian Armed Forces, whether the past, present or future. We request members to kindly stay within the mandate of this forum and keep their exchanges of views, on a civilised level, however vehemently any disagreement may be felt. All feedback regarding forum usage may be sent to the moderators using the Feedback Form or by clicking the Report Post Icon in any objectionable post for proper action. Please note that the views expressed by the Members and Moderators on these discussion boards are that of the individuals only and do not reflect the official policy or view of the Bharat-Rakshak.com Website. Copyright Violation is strictly prohibited and may result in revocation of your posting rights - please read the FAQ for full details. Users must also abide by the Forum Guidelines at all times.

ArjunPandit
BRFite
Posts: 409
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 06:37

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby ArjunPandit » 17 Jul 2017 19:18

chinese-army-conducts-live-fire-drills-in-tibet

There is a message to India as the article says, but the message should be to conduct a full scale fire exercise rather than DS.
That reminds me that IA hasnt done any major exercise in our eastern borders for long. I know IAF has done ex pralay but there is not much news about it. This thing has always intrigued me why is it so. Could be be our pacifist policies or lack of infra or our active exercises on western border that give us adequate exposure to avoid replicating the effort.

brar_w
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5690
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby brar_w » 19 Jul 2017 17:46

New BVRAAM may have entered PLAAF service



Images have emerged on Chinese online military forums showing a People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) Chengdu Aircraft Industry Corporation (CAC) J-10C combat aircraft armed with what appears to be a new beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVRAAM).

The fighter was photographed carrying two PL-10 short-range AAMs on its outer underwing pylons and two of the new missiles on its mid-underwing pylons.

Although nomenclature is uncertain as no official information is forthcoming, it is likely that the new missile is the one being referred to unofficially as the PL-15, with its appearance on the underwing pylons of a J-10C possibly reflecting that it is now in service.

The missile is estimated to be around 3.7 m long, with a diameter of 200 mm. It is fitted with low aspect ratio aerodynamic stabilising surfaces (trapezoidal wings) on its mid-section and at the moveable control surfaces (clipped delta fins) at its tail.

The respective surface spans approximately 390 mm and 515 mm. There is no visible evidence of a thrust vectoring control (TVC) system present at the rear of the new missile, as can clearly be seen on the PL-10, so control appears to be aerodynamic only. Additionally, there are no air intakes that would be necessary if propulsion was provided by a ramjet, so it can be assumed that a standard form rocket motor is being used.

Photographs of a similar missile carried by a Shenyang Aircraft Corporation J-16 emerged in 2012, which is thought to be undergoing development trials. Like the recent sighting, the missile’s aerodynamic surfaces are the same low aspect ratio planform, which facilitates loading in the internal weapons bay of the CAC J-20 'fifth-generation' fighter.

Images appeared in 2013 of a J-20 carrying the missile, which has the capacity to take up to four of them in its weapons bay. It would seem a second of the new missiles was present in the bay, albeit without its aerodynamic surfaces attached.

Currently, the PLAAF’s principal in-service BVRAAM is the PL-12, which was introduced around 2005 and is thought to have a range of 60-70 km and a maximum speed at altitude of approximately Mach 4. The export version of the PL-12 is believed to be the SD-10.

Characteristics of the new missile are inevitably speculative, although it is reasonable to expect improvements over the PL-12. One usually well informed and reliable source assesses that the missile has a dual pulse rocket motor that may extend its range out to 200 km. It is also thought to be equipped with active/passive electronically scanned array radar and datalinking, which would support long-range engagements and make the missile less vulnerable to electronic countermeasures.

The recently photographed missile is not the same as another long-range AAM seen under the wing of a J-16 in December 2016 when it was thought to be undergoing trials. The nomenclature for this missile is also unknown, so it is commonly referred to as PL-X.

At around 5.8 m in length and 300 mm in diameter, it is much larger than the missile seen carried by the J-10C and has control surfaces only at the tail, although the short extension at the rear of the missile could possibly be some form of TVC system.

Having been photographed being carried by J-10, J-16, and J-20 aircraft, it is reasonable to assume that the new missile is intended to become the PLAAF’s main BVRAAM, and that it will be used by naval combat aircraft as well.

It is thought that targeting data for the missile can be supplied over the datalink by airborne early warning and control aircraft such as the KJ-500 and KJ-2000. Not only will this offer potentially longer-range detections than those achievable using the launch aircraft's radar, but it will also reduce the likelihood that the firing platform will be detected by the target aircraft.



Image

chola
BRFite
Posts: 1472
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby chola » 19 Jul 2017 19:38

^^^
Probably using the same Russian seeker head as the R-77. Nothing to worry about.

brar_w
BRF Oldie
Posts: 5690
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby brar_w » 19 Jul 2017 19:45

This report seems to imply that it using a new seeker, different from their other BVRAAM/PL-12 which borrows the seeker and data-link from the R-77.

DavidD
BRFite
Posts: 854
Joined: 23 Jun 2010 04:08

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby DavidD » 20 Jul 2017 09:09

Some news on the PLA orbat reform (from Forbin on SDF), not sexy topic but quite important operationally.

The red line outlines disbanded corps:

Image

The remaining corps are undergoing brigadization, including the formation of combined arms brigades as following:

4 x combined arms battalion (合成营)
- each battalion (31 IFV + 40 MBT/Assault vehicle + 6 x 120mm mortar): 3 x IFV (装步连) company, 2 x tank (坦克连) company (only for 2 battalion) or assault vehicle (突击车连) company, 1 x 6x120mm mortar (炮兵连) company.

1 x artillery battalion (火炮营)
- comprising 4 x 9 gun (炮兵连) company or 2x9 gun (炮兵连)+ 2x 9 MRL company (火箭炮连), 1 x 4 ATGM (反坦克连) company

1 x air defence battalion (防空营)
- comprising 2 x 9 AAA (高炮连) company, 2 x 9 SAM (防空导单) company

deejay
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 3364
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby deejay » 20 Jul 2017 10:31

DavidD wrote:Some news on the PLA orbat reform (from Forbin on SDF), not sexy topic but quite important operationally.

...


Is their any info on UAV orbat on the Chinese side?

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33296
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 23 Jul 2017 20:33

A list of major Chinese military installations, radar sites and logistics hubs near the border with India with coordinates. Will provide kmz file later
https://youtu.be/KtCb2P_KOgA

deejay
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 3364
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 06:14

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby deejay » 23 Jul 2017 20:56

^^^ Tweet it sir.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33296
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 23 Jul 2017 21:11

^^Done

AdityaM
BRFite
Posts: 1776
Joined: 30 Sep 2002 11:31
Location: New Delhi

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby AdityaM » 26 Jul 2017 00:37

From twitter:

https://twitter.com/hdevreij/status/889842784584294400

Dutch civilian airline pilot witnessed a presumed Chinese (ABM?) missile launch over the Himalayas. Pics copyright: Christiaan van Heijst

Image

Image


https://twitter.com/defconwsalerts/stat ... 2504283136
Transporter vehicles carrying equipment for the firing of a ballistic missile were seen arriving in Kusong, North Pyongan Province


More info and pics from the pilot
https://jpcvanheijst.com/blogs/2017/07/ ... over-china

http://liuqiankktt.blog.163.com/blog/st ... 495336818/

Prasad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6521
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 00:53
Location: Chennai

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Prasad » 26 Jul 2017 01:24

What the heck are these that require boring through hills to form a line that stretches all along the TsangPo river?
From 29°17'04.7"N 91°09'05.3"E to 29°17'21.4"N 91°02'58.9"E

Also looks like a massive subterranean whatever - Two tunnel entrances at Shannan -29°12'28.0"N 91°44'43.7"E

Another slightly to the north, on the other side of the hill - Two entrances again (at different levels?) 29°14'31.7"N 91°44'13.6"E

Note the racetrack type whitish road structure close to both tunnels? What are those? And are those orange trucks construction trucks ?

And what are these at 29°13'01.2"N 91°42'08.4"E ? Also at 29°12'34.6"N 91°43'09.1"E

Holy whatever - Look at the trucks in this compound right next to the hill into which those tunnels lead to - 29°11'56.8"N 91°45'28.0"E
Power Substation (I think. Looks that way with all the transmission lines leading from/to it) - 29°15'43.3"N 91°52'57.4"E There is a small track leading E from the SE corner to some 'thing'. Can anyone ID what that is? 4 holes in the ground surrounded by 4 mounds?

Possible SAM locations? North side of the Tsangpo of Shannan - Mountainside tracks leading up to hilltop with tunnels - 29°18'53.8"N 91°48'06.1"E
Possible massive barracks complex - 29°16'49.6"N 91°53'13.7"E There are 5 such complexes on the north bank in a line.

Bing maps appears to have older images than google. That last structure isn't present in bing. Same with all those trucks at that compound in Shannan. Guess Shannan, sitting at that tri-junction with the S202 that leads to border/Bum La pass will be figure quite extensively in our target list. Electricity being a prime target. And dams. Wrecking the Lhasa river might starve the city but flood everything downstream pretty quickly.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33296
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 26 Jul 2017 08:09

Prasad wrote:Also looks like a massive subterranean whatever - Two tunnel entrances at Shannan -29°12'28.0"N 91°44'43.7"E

These look like Hydel tunnel exits

Prasad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6521
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 00:53
Location: Chennai

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Prasad » 26 Jul 2017 08:20

Hydro? How sir? They're on the edge of the city.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33296
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 26 Jul 2017 08:25

Prasad wrote:Hydro? How sir? They're on the edge of the city.

Look at the river North of that and the fact that both tunnels exit into a gorge.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33296
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 26 Jul 2017 08:41

Prasad wrote:
Holy whatever - Look at the trucks in this compound right next to the hill into which those tunnels lead to - 29°11'56.8"N 91°45'28.0"E.

This is a military site featured in my Tawang Video
https://youtu.be/azQlfT9Iv4s?t=258
Last edited by shiv on 26 Jul 2017 08:57, edited 1 time in total.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33296
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 26 Jul 2017 08:47

I must compliment you for taking the trouble and showing interest. It is important that more people do that and find what I have missed or new stuff.

Prasad wrote:Possible SAM locations? North side of the Tsangpo of Shannan - Mountainside tracks leading up to hilltop with tunnels - 29°18'53.8"N 91°48'06.1"E

In general I have found that the Chinese invariably have excellent tarred roads leading to military sites. These are dirt tracks and this looks more like a mine to me


Prasad wrote:Possible massive barracks complex - 29°16'49.6"N 91°53'13.7"E There are 5 such complexes on the north bank in a line.

These are solar panels. Note - there are no "roads" to service the barracks.

In general - military sites show
1. Excellent access roads
2. Walled compound with single protected gate
3. Barracks tend to be about 30 or more meters long and 10 or more meters wide
4. Parked military trucks is a clincher
5. Incorporate open areas for parking/assembly

Singha
BRF Oldie
Posts: 60187
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 19:42
Location: Lupine but moderately dharmic

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Singha » 26 Jul 2017 08:59

ABM is tough over a vast area like indo-china, but this could be a ASAT weapon. we have 8 sats flying polar orbits over the region and they have already demonstrated kinetic hits on their own sats. he who blinds the enemy from space has a advantage but this can only be done as the 1st move of a open war, not as a limited thing.

Image

Prasad
BRF Oldie
Posts: 6521
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 00:53
Location: Chennai

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Prasad » 26 Jul 2017 12:14

shiv wrote:
Prasad wrote:Hydro? How sir? They're on the edge of the city.

Look at the river North of that and the fact that both tunnels exit into a gorge.

Cant be sir. There is a road leading to a fork and then to the two tunnels. There is a gate and some buildings too. Def not hydel. Could be some depot. Weapons, ammo, fuel. There is a fuel depot in the open on the road between the two tunnels.
South tunnel
Image

North Tunnel - See the dirt track that leads to the main road?
Image

Both & Fuel depot - Positions relative to each other and the Shannan town itself to the right.
Image


shiv wrote:
Prasad wrote:
Holy whatever - Look at the trucks in this compound right next to the hill into which those tunnels lead to - 29°11'56.8"N 91°45'28.0"E.

This is a military site featured in my Tawang Video
https://youtu.be/azQlfT9Iv4s?t=258

Yes sir. I remember seeing it. Bing maps pictures do not show such a massive presence. Its pretty deserted in its sat picture. I wonder what the dates on bing & google are for the pictures.

shiv wrote:I must compliment you for taking the trouble and showing interest. It is important that more people do that and find what I have missed or new stuff.

Lawl. My wife would lou to hear that somebody else is as nuts :P

Prasad wrote:Possible SAM locations? North side of the Tsangpo of Shannan - Mountainside tracks leading up to hilltop with tunnels - 29°18'53.8"N 91°48'06.1"E

In general I have found that the Chinese invariably have excellent tarred roads leading to military sites. These are dirt tracks and this looks more like a mine to me

These seem to be nearer to the top of that ridge. I thought tracked/wheeled short range SAM might be used there. Hide when not in use and then quickly dart out to position themselves to provide cover when things get hot. Deejay or somebody else who knows SRSAMS tactics might be able to tell if i'm dead wrong here :)

This is particularly interesting since I was looking for SAM sites in the first place. There is an HQ-9 system deployed that is visible next to the Lhasa airport a bit to the west of this place. That is a medium/long range SAM. I suppose the shorter ranged ones might be to the south of the town but that is a narrow valley with no east-west spread. Will check.

Prasad wrote:Possible massive barracks complex - 29°16'49.6"N 91°53'13.7"E There are 5 such complexes on the north bank in a line.

These are solar panels. Note - there are no "roads" to service the barracks.

In general - military sites show
1. Excellent access roads
2. Walled compound with single protected gate
3. Barracks tend to be about 30 or more meters long and 10 or more meters wide
4. Parked military trucks is a clincher
5. Incorporate open areas for parking/assembly

Yeah. :oops: Supposed to be elec engg. Explains the power lines and substation in the south. Nice ripe target for plinking, panels and substation both. Wonder what alternate electricity source they have.

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33296
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 26 Jul 2017 14:38

Prasad wrote:Cant be sir. There is a road leading to a fork and then to the two tunnels. There is a gate and some buildings too. Def not hydel. Could be some depot. Weapons, ammo, fuel. There is a fuel depot in the open on the road between the two tunnels.
South tunnel

Good catch. I got the perspective better by turning the image 180 deg and tilting. Those tunnel entrances are actually opening into a mountainside. This is definitely a military site

DrRatnadip
BRFite
Posts: 326
Joined: 31 Dec 2016 00:40

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby DrRatnadip » 27 Jul 2017 15:27

http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1058138.shtml

Missile destroyer Hefei opens live fire drill in Baltic Sea

Following the order of Tian Zhong, vice admiral of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy, the missile destroyer Hefei departed from the naval port of Baltiysk, marking the beginning of the Russian-Chinese "Joint Sea 2017" naval drills.

During an opening ceremony, senior naval officers from China and Russia reiterated that the military exercises are not aimed at any third party and have nothing to do with the regional situation.

The Global Times reporter boarded Hefei and witnessed the joint air defense drill and live gun-firing practice in the first phase of the joint drills that runs from July 21 to 28 in the Baltic Sea.
.
.
Hefei was enlisted in December 2015 and accomplished all needed exercises in March 2016, in half the normal time frame. Within less than five months, the advanced destroyer, taking the role of command ship, joined a series of far-sea trainings within Chinese navy's South China Sea Fleet and entered the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean.

Zhang Huiyao, a naval officer, told the Global Times that the Hefei, equipped with complex radar and air defense system and strong combat ability, is capable of detecting long-distance targets.

With the rapid development of China's navy and the growing demand to protect the country's legitimate interests overseas, China's naval vessels are entering the blue seas.

Gaur
BR Mainsite Crew
Posts: 1994
Joined: 01 Feb 2009 23:19

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Gaur » 27 Jul 2017 17:57

A surprisingly detailed article by NYT on current standoff. Interesting to read how the other nations are viewing the situation. Be warned of slight dhoti shivering quote by an Indian "expert" though.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/26/world/asia/dolam-plateau-china-india-bhutan.html

Philip
BRF Oldie
Posts: 17004
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: India

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Philip » 27 Jul 2017 19:27

The number of Chinese mil targets keeps on increasing.India will have to dramatically ramp up production of BMos and other tactical missiles in the thousands,to deal with Pak as well. BMos missiles should be coming off the belts at the rate of at least 1/day per plant.The pace at which OPGMs get exhausted in a spat is amazing.The US found that out during GW1,when Tomahawk production had to be dramatically increased.Until our Nirbhay LRCM is perfected and in large-scale production,we may have to augment the forces with alternatives,which obviously can come from Russia (Klub/kalibir,etc.,etc.)

Meanwhile,the Dragon beefs up its sub=detection capabilities:
https://sputniknews.com/asia/2017072610 ... n-testing/
Xcpt:
Chinese Navy Expands Submarine Detection Testing in the South China Sea
© REUTERS/ U.S. Navy/Handout
Asia & Pacific
22:01 26.07.2017

The Chinese navy will conduct a massive experiment with underwater drones equipped with "real-time data transmission technology," in hopes of building up Beijing’s capacity to detect hostile submarines in the South China Sea.

Beijing wants to accelerate the development of underwater monitoring technology, the South China Morning Post report said, in response to US President Donald Trump’s sanctioning the US Navy to conduct more freedom-of-navigation operations.

Twelve undersea "gliders" positioned in undisclosed locations in the South China Sea will transmit data back to control centers, SCMP noted. The unmanned sea drones will cruise around for a month to gather data on water temperature, salinity, cleanliness, oxygen levels and sea current velocity, a Chinese Academy of Sciences official told the Post.

If the tests achieve the expected results it will "definitely" be a "breakthrough,' said Yin Jingwei, a dean at Harbin Engineering University. “Real-time data transmission” has proven “extremely difficult for underwater gliders,” Yin added.

Beijing has successfully installed military assets and new capabilities throughout the disputed South China Sea in recent years as it aims at full-on hegemony in the strategic body of water. "New missile shelters, radio/communications facilities, and other infrastructure are going in on the Fiery Cross, Mischief and Subi Reefs," in the Spratly archipelago, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies’ Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative.

chola
BRFite
Posts: 1472
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby chola » 27 Jul 2017 19:44

DrRatnadip wrote:http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1058138.shtml

Missile destroyer Hefei opens live fire drill in Baltic Sea

Following the order of Tian Zhong, vice admiral of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Navy, the missile destroyer Hefei departed from the naval port of Baltiysk, marking the beginning of the Russian-Chinese "Joint Sea 2017" naval drills.

During an opening ceremony, senior naval officers from China and Russia reiterated that the military exercises are not aimed at any third party and have nothing to do with the regional situation.

The Global Times reporter boarded Hefei and witnessed the joint air defense drill and live gun-firing practice in the first phase of the joint drills that runs from July 21 to 28 in the Baltic Sea.
.
.
Hefei was enlisted in December 2015 and accomplished all needed exercises in March 2016, in half the normal time frame. Within less than five months, the advanced destroyer, taking the role of command ship, joined a series of far-sea trainings within Chinese navy's South China Sea Fleet and entered the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean.

Zhang Huiyao, a naval officer, told the Global Times that the Hefei, equipped with complex radar and air defense system and strong combat ability, is capable of detecting long-distance targets.

With the rapid development of China's navy and the growing demand to protect the country's legitimate interests overseas, China's naval vessels are entering the blue seas.



Originally, the Type 052D leading the Baltics flotilla was supposed to be Pennant 173 Changsha not the Hefei (174.) A veteran China watcher thinks the Changsha might have broken down in the Indian Ocean somewhere.

I hope the IN can locate it and put it under the surveillance of our warships.

We can sink or board it if hostilities broke out. It is their most powerful ship after the new Type 055. It would be a monumental prize if we could take it.

DavidD
BRFite
Posts: 854
Joined: 23 Jun 2010 04:08

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby DavidD » 27 Jul 2017 21:12

The latest rumor is that the Changsha's early return is related to some internal disciplinary investigations. All rumors though at this point, but if it indeed broke down it was like 3 weeks ago, I'm sure it's been towed back to China by now.

chola
BRFite
Posts: 1472
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby chola » 27 Jul 2017 23:01

DavidD wrote:The latest rumor is that the Changsha's early return is related to some internal disciplinary investigations. All rumors though at this point, but if it indeed broke down it was like 3 weeks ago, I'm sure it's been towed back to China by now.


It would take more than three weeks for a tug (or tugs) to 1) get out there and then 2) tow a 8K ton warship back.

At best, it and those tugging it might still be in transit somewhere in the ocean.

I think you are just trying throw the wolfpack off the trail, chinaman.

DavidD
BRFite
Posts: 854
Joined: 23 Jun 2010 04:08

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby DavidD » 27 Jul 2017 23:31

chola wrote:
DavidD wrote:The latest rumor is that the Changsha's early return is related to some internal disciplinary investigations. All rumors though at this point, but if it indeed broke down it was like 3 weeks ago, I'm sure it's been towed back to China by now.


It would take more than three weeks for a tug (or tugs) to 1) get out there and then 2) tow a 8K ton warship back.

At best, it and those tugging it might still be in transit somewhere in the ocean.

I think you are just trying throw the wolfpack off the trail, chinaman.


Not my analysis, it's Henri K's. Is he the "veteran China watcher" you referred to? I'd think it wouldn't take 3 weeks for a tug to get out there, but I guess it depends on where in in the IOR. A 94K ton LNG can be towed at 9 knots, I'd assume an 8K ton warship can be towed a bit faster than that.

http://www.eastpendulum.com/histoire-de ... 3-changsha

chola
BRFite
Posts: 1472
Joined: 16 Dec 2002 12:31
Location: USA

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby chola » 28 Jul 2017 16:33

Looks like Cheen is importing Antonov's people not just equipment and designs.

http://micetimes.asia/antonov-leaked-to-the-chinese-russian-engines-are-no-longer-needed/

In the County, Pucan (Weinan, Shaanxi province) on an area of 124 square kilometers, completed construction of a Modern open production area Loango, where they will live and work for two thousand employees of the Ukrainian KB Antonov with family members.

Indranil
Forum Moderator
Posts: 5575
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 01:21

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Indranil » 28 Jul 2017 21:50

Nothing new. And incredibly smart of them. People are current and future technology and ecosystem. We import aircrafts/license manufacturing. In this aspect, China is better than us.

Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10470
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Gagan » 29 Jul 2017 05:35

Prasad wrote:What the heck are these that require boring through hills to form a line that stretches all along the TsangPo river?
From 29°17'04.7"N 91°09'05.3"E to 29°17'21.4"N 91°02'58.9"E

Extension of the Tibet railways.
The chinese want to take this all the way into Nepal from Lhasa
You will see tunnels, poles for bridges and landscaping done in preparation for laying the track

Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10470
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Gagan » 29 Jul 2017 05:43

Prasad wrote:Also looks like a massive subterranean whatever - Two tunnel entrances at Shannan -29°12'28.0"N 91°44'43.7"E

Very very suspicious. Possible underground bunker or weapons storage site.
Might even store missiles. Possible Military location

Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10470
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Gagan » 29 Jul 2017 05:50

AdityaM wrote:From twitter:

https://twitter.com/hdevreij/status/889842784584294400

Dutch civilian airline pilot witnessed a presumed Chinese (ABM?) missile launch over the Himalayas. Pics copyright: Christiaan van Heijst

Image
https://twitter.com/defconwsalerts/stat ... 2504283136
Transporter vehicles carrying equipment for the firing of a ballistic missile were seen arriving in Kusong, North Pyongan Province


More info and pics from the pilot
https://jpcvanheijst.com/blogs/2017/07/ ... over-china

http://liuqiankktt.blog.163.com/blog/st ... 495336818/

Kusong is right at the China-North Korea border, and hosts a few Anti-Aricraft SAM Units in the area.
Very possible that this is a high altitude SAM test or an ABM test.
Couple this with live fire exercises next to NoKo-SoKo border by the PLAN

Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10470
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Gagan » 29 Jul 2017 05:55

Prasad wrote:Possible SAM locations? North side of the Tsangpo of Shannan - Mountainside tracks leading up to hilltop with tunnels - 29°18'53.8"N 91°48'06.1"E

Possible mining sites. They are probably drilling and taking samples all over the mountain through those dirt tracks and sending them for analysis.
They have probably hit something precious, because a whole town has cropped up in the area !

Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10470
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Gagan » 29 Jul 2017 05:58

Prasad wrote:And what are these at 29°13'01.2"N 91°42'08.4"E ? Also at 29°12'34.6"N 91°43'09.1"E

Possible water pipes for drilling.
Possible mining area

Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10470
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Gagan » 29 Jul 2017 06:00

Shiv ji
Excellent video that, as always

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33296
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 29 Jul 2017 06:19

Thanks Gagan

AdityaM
BRFite
Posts: 1776
Joined: 30 Sep 2002 11:31
Location: New Delhi

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby AdityaM » 29 Jul 2017 08:10

Gagan wrote:
AdityaM wrote:From twitter:

https://twitter.com/hdevreij/status/889842784584294400

Dutch civilian airline pilot witnessed a presumed Chinese (ABM?) missile launch over the Himalayas. Pics copyright: Christiaan van Heijst

Image
https://twitter.com/defconwsalerts/stat ... 2504283136
Transporter vehicles carrying equipment for the firing of a ballistic missile were seen arriving in Kusong, North Pyongan Province


More info and pics from the pilot
https://jpcvanheijst.com/blogs/2017/07/ ... over-china

http://liuqiankktt.blog.163.com/blog/st ... 495336818/

Kusong is right at the China-North Korea border, and hosts a few Anti-Aricraft SAM Units in the area.
Very possible that this is a high altitude SAM test or an ABM test.
Couple this with live fire exercises next to NoKo-SoKo border by the PLAN


The missile test happened close to Himalayas as reported.
Kusong Tweet may have been unrelated which I mistakenly clubbed here

DavidD
BRFite
Posts: 854
Joined: 23 Jun 2010 04:08

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby DavidD » 29 Jul 2017 09:45

It wasn't that close to the Himalayas:

Image

shiv
BRF Oldie
Posts: 33296
Joined: 01 Jan 1970 05:30
Location: Pindliyon ka Gooda

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby shiv » 29 Jul 2017 18:04

I can't understand why a missile test would be more scary if it happens closer to one's borders. I means missiles are the classic example of "Jo Lahore mein g@ndu woh Peshawar mein bhi g@ndu" If it can do its business 5000 km north it can do the same 5000 km south. That is why I an unimpressed by Chinese "moving missiles to our borders". This is made to sound like foreplay in the media "..and she slowly slipped off her skirt..". Those missiles can come an poke Indians in the butt pretty much wherever they are placed now.

Gagan
BRF Oldie
Posts: 10470
Joined: 16 Apr 2008 22:25

Re: China Military Watch - Sept' 2016

Postby Gagan » 30 Jul 2017 02:01

DavidD wrote:It wasn't that close to the Himalayas:

Image

The top circle is the Lop Nor test range. The south end (impact area / area of intercept) was the northwest Sichuan province - unihabited, without much roads.

Possibly an ABM test or an MRBM test

Hope there was an IAF AWACs in the air at that time, they would have all the details of this.


Return to “Military Issues & History Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: srinebula, vikramb and 42 guests